Herbicidas dessecantes na fauna edáfica e genotoxicidade

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Reimche, Geovane Boschmann
Data de Publicação: 2014
Tipo de documento: Tese
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/3238
Resumo: The use of direct seeding system brought changes on the weed management, by the mean of increasing of chemical control. The intense use of herbicides may have effect over the ecology of non-target soil organism. Two studies were conduct aiming testing the effect of herbicides over composition of soil mesofauna under genetically modified glyphosate resistance soy (RR®) (Chapter I) and assess the cito- genotoxicity effect of glyphosate, ammonium gluphosinate, paraquat and saflufenacil herbicide, applied during non-selective operation spray, before soy seeding (Chapter II). In Chapter I, results showed that in both agricultural years, soil mesofauna was dominate by Acari followed by Collembola, were Oribatida and Entomobryomorpha were the most predominating, respectively. In Chapter I, results showed of ammonium glufosinate favored an increase of springtails (Entomobryomorpha) and mites (Eupodes sp. Scheloribates sp. Galumnidae and Mesostigmata). Paraquat favored springtails (Entomobryomorpha) and mites (Pygmephoridae, Scheloribates sp. and Mesostigmata). Mite population (Pygmephoridae and Scheloribates sp.) increase with glyphosate treatment; and mites (Scheloribates sp.) with saflufenacil application; while in the glyphosate with saflufenacil association there was an increased springtails (Entomobryomorpha) density. The Haplotaxida Order show a greater sensitivity to glufosinato herbicides, paraquat and saflufenacil. In Chapter II, results showed that the glyphosate commercial formulation and analytical standard did not show cytotoxic effect at 5, 10 or 26ppm concentrations over the A. cepa cells; and only commercial formulation presented genotoxic. The gluphosinate shows no cytotoxic action, but tested plant cells, evidenced little genotoxic effect. Paraquat commercial formulation reduced cell division at the test concentrations (2, 4 and 11ppm) without genotoxic evidence. Saflufenacil did not affect cell division and express a weak genotoxicity using 0,25ppm concentration in plant cells test.
id UFSM_0b9e3d666050175bbbf60da89fae3504
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/3238
network_acronym_str UFSM
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM
repository_id_str
spelling 2017-05-052017-05-052014-08-21REIMCHE, Geovane Boschmann. Non-setective herbicides on edaphic fauna and genotoxicity. 2014. 100 f. Tese (Doutorado em Agronomia) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, 2014.http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/3238The use of direct seeding system brought changes on the weed management, by the mean of increasing of chemical control. The intense use of herbicides may have effect over the ecology of non-target soil organism. Two studies were conduct aiming testing the effect of herbicides over composition of soil mesofauna under genetically modified glyphosate resistance soy (RR®) (Chapter I) and assess the cito- genotoxicity effect of glyphosate, ammonium gluphosinate, paraquat and saflufenacil herbicide, applied during non-selective operation spray, before soy seeding (Chapter II). In Chapter I, results showed that in both agricultural years, soil mesofauna was dominate by Acari followed by Collembola, were Oribatida and Entomobryomorpha were the most predominating, respectively. In Chapter I, results showed of ammonium glufosinate favored an increase of springtails (Entomobryomorpha) and mites (Eupodes sp. Scheloribates sp. Galumnidae and Mesostigmata). Paraquat favored springtails (Entomobryomorpha) and mites (Pygmephoridae, Scheloribates sp. and Mesostigmata). Mite population (Pygmephoridae and Scheloribates sp.) increase with glyphosate treatment; and mites (Scheloribates sp.) with saflufenacil application; while in the glyphosate with saflufenacil association there was an increased springtails (Entomobryomorpha) density. The Haplotaxida Order show a greater sensitivity to glufosinato herbicides, paraquat and saflufenacil. In Chapter II, results showed that the glyphosate commercial formulation and analytical standard did not show cytotoxic effect at 5, 10 or 26ppm concentrations over the A. cepa cells; and only commercial formulation presented genotoxic. The gluphosinate shows no cytotoxic action, but tested plant cells, evidenced little genotoxic effect. Paraquat commercial formulation reduced cell division at the test concentrations (2, 4 and 11ppm) without genotoxic evidence. Saflufenacil did not affect cell division and express a weak genotoxicity using 0,25ppm concentration in plant cells test.Com a introdução do sistema de plantio direto ocorreram mudanças no manejo de plantas daninhas, onde se intensificou o controle químico. O uso intenso de herbicidas pode ter efeito na ecologia de organismos não alvo presentes no solo. Nesse sentido foram conduzidos dois trabalhos objetivando avaliar o efeito de herbicidas sobre a composição da mesofauna edáfica em soja geneticamente modificada e resistência ao herbicida glifosato (soja RR®) (Capítulo I) e verificar o efeito citotóxico e de genotoxicidade de diferentes concentrações dos herbicidas glifosato, glufosinato, paraquat e saflufenacil, aplicados na operação de dessecação em pré-semeadura da soja RR® (Capítulo II). No capítulo I, os resultados mostraram que glufosinato favoreceu o aumento de colêmbolos (Entomobryomorpha) e ácaros (Eupodes sp. e Scheloribates sp. predadores Galumnidae e Mesostigmata). Paraquat favoreceu o aumento de colêmbolos (Entomobryomorpha) e ácaros (Pygmephoridae, Scheloribates sp. e Mesostigmata). A população dos ácaros (Pygmephoridae e Scheloribates sp.) aumentou com o tratamento glifosato; e dos ácaros (Scheloribates sp) com a aplicação de saflufenacil. Enquanto que na associação de glifosato com saflufenacil houve aumento da densidade de colêmbolos (Entomobryomorpha). A Ordem Haplotaxida apresentou maior sensibilidade aos herbicidas glufosinato, paraquat e saflufenacil. No capítulo II, os resultados mostraram que a formulação comercial e o padrão analítico do glifosato não apresentaram efeito citotóxico nas concentrações de 5, 10 ou 26ppm em células de Allium cepa; e apenas a formulação comercial apresentou ação genotóxica. O glufosinato não apresentou ação citotóxica, porém em células da planta teste se evidenciou pouca ação genotóxica. A formulação comercial de paraquat reduziu a divisão celular nas concentrações testadas (2, 4 e 11ppm), sem evidências de ação genotóxica. Saflufenacil não afetou a divisão celular e apresentou baixa ação genotóxica na concentração de 0,25ppm em células da planta teste.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superiorapplication/pdfporUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em AgronomiaUFSMBRAgronomiaGlycine max (L.)AgrotóxicosMesofauna edáficaCitotoxicidadeAlterações cromossômicas estruturaisAgrotoxicsEdaphic mesofaunaCitotoxicityStructural cromossomal alterationsCNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIAHerbicidas dessecantes na fauna edáfica e genotoxicidadeNon-setective herbicides on edaphic fauna and genotoxicityinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisTedesco, Solange Bosiohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2541303074261787Machado, Sérgio Luiz de Oliveirahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0360886006002113Antoniolli, Zaida Inêshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/4692942549618168Huber, Ana Claudia Kalilhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/5467686758227355Krolow, Ivan Renato Cardosohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0910653243659245http://lattes.cnpq.br/8140181961367166Reimche, Geovane Boschmann5001000000094003003003003003003006090974d-4c73-4bec-8e07-8cf0a1e0c33e8a7438f9-3794-4a1f-9173-bcdb9490d161ecda4025-d9ed-479c-bb4c-d152ea55676a90ef9c57-343d-4322-b0d6-ea7bb2e9421488a85efb-a21e-4069-a3f6-8f88defb825260b5d67c-50e3-4dbb-b2ef-a0c6dd8e0a61info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMORIGINALREIMCHE, GEOVANE BOSCHMANN.pdfapplication/pdf3054955http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/3238/1/REIMCHE%2c%20GEOVANE%20BOSCHMANN.pdf2e1d469334f3e0b21b18d33602dc44eeMD51TEXTREIMCHE, GEOVANE BOSCHMANN.pdf.txtREIMCHE, GEOVANE BOSCHMANN.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain162213http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/3238/2/REIMCHE%2c%20GEOVANE%20BOSCHMANN.pdf.txteb5534be9c07103ed6b2afa183481a65MD52THUMBNAILREIMCHE, GEOVANE BOSCHMANN.pdf.jpgREIMCHE, GEOVANE BOSCHMANN.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg4890http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/3238/3/REIMCHE%2c%20GEOVANE%20BOSCHMANN.pdf.jpge55bfcbc1740028fe41b0afa87f35b6aMD531/32382022-08-25 10:59:02.616oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/3238Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/ONGhttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestatendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.comopendoar:2022-08-25T13:59:02Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Herbicidas dessecantes na fauna edáfica e genotoxicidade
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv Non-setective herbicides on edaphic fauna and genotoxicity
title Herbicidas dessecantes na fauna edáfica e genotoxicidade
spellingShingle Herbicidas dessecantes na fauna edáfica e genotoxicidade
Reimche, Geovane Boschmann
Glycine max (L.)
Agrotóxicos
Mesofauna edáfica
Citotoxicidade
Alterações cromossômicas estruturais
Agrotoxics
Edaphic mesofauna
Citotoxicity
Structural cromossomal alterations
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIA
title_short Herbicidas dessecantes na fauna edáfica e genotoxicidade
title_full Herbicidas dessecantes na fauna edáfica e genotoxicidade
title_fullStr Herbicidas dessecantes na fauna edáfica e genotoxicidade
title_full_unstemmed Herbicidas dessecantes na fauna edáfica e genotoxicidade
title_sort Herbicidas dessecantes na fauna edáfica e genotoxicidade
author Reimche, Geovane Boschmann
author_facet Reimche, Geovane Boschmann
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Tedesco, Solange Bosio
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/2541303074261787
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv Machado, Sérgio Luiz de Oliveira
dc.contributor.referee1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/0360886006002113
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv Antoniolli, Zaida Inês
dc.contributor.referee2Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/4692942549618168
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv Huber, Ana Claudia Kalil
dc.contributor.referee3Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/5467686758227355
dc.contributor.referee4.fl_str_mv Krolow, Ivan Renato Cardoso
dc.contributor.referee4Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/0910653243659245
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/8140181961367166
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Reimche, Geovane Boschmann
contributor_str_mv Tedesco, Solange Bosio
Machado, Sérgio Luiz de Oliveira
Antoniolli, Zaida Inês
Huber, Ana Claudia Kalil
Krolow, Ivan Renato Cardoso
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Glycine max (L.)
Agrotóxicos
Mesofauna edáfica
Citotoxicidade
Alterações cromossômicas estruturais
topic Glycine max (L.)
Agrotóxicos
Mesofauna edáfica
Citotoxicidade
Alterações cromossômicas estruturais
Agrotoxics
Edaphic mesofauna
Citotoxicity
Structural cromossomal alterations
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIA
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Agrotoxics
Edaphic mesofauna
Citotoxicity
Structural cromossomal alterations
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIA
description The use of direct seeding system brought changes on the weed management, by the mean of increasing of chemical control. The intense use of herbicides may have effect over the ecology of non-target soil organism. Two studies were conduct aiming testing the effect of herbicides over composition of soil mesofauna under genetically modified glyphosate resistance soy (RR®) (Chapter I) and assess the cito- genotoxicity effect of glyphosate, ammonium gluphosinate, paraquat and saflufenacil herbicide, applied during non-selective operation spray, before soy seeding (Chapter II). In Chapter I, results showed that in both agricultural years, soil mesofauna was dominate by Acari followed by Collembola, were Oribatida and Entomobryomorpha were the most predominating, respectively. In Chapter I, results showed of ammonium glufosinate favored an increase of springtails (Entomobryomorpha) and mites (Eupodes sp. Scheloribates sp. Galumnidae and Mesostigmata). Paraquat favored springtails (Entomobryomorpha) and mites (Pygmephoridae, Scheloribates sp. and Mesostigmata). Mite population (Pygmephoridae and Scheloribates sp.) increase with glyphosate treatment; and mites (Scheloribates sp.) with saflufenacil application; while in the glyphosate with saflufenacil association there was an increased springtails (Entomobryomorpha) density. The Haplotaxida Order show a greater sensitivity to glufosinato herbicides, paraquat and saflufenacil. In Chapter II, results showed that the glyphosate commercial formulation and analytical standard did not show cytotoxic effect at 5, 10 or 26ppm concentrations over the A. cepa cells; and only commercial formulation presented genotoxic. The gluphosinate shows no cytotoxic action, but tested plant cells, evidenced little genotoxic effect. Paraquat commercial formulation reduced cell division at the test concentrations (2, 4 and 11ppm) without genotoxic evidence. Saflufenacil did not affect cell division and express a weak genotoxicity using 0,25ppm concentration in plant cells test.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2014-08-21
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2017-05-05
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2017-05-05
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv REIMCHE, Geovane Boschmann. Non-setective herbicides on edaphic fauna and genotoxicity. 2014. 100 f. Tese (Doutorado em Agronomia) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, 2014.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/3238
identifier_str_mv REIMCHE, Geovane Boschmann. Non-setective herbicides on edaphic fauna and genotoxicity. 2014. 100 f. Tese (Doutorado em Agronomia) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, 2014.
url http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/3238
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv 500100000009
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 400
300
300
300
300
300
300
dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv 6090974d-4c73-4bec-8e07-8cf0a1e0c33e
8a7438f9-3794-4a1f-9173-bcdb9490d161
ecda4025-d9ed-479c-bb4c-d152ea55676a
90ef9c57-343d-4322-b0d6-ea7bb2e94214
88a85efb-a21e-4069-a3f6-8f88defb8252
60b5d67c-50e3-4dbb-b2ef-a0c6dd8e0a61
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Agronomia
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFSM
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv BR
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Agronomia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/3238/1/REIMCHE%2c%20GEOVANE%20BOSCHMANN.pdf
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/3238/2/REIMCHE%2c%20GEOVANE%20BOSCHMANN.pdf.txt
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/3238/3/REIMCHE%2c%20GEOVANE%20BOSCHMANN.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 2e1d469334f3e0b21b18d33602dc44ee
eb5534be9c07103ed6b2afa183481a65
e55bfcbc1740028fe41b0afa87f35b6a
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv atendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.com
_version_ 1801485116632989696