Autoconhecimento de crenças: empirismo, racionalismo e racionalidade
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM |
Texto Completo: | http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/15093 |
Resumo: | Self-knowledge is the cognitive ability of the agent to know his or her own mental states. There are several types of mental states, and there is a method for the knowledge of each type. The focus of this dissertation is on the knowledge of one‘s own beliefs. With this goal in mind, we present the empiricist and the rationalist approaches to the knowledge of one‘s own beliefs. Empiricist theories of self-knowledge proposes introspection as the method for the knowledge of one‘s own beliefs. However, there are issues related to the phenomenology of belief – what it is like to believe that p? The best rationalist theories of self-knowledge proposes that an agent ―look outwards to constitute her own mind and her own belief. Our final question is about the relationship between knowledge of one‘s beliefs and rationality. Burge (2013) requires that, in order to be rational, one must have self-knowledge. We argue that the kind of rationality specified by Burge is too demanding. As agents in the realm of common life, we have incomplete understanding of our own doxastic mental states, but that is not a problem for the knowledge of our own beliefs as dispositions, since they does not come from rational deliberation; nevertheless, we are responsible and our beliefs as commitments. Both kinds of belief can be known by the transparency method. We conclude claiming that the transparency method is enough for the self-knowledge of doxastic mental state and ensuring the rationality of the agent. |
id |
UFSM_354ef5b53d9ae28170163ebb05458e2a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/15093 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSM |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
2018-12-12T19:10:07Z2018-12-12T19:10:07Z2017-08-04http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/15093Self-knowledge is the cognitive ability of the agent to know his or her own mental states. There are several types of mental states, and there is a method for the knowledge of each type. The focus of this dissertation is on the knowledge of one‘s own beliefs. With this goal in mind, we present the empiricist and the rationalist approaches to the knowledge of one‘s own beliefs. Empiricist theories of self-knowledge proposes introspection as the method for the knowledge of one‘s own beliefs. However, there are issues related to the phenomenology of belief – what it is like to believe that p? The best rationalist theories of self-knowledge proposes that an agent ―look outwards to constitute her own mind and her own belief. Our final question is about the relationship between knowledge of one‘s beliefs and rationality. Burge (2013) requires that, in order to be rational, one must have self-knowledge. We argue that the kind of rationality specified by Burge is too demanding. As agents in the realm of common life, we have incomplete understanding of our own doxastic mental states, but that is not a problem for the knowledge of our own beliefs as dispositions, since they does not come from rational deliberation; nevertheless, we are responsible and our beliefs as commitments. Both kinds of belief can be known by the transparency method. We conclude claiming that the transparency method is enough for the self-knowledge of doxastic mental state and ensuring the rationality of the agent.O autoconhecimento é a habilidade cognitiva do agente para conhecer seus próprios estados mentais. Existem vários tipos de estados mentais. Cada tipo de estado mental tem suas próprias particularidades. Concordamos com a proposta de Coliva (2016) de um pluralismo sobre autoconhecimento. Existem diferentes tipos de estados mentais, por exemplo, sensação, crença, desejo, julgamento e emoção, e para cada tipo existe um método para seu conhecimento. O foco deste trabalho é sobre o conhecimento de nossas próprias crenças. Tendo em mente este objetivo, apresentamos as teorias empiristas e racionalistas sobre o conhecimento das próprias crenças. As teorias empiristas do autoconhecimento propõem a introspecção como método para o conhecimento das próprias crenças. No entanto, há questões relacionadas à fenomenologia da crença - como é acreditar que p? As melhores teorias racionalistas do autoconhecimento propõem que o agente "olhe para fora" para fazer sua própria mente e constituir sua própria crença. Nossa última questão é sobre a relação entre o conhecimento de suas crenças e racionalidade. Burge (2013) exige que, para ser racional, é preciso ter autoconhecimento. Mas o tipo de racionalidade especificado por Burge é muito exigente. Como agentes no domínio da vida comum, temos entendimento incompleto de nossos próprios estados mentais doxásticos, mas isso não é um problema para o conhecimento de nossas próprias crenças como disposições, segundo as quais não somos responsáveis, pois não provém de deliberação racional; e nossas crenças como compromissos, nas quais somos responsáveis, pois deliberamos racionalmente sobre elas. Ambas, podem ser conhecidas pelo método de transparência. Dessa maneira, se obtém a tese de que o método da transparência é suficiente para o autoconhecimento de estados mentais doxásticos e com isso assegurando a racionalidade do agente.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESporUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaCentro de Ciências Sociais e HumanasPrograma de Pós-Graduação em FilosofiaUFSMBrasilFilosofiaAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAutoconhecimentoRacionalidadeCrençaSelf knowledgeRationalityBeliefCNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIAAutoconhecimento de crenças: empirismo, racionalismo e racionalidadeThe knowledge of one’s own beliefs: empiricism, rationalism, and rationalityinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisSantos, César Schirmer doshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/4518010795079534Medeiros, Eduardo Vicentini dehttp://lattes.cnpq.br/7122348041835817Rodrigues, Tiegue Vieirahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/4547029422865527http://lattes.cnpq.br/0853503798418322Barcelos, Róbson da Rosa700100000004600c770dde9-3370-4717-92c7-6c353fa8885202fead99-03d9-4539-b924-650e125bdad408942fbf-974f-456c-b342-21d257f21f577be2aed1-5175-469c-b96a-10a6d794a980reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMCC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8805http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/15093/2/license_rdf4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81956http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/15093/3/license.txt2f0571ecee68693bd5cd3f17c1e075dfMD53ORIGINALDIS_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_BARCELOS_ROBSON.pdfDIS_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_BARCELOS_ROBSON.pdfDissertação de Mestradoapplication/pdf612925http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/15093/1/DIS_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_BARCELOS_ROBSON.pdf13b9ed8d355414bc1afa5a3cc5f62991MD51TEXTDIS_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_BARCELOS_ROBSON.pdf.txtDIS_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_BARCELOS_ROBSON.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain171124http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/15093/4/DIS_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_BARCELOS_ROBSON.pdf.txtd1adc58b454d764382040f1079b05d6cMD54THUMBNAILDIS_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_BARCELOS_ROBSON.pdf.jpgDIS_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_BARCELOS_ROBSON.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg4429http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/15093/5/DIS_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_BARCELOS_ROBSON.pdf.jpgdd2bf8548e0424647969f82c1e864651MD551/150932018-12-13 03:01:18.941oai:repositorio.ufsm.br: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 Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/ONGhttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestatendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.comopendoar:2018-12-13T05:01:18Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Autoconhecimento de crenças: empirismo, racionalismo e racionalidade |
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
The knowledge of one’s own beliefs: empiricism, rationalism, and rationality |
title |
Autoconhecimento de crenças: empirismo, racionalismo e racionalidade |
spellingShingle |
Autoconhecimento de crenças: empirismo, racionalismo e racionalidade Barcelos, Róbson da Rosa Autoconhecimento Racionalidade Crença Self knowledge Rationality Belief CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
title_short |
Autoconhecimento de crenças: empirismo, racionalismo e racionalidade |
title_full |
Autoconhecimento de crenças: empirismo, racionalismo e racionalidade |
title_fullStr |
Autoconhecimento de crenças: empirismo, racionalismo e racionalidade |
title_full_unstemmed |
Autoconhecimento de crenças: empirismo, racionalismo e racionalidade |
title_sort |
Autoconhecimento de crenças: empirismo, racionalismo e racionalidade |
author |
Barcelos, Róbson da Rosa |
author_facet |
Barcelos, Róbson da Rosa |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Santos, César Schirmer dos |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/4518010795079534 |
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv |
Medeiros, Eduardo Vicentini de |
dc.contributor.referee1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/7122348041835817 |
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv |
Rodrigues, Tiegue Vieira |
dc.contributor.referee2Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/4547029422865527 |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/0853503798418322 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Barcelos, Róbson da Rosa |
contributor_str_mv |
Santos, César Schirmer dos Medeiros, Eduardo Vicentini de Rodrigues, Tiegue Vieira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Autoconhecimento Racionalidade Crença |
topic |
Autoconhecimento Racionalidade Crença Self knowledge Rationality Belief CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Self knowledge Rationality Belief |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
description |
Self-knowledge is the cognitive ability of the agent to know his or her own mental states. There are several types of mental states, and there is a method for the knowledge of each type. The focus of this dissertation is on the knowledge of one‘s own beliefs. With this goal in mind, we present the empiricist and the rationalist approaches to the knowledge of one‘s own beliefs. Empiricist theories of self-knowledge proposes introspection as the method for the knowledge of one‘s own beliefs. However, there are issues related to the phenomenology of belief – what it is like to believe that p? The best rationalist theories of self-knowledge proposes that an agent ―look outwards to constitute her own mind and her own belief. Our final question is about the relationship between knowledge of one‘s beliefs and rationality. Burge (2013) requires that, in order to be rational, one must have self-knowledge. We argue that the kind of rationality specified by Burge is too demanding. As agents in the realm of common life, we have incomplete understanding of our own doxastic mental states, but that is not a problem for the knowledge of our own beliefs as dispositions, since they does not come from rational deliberation; nevertheless, we are responsible and our beliefs as commitments. Both kinds of belief can be known by the transparency method. We conclude claiming that the transparency method is enough for the self-knowledge of doxastic mental state and ensuring the rationality of the agent. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2017-08-04 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-12T19:10:07Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-12T19:10:07Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/15093 |
url |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/15093 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
700100000004 |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
600 |
dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv |
c770dde9-3370-4717-92c7-6c353fa88852 02fead99-03d9-4539-b924-650e125bdad4 08942fbf-974f-456c-b342-21d257f21f57 7be2aed1-5175-469c-b96a-10a6d794a980 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UFSM |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Filosofia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) instacron:UFSM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
instacron_str |
UFSM |
institution |
UFSM |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/15093/2/license_rdf http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/15093/3/license.txt http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/15093/1/DIS_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_BARCELOS_ROBSON.pdf http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/15093/4/DIS_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_BARCELOS_ROBSON.pdf.txt http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/15093/5/DIS_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_BARCELOS_ROBSON.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347 2f0571ecee68693bd5cd3f17c1e075df 13b9ed8d355414bc1afa5a3cc5f62991 d1adc58b454d764382040f1079b05d6c dd2bf8548e0424647969f82c1e864651 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
atendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1801485358795325440 |