Manejo de Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith, 1797) com uso de milho Bt e inseticidas
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
dARK ID: | ark:/26339/001300000z21b |
Texto Completo: | http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/11595 |
Resumo: | The fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith 1797) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), is considered the main insect-pest of corn in Brazil. Its control, in recent years, is mainly accomplished through the use of Bt plants and spray insecticides. Aiming to evaluate the efficiency of Bt proteins expressed by maize commercially available, as well as their interaction with the use of insecticides for the control of S. frugiperda to subsidize IPM and IRM programs in Bt maize, experiments were carried under field condition during two crop seasons in the 2015-16. Eight technologies of Bt maize and one non-Bt hybrid were evaluated, as well as seven insecticide application programs. Damage assessments were performed every five days, counting the number of damaged plants and assigning a score according to the Davis Scale (1992). For the application of the insecticides, a control level was established in which the spraying was carried out whenever 10% of the plants showed a damage score > 3. In the 1st season 2015/16, Agrisure TL (Cry1Ab), Herculex (Cry1F) and Optimum Intrasect (Cry1Ab/ Cry1F) and non-Bt maize required 1 to 3 sprays of insecticides to complement the control of S. frugiperda. In this season, all tested insecticides were efficient in control. In the case of YieldGard VT PRO (Cry1A.105 / Cry2Ab2), YieldGard VT PRO 3 (Cry1A.105 / Cry2Ab2 / Cry3Bb1), PowerCore (Cry1A.105 / Cry2Ab2 / Cry1F), Agrisure Viptera (Vip3Aa20) and Agrisure Viptera 3 (Vip3Aa20 / Cry1Ab) the use of insecticides was not necessary. In the second crop year 2015/16, with the exception of Agrisure Viptera and Agrisure Viptera 3, all other hybrids of Bt and non-Bt maize required 1 to 4 sprays of insecticides. The results obtained in the present work demonstrate that some Bt maize technologies (expressing genes that encode Cry1 proteins) present low control efficiency, thus making insecticides indispensable to complement the control of S. frugiperda. In contrast, the Vip3Aa20 protein shows high toxicity to S. frugiperda, showing insignificant damage to the culture. Among the insecticides tested in the work, spinetoram (12 g of a.i./ha), in general presented the highest control efficiency for fall armyworm. |
id |
UFSM_4bf83c6b872cafb0b014c3fec031e821 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/11595 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSM |
network_name_str |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Manejo de Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith, 1797) com uso de milho Bt e inseticidasManagement of Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. SMITH, 1797) with use of Bt maize and insecticidesSpodoptera frugiperdaMilho BtControle químicoMIPMRISpodoptera frugiperdaBt maizeChemical controlIPMIRMCNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ENGENHARIA AGRICOLAThe fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith 1797) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), is considered the main insect-pest of corn in Brazil. Its control, in recent years, is mainly accomplished through the use of Bt plants and spray insecticides. Aiming to evaluate the efficiency of Bt proteins expressed by maize commercially available, as well as their interaction with the use of insecticides for the control of S. frugiperda to subsidize IPM and IRM programs in Bt maize, experiments were carried under field condition during two crop seasons in the 2015-16. Eight technologies of Bt maize and one non-Bt hybrid were evaluated, as well as seven insecticide application programs. Damage assessments were performed every five days, counting the number of damaged plants and assigning a score according to the Davis Scale (1992). For the application of the insecticides, a control level was established in which the spraying was carried out whenever 10% of the plants showed a damage score > 3. In the 1st season 2015/16, Agrisure TL (Cry1Ab), Herculex (Cry1F) and Optimum Intrasect (Cry1Ab/ Cry1F) and non-Bt maize required 1 to 3 sprays of insecticides to complement the control of S. frugiperda. In this season, all tested insecticides were efficient in control. In the case of YieldGard VT PRO (Cry1A.105 / Cry2Ab2), YieldGard VT PRO 3 (Cry1A.105 / Cry2Ab2 / Cry3Bb1), PowerCore (Cry1A.105 / Cry2Ab2 / Cry1F), Agrisure Viptera (Vip3Aa20) and Agrisure Viptera 3 (Vip3Aa20 / Cry1Ab) the use of insecticides was not necessary. In the second crop year 2015/16, with the exception of Agrisure Viptera and Agrisure Viptera 3, all other hybrids of Bt and non-Bt maize required 1 to 4 sprays of insecticides. The results obtained in the present work demonstrate that some Bt maize technologies (expressing genes that encode Cry1 proteins) present low control efficiency, thus making insecticides indispensable to complement the control of S. frugiperda. In contrast, the Vip3Aa20 protein shows high toxicity to S. frugiperda, showing insignificant damage to the culture. Among the insecticides tested in the work, spinetoram (12 g of a.i./ha), in general presented the highest control efficiency for fall armyworm.A lagarta-do-cartucho, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith 1797) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), é considerada o principal inseto-praga da cultura do milho no Brasil. Seu controle, nos últimos anos, é realizado principalmente por meio do uso de plantas Bt e pulverização de inseticidas. Visando avaliar a eficiência das proteínas Bt expressas pelos milhos disponíveis no mercado, bem como sua interação com o uso de inseticidas para o controle de S. frugiperda para subsidiar programas de MIP e MRI em milho Bt, foram realizados experimentos, em condição de campo, durante duas épocas de cultivo na safra 2015-16. Foram avaliadas oito tecnologias de milho Bt e um híbrido não-Bt, bem com sete programas de aplicação de inseticidas. A cada cinco dias, foram realizadas avaliações de dano, contabilizando o número de plantas danificadas e atribuindo uma nota de acordo com a Escala de Davis (1992). Para a aplicação dos inseticidas, foi estabelecido um nível de controle em que era realizada a pulverização sempre que 10% das plantas apresentassem nota de dano >3. Na 1a safra 2015/16, Agrisure TL (Cry1Ab), Herculex (Cry1F) e Optimum Intrasect (Cry1Ab/Cry1F) e milho não-Bt necessitaram de 1 a 3 pulverizações de inseticidas para complementar o controle de S. frugiperda. Nesta safra, todos os inseticidas testados foram eficientes no controle. Já em milho YieldGard VT PRO (Cry1A.105/Cry2Ab2), YieldGard VT PRO 3 (Cry1A.105/Cry2Ab2/Cry3Bb1), PowerCore (Cry1A.105/Cry2Ab2/ Cry1F), Agrisure Viptera (Vip3Aa20) e Agrisure Viptera 3 (Vip3Aa20/Cry1Ab) não foi necessário o uso de inseticidas. Na 2a safra 2015/16, com exceção de Agrisure Viptera e Agrisure Viptera 3, todos as demais híbridos de milho Bt e não-Bt necessitaram de 1 a 4 pulverizações de inseticidas. Os resultados obtidos no presente trabalho demonstram que algumas tecnologias de milho Bt (expressando genes que codificam proteínas Cry1) apresentam baixa eficiência de controle, tornando-se assim indispensável o uso de inseticidas para complementar o controle de S. frugiperda. Em contraste, a proteína Vip3Aa20 apresenta alta toxicidade para S. frugiperda, apresentando danos insignificantes à cultura. Dentre os inseticidas testados no trabalho, spinetoram (12 g de i.a./ha), de modo geral apresentou a maior eficiência de controle para lagarta-do-cartucho.Universidade Federal de Santa MariaBrasilEngenharia AgrícolaUFSMPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia AgrícolaCentro de Ciências RuraisGuedes, Jerson Carushttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0846418627719511Bernardi, Oderleihttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3085175517473196Franco, Cláudio Robertohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2377954587199424Burtet, Leonardo Moreira2017-09-04T13:21:26Z2017-09-04T13:21:26Z2017-03-06info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/11595ark:/26339/001300000z21bporAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM2022-08-18T14:05:23Zoai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/11595Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/ONGhttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestatendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.comopendoar:2022-08-18T14:05:23Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Manejo de Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith, 1797) com uso de milho Bt e inseticidas Management of Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. SMITH, 1797) with use of Bt maize and insecticides |
title |
Manejo de Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith, 1797) com uso de milho Bt e inseticidas |
spellingShingle |
Manejo de Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith, 1797) com uso de milho Bt e inseticidas Burtet, Leonardo Moreira Spodoptera frugiperda Milho Bt Controle químico MIP MRI Spodoptera frugiperda Bt maize Chemical control IPM IRM CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ENGENHARIA AGRICOLA |
title_short |
Manejo de Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith, 1797) com uso de milho Bt e inseticidas |
title_full |
Manejo de Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith, 1797) com uso de milho Bt e inseticidas |
title_fullStr |
Manejo de Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith, 1797) com uso de milho Bt e inseticidas |
title_full_unstemmed |
Manejo de Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith, 1797) com uso de milho Bt e inseticidas |
title_sort |
Manejo de Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith, 1797) com uso de milho Bt e inseticidas |
author |
Burtet, Leonardo Moreira |
author_facet |
Burtet, Leonardo Moreira |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Guedes, Jerson Carus http://lattes.cnpq.br/0846418627719511 Bernardi, Oderlei http://lattes.cnpq.br/3085175517473196 Franco, Cláudio Roberto http://lattes.cnpq.br/2377954587199424 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Burtet, Leonardo Moreira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Spodoptera frugiperda Milho Bt Controle químico MIP MRI Spodoptera frugiperda Bt maize Chemical control IPM IRM CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ENGENHARIA AGRICOLA |
topic |
Spodoptera frugiperda Milho Bt Controle químico MIP MRI Spodoptera frugiperda Bt maize Chemical control IPM IRM CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ENGENHARIA AGRICOLA |
description |
The fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith 1797) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), is considered the main insect-pest of corn in Brazil. Its control, in recent years, is mainly accomplished through the use of Bt plants and spray insecticides. Aiming to evaluate the efficiency of Bt proteins expressed by maize commercially available, as well as their interaction with the use of insecticides for the control of S. frugiperda to subsidize IPM and IRM programs in Bt maize, experiments were carried under field condition during two crop seasons in the 2015-16. Eight technologies of Bt maize and one non-Bt hybrid were evaluated, as well as seven insecticide application programs. Damage assessments were performed every five days, counting the number of damaged plants and assigning a score according to the Davis Scale (1992). For the application of the insecticides, a control level was established in which the spraying was carried out whenever 10% of the plants showed a damage score > 3. In the 1st season 2015/16, Agrisure TL (Cry1Ab), Herculex (Cry1F) and Optimum Intrasect (Cry1Ab/ Cry1F) and non-Bt maize required 1 to 3 sprays of insecticides to complement the control of S. frugiperda. In this season, all tested insecticides were efficient in control. In the case of YieldGard VT PRO (Cry1A.105 / Cry2Ab2), YieldGard VT PRO 3 (Cry1A.105 / Cry2Ab2 / Cry3Bb1), PowerCore (Cry1A.105 / Cry2Ab2 / Cry1F), Agrisure Viptera (Vip3Aa20) and Agrisure Viptera 3 (Vip3Aa20 / Cry1Ab) the use of insecticides was not necessary. In the second crop year 2015/16, with the exception of Agrisure Viptera and Agrisure Viptera 3, all other hybrids of Bt and non-Bt maize required 1 to 4 sprays of insecticides. The results obtained in the present work demonstrate that some Bt maize technologies (expressing genes that encode Cry1 proteins) present low control efficiency, thus making insecticides indispensable to complement the control of S. frugiperda. In contrast, the Vip3Aa20 protein shows high toxicity to S. frugiperda, showing insignificant damage to the culture. Among the insecticides tested in the work, spinetoram (12 g of a.i./ha), in general presented the highest control efficiency for fall armyworm. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-09-04T13:21:26Z 2017-09-04T13:21:26Z 2017-03-06 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/11595 |
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv |
ark:/26339/001300000z21b |
url |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/11595 |
identifier_str_mv |
ark:/26339/001300000z21b |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Brasil Engenharia Agrícola UFSM Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Agrícola Centro de Ciências Rurais |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Brasil Engenharia Agrícola UFSM Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Agrícola Centro de Ciências Rurais |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) instacron:UFSM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
instacron_str |
UFSM |
institution |
UFSM |
reponame_str |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
collection |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
atendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1815172416367755264 |