Resposta sorológica e avaliação de proteção fetal em ovinos e bovinos vacinados contra o vírus da diarréia viral bovina (BVDV)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Vogel, Fernanda Silveira Flôres
Data de Publicação: 2000
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
dARK ID: ark:/26339/001300000tgk3
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/26850
Resumo: The serological response and fetal protection induced by three commercial vaccines against bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) were evaluated in pregnant sheep immunized and subsequently challenged with Brazilian BVDV-1 and BVDV-2 field isolates. Low to moderate antibody titers to BVDV-1 were detected in most animals (45/47) 30 days after the second vaccine administration (geometric mean titers [GMT] of 124.6; 74.6 and 26.8 for vaccines A, B and C, respectively). In contrast, neutralizing activity to BVDV-2 was not detected in several animals (12/47) and was lower in all vaccine groups (GMT 19.1; 14.1 e 15.1). The means titers decreased significantly by day 180 such that several animals had no detectable antibody to BVDV-1 (vaccine B=1/19; C=8/14) and mainly to BVDV-2 (A=7/14; B=13/19; C=13/14). At this time, the ewes were challenged intranasally with either of two Brazilian field isolates of BVDV-1 and BVDV-2. The antibody titers were not sufficient to prevent virus replication, viremia and transplacental transmission such that fetuses from all vaccinated ewes were infected. In a second experiment, calves were immunized three times (days 0, 30 and 180) and tested serologically at different intervals. Neutralizing activity in low to moderate titers to BVDV-1 (25 out of 94 animals) and to BVDV-2 (20/94) were detected at day 60. The GMT and the number of positive animals to BVDV-1 were 109.3 (32/36); 54.6 (22/28) and 25.5 (16/30) for vaccines A, B and C respectively and 19 (27/36); 42.3 (12/28) and 18.4 (10/30) against BVDV-2. At day 180, the GMTs and the number of reagents to BVDV-1 were 28.3 (30/36), 28.3 (20/28) and 16.1 (14/30) and to BVDV-2 were 16.8 (18/36); 21.6 (10/28) and 28.3 (4/30) for vaccines A, B and C, respectively. After the revaccination (day 180), the means titers to BVDV-1 increased significantly in all vaccine groups and to BVDV-2 only in group A. At day 210, the GMT and the number of seropositive animals to BVDV-1 were 104.8 (23/24); 50.3 (24/26) and 43.7 (24/28) and to BVDV-2 were 33.4 (23/24); 23.3 (22/26) and 15.7 (22/28) for vaccines A, B and C. The titers to BVDV-1 were higher than those to BVDV-2 in all three groups. Sera from seropositive animals from the three vaccine groups were tested against four Brazilian isolates of BVDV-1 and two of BVDV-2. In addition to the low to moderate titers, the cross-neutralization assays revealed dramatic differences in neutralizing activity when a given serum was tested against different viruses. These results demonstrate that the vaccines induced low to moderate titers to BVDV-1 and even lower titers to BVDV-2. The magnitude of serological response was highly variable among animals and several animals did not respond to vaccination. In sheep, the antibody levels induced by vaccination were not sufficient to protect the fetuses upon challenge. These results also indicate the suitability of sheep as a model to test the efficacy of BVDV vaccines.
id UFSM_7c7f6f84b12c16da54594850ba269d28
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/26850
network_acronym_str UFSM
network_name_str Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
repository_id_str
spelling Resposta sorológica e avaliação de proteção fetal em ovinos e bovinos vacinados contra o vírus da diarréia viral bovina (BVDV)Serological response in cattle and evaluation of fetal protection in sheep vaccinated against bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV)Vírus da diarréia viral bovina (BVDV)VacinasOvinosProteção fetalVariabilidade antigênicaBovine viral diarrhea virusBVDVVaccinesProtectionSheepAntigenic diversityCNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::MEDICINA VETERINARIAThe serological response and fetal protection induced by three commercial vaccines against bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) were evaluated in pregnant sheep immunized and subsequently challenged with Brazilian BVDV-1 and BVDV-2 field isolates. Low to moderate antibody titers to BVDV-1 were detected in most animals (45/47) 30 days after the second vaccine administration (geometric mean titers [GMT] of 124.6; 74.6 and 26.8 for vaccines A, B and C, respectively). In contrast, neutralizing activity to BVDV-2 was not detected in several animals (12/47) and was lower in all vaccine groups (GMT 19.1; 14.1 e 15.1). The means titers decreased significantly by day 180 such that several animals had no detectable antibody to BVDV-1 (vaccine B=1/19; C=8/14) and mainly to BVDV-2 (A=7/14; B=13/19; C=13/14). At this time, the ewes were challenged intranasally with either of two Brazilian field isolates of BVDV-1 and BVDV-2. The antibody titers were not sufficient to prevent virus replication, viremia and transplacental transmission such that fetuses from all vaccinated ewes were infected. In a second experiment, calves were immunized three times (days 0, 30 and 180) and tested serologically at different intervals. Neutralizing activity in low to moderate titers to BVDV-1 (25 out of 94 animals) and to BVDV-2 (20/94) were detected at day 60. The GMT and the number of positive animals to BVDV-1 were 109.3 (32/36); 54.6 (22/28) and 25.5 (16/30) for vaccines A, B and C respectively and 19 (27/36); 42.3 (12/28) and 18.4 (10/30) against BVDV-2. At day 180, the GMTs and the number of reagents to BVDV-1 were 28.3 (30/36), 28.3 (20/28) and 16.1 (14/30) and to BVDV-2 were 16.8 (18/36); 21.6 (10/28) and 28.3 (4/30) for vaccines A, B and C, respectively. After the revaccination (day 180), the means titers to BVDV-1 increased significantly in all vaccine groups and to BVDV-2 only in group A. At day 210, the GMT and the number of seropositive animals to BVDV-1 were 104.8 (23/24); 50.3 (24/26) and 43.7 (24/28) and to BVDV-2 were 33.4 (23/24); 23.3 (22/26) and 15.7 (22/28) for vaccines A, B and C. The titers to BVDV-1 were higher than those to BVDV-2 in all three groups. Sera from seropositive animals from the three vaccine groups were tested against four Brazilian isolates of BVDV-1 and two of BVDV-2. In addition to the low to moderate titers, the cross-neutralization assays revealed dramatic differences in neutralizing activity when a given serum was tested against different viruses. These results demonstrate that the vaccines induced low to moderate titers to BVDV-1 and even lower titers to BVDV-2. The magnitude of serological response was highly variable among animals and several animals did not respond to vaccination. In sheep, the antibody levels induced by vaccination were not sufficient to protect the fetuses upon challenge. These results also indicate the suitability of sheep as a model to test the efficacy of BVDV vaccines.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESA resposta sorológica e proteção fetal induzidas por três vacinas comerciais contra o vírus da Diarréia Viral Bovina (BVDV) foi avaliada em ovelhas prenhes vacinadas e posteriormente desafiadas com amostras brasileiras de BVDV-1 e BVDV-2. Níveis baixos a moderados de anticorpos neutralizantes anti-BVDV-1 foram detectados na maioria dos animais (45/47) aos 30 dias após a segunda dose vacinal (títulos médios geométricos [GMT] de 124,6; 74,6 e 26,8 para as vacinas A, B e C, respectivamente). Em contraste, atividade neutralizante anti-BVDV-2 não foi detectada em vários animais (12/47) e foi de magnitude inferior nos três grupos vacinais (GMT 19,1; 14,1 e 15,1). Os títulos médios de anticorpos reduziram-se no dia 180, sendo que vários animais já não apresentavam atividade neutralizante detectável frente ao BVDV-1 (vacina B=1/19; C=8/14) e principalmente frente ao BVDV-2 (A=7/14; B=13/19; C=13/14). Nessa data, as ovelhas foram inoculadas com amostras brasileiras de BVDV-1 ou BVDV-2 pela via intranasal. Os títulos de anticorpos neutralizantes não foram suficientes para prevenir a replicação, disseminação virêmica e transmissão transplacentária do vírus: todos os fetos das ovelhas vacinadas foram infectados. No segundo experimento, bovinos foram vacinados três vezes (dias 0, 30 e 180) e examinados sorologicamente a três intervalos. Anticorpos neutralizantes em títulos baixos a moderados frente ao BVDV-1 (25/94) e ao BVDV-2 (20/94) foram detectados aos 60 dias. Os títulos médios e o número de animais reagentes contra o BVDV-1 foram de 109,3 (32/36); 54,6 (22/28) e 25,5 (16/30) para as vacinas A, B e C e de 19 (27/36); 42,3 (12/28) e 18,4 (10/30) contra o BVDV-2. Aos 180 dias, os títulos médios e o número de animais soropositivos frente ao BVDV-1 eram de 28,3 (30/36), 28,3 (20/28) e 16,1 (14/30) e frente ao BVDV-2 de 16,8 (18/36); 21,6 (10/28) e 28,3 (4/30) para as vacinas A, B e C, respectivamente. Após a aplicação do reforço (dia 180), os títulos médios contra o BVDV-1 aumentaram significativamente nos três grupos vacinais e contra o BVDV-2 apenas na vacina A. Aos 210 dias, os títulos médios e o número de reagentes contra o BVDV-1 eram de 104,8 (23/24); 50,3 (24/26) e 43,7 (24/28) e contra o BVDV-2 de 33,4 (23/24); 23,3 (22/26) e 15,7 (22/28) para as vacinas A, B e C. Os títulos contra o BVDV-1 foram em geral superiores aos do BVDV-2 nos três grupos vacinais. O soro de alguns animais positivos de cada grupo foi testado frente a quatro amostras brasileiras de BVDV-1 e duas de BVDV-2. Além dos títulos baixos a moderados, os testes de neutralização cruzada revelaram variações marcantes na atividade neutralizante frente a isolados de campo antigenicamente diferentes. Esses resultados demonstram que as vacinas induziram apenas títulos baixos a moderados de anticorpos frente ao BVDV-1 e títulos inferiores contra BVDV-2. A magnitude da resposta foi muito variável entre os animais e uma parcela desses não reagiu sorologicamente. Em ovinos, os níveis de anticorpos produzidos não foram suficientes para prevenir a infecção fetal frente ao desafio com duas amostras de campo. Esses resultados também indicam que ovelhas prenhes podem ser utilizadas para testes de proteção vacinal contra o BVDV.Universidade Federal de Santa MariaBrasilMedicina VeterináriaUFSMPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Medicina VeterináriaCentro de Ciências RuraisFlores, Eduardo Furtadohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0446078331070694Weiblen, RudiVidor, TelmoVogel, Fernanda Silveira Flôres2022-11-11T19:23:47Z2022-11-11T19:23:47Z2000-11-19info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/26850ark:/26339/001300000tgk3porAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM2022-11-11T19:23:47Zoai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/26850Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/ONGhttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestatendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.comopendoar:2022-11-11T19:23:47Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Resposta sorológica e avaliação de proteção fetal em ovinos e bovinos vacinados contra o vírus da diarréia viral bovina (BVDV)
Serological response in cattle and evaluation of fetal protection in sheep vaccinated against bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV)
title Resposta sorológica e avaliação de proteção fetal em ovinos e bovinos vacinados contra o vírus da diarréia viral bovina (BVDV)
spellingShingle Resposta sorológica e avaliação de proteção fetal em ovinos e bovinos vacinados contra o vírus da diarréia viral bovina (BVDV)
Vogel, Fernanda Silveira Flôres
Vírus da diarréia viral bovina (BVDV)
Vacinas
Ovinos
Proteção fetal
Variabilidade antigênica
Bovine viral diarrhea virus
BVDV
Vaccines
Protection
Sheep
Antigenic diversity
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::MEDICINA VETERINARIA
title_short Resposta sorológica e avaliação de proteção fetal em ovinos e bovinos vacinados contra o vírus da diarréia viral bovina (BVDV)
title_full Resposta sorológica e avaliação de proteção fetal em ovinos e bovinos vacinados contra o vírus da diarréia viral bovina (BVDV)
title_fullStr Resposta sorológica e avaliação de proteção fetal em ovinos e bovinos vacinados contra o vírus da diarréia viral bovina (BVDV)
title_full_unstemmed Resposta sorológica e avaliação de proteção fetal em ovinos e bovinos vacinados contra o vírus da diarréia viral bovina (BVDV)
title_sort Resposta sorológica e avaliação de proteção fetal em ovinos e bovinos vacinados contra o vírus da diarréia viral bovina (BVDV)
author Vogel, Fernanda Silveira Flôres
author_facet Vogel, Fernanda Silveira Flôres
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Flores, Eduardo Furtado
http://lattes.cnpq.br/0446078331070694
Weiblen, Rudi
Vidor, Telmo
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Vogel, Fernanda Silveira Flôres
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Vírus da diarréia viral bovina (BVDV)
Vacinas
Ovinos
Proteção fetal
Variabilidade antigênica
Bovine viral diarrhea virus
BVDV
Vaccines
Protection
Sheep
Antigenic diversity
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::MEDICINA VETERINARIA
topic Vírus da diarréia viral bovina (BVDV)
Vacinas
Ovinos
Proteção fetal
Variabilidade antigênica
Bovine viral diarrhea virus
BVDV
Vaccines
Protection
Sheep
Antigenic diversity
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::MEDICINA VETERINARIA
description The serological response and fetal protection induced by three commercial vaccines against bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) were evaluated in pregnant sheep immunized and subsequently challenged with Brazilian BVDV-1 and BVDV-2 field isolates. Low to moderate antibody titers to BVDV-1 were detected in most animals (45/47) 30 days after the second vaccine administration (geometric mean titers [GMT] of 124.6; 74.6 and 26.8 for vaccines A, B and C, respectively). In contrast, neutralizing activity to BVDV-2 was not detected in several animals (12/47) and was lower in all vaccine groups (GMT 19.1; 14.1 e 15.1). The means titers decreased significantly by day 180 such that several animals had no detectable antibody to BVDV-1 (vaccine B=1/19; C=8/14) and mainly to BVDV-2 (A=7/14; B=13/19; C=13/14). At this time, the ewes were challenged intranasally with either of two Brazilian field isolates of BVDV-1 and BVDV-2. The antibody titers were not sufficient to prevent virus replication, viremia and transplacental transmission such that fetuses from all vaccinated ewes were infected. In a second experiment, calves were immunized three times (days 0, 30 and 180) and tested serologically at different intervals. Neutralizing activity in low to moderate titers to BVDV-1 (25 out of 94 animals) and to BVDV-2 (20/94) were detected at day 60. The GMT and the number of positive animals to BVDV-1 were 109.3 (32/36); 54.6 (22/28) and 25.5 (16/30) for vaccines A, B and C respectively and 19 (27/36); 42.3 (12/28) and 18.4 (10/30) against BVDV-2. At day 180, the GMTs and the number of reagents to BVDV-1 were 28.3 (30/36), 28.3 (20/28) and 16.1 (14/30) and to BVDV-2 were 16.8 (18/36); 21.6 (10/28) and 28.3 (4/30) for vaccines A, B and C, respectively. After the revaccination (day 180), the means titers to BVDV-1 increased significantly in all vaccine groups and to BVDV-2 only in group A. At day 210, the GMT and the number of seropositive animals to BVDV-1 were 104.8 (23/24); 50.3 (24/26) and 43.7 (24/28) and to BVDV-2 were 33.4 (23/24); 23.3 (22/26) and 15.7 (22/28) for vaccines A, B and C. The titers to BVDV-1 were higher than those to BVDV-2 in all three groups. Sera from seropositive animals from the three vaccine groups were tested against four Brazilian isolates of BVDV-1 and two of BVDV-2. In addition to the low to moderate titers, the cross-neutralization assays revealed dramatic differences in neutralizing activity when a given serum was tested against different viruses. These results demonstrate that the vaccines induced low to moderate titers to BVDV-1 and even lower titers to BVDV-2. The magnitude of serological response was highly variable among animals and several animals did not respond to vaccination. In sheep, the antibody levels induced by vaccination were not sufficient to protect the fetuses upon challenge. These results also indicate the suitability of sheep as a model to test the efficacy of BVDV vaccines.
publishDate 2000
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2000-11-19
2022-11-11T19:23:47Z
2022-11-11T19:23:47Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/26850
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv ark:/26339/001300000tgk3
url http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/26850
identifier_str_mv ark:/26339/001300000tgk3
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Brasil
Medicina Veterinária
UFSM
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Medicina Veterinária
Centro de Ciências Rurais
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Brasil
Medicina Veterinária
UFSM
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Medicina Veterinária
Centro de Ciências Rurais
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
collection Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
repository.name.fl_str_mv Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv atendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.com
_version_ 1815172396142821376