Entre a droga e o remédio: uma análise do debate sobre a regulamentação da maconha no Brasil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Elwanger, Guilherme Alves
Data de Publicação: 2016
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/12319
Resumo: This work analyzed the discursive conflict between the participant subjects in the public debate on the regulation of marijuana in Brazil, in order to understand how these subjects employ medical-scientific and juridical-legal arguments to support propositions based on moral-values conceptions. In this sense, in order to analyze this conflict, it were observed six public hearings promoted by the Federal Senate of Brazil in 2014, which discussed the proposal to regulate the use of marijuana in Brazil. It was considered, initially, that the clash observed at these hearings was between groups of 'moral entrepreneurs', who defended opposing and favorable positions on the regulation. More than this, at some points the discussion develops in such a way that the conflict is between what is 'true' and what is 'false' in this debate. Thereby, the speeches of the 'experts' invited to these hearings were fundamental to ground the argument of the conflicting entrepreneurs to establish the 'correct' position in this debate. That being said, and since juridical-legal and medical-scientific discourses are central to this discussion, the aim of this work is to understand how the 'moral entrepreneurs' involved in this debate employ medical-scientific and juridical-legal ‗discourses‘ to support their propositions. In the attempt to answer this question, a discussion was made on Howard Becker's 'Interactionist theory of deviance' to understand the importance of the moral entrepreneurs actuations in establishing social rules. In addition, some 'methodological tools' pointed out by Michel Foucault in his 'archaeogenealogical' proposal were retrieved in order to understand how the emergence of the current conflict was possible and how the 'regimes of truth' and 'practices regimes' on marijuana use in Brazil have been modified throughout history.
id UFSM_838f061ac82770776f936f32ff5bbce2
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/12319
network_acronym_str UFSM
network_name_str Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
repository_id_str
spelling Entre a droga e o remédio: uma análise do debate sobre a regulamentação da maconha no BrasilBetween drug and remedy: an analysis of the debate on the regulation of marijuana in BrazilRegulamentação da maconhaEmpreendedores moraisUsuários de maconhaRegimes de verdadeRegimes de práticasMarijuana regulationMoral entrepreneursMarijuana usersRegimes of truthPractices regimesCNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::SOCIOLOGIAThis work analyzed the discursive conflict between the participant subjects in the public debate on the regulation of marijuana in Brazil, in order to understand how these subjects employ medical-scientific and juridical-legal arguments to support propositions based on moral-values conceptions. In this sense, in order to analyze this conflict, it were observed six public hearings promoted by the Federal Senate of Brazil in 2014, which discussed the proposal to regulate the use of marijuana in Brazil. It was considered, initially, that the clash observed at these hearings was between groups of 'moral entrepreneurs', who defended opposing and favorable positions on the regulation. More than this, at some points the discussion develops in such a way that the conflict is between what is 'true' and what is 'false' in this debate. Thereby, the speeches of the 'experts' invited to these hearings were fundamental to ground the argument of the conflicting entrepreneurs to establish the 'correct' position in this debate. That being said, and since juridical-legal and medical-scientific discourses are central to this discussion, the aim of this work is to understand how the 'moral entrepreneurs' involved in this debate employ medical-scientific and juridical-legal ‗discourses‘ to support their propositions. In the attempt to answer this question, a discussion was made on Howard Becker's 'Interactionist theory of deviance' to understand the importance of the moral entrepreneurs actuations in establishing social rules. In addition, some 'methodological tools' pointed out by Michel Foucault in his 'archaeogenealogical' proposal were retrieved in order to understand how the emergence of the current conflict was possible and how the 'regimes of truth' and 'practices regimes' on marijuana use in Brazil have been modified throughout history.Este trabalho analisou o conflito discursivo entre os sujeitos participantes do debate público sobre a regulamentação da maconha no Brasil, deste modo, buscou-se compreender como estes sujeitos empregam argumentos médico-científicos e jurídico-legais para sustentar proposições baseadas em concepções morais-valorativas. Neste sentido, visando analisar este conflito, foram observadas seis audiências públicas promovidas pelo Senado Federal do Brasil em 2014, que discutiram a proposta de regulamentação do uso da maconha no Brasil. Considerou-se, inicialmente, que o embate observado nestas audiências era feito entre os grupos de ‗empreendedores morais‘, que defendiam posições contrárias e favoráveis à regulamentação. Mais do que isto, em alguns momentos a discussão se desenvolve de tal maneira que o conflito é entre o que é ‗verdadeiro‘ e o que é ‗falso‘ neste debate. Assim, as falas dos ‗especialistas‘ convidados para estas audiências foram fundamentais para embasar o argumento dos empreendedores que estão em conflito para estabelecer qual é a posição ‗correta‘ neste debate. Dito isto, e tendo em vista que os discursos jurídico-legais e médico-científicos são centrais nesta discussão, o trabalho tem por objetivo compreender como os ‗empreendedores morais‘ envolvidos neste debate empregam ‗discursos‘ médico-científicos e jurídico-legais para sustentar suas proposições. Na tentativa de responder esta questão, foi feita uma discussão sobre a ‗teoria interacionista do desvio‘, proposta por Howard Becker, para se compreender a importância da atuação dos empreendedores morais no estabelecimento de regras sociais. Além disso, foram resgatadas algumas ‗ferramentas metodológicas‘ apontadas por Michel Foucault em sua proposta ‗arqueogenealógica‘, com o intuito de compreender como foi possível a emergência do conflito atual e como foram se modificando os ‗regimes de verdade‘ e os ‗regimes de práticas‘ sobre o consumo da maconha no Brasil no decorrer da história.Universidade Federal de Santa MariaBrasilSociologiaUFSMPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências SociaisCentro de Ciências Sociais e HumanasAlmeida, Francis Moraes dehttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8180956076012731Azambuja, Marcos Adegas dehttp://lattes.cnpq.br/7914533916976761Perez, Reginaldo Teixeirahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/1378204180017338Elwanger, Guilherme Alves2018-01-30T13:52:49Z2018-01-30T13:52:49Z2016-03-28info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/12319porAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM2018-01-30T13:52:49Zoai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/12319Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/ONGhttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestatendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.comopendoar:2018-01-30T13:52:49Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Entre a droga e o remédio: uma análise do debate sobre a regulamentação da maconha no Brasil
Between drug and remedy: an analysis of the debate on the regulation of marijuana in Brazil
title Entre a droga e o remédio: uma análise do debate sobre a regulamentação da maconha no Brasil
spellingShingle Entre a droga e o remédio: uma análise do debate sobre a regulamentação da maconha no Brasil
Elwanger, Guilherme Alves
Regulamentação da maconha
Empreendedores morais
Usuários de maconha
Regimes de verdade
Regimes de práticas
Marijuana regulation
Moral entrepreneurs
Marijuana users
Regimes of truth
Practices regimes
CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::SOCIOLOGIA
title_short Entre a droga e o remédio: uma análise do debate sobre a regulamentação da maconha no Brasil
title_full Entre a droga e o remédio: uma análise do debate sobre a regulamentação da maconha no Brasil
title_fullStr Entre a droga e o remédio: uma análise do debate sobre a regulamentação da maconha no Brasil
title_full_unstemmed Entre a droga e o remédio: uma análise do debate sobre a regulamentação da maconha no Brasil
title_sort Entre a droga e o remédio: uma análise do debate sobre a regulamentação da maconha no Brasil
author Elwanger, Guilherme Alves
author_facet Elwanger, Guilherme Alves
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Almeida, Francis Moraes de
http://lattes.cnpq.br/8180956076012731
Azambuja, Marcos Adegas de
http://lattes.cnpq.br/7914533916976761
Perez, Reginaldo Teixeira
http://lattes.cnpq.br/1378204180017338
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Elwanger, Guilherme Alves
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Regulamentação da maconha
Empreendedores morais
Usuários de maconha
Regimes de verdade
Regimes de práticas
Marijuana regulation
Moral entrepreneurs
Marijuana users
Regimes of truth
Practices regimes
CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::SOCIOLOGIA
topic Regulamentação da maconha
Empreendedores morais
Usuários de maconha
Regimes de verdade
Regimes de práticas
Marijuana regulation
Moral entrepreneurs
Marijuana users
Regimes of truth
Practices regimes
CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::SOCIOLOGIA
description This work analyzed the discursive conflict between the participant subjects in the public debate on the regulation of marijuana in Brazil, in order to understand how these subjects employ medical-scientific and juridical-legal arguments to support propositions based on moral-values conceptions. In this sense, in order to analyze this conflict, it were observed six public hearings promoted by the Federal Senate of Brazil in 2014, which discussed the proposal to regulate the use of marijuana in Brazil. It was considered, initially, that the clash observed at these hearings was between groups of 'moral entrepreneurs', who defended opposing and favorable positions on the regulation. More than this, at some points the discussion develops in such a way that the conflict is between what is 'true' and what is 'false' in this debate. Thereby, the speeches of the 'experts' invited to these hearings were fundamental to ground the argument of the conflicting entrepreneurs to establish the 'correct' position in this debate. That being said, and since juridical-legal and medical-scientific discourses are central to this discussion, the aim of this work is to understand how the 'moral entrepreneurs' involved in this debate employ medical-scientific and juridical-legal ‗discourses‘ to support their propositions. In the attempt to answer this question, a discussion was made on Howard Becker's 'Interactionist theory of deviance' to understand the importance of the moral entrepreneurs actuations in establishing social rules. In addition, some 'methodological tools' pointed out by Michel Foucault in his 'archaeogenealogical' proposal were retrieved in order to understand how the emergence of the current conflict was possible and how the 'regimes of truth' and 'practices regimes' on marijuana use in Brazil have been modified throughout history.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-03-28
2018-01-30T13:52:49Z
2018-01-30T13:52:49Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/12319
url http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/12319
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Brasil
Sociologia
UFSM
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Sociais
Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Brasil
Sociologia
UFSM
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Sociais
Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
collection Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
repository.name.fl_str_mv Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv atendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.com
_version_ 1805922026754408448