Sobre uma suposta teoria do erro no alvorecer da filosofia de Nietzsche
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Tese |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
Texto Completo: | http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/23317 |
Resumo: | The assertion that knowledge is through and through anthropomorphic is part of a varied repertoire of ideas, sentences and statements that express more or less uniformly one of the most unusual aspects of Nietzsche's meditation on knowledge, notably, the clearly paradoxical idea that knowledge carries something illusory, that the theoretical discourse does not capture or even falsify reality, that truth is nothing but an error. Since, on the one hand, such an idea derives from an earlier reflection that unfolds according to a sinuous argumentative logic and that in addition has its particular assumptions; and since, on the other hand, as supposed knowledge, neither this reflection nor its assumptions escape the drastic denial contained in the very idea that knowledge is error, it is claimed in the present study that Nietzsche's reflection on the erroneous character of knowledge can be freely understood as a theory: only instead of a theory of knowledge, it is maintained that it must rather to be understood as an error theory. Concretely, it is claimed, first, that Nietzsche's reflections trace an aporia in the very concept of knowledge; and, later, that this aporia invariably affects the self-portrait of beings who understand themselves as knowing beings. In this sense, despite the aporetic idea that knowledge is erroneous, the error theory attributed to the philosopher is less a drastic variant of skepticism, and more a theory concerned with showing that the discovery of such an aporia is inevitable for someone who thinks knowledge as we traditionally think. |
id |
UFSM_8add48ea181df4c5aaf253c33143d61d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/23317 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSM |
network_name_str |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Sobre uma suposta teoria do erro no alvorecer da filosofia de NietzscheOn an alleged error theory in early Nietzsche’s philosophyNietzscheConhecimentoErroIlusãoTragédiaKnowledgeErrorIllusionTragedyCNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIAThe assertion that knowledge is through and through anthropomorphic is part of a varied repertoire of ideas, sentences and statements that express more or less uniformly one of the most unusual aspects of Nietzsche's meditation on knowledge, notably, the clearly paradoxical idea that knowledge carries something illusory, that the theoretical discourse does not capture or even falsify reality, that truth is nothing but an error. Since, on the one hand, such an idea derives from an earlier reflection that unfolds according to a sinuous argumentative logic and that in addition has its particular assumptions; and since, on the other hand, as supposed knowledge, neither this reflection nor its assumptions escape the drastic denial contained in the very idea that knowledge is error, it is claimed in the present study that Nietzsche's reflection on the erroneous character of knowledge can be freely understood as a theory: only instead of a theory of knowledge, it is maintained that it must rather to be understood as an error theory. Concretely, it is claimed, first, that Nietzsche's reflections trace an aporia in the very concept of knowledge; and, later, that this aporia invariably affects the self-portrait of beings who understand themselves as knowing beings. In this sense, despite the aporetic idea that knowledge is erroneous, the error theory attributed to the philosopher is less a drastic variant of skepticism, and more a theory concerned with showing that the discovery of such an aporia is inevitable for someone who thinks knowledge as we traditionally think.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESA afirmação de que o conhecimento é de ponta a ponta antropomórfico faz parte de um variado repertório de ideias, sentenças e ditos que expressam de maneira mais ou menos uniforme um dos aspectos mais insólitos da meditação de Nietzsche sobre o conhecimento, notadamente, a ideia paradoxal de que o conhecimento carrega algo de ilusório, de que o discurso teórico não capta ou até mesmo falseia a realidade, de que a verdade não passa de um erro. Dado que, por um lado, semelhante ideia é rebento de uma anterior reflexão que se desdobra segundo uma sinuosa lógica argumentativa e que, além do mais, dispõe de pressupostos particulares; e dado que, por outro lado, na qualidade de suposto conhecimento, nem mesmo essa reflexão nem tampouco seus pressupostos escapam à negação drástica contida na ideia cabal de que conhecimento é erro, reivindica-se na presente tese que a reflexão de Nietzsche sobre o caráter errôneo do conhecimento pode ser livremente entendida como uma teoria: só que em vez de uma teoria do conhecimento, sustenta-se que cabe antes entendê-la como uma teoria do erro. Concretamente, reivindica-se, primeiro, que as reflexões de Nietzsche rastreiam uma aporia no próprio conceito de conhecimento; depois, reivindica-se que essa aporia invariavelmente acomete o autorretrato de seres que compreendem a si mesmos como seres cognoscentes. Nesse sentido, apesar da ideia aporética de que o conhecimento é errôneo, a teoria do erro que se atribui ao filósofo é menos uma variante demasiado drástica de ceticismo, e mais uma teoria preocupada em mostrar que a descoberta de uma tal aporia é inevitável para alguém que pensa o conhecimento como nós tradicionalmente o pensamos.Universidade Federal de Santa MariaBrasilFilosofiaUFSMPrograma de Pós-Graduação em FilosofiaCentro de Ciências Sociais e HumanasWilliges, Flaviohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/5467666371380781Lopes, Rogério Antôniohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2684407226973550Chaves, Ernani PinheiroViesenteiner, Jorge LuizPimenta Neto, Olímpio JoséReis, Róbson Ramos dosTemp, Daniel2021-12-15T13:02:33Z2021-12-15T13:02:33Z2021-07-21info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisapplication/pdfhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/23317porAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM2021-12-16T06:03:52Zoai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/23317Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/ONGhttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestatendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.comopendoar:2021-12-16T06:03:52Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Sobre uma suposta teoria do erro no alvorecer da filosofia de Nietzsche On an alleged error theory in early Nietzsche’s philosophy |
title |
Sobre uma suposta teoria do erro no alvorecer da filosofia de Nietzsche |
spellingShingle |
Sobre uma suposta teoria do erro no alvorecer da filosofia de Nietzsche Temp, Daniel Nietzsche Conhecimento Erro Ilusão Tragédia Knowledge Error Illusion Tragedy CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
title_short |
Sobre uma suposta teoria do erro no alvorecer da filosofia de Nietzsche |
title_full |
Sobre uma suposta teoria do erro no alvorecer da filosofia de Nietzsche |
title_fullStr |
Sobre uma suposta teoria do erro no alvorecer da filosofia de Nietzsche |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sobre uma suposta teoria do erro no alvorecer da filosofia de Nietzsche |
title_sort |
Sobre uma suposta teoria do erro no alvorecer da filosofia de Nietzsche |
author |
Temp, Daniel |
author_facet |
Temp, Daniel |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Williges, Flavio http://lattes.cnpq.br/5467666371380781 Lopes, Rogério Antônio http://lattes.cnpq.br/2684407226973550 Chaves, Ernani Pinheiro Viesenteiner, Jorge Luiz Pimenta Neto, Olímpio José Reis, Róbson Ramos dos |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Temp, Daniel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Nietzsche Conhecimento Erro Ilusão Tragédia Knowledge Error Illusion Tragedy CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
topic |
Nietzsche Conhecimento Erro Ilusão Tragédia Knowledge Error Illusion Tragedy CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
description |
The assertion that knowledge is through and through anthropomorphic is part of a varied repertoire of ideas, sentences and statements that express more or less uniformly one of the most unusual aspects of Nietzsche's meditation on knowledge, notably, the clearly paradoxical idea that knowledge carries something illusory, that the theoretical discourse does not capture or even falsify reality, that truth is nothing but an error. Since, on the one hand, such an idea derives from an earlier reflection that unfolds according to a sinuous argumentative logic and that in addition has its particular assumptions; and since, on the other hand, as supposed knowledge, neither this reflection nor its assumptions escape the drastic denial contained in the very idea that knowledge is error, it is claimed in the present study that Nietzsche's reflection on the erroneous character of knowledge can be freely understood as a theory: only instead of a theory of knowledge, it is maintained that it must rather to be understood as an error theory. Concretely, it is claimed, first, that Nietzsche's reflections trace an aporia in the very concept of knowledge; and, later, that this aporia invariably affects the self-portrait of beings who understand themselves as knowing beings. In this sense, despite the aporetic idea that knowledge is erroneous, the error theory attributed to the philosopher is less a drastic variant of skepticism, and more a theory concerned with showing that the discovery of such an aporia is inevitable for someone who thinks knowledge as we traditionally think. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-12-15T13:02:33Z 2021-12-15T13:02:33Z 2021-07-21 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
format |
doctoralThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/23317 |
url |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/23317 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Brasil Filosofia UFSM Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Brasil Filosofia UFSM Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) instacron:UFSM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
instacron_str |
UFSM |
institution |
UFSM |
reponame_str |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
collection |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
atendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1805922154913464320 |