Altimetria com topografia convencional e sensoriamento remoto

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pinto, Leandro de Mello
Data de Publicação: 2012
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
dARK ID: ark:/26339/001300000155p
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/9559
Resumo: The altimetry of the surface terrain for many decades has been achieved almost exclusively by conventional surveying. The advancement of technology allowed the development of space missions and the creation of artificial satellites, making the science of remote sensing to expand exponentially. The SRTM (Shuttle Radar Topographic Mission) and ASTER GDEM (Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer) are spatial programs that provide altitude information of almost the entire globe. The program Google Earth uses that information, and provides for its users in a practical and rapid way. For ease of access to data from these techniques, many users use them without knowing the geometric problems existing in these products, which can compromise the quality of results obtained through these techniques. Therefore, there is a need for a prior evaluation to assess the quality and workability for each method. In this context, the objective was to analyze the accuracy of three ways of obtaining altitude: by SRTM, ASTER and Google Earth, comparing them with conventional surveying and with GPS, because they are more established techniques. To this end, two surveys were performed in situ, one using a GPS receiver and the other by conventional topography, where the heights of the points were compared with the heights obtained by the three methods analyzed, resulting in discrepancies. The results show that the data from the SRTM provided by Embrapa Monitoring by Satellites through the Project Brasil em Relevo are more accurate than ASTER data and Google Earth, moreover, was also found that the Kriging interpolation technique has best results for altimetric spatial data.
id UFSM_a19a5b736edaf8fa85b20a313c6a66cf
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/9559
network_acronym_str UFSM
network_name_str Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
repository_id_str
spelling Altimetria com topografia convencional e sensoriamento remotoAltimetry with conventional surveying and remote sensingNivelamentoInterpolação espacialAcuráciaLevelingSpatial interpolationAccuracyCNPQ::CIENCIAS EXATAS E DA TERRA::GEOCIENCIASThe altimetry of the surface terrain for many decades has been achieved almost exclusively by conventional surveying. The advancement of technology allowed the development of space missions and the creation of artificial satellites, making the science of remote sensing to expand exponentially. The SRTM (Shuttle Radar Topographic Mission) and ASTER GDEM (Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer) are spatial programs that provide altitude information of almost the entire globe. The program Google Earth uses that information, and provides for its users in a practical and rapid way. For ease of access to data from these techniques, many users use them without knowing the geometric problems existing in these products, which can compromise the quality of results obtained through these techniques. Therefore, there is a need for a prior evaluation to assess the quality and workability for each method. In this context, the objective was to analyze the accuracy of three ways of obtaining altitude: by SRTM, ASTER and Google Earth, comparing them with conventional surveying and with GPS, because they are more established techniques. To this end, two surveys were performed in situ, one using a GPS receiver and the other by conventional topography, where the heights of the points were compared with the heights obtained by the three methods analyzed, resulting in discrepancies. The results show that the data from the SRTM provided by Embrapa Monitoring by Satellites through the Project Brasil em Relevo are more accurate than ASTER data and Google Earth, moreover, was also found that the Kriging interpolation technique has best results for altimetric spatial data.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorA altimetria do terreno, por muitas décadas, tem sido obtida, quase que exclusivamente por meio da topografia convencional. O avanço da tecnologia permitiu o desenvolvimento de missões espaciais e a criação de satélites artificiais, fazendo com que a ciência do Sensoriamento Remoto se expandisse de forma exponencial. O SRTM (Shuttle Radar Topographic Mission) e o ASTER GDEM (Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer) são programas espaciais que fornecem informações altimétricas de quase todo o globo terrestre. O programa Google Earth utiliza-se dessas informações e as disponibiliza para seus usuários de forma prática e rápida. Pela facilidade de acesso aos dados provenientes destas técnicas, muitos usuários os utilizam sem conhecer os problemas geométricos existentes nesses produtos, o que pode comprometer a qualidade dos resultados obtidos através dessas técnicas. Por esse motivo, há a necessidade de uma prévia avaliação para aferir a qualidade e a aplicabilidade de cada método. Nesse contexto, o objetivo do trabalho foi analisar a acurácia de três formas de obtenção de altitude: por SRTM, ASTER e Google Earth, comparando-os com a topografia convencional e com o GPS, por serem técnicas mais consolidadas. Para isso, foram realizados dois levantamentos in situ, um através de receptores GPS e outro por topografia convencional, onde as altitudes dos pontos foram comparadas com as altitudes obtidas pelos três métodos analisados, resultando nas discrepâncias. Os resultados mostram que os dados provenientes do SRTM, fornecidos pela Embrapa Monitoramento por Satélite, através do Projeto Brasil em Relevo, são mais acurados do que os dados ASTER e Google Earth, além disto, também foi constatado que a técnica de interpolação da Krigagem apresenta melhores resultados para a espacialização de dados altimétricos.Universidade Federal de Santa MariaBRGeociênciasUFSMPrograma de Pós-Graduação em GeomáticaRobaina, Adroaldo Diashttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8629241691140049Schons, Ricardo Luishttp://lattes.cnpq.br/9875030355020810Weber, Liane de Souzahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2891799660226360Pinto, Leandro de Mello2013-03-042013-03-042012-04-17info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfapplication/pdfPINTO, Leandro de Mello. Altimetry with conventional surveying and remote sensing. 2012. 96 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Geociências) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, 2012.http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/9559ark:/26339/001300000155pporinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM2023-06-23T11:27:36Zoai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/9559Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/ONGhttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestatendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.comopendoar:2023-06-23T11:27:36Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Altimetria com topografia convencional e sensoriamento remoto
Altimetry with conventional surveying and remote sensing
title Altimetria com topografia convencional e sensoriamento remoto
spellingShingle Altimetria com topografia convencional e sensoriamento remoto
Pinto, Leandro de Mello
Nivelamento
Interpolação espacial
Acurácia
Leveling
Spatial interpolation
Accuracy
CNPQ::CIENCIAS EXATAS E DA TERRA::GEOCIENCIAS
title_short Altimetria com topografia convencional e sensoriamento remoto
title_full Altimetria com topografia convencional e sensoriamento remoto
title_fullStr Altimetria com topografia convencional e sensoriamento remoto
title_full_unstemmed Altimetria com topografia convencional e sensoriamento remoto
title_sort Altimetria com topografia convencional e sensoriamento remoto
author Pinto, Leandro de Mello
author_facet Pinto, Leandro de Mello
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Robaina, Adroaldo Dias
http://lattes.cnpq.br/8629241691140049
Schons, Ricardo Luis
http://lattes.cnpq.br/9875030355020810
Weber, Liane de Souza
http://lattes.cnpq.br/2891799660226360
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pinto, Leandro de Mello
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Nivelamento
Interpolação espacial
Acurácia
Leveling
Spatial interpolation
Accuracy
CNPQ::CIENCIAS EXATAS E DA TERRA::GEOCIENCIAS
topic Nivelamento
Interpolação espacial
Acurácia
Leveling
Spatial interpolation
Accuracy
CNPQ::CIENCIAS EXATAS E DA TERRA::GEOCIENCIAS
description The altimetry of the surface terrain for many decades has been achieved almost exclusively by conventional surveying. The advancement of technology allowed the development of space missions and the creation of artificial satellites, making the science of remote sensing to expand exponentially. The SRTM (Shuttle Radar Topographic Mission) and ASTER GDEM (Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer) are spatial programs that provide altitude information of almost the entire globe. The program Google Earth uses that information, and provides for its users in a practical and rapid way. For ease of access to data from these techniques, many users use them without knowing the geometric problems existing in these products, which can compromise the quality of results obtained through these techniques. Therefore, there is a need for a prior evaluation to assess the quality and workability for each method. In this context, the objective was to analyze the accuracy of three ways of obtaining altitude: by SRTM, ASTER and Google Earth, comparing them with conventional surveying and with GPS, because they are more established techniques. To this end, two surveys were performed in situ, one using a GPS receiver and the other by conventional topography, where the heights of the points were compared with the heights obtained by the three methods analyzed, resulting in discrepancies. The results show that the data from the SRTM provided by Embrapa Monitoring by Satellites through the Project Brasil em Relevo are more accurate than ASTER data and Google Earth, moreover, was also found that the Kriging interpolation technique has best results for altimetric spatial data.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-04-17
2013-03-04
2013-03-04
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv PINTO, Leandro de Mello. Altimetry with conventional surveying and remote sensing. 2012. 96 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Geociências) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, 2012.
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/9559
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv ark:/26339/001300000155p
identifier_str_mv PINTO, Leandro de Mello. Altimetry with conventional surveying and remote sensing. 2012. 96 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Geociências) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, 2012.
ark:/26339/001300000155p
url http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/9559
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
BR
Geociências
UFSM
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Geomática
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
BR
Geociências
UFSM
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Geomática
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
collection Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
repository.name.fl_str_mv Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv atendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.com
_version_ 1815172261739495424