Segunda pessoa e casos-limite em Paul Ricoeur
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Tese |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
dARK ID: | ark:/26339/0013000000bm4 |
Texto Completo: | http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/23314 |
Resumo: | The present research starts from the observation of the philosopher Paul Ricoeur, who, like two major philosophical ethical traditions, a chain of teleology in the wake of Aristotle and a chain of deontology in Emmanuel Kant, treats the second person of ethics in an obliterated way. The chain of teleological ethics sees civic virtue or humanity only in friendship (philia) between men, free and equal. Interpersonal relationships are only possible or reasonable if those involved are predominantly male, from the same and higher socioeconomic class. The current of deontological morality, in turn, brings with it the modern ideal of an autonomous subject that constantly clashes with the demand for reciprocity in interpersonal relationships. Both traditions, therefore, do not overcome the initial dissymmetry, based on the theories of deposition of the other and cultivate inertia in the face of so much violence. Thinking about the suffering of the second person immersed in these situations of inequality, the French philosopher points out a way out, arising from the articulation and complementarity between ethics, from the notion of solicitude, and moral, from the category of respect. Thus, we will defend that Ricoeur corrects the deficiencies in the treatment of the second person of ethics, in accordance with the premises of solicitude and respect and the search for articulation between ethics and morals. Our proposal will be better understood from the analysis of the way in which our philosopher operates deliberation, or moral judgment in a singular situation, through the examination of limit cases. |
id |
UFSM_b6a60d1598c8bbff3eaa02e80514530e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/23314 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSM |
network_name_str |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Segunda pessoa e casos-limite em Paul RicoeurÉticaMoralAristótelesKantSegunda pessoaSolicitudeRespeitoCasos-limiteÉthicsAristotleSecond personSolicitudeRespectLimit casesCNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIAThe present research starts from the observation of the philosopher Paul Ricoeur, who, like two major philosophical ethical traditions, a chain of teleology in the wake of Aristotle and a chain of deontology in Emmanuel Kant, treats the second person of ethics in an obliterated way. The chain of teleological ethics sees civic virtue or humanity only in friendship (philia) between men, free and equal. Interpersonal relationships are only possible or reasonable if those involved are predominantly male, from the same and higher socioeconomic class. The current of deontological morality, in turn, brings with it the modern ideal of an autonomous subject that constantly clashes with the demand for reciprocity in interpersonal relationships. Both traditions, therefore, do not overcome the initial dissymmetry, based on the theories of deposition of the other and cultivate inertia in the face of so much violence. Thinking about the suffering of the second person immersed in these situations of inequality, the French philosopher points out a way out, arising from the articulation and complementarity between ethics, from the notion of solicitude, and moral, from the category of respect. Thus, we will defend that Ricoeur corrects the deficiencies in the treatment of the second person of ethics, in accordance with the premises of solicitude and respect and the search for articulation between ethics and morals. Our proposal will be better understood from the analysis of the way in which our philosopher operates deliberation, or moral judgment in a singular situation, through the examination of limit cases.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESA presente pesquisa parte da constatação do filósofo Paul Ricoeur, de que as duas maiores tradições da ética filosófica, a corrente da teleologia na esteira de Aristóteles e a corrente da deontologia em Emmanuel Kant, tratam a segunda pessoa da ética de forma obliterada. A corrente da ética teleológica vê virtude cívica ou humanidade apenas na amizade (philia) entre homens, livres e iguais. As relações interpessoais só são possíveis ou razoáveis se os envolvidos forem predominantemente do sexo masculino, de uma mesma e mais elevada classe socioeconômica. A corrente da moral deontológica, por sua vez, traz consigo o ideal moderno de sujeito autônomo que se choca constantemente com a exigência de reciprocidade na relação interpessoal. Ambas as tradições, destarte, não superam a dissimetria inicial, calcada nas teorias de deposição do outro e cultivam a inércia diante de tanta violência. Pensando acerca do sofrimento da segunda pessoa imersa nessas situações de desigualdade, o filósofo francês aponta uma saída, advinda da articulação e complementariedade entre ética, a partir da noção de solicitude, e moral, a partir da categoria do respeito. Desse modo, defenderemos que Ricoeur corrige as deficiências do tratamento da segunda pessoa da ética, em conformidade com as premissas da solicitude e do respeito e a busca de articulação entre ética e moral. Nossa proposta será mais bem compreendida a partir da análise da maneira pela qual nosso filósofo opera a deliberação, ou o juízo moral em situação singular, mediante o exame de casos-limite.Universidade Federal de Santa MariaBrasilFilosofiaUFSMPrograma de Pós-Graduação em FilosofiaCentro de Ciências Sociais e HumanasRossatto, Noeli Dutrahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2947312243186882Moratalla, Tomás DomingoKrassuski, Jair AntônioGubert, Paulo GilbertoCosta, Paulo Sérgio de JesusTiellet, Claudia Aita2021-12-15T11:17:06Z2021-12-15T11:17:06Z2020-03-31info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisapplication/pdfhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/23314ark:/26339/0013000000bm4porAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM2021-12-16T06:03:48Zoai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/23314Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/ONGhttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestatendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.comopendoar:2024-07-29T10:32:53.339008Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Segunda pessoa e casos-limite em Paul Ricoeur |
title |
Segunda pessoa e casos-limite em Paul Ricoeur |
spellingShingle |
Segunda pessoa e casos-limite em Paul Ricoeur Tiellet, Claudia Aita Ética Moral Aristóteles Kant Segunda pessoa Solicitude Respeito Casos-limite Éthics Aristotle Second person Solicitude Respect Limit cases CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
title_short |
Segunda pessoa e casos-limite em Paul Ricoeur |
title_full |
Segunda pessoa e casos-limite em Paul Ricoeur |
title_fullStr |
Segunda pessoa e casos-limite em Paul Ricoeur |
title_full_unstemmed |
Segunda pessoa e casos-limite em Paul Ricoeur |
title_sort |
Segunda pessoa e casos-limite em Paul Ricoeur |
author |
Tiellet, Claudia Aita |
author_facet |
Tiellet, Claudia Aita |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Rossatto, Noeli Dutra http://lattes.cnpq.br/2947312243186882 Moratalla, Tomás Domingo Krassuski, Jair Antônio Gubert, Paulo Gilberto Costa, Paulo Sérgio de Jesus |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Tiellet, Claudia Aita |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ética Moral Aristóteles Kant Segunda pessoa Solicitude Respeito Casos-limite Éthics Aristotle Second person Solicitude Respect Limit cases CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
topic |
Ética Moral Aristóteles Kant Segunda pessoa Solicitude Respeito Casos-limite Éthics Aristotle Second person Solicitude Respect Limit cases CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
description |
The present research starts from the observation of the philosopher Paul Ricoeur, who, like two major philosophical ethical traditions, a chain of teleology in the wake of Aristotle and a chain of deontology in Emmanuel Kant, treats the second person of ethics in an obliterated way. The chain of teleological ethics sees civic virtue or humanity only in friendship (philia) between men, free and equal. Interpersonal relationships are only possible or reasonable if those involved are predominantly male, from the same and higher socioeconomic class. The current of deontological morality, in turn, brings with it the modern ideal of an autonomous subject that constantly clashes with the demand for reciprocity in interpersonal relationships. Both traditions, therefore, do not overcome the initial dissymmetry, based on the theories of deposition of the other and cultivate inertia in the face of so much violence. Thinking about the suffering of the second person immersed in these situations of inequality, the French philosopher points out a way out, arising from the articulation and complementarity between ethics, from the notion of solicitude, and moral, from the category of respect. Thus, we will defend that Ricoeur corrects the deficiencies in the treatment of the second person of ethics, in accordance with the premises of solicitude and respect and the search for articulation between ethics and morals. Our proposal will be better understood from the analysis of the way in which our philosopher operates deliberation, or moral judgment in a singular situation, through the examination of limit cases. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-03-31 2021-12-15T11:17:06Z 2021-12-15T11:17:06Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
format |
doctoralThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/23314 |
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv |
ark:/26339/0013000000bm4 |
url |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/23314 |
identifier_str_mv |
ark:/26339/0013000000bm4 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Brasil Filosofia UFSM Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Brasil Filosofia UFSM Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) instacron:UFSM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
instacron_str |
UFSM |
institution |
UFSM |
reponame_str |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
collection |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
atendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1814439704007802880 |