Segunda pessoa e casos-limite em Paul Ricoeur

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Tiellet, Claudia Aita
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Tese
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
dARK ID: ark:/26339/0013000000bm4
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/23314
Resumo: The present research starts from the observation of the philosopher Paul Ricoeur, who, like two major philosophical ethical traditions, a chain of teleology in the wake of Aristotle and a chain of deontology in Emmanuel Kant, treats the second person of ethics in an obliterated way. The chain of teleological ethics sees civic virtue or humanity only in friendship (philia) between men, free and equal. Interpersonal relationships are only possible or reasonable if those involved are predominantly male, from the same and higher socioeconomic class. The current of deontological morality, in turn, brings with it the modern ideal of an autonomous subject that constantly clashes with the demand for reciprocity in interpersonal relationships. Both traditions, therefore, do not overcome the initial dissymmetry, based on the theories of deposition of the other and cultivate inertia in the face of so much violence. Thinking about the suffering of the second person immersed in these situations of inequality, the French philosopher points out a way out, arising from the articulation and complementarity between ethics, from the notion of solicitude, and moral, from the category of respect. Thus, we will defend that Ricoeur corrects the deficiencies in the treatment of the second person of ethics, in accordance with the premises of solicitude and respect and the search for articulation between ethics and morals. Our proposal will be better understood from the analysis of the way in which our philosopher operates deliberation, or moral judgment in a singular situation, through the examination of limit cases.
id UFSM_b6a60d1598c8bbff3eaa02e80514530e
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/23314
network_acronym_str UFSM
network_name_str Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
repository_id_str
spelling Segunda pessoa e casos-limite em Paul RicoeurÉticaMoralAristótelesKantSegunda pessoaSolicitudeRespeitoCasos-limiteÉthicsAristotleSecond personSolicitudeRespectLimit casesCNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIAThe present research starts from the observation of the philosopher Paul Ricoeur, who, like two major philosophical ethical traditions, a chain of teleology in the wake of Aristotle and a chain of deontology in Emmanuel Kant, treats the second person of ethics in an obliterated way. The chain of teleological ethics sees civic virtue or humanity only in friendship (philia) between men, free and equal. Interpersonal relationships are only possible or reasonable if those involved are predominantly male, from the same and higher socioeconomic class. The current of deontological morality, in turn, brings with it the modern ideal of an autonomous subject that constantly clashes with the demand for reciprocity in interpersonal relationships. Both traditions, therefore, do not overcome the initial dissymmetry, based on the theories of deposition of the other and cultivate inertia in the face of so much violence. Thinking about the suffering of the second person immersed in these situations of inequality, the French philosopher points out a way out, arising from the articulation and complementarity between ethics, from the notion of solicitude, and moral, from the category of respect. Thus, we will defend that Ricoeur corrects the deficiencies in the treatment of the second person of ethics, in accordance with the premises of solicitude and respect and the search for articulation between ethics and morals. Our proposal will be better understood from the analysis of the way in which our philosopher operates deliberation, or moral judgment in a singular situation, through the examination of limit cases.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESA presente pesquisa parte da constatação do filósofo Paul Ricoeur, de que as duas maiores tradições da ética filosófica, a corrente da teleologia na esteira de Aristóteles e a corrente da deontologia em Emmanuel Kant, tratam a segunda pessoa da ética de forma obliterada. A corrente da ética teleológica vê virtude cívica ou humanidade apenas na amizade (philia) entre homens, livres e iguais. As relações interpessoais só são possíveis ou razoáveis se os envolvidos forem predominantemente do sexo masculino, de uma mesma e mais elevada classe socioeconômica. A corrente da moral deontológica, por sua vez, traz consigo o ideal moderno de sujeito autônomo que se choca constantemente com a exigência de reciprocidade na relação interpessoal. Ambas as tradições, destarte, não superam a dissimetria inicial, calcada nas teorias de deposição do outro e cultivam a inércia diante de tanta violência. Pensando acerca do sofrimento da segunda pessoa imersa nessas situações de desigualdade, o filósofo francês aponta uma saída, advinda da articulação e complementariedade entre ética, a partir da noção de solicitude, e moral, a partir da categoria do respeito. Desse modo, defenderemos que Ricoeur corrige as deficiências do tratamento da segunda pessoa da ética, em conformidade com as premissas da solicitude e do respeito e a busca de articulação entre ética e moral. Nossa proposta será mais bem compreendida a partir da análise da maneira pela qual nosso filósofo opera a deliberação, ou o juízo moral em situação singular, mediante o exame de casos-limite.Universidade Federal de Santa MariaBrasilFilosofiaUFSMPrograma de Pós-Graduação em FilosofiaCentro de Ciências Sociais e HumanasRossatto, Noeli Dutrahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2947312243186882Moratalla, Tomás DomingoKrassuski, Jair AntônioGubert, Paulo GilbertoCosta, Paulo Sérgio de JesusTiellet, Claudia Aita2021-12-15T11:17:06Z2021-12-15T11:17:06Z2020-03-31info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisapplication/pdfhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/23314ark:/26339/0013000000bm4porAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM2021-12-16T06:03:48Zoai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/23314Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/ONGhttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestatendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.comopendoar:2024-07-29T10:32:53.339008Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Segunda pessoa e casos-limite em Paul Ricoeur
title Segunda pessoa e casos-limite em Paul Ricoeur
spellingShingle Segunda pessoa e casos-limite em Paul Ricoeur
Tiellet, Claudia Aita
Ética
Moral
Aristóteles
Kant
Segunda pessoa
Solicitude
Respeito
Casos-limite
Éthics
Aristotle
Second person
Solicitude
Respect
Limit cases
CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA
title_short Segunda pessoa e casos-limite em Paul Ricoeur
title_full Segunda pessoa e casos-limite em Paul Ricoeur
title_fullStr Segunda pessoa e casos-limite em Paul Ricoeur
title_full_unstemmed Segunda pessoa e casos-limite em Paul Ricoeur
title_sort Segunda pessoa e casos-limite em Paul Ricoeur
author Tiellet, Claudia Aita
author_facet Tiellet, Claudia Aita
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Rossatto, Noeli Dutra
http://lattes.cnpq.br/2947312243186882
Moratalla, Tomás Domingo
Krassuski, Jair Antônio
Gubert, Paulo Gilberto
Costa, Paulo Sérgio de Jesus
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Tiellet, Claudia Aita
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ética
Moral
Aristóteles
Kant
Segunda pessoa
Solicitude
Respeito
Casos-limite
Éthics
Aristotle
Second person
Solicitude
Respect
Limit cases
CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA
topic Ética
Moral
Aristóteles
Kant
Segunda pessoa
Solicitude
Respeito
Casos-limite
Éthics
Aristotle
Second person
Solicitude
Respect
Limit cases
CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA
description The present research starts from the observation of the philosopher Paul Ricoeur, who, like two major philosophical ethical traditions, a chain of teleology in the wake of Aristotle and a chain of deontology in Emmanuel Kant, treats the second person of ethics in an obliterated way. The chain of teleological ethics sees civic virtue or humanity only in friendship (philia) between men, free and equal. Interpersonal relationships are only possible or reasonable if those involved are predominantly male, from the same and higher socioeconomic class. The current of deontological morality, in turn, brings with it the modern ideal of an autonomous subject that constantly clashes with the demand for reciprocity in interpersonal relationships. Both traditions, therefore, do not overcome the initial dissymmetry, based on the theories of deposition of the other and cultivate inertia in the face of so much violence. Thinking about the suffering of the second person immersed in these situations of inequality, the French philosopher points out a way out, arising from the articulation and complementarity between ethics, from the notion of solicitude, and moral, from the category of respect. Thus, we will defend that Ricoeur corrects the deficiencies in the treatment of the second person of ethics, in accordance with the premises of solicitude and respect and the search for articulation between ethics and morals. Our proposal will be better understood from the analysis of the way in which our philosopher operates deliberation, or moral judgment in a singular situation, through the examination of limit cases.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-03-31
2021-12-15T11:17:06Z
2021-12-15T11:17:06Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/23314
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv ark:/26339/0013000000bm4
url http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/23314
identifier_str_mv ark:/26339/0013000000bm4
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Brasil
Filosofia
UFSM
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia
Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Brasil
Filosofia
UFSM
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia
Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
collection Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
repository.name.fl_str_mv Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv atendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.com
_version_ 1814439704007802880