Vegetação e mecanismos de regeneração em fragmento de floresta estacional decidual ripária, Cachoeira do Sul, RS, Brasil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Araujo, Maristela Machado
Data de Publicação: 2002
Tipo de documento: Tese
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
dARK ID: ark:/26339/001300000p6z1
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/27116
Resumo: Riparian forests are complex ecosystems closely associated with river dynamics and occurring under particular phytogeographic conditions. In the state of Rio Grande do Sul, these forests have been altered and fragmented by human activity. The objective of this study is to analyze the structure and floristic composition of these forests and their regeneration mechanisms (seedling bank, seed rain, and soil seed bank). The study site is a 4 ha fragment located in the municipality of Cachoeira do Sul-RS, low River Jacuí (30o04’36”S; 52o53’09”W). The vegetation was inventoried using strips about 10 m wide that were laid out perpendicular to the river and separated by 50 meters. The strips were divided into 10 x 10 m plots. Within each plot I identified and measured circumference and height of all individuals with girth breast height- GBH15 cm (Classe I). Lianas were also measured, but were identified only according to life form. Species density data were entered into a matrix (70 x 42) that was used in multivariate analysis. The presence of vegetation clustering at the interior of the fragment was tested with TWINSPAN (Two-way indicator species analysis), which identified the existence of three forest subformations (S-F1, S-F2 e S-F3). S-F1 was characterized by a higher influence of flooding and the ground water table was closer to the surface; S-F2 occurred in the central part of the fragment, but presented a strong influence from flooding and inundation; and S-F3, also in the central part of the fragment, experienced the greatest influence from the ground water table. The indicator species of the three forest formations were Sebastiania commersoniana and Eugenia uniflora (S-F1); Gymnanthes concolor, Cupania vernalis and Seguieria aculeata (S-F2); and Casearia sylvestris and Allophylus edulis (S-F3). To evaluate if the regeneration mechanisms also exhibited differences according to the forest formations, and to identify the most effective regeneration process in the ecosystem, I used a different methodology for each mechanism. The seedling bank was sampled in sub-plots 1 x 4 m, placed within 27 plots of Class I, and individuals with height ≥ 20 cm and CBH < 15 cm were identified and measured. Statistical analysis showed that S-F1 was significantly different from S-F2 e S-F3. Using data from two years of study, I calculated rates of mortality, recruitment and change for species in S-F1 and in the middle of the forest fragment (S-F2 and S-F3). I observed that the seedling bank of S-F1 showed lower species richness and change over time than the interior of the fragment. Seed rain was monitored over two years in 30 collectors (1 x 1 m), and I observed no significant difference in the deposition of seeds among the forest formations. However, during the first year of study seed production was higher, principally among tree species. To characterize the soil seed bank, I sampled the first 5 cm of the soil surface (litter and soil). There was no significant difference between the forest formations. Most seeds were herbaceous species, followed by trees, shrubs and lianas. This study revealed that the highest similarity occurred between the vegetation and the seedling bank, followed by vegetation and seed rain, and the least similarity occurred with the seed bank. Therefore, the seedling bank is primarily responsible for the conservation of the fragment, because it depends on seed rain that varies over time. The soil seed bank is important in the first stages after disturbance of the environment, but depends on the seed rain to be more represented qualitatively. For conservation, I suggest twenty two species and also I highly indicate for recovery riparian areas, that species occur under the girth breast height (GBH15 cm) class, and at least under two regeneration mechanism.
id UFSM_ca3c7eb04eaf978558e50e867ce51127
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/27116
network_acronym_str UFSM
network_name_str Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
repository_id_str
spelling Vegetação e mecanismos de regeneração em fragmento de floresta estacional decidual ripária, Cachoeira do Sul, RS, BrasilVegetation and regeneration mechanisms in a seasonal deciduous riparian forest fragment, Cachoeira do Sul, RS, BrazilFloresta ripáriaAnálise de clusterFluxo de sementesBanco de sementes do soloBanco de plântulasRyparian forestCluster analysisSeed rainSeed bankSapling bankCNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::RECURSOS FLORESTAIS E ENGENHARIA FLORESTALRiparian forests are complex ecosystems closely associated with river dynamics and occurring under particular phytogeographic conditions. In the state of Rio Grande do Sul, these forests have been altered and fragmented by human activity. The objective of this study is to analyze the structure and floristic composition of these forests and their regeneration mechanisms (seedling bank, seed rain, and soil seed bank). The study site is a 4 ha fragment located in the municipality of Cachoeira do Sul-RS, low River Jacuí (30o04’36”S; 52o53’09”W). The vegetation was inventoried using strips about 10 m wide that were laid out perpendicular to the river and separated by 50 meters. The strips were divided into 10 x 10 m plots. Within each plot I identified and measured circumference and height of all individuals with girth breast height- GBH15 cm (Classe I). Lianas were also measured, but were identified only according to life form. Species density data were entered into a matrix (70 x 42) that was used in multivariate analysis. The presence of vegetation clustering at the interior of the fragment was tested with TWINSPAN (Two-way indicator species analysis), which identified the existence of three forest subformations (S-F1, S-F2 e S-F3). S-F1 was characterized by a higher influence of flooding and the ground water table was closer to the surface; S-F2 occurred in the central part of the fragment, but presented a strong influence from flooding and inundation; and S-F3, also in the central part of the fragment, experienced the greatest influence from the ground water table. The indicator species of the three forest formations were Sebastiania commersoniana and Eugenia uniflora (S-F1); Gymnanthes concolor, Cupania vernalis and Seguieria aculeata (S-F2); and Casearia sylvestris and Allophylus edulis (S-F3). To evaluate if the regeneration mechanisms also exhibited differences according to the forest formations, and to identify the most effective regeneration process in the ecosystem, I used a different methodology for each mechanism. The seedling bank was sampled in sub-plots 1 x 4 m, placed within 27 plots of Class I, and individuals with height ≥ 20 cm and CBH < 15 cm were identified and measured. Statistical analysis showed that S-F1 was significantly different from S-F2 e S-F3. Using data from two years of study, I calculated rates of mortality, recruitment and change for species in S-F1 and in the middle of the forest fragment (S-F2 and S-F3). I observed that the seedling bank of S-F1 showed lower species richness and change over time than the interior of the fragment. Seed rain was monitored over two years in 30 collectors (1 x 1 m), and I observed no significant difference in the deposition of seeds among the forest formations. However, during the first year of study seed production was higher, principally among tree species. To characterize the soil seed bank, I sampled the first 5 cm of the soil surface (litter and soil). There was no significant difference between the forest formations. Most seeds were herbaceous species, followed by trees, shrubs and lianas. This study revealed that the highest similarity occurred between the vegetation and the seedling bank, followed by vegetation and seed rain, and the least similarity occurred with the seed bank. Therefore, the seedling bank is primarily responsible for the conservation of the fragment, because it depends on seed rain that varies over time. The soil seed bank is important in the first stages after disturbance of the environment, but depends on the seed rain to be more represented qualitatively. For conservation, I suggest twenty two species and also I highly indicate for recovery riparian areas, that species occur under the girth breast height (GBH15 cm) class, and at least under two regeneration mechanism.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESAs florestas ripárias são ecossistemas complexos, associados à região fitogeográfica que ocorrem e à dinâmica dos rios. No Estado do Rio Grande do Sul, encontram-se alteradas pela ação antrópica, formando fragmentos. O estudo teve como objetivo analisar a estrutura e florística interna destas florestas e seus mecanismos de regeneração (banco de plântulas, fluxo de sementes e banco de sementes do solo). A área escolhida foi um fragmento (30o04’36”S; 52o53’09”W), de 4 ha, localizada no município de Cachoeira do Sul, RS, Baixo Rio Jacuí. A vegetação foi inventariada, utilizando-se faixas perpendiculares ao rio, distanciadas por 50 m, as quais apresentaram 10 m de largura e comprimento que variou com a largura da floresta. As faixas foram divididas em unidades amostrais de 10x10 m, onde foram identificados indivíduos com CAP15 cm (Classe I), registrados os valores de circunferência e altura. As lianas também tiveram circunferências medidas, mas identificadas somente quanto à forma de vida. Os dados de densidade por espécie formaram uma matriz (70x42) utilizada na análise multivariada. A presença de agrupamento de vegetação no interior do fragmento foi testada pelo TWINSPAN (Two-way indicator species analysis), a partir do qual foi constatada a existência de três sub-formações florestais (S-F1, S-F2 e S-F3). A S-F1 foi caracterizada por ter maior influência das enchentes e lençol freático mais próximo da superfície, S-F2 ocorreu na parte central do fragmento, mas apresentou forte influência dos extravasamentos e enchentes; e na S-F3, também na porção central, ocorreu maior influência do lençol freático. As espécies indicadoras das formações foram: Sebastiania commersoniana e Eugenia uniflora (S-F1); Gymnanthes concolor, Cupania vernalis e Seguieria aculeata (S-F2); e Casearia sylvestris e Allophylus edulis (S-F3). Para avaliar se os mecanismos de regeneração também apresentaram diferença, conforme as formações, e verificar qual era o mais efetivo no processo de regeneração do ecossistema, utilizou-se metodologia apropriada para cada um desses. O banco de plântulas foi amostrado em subunidades de 1x4 m, locados em 27 unidades da Classe I, onde os indivíduos com altura igual ou maior de 20 cm e CAP<15 cm foram identificados e medidos. A análise estatística mostrou que quantitativamente havia diferença significativa da S-F1 em relação a S-F2 e S-F3. Posteriormente, utilizando dados obtidos em dois anos de estudo, foi verificadas a taxa de mortalidade, recrutamento e mudança das espécies da S-F1 e do meio da floresta (S-F2 e S-F3). Nesta análise, observou-se que o banco de plântulas na S-F1 apresentou menor riqueza florística e mudança do que no meio. No fluxo de sementes que foi avaliado a partir da disposição de 30 coletores de 1x1m, monitorado durante dois anos, observou-se que não houve diferença significativa na deposição de sementes nas formações. Porém, o primeiro ano de estudo apresentou uma produção de sementes bem maior, principalmente, de espécies arbóreas. O estudo do banco de sementes do solo, mediante a coleta de 5 cm de amostra da superfície do solo (serapilheira e solo), mostrou não haver diferença significativa entre as formações. Este apresentou maior proporção de espécies herbáceas, seguido de árvores, arbustos e lianas. Considerando vegetação e mecanismos de regeneração, constatou-se que a maior similaridade ocorreu entre a vegetação e banco de plântulas, seguido por vegetação e fluxo de sementes e as menores estiveram associadas ao banco de sementes do solo. Contudo, constatou-se que o banco de plântulas é o principal responsável pela conservação do fragmento, sendo dependente do fluxo de sementes, que apresentou variação temporal. O banco de sementes do solo é importante no primeiro momento após a alteração do ambiente, mas depende do fluxo de sementes para ser mais bem representado qualitativamente. Vinte e duas espécies são fundamentais para a conservação podendo ser indicadas para recuperação destas áreas, considerando sua presença na vegetação com CAP  15cm e em pelo menos dois mecanismos de regeneração.Universidade Federal de Santa MariaBrasilRecursos Florestais e Engenharia FlorestalUFSMPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia FlorestalCentro de Ciências RuraisLonghi, Solon Jonashttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2401814326298046Carvalho, João Olegário Pereira deBarros, Paulo Luis Contente deDurlo, Miguel AntãoBrena, Doadi AntônioAraujo, Maristela Machado2022-11-25T18:27:22Z2022-11-25T18:27:22Z2002-10-04info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisapplication/pdfhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/27116ark:/26339/001300000p6z1porAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM2022-11-25T18:27:22Zoai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/27116Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/ONGhttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestatendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.comopendoar:2022-11-25T18:27:22Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Vegetação e mecanismos de regeneração em fragmento de floresta estacional decidual ripária, Cachoeira do Sul, RS, Brasil
Vegetation and regeneration mechanisms in a seasonal deciduous riparian forest fragment, Cachoeira do Sul, RS, Brazil
title Vegetação e mecanismos de regeneração em fragmento de floresta estacional decidual ripária, Cachoeira do Sul, RS, Brasil
spellingShingle Vegetação e mecanismos de regeneração em fragmento de floresta estacional decidual ripária, Cachoeira do Sul, RS, Brasil
Araujo, Maristela Machado
Floresta ripária
Análise de cluster
Fluxo de sementes
Banco de sementes do solo
Banco de plântulas
Ryparian forest
Cluster analysis
Seed rain
Seed bank
Sapling bank
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::RECURSOS FLORESTAIS E ENGENHARIA FLORESTAL
title_short Vegetação e mecanismos de regeneração em fragmento de floresta estacional decidual ripária, Cachoeira do Sul, RS, Brasil
title_full Vegetação e mecanismos de regeneração em fragmento de floresta estacional decidual ripária, Cachoeira do Sul, RS, Brasil
title_fullStr Vegetação e mecanismos de regeneração em fragmento de floresta estacional decidual ripária, Cachoeira do Sul, RS, Brasil
title_full_unstemmed Vegetação e mecanismos de regeneração em fragmento de floresta estacional decidual ripária, Cachoeira do Sul, RS, Brasil
title_sort Vegetação e mecanismos de regeneração em fragmento de floresta estacional decidual ripária, Cachoeira do Sul, RS, Brasil
author Araujo, Maristela Machado
author_facet Araujo, Maristela Machado
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Longhi, Solon Jonas
http://lattes.cnpq.br/2401814326298046
Carvalho, João Olegário Pereira de
Barros, Paulo Luis Contente de
Durlo, Miguel Antão
Brena, Doadi Antônio
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Araujo, Maristela Machado
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Floresta ripária
Análise de cluster
Fluxo de sementes
Banco de sementes do solo
Banco de plântulas
Ryparian forest
Cluster analysis
Seed rain
Seed bank
Sapling bank
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::RECURSOS FLORESTAIS E ENGENHARIA FLORESTAL
topic Floresta ripária
Análise de cluster
Fluxo de sementes
Banco de sementes do solo
Banco de plântulas
Ryparian forest
Cluster analysis
Seed rain
Seed bank
Sapling bank
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::RECURSOS FLORESTAIS E ENGENHARIA FLORESTAL
description Riparian forests are complex ecosystems closely associated with river dynamics and occurring under particular phytogeographic conditions. In the state of Rio Grande do Sul, these forests have been altered and fragmented by human activity. The objective of this study is to analyze the structure and floristic composition of these forests and their regeneration mechanisms (seedling bank, seed rain, and soil seed bank). The study site is a 4 ha fragment located in the municipality of Cachoeira do Sul-RS, low River Jacuí (30o04’36”S; 52o53’09”W). The vegetation was inventoried using strips about 10 m wide that were laid out perpendicular to the river and separated by 50 meters. The strips were divided into 10 x 10 m plots. Within each plot I identified and measured circumference and height of all individuals with girth breast height- GBH15 cm (Classe I). Lianas were also measured, but were identified only according to life form. Species density data were entered into a matrix (70 x 42) that was used in multivariate analysis. The presence of vegetation clustering at the interior of the fragment was tested with TWINSPAN (Two-way indicator species analysis), which identified the existence of three forest subformations (S-F1, S-F2 e S-F3). S-F1 was characterized by a higher influence of flooding and the ground water table was closer to the surface; S-F2 occurred in the central part of the fragment, but presented a strong influence from flooding and inundation; and S-F3, also in the central part of the fragment, experienced the greatest influence from the ground water table. The indicator species of the three forest formations were Sebastiania commersoniana and Eugenia uniflora (S-F1); Gymnanthes concolor, Cupania vernalis and Seguieria aculeata (S-F2); and Casearia sylvestris and Allophylus edulis (S-F3). To evaluate if the regeneration mechanisms also exhibited differences according to the forest formations, and to identify the most effective regeneration process in the ecosystem, I used a different methodology for each mechanism. The seedling bank was sampled in sub-plots 1 x 4 m, placed within 27 plots of Class I, and individuals with height ≥ 20 cm and CBH < 15 cm were identified and measured. Statistical analysis showed that S-F1 was significantly different from S-F2 e S-F3. Using data from two years of study, I calculated rates of mortality, recruitment and change for species in S-F1 and in the middle of the forest fragment (S-F2 and S-F3). I observed that the seedling bank of S-F1 showed lower species richness and change over time than the interior of the fragment. Seed rain was monitored over two years in 30 collectors (1 x 1 m), and I observed no significant difference in the deposition of seeds among the forest formations. However, during the first year of study seed production was higher, principally among tree species. To characterize the soil seed bank, I sampled the first 5 cm of the soil surface (litter and soil). There was no significant difference between the forest formations. Most seeds were herbaceous species, followed by trees, shrubs and lianas. This study revealed that the highest similarity occurred between the vegetation and the seedling bank, followed by vegetation and seed rain, and the least similarity occurred with the seed bank. Therefore, the seedling bank is primarily responsible for the conservation of the fragment, because it depends on seed rain that varies over time. The soil seed bank is important in the first stages after disturbance of the environment, but depends on the seed rain to be more represented qualitatively. For conservation, I suggest twenty two species and also I highly indicate for recovery riparian areas, that species occur under the girth breast height (GBH15 cm) class, and at least under two regeneration mechanism.
publishDate 2002
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2002-10-04
2022-11-25T18:27:22Z
2022-11-25T18:27:22Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/27116
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv ark:/26339/001300000p6z1
url http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/27116
identifier_str_mv ark:/26339/001300000p6z1
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Brasil
Recursos Florestais e Engenharia Florestal
UFSM
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Florestal
Centro de Ciências Rurais
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Brasil
Recursos Florestais e Engenharia Florestal
UFSM
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Florestal
Centro de Ciências Rurais
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
collection Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
repository.name.fl_str_mv Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv atendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.com
_version_ 1815172371946930176