Vegetação e mecanismos de regeneração em fragmento de floresta estacional decidual ripária, Cachoeira do Sul, RS, Brasil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2002 |
Tipo de documento: | Tese |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
dARK ID: | ark:/26339/001300000p6z1 |
Texto Completo: | http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/27116 |
Resumo: | Riparian forests are complex ecosystems closely associated with river dynamics and occurring under particular phytogeographic conditions. In the state of Rio Grande do Sul, these forests have been altered and fragmented by human activity. The objective of this study is to analyze the structure and floristic composition of these forests and their regeneration mechanisms (seedling bank, seed rain, and soil seed bank). The study site is a 4 ha fragment located in the municipality of Cachoeira do Sul-RS, low River Jacuí (30o04’36”S; 52o53’09”W). The vegetation was inventoried using strips about 10 m wide that were laid out perpendicular to the river and separated by 50 meters. The strips were divided into 10 x 10 m plots. Within each plot I identified and measured circumference and height of all individuals with girth breast height- GBH15 cm (Classe I). Lianas were also measured, but were identified only according to life form. Species density data were entered into a matrix (70 x 42) that was used in multivariate analysis. The presence of vegetation clustering at the interior of the fragment was tested with TWINSPAN (Two-way indicator species analysis), which identified the existence of three forest subformations (S-F1, S-F2 e S-F3). S-F1 was characterized by a higher influence of flooding and the ground water table was closer to the surface; S-F2 occurred in the central part of the fragment, but presented a strong influence from flooding and inundation; and S-F3, also in the central part of the fragment, experienced the greatest influence from the ground water table. The indicator species of the three forest formations were Sebastiania commersoniana and Eugenia uniflora (S-F1); Gymnanthes concolor, Cupania vernalis and Seguieria aculeata (S-F2); and Casearia sylvestris and Allophylus edulis (S-F3). To evaluate if the regeneration mechanisms also exhibited differences according to the forest formations, and to identify the most effective regeneration process in the ecosystem, I used a different methodology for each mechanism. The seedling bank was sampled in sub-plots 1 x 4 m, placed within 27 plots of Class I, and individuals with height ≥ 20 cm and CBH < 15 cm were identified and measured. Statistical analysis showed that S-F1 was significantly different from S-F2 e S-F3. Using data from two years of study, I calculated rates of mortality, recruitment and change for species in S-F1 and in the middle of the forest fragment (S-F2 and S-F3). I observed that the seedling bank of S-F1 showed lower species richness and change over time than the interior of the fragment. Seed rain was monitored over two years in 30 collectors (1 x 1 m), and I observed no significant difference in the deposition of seeds among the forest formations. However, during the first year of study seed production was higher, principally among tree species. To characterize the soil seed bank, I sampled the first 5 cm of the soil surface (litter and soil). There was no significant difference between the forest formations. Most seeds were herbaceous species, followed by trees, shrubs and lianas. This study revealed that the highest similarity occurred between the vegetation and the seedling bank, followed by vegetation and seed rain, and the least similarity occurred with the seed bank. Therefore, the seedling bank is primarily responsible for the conservation of the fragment, because it depends on seed rain that varies over time. The soil seed bank is important in the first stages after disturbance of the environment, but depends on the seed rain to be more represented qualitatively. For conservation, I suggest twenty two species and also I highly indicate for recovery riparian areas, that species occur under the girth breast height (GBH15 cm) class, and at least under two regeneration mechanism. |
id |
UFSM_ca3c7eb04eaf978558e50e867ce51127 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/27116 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSM |
network_name_str |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Vegetação e mecanismos de regeneração em fragmento de floresta estacional decidual ripária, Cachoeira do Sul, RS, BrasilVegetation and regeneration mechanisms in a seasonal deciduous riparian forest fragment, Cachoeira do Sul, RS, BrazilFloresta ripáriaAnálise de clusterFluxo de sementesBanco de sementes do soloBanco de plântulasRyparian forestCluster analysisSeed rainSeed bankSapling bankCNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::RECURSOS FLORESTAIS E ENGENHARIA FLORESTALRiparian forests are complex ecosystems closely associated with river dynamics and occurring under particular phytogeographic conditions. In the state of Rio Grande do Sul, these forests have been altered and fragmented by human activity. The objective of this study is to analyze the structure and floristic composition of these forests and their regeneration mechanisms (seedling bank, seed rain, and soil seed bank). The study site is a 4 ha fragment located in the municipality of Cachoeira do Sul-RS, low River Jacuí (30o04’36”S; 52o53’09”W). The vegetation was inventoried using strips about 10 m wide that were laid out perpendicular to the river and separated by 50 meters. The strips were divided into 10 x 10 m plots. Within each plot I identified and measured circumference and height of all individuals with girth breast height- GBH15 cm (Classe I). Lianas were also measured, but were identified only according to life form. Species density data were entered into a matrix (70 x 42) that was used in multivariate analysis. The presence of vegetation clustering at the interior of the fragment was tested with TWINSPAN (Two-way indicator species analysis), which identified the existence of three forest subformations (S-F1, S-F2 e S-F3). S-F1 was characterized by a higher influence of flooding and the ground water table was closer to the surface; S-F2 occurred in the central part of the fragment, but presented a strong influence from flooding and inundation; and S-F3, also in the central part of the fragment, experienced the greatest influence from the ground water table. The indicator species of the three forest formations were Sebastiania commersoniana and Eugenia uniflora (S-F1); Gymnanthes concolor, Cupania vernalis and Seguieria aculeata (S-F2); and Casearia sylvestris and Allophylus edulis (S-F3). To evaluate if the regeneration mechanisms also exhibited differences according to the forest formations, and to identify the most effective regeneration process in the ecosystem, I used a different methodology for each mechanism. The seedling bank was sampled in sub-plots 1 x 4 m, placed within 27 plots of Class I, and individuals with height ≥ 20 cm and CBH < 15 cm were identified and measured. Statistical analysis showed that S-F1 was significantly different from S-F2 e S-F3. Using data from two years of study, I calculated rates of mortality, recruitment and change for species in S-F1 and in the middle of the forest fragment (S-F2 and S-F3). I observed that the seedling bank of S-F1 showed lower species richness and change over time than the interior of the fragment. Seed rain was monitored over two years in 30 collectors (1 x 1 m), and I observed no significant difference in the deposition of seeds among the forest formations. However, during the first year of study seed production was higher, principally among tree species. To characterize the soil seed bank, I sampled the first 5 cm of the soil surface (litter and soil). There was no significant difference between the forest formations. Most seeds were herbaceous species, followed by trees, shrubs and lianas. This study revealed that the highest similarity occurred between the vegetation and the seedling bank, followed by vegetation and seed rain, and the least similarity occurred with the seed bank. Therefore, the seedling bank is primarily responsible for the conservation of the fragment, because it depends on seed rain that varies over time. The soil seed bank is important in the first stages after disturbance of the environment, but depends on the seed rain to be more represented qualitatively. For conservation, I suggest twenty two species and also I highly indicate for recovery riparian areas, that species occur under the girth breast height (GBH15 cm) class, and at least under two regeneration mechanism.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESAs florestas ripárias são ecossistemas complexos, associados à região fitogeográfica que ocorrem e à dinâmica dos rios. No Estado do Rio Grande do Sul, encontram-se alteradas pela ação antrópica, formando fragmentos. O estudo teve como objetivo analisar a estrutura e florística interna destas florestas e seus mecanismos de regeneração (banco de plântulas, fluxo de sementes e banco de sementes do solo). A área escolhida foi um fragmento (30o04’36”S; 52o53’09”W), de 4 ha, localizada no município de Cachoeira do Sul, RS, Baixo Rio Jacuí. A vegetação foi inventariada, utilizando-se faixas perpendiculares ao rio, distanciadas por 50 m, as quais apresentaram 10 m de largura e comprimento que variou com a largura da floresta. As faixas foram divididas em unidades amostrais de 10x10 m, onde foram identificados indivíduos com CAP15 cm (Classe I), registrados os valores de circunferência e altura. As lianas também tiveram circunferências medidas, mas identificadas somente quanto à forma de vida. Os dados de densidade por espécie formaram uma matriz (70x42) utilizada na análise multivariada. A presença de agrupamento de vegetação no interior do fragmento foi testada pelo TWINSPAN (Two-way indicator species analysis), a partir do qual foi constatada a existência de três sub-formações florestais (S-F1, S-F2 e S-F3). A S-F1 foi caracterizada por ter maior influência das enchentes e lençol freático mais próximo da superfície, S-F2 ocorreu na parte central do fragmento, mas apresentou forte influência dos extravasamentos e enchentes; e na S-F3, também na porção central, ocorreu maior influência do lençol freático. As espécies indicadoras das formações foram: Sebastiania commersoniana e Eugenia uniflora (S-F1); Gymnanthes concolor, Cupania vernalis e Seguieria aculeata (S-F2); e Casearia sylvestris e Allophylus edulis (S-F3). Para avaliar se os mecanismos de regeneração também apresentaram diferença, conforme as formações, e verificar qual era o mais efetivo no processo de regeneração do ecossistema, utilizou-se metodologia apropriada para cada um desses. O banco de plântulas foi amostrado em subunidades de 1x4 m, locados em 27 unidades da Classe I, onde os indivíduos com altura igual ou maior de 20 cm e CAP<15 cm foram identificados e medidos. A análise estatística mostrou que quantitativamente havia diferença significativa da S-F1 em relação a S-F2 e S-F3. Posteriormente, utilizando dados obtidos em dois anos de estudo, foi verificadas a taxa de mortalidade, recrutamento e mudança das espécies da S-F1 e do meio da floresta (S-F2 e S-F3). Nesta análise, observou-se que o banco de plântulas na S-F1 apresentou menor riqueza florística e mudança do que no meio. No fluxo de sementes que foi avaliado a partir da disposição de 30 coletores de 1x1m, monitorado durante dois anos, observou-se que não houve diferença significativa na deposição de sementes nas formações. Porém, o primeiro ano de estudo apresentou uma produção de sementes bem maior, principalmente, de espécies arbóreas. O estudo do banco de sementes do solo, mediante a coleta de 5 cm de amostra da superfície do solo (serapilheira e solo), mostrou não haver diferença significativa entre as formações. Este apresentou maior proporção de espécies herbáceas, seguido de árvores, arbustos e lianas. Considerando vegetação e mecanismos de regeneração, constatou-se que a maior similaridade ocorreu entre a vegetação e banco de plântulas, seguido por vegetação e fluxo de sementes e as menores estiveram associadas ao banco de sementes do solo. Contudo, constatou-se que o banco de plântulas é o principal responsável pela conservação do fragmento, sendo dependente do fluxo de sementes, que apresentou variação temporal. O banco de sementes do solo é importante no primeiro momento após a alteração do ambiente, mas depende do fluxo de sementes para ser mais bem representado qualitativamente. Vinte e duas espécies são fundamentais para a conservação podendo ser indicadas para recuperação destas áreas, considerando sua presença na vegetação com CAP 15cm e em pelo menos dois mecanismos de regeneração.Universidade Federal de Santa MariaBrasilRecursos Florestais e Engenharia FlorestalUFSMPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia FlorestalCentro de Ciências RuraisLonghi, Solon Jonashttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2401814326298046Carvalho, João Olegário Pereira deBarros, Paulo Luis Contente deDurlo, Miguel AntãoBrena, Doadi AntônioAraujo, Maristela Machado2022-11-25T18:27:22Z2022-11-25T18:27:22Z2002-10-04info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisapplication/pdfhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/27116ark:/26339/001300000p6z1porAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM2022-11-25T18:27:22Zoai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/27116Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/ONGhttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestatendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.comopendoar:2022-11-25T18:27:22Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Vegetação e mecanismos de regeneração em fragmento de floresta estacional decidual ripária, Cachoeira do Sul, RS, Brasil Vegetation and regeneration mechanisms in a seasonal deciduous riparian forest fragment, Cachoeira do Sul, RS, Brazil |
title |
Vegetação e mecanismos de regeneração em fragmento de floresta estacional decidual ripária, Cachoeira do Sul, RS, Brasil |
spellingShingle |
Vegetação e mecanismos de regeneração em fragmento de floresta estacional decidual ripária, Cachoeira do Sul, RS, Brasil Araujo, Maristela Machado Floresta ripária Análise de cluster Fluxo de sementes Banco de sementes do solo Banco de plântulas Ryparian forest Cluster analysis Seed rain Seed bank Sapling bank CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::RECURSOS FLORESTAIS E ENGENHARIA FLORESTAL |
title_short |
Vegetação e mecanismos de regeneração em fragmento de floresta estacional decidual ripária, Cachoeira do Sul, RS, Brasil |
title_full |
Vegetação e mecanismos de regeneração em fragmento de floresta estacional decidual ripária, Cachoeira do Sul, RS, Brasil |
title_fullStr |
Vegetação e mecanismos de regeneração em fragmento de floresta estacional decidual ripária, Cachoeira do Sul, RS, Brasil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Vegetação e mecanismos de regeneração em fragmento de floresta estacional decidual ripária, Cachoeira do Sul, RS, Brasil |
title_sort |
Vegetação e mecanismos de regeneração em fragmento de floresta estacional decidual ripária, Cachoeira do Sul, RS, Brasil |
author |
Araujo, Maristela Machado |
author_facet |
Araujo, Maristela Machado |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Longhi, Solon Jonas http://lattes.cnpq.br/2401814326298046 Carvalho, João Olegário Pereira de Barros, Paulo Luis Contente de Durlo, Miguel Antão Brena, Doadi Antônio |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Araujo, Maristela Machado |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Floresta ripária Análise de cluster Fluxo de sementes Banco de sementes do solo Banco de plântulas Ryparian forest Cluster analysis Seed rain Seed bank Sapling bank CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::RECURSOS FLORESTAIS E ENGENHARIA FLORESTAL |
topic |
Floresta ripária Análise de cluster Fluxo de sementes Banco de sementes do solo Banco de plântulas Ryparian forest Cluster analysis Seed rain Seed bank Sapling bank CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::RECURSOS FLORESTAIS E ENGENHARIA FLORESTAL |
description |
Riparian forests are complex ecosystems closely associated with river dynamics and occurring under particular phytogeographic conditions. In the state of Rio Grande do Sul, these forests have been altered and fragmented by human activity. The objective of this study is to analyze the structure and floristic composition of these forests and their regeneration mechanisms (seedling bank, seed rain, and soil seed bank). The study site is a 4 ha fragment located in the municipality of Cachoeira do Sul-RS, low River Jacuí (30o04’36”S; 52o53’09”W). The vegetation was inventoried using strips about 10 m wide that were laid out perpendicular to the river and separated by 50 meters. The strips were divided into 10 x 10 m plots. Within each plot I identified and measured circumference and height of all individuals with girth breast height- GBH15 cm (Classe I). Lianas were also measured, but were identified only according to life form. Species density data were entered into a matrix (70 x 42) that was used in multivariate analysis. The presence of vegetation clustering at the interior of the fragment was tested with TWINSPAN (Two-way indicator species analysis), which identified the existence of three forest subformations (S-F1, S-F2 e S-F3). S-F1 was characterized by a higher influence of flooding and the ground water table was closer to the surface; S-F2 occurred in the central part of the fragment, but presented a strong influence from flooding and inundation; and S-F3, also in the central part of the fragment, experienced the greatest influence from the ground water table. The indicator species of the three forest formations were Sebastiania commersoniana and Eugenia uniflora (S-F1); Gymnanthes concolor, Cupania vernalis and Seguieria aculeata (S-F2); and Casearia sylvestris and Allophylus edulis (S-F3). To evaluate if the regeneration mechanisms also exhibited differences according to the forest formations, and to identify the most effective regeneration process in the ecosystem, I used a different methodology for each mechanism. The seedling bank was sampled in sub-plots 1 x 4 m, placed within 27 plots of Class I, and individuals with height ≥ 20 cm and CBH < 15 cm were identified and measured. Statistical analysis showed that S-F1 was significantly different from S-F2 e S-F3. Using data from two years of study, I calculated rates of mortality, recruitment and change for species in S-F1 and in the middle of the forest fragment (S-F2 and S-F3). I observed that the seedling bank of S-F1 showed lower species richness and change over time than the interior of the fragment. Seed rain was monitored over two years in 30 collectors (1 x 1 m), and I observed no significant difference in the deposition of seeds among the forest formations. However, during the first year of study seed production was higher, principally among tree species. To characterize the soil seed bank, I sampled the first 5 cm of the soil surface (litter and soil). There was no significant difference between the forest formations. Most seeds were herbaceous species, followed by trees, shrubs and lianas. This study revealed that the highest similarity occurred between the vegetation and the seedling bank, followed by vegetation and seed rain, and the least similarity occurred with the seed bank. Therefore, the seedling bank is primarily responsible for the conservation of the fragment, because it depends on seed rain that varies over time. The soil seed bank is important in the first stages after disturbance of the environment, but depends on the seed rain to be more represented qualitatively. For conservation, I suggest twenty two species and also I highly indicate for recovery riparian areas, that species occur under the girth breast height (GBH15 cm) class, and at least under two regeneration mechanism. |
publishDate |
2002 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2002-10-04 2022-11-25T18:27:22Z 2022-11-25T18:27:22Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
format |
doctoralThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/27116 |
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv |
ark:/26339/001300000p6z1 |
url |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/27116 |
identifier_str_mv |
ark:/26339/001300000p6z1 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Brasil Recursos Florestais e Engenharia Florestal UFSM Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Florestal Centro de Ciências Rurais |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Brasil Recursos Florestais e Engenharia Florestal UFSM Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Florestal Centro de Ciências Rurais |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) instacron:UFSM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
instacron_str |
UFSM |
institution |
UFSM |
reponame_str |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
collection |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
atendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1815172371946930176 |