Impactos dos sistemas de produção e debicagem na produção e qualidade de ovos de poedeiras

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Kuhn, Micheli Faccin
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/17898
Resumo: The production of eggs in conventional cages has been strongly questioned as to the welfare provided to the animals; this system could cause physical discomfort and inhibit the manifestation of natural behaviors. In this way alternative systems have emerged, which aim to improve the welfare of animals in the production system. Faced with this, one of the major challenges is to establish which of the production systems provides an adequate level of animal welfare, since no system meets all welfare requirements unless the animal is in freedom. The experiment was conducted in two experimental aviaries located in the Poultry Laboratory of the Federal University of Santa Maria. The objective of this study was to compare the performance and egg quality of laying hens, housed in conventional cages and in a floor (wood shaving was used as litter). The experiment used a total of 528 laying hens, Isa Brown line, 21 weeks old, distributed in a completely randomized design, with 4 treatments in a 2 x 2 factorial scheme (2 housing systems x 2 types of beak trimming), with 6 replicates of 22 birds each. The birds were divided into two groups, maintained in different housing systems (conventional cage versus floor with wood shaving litter), productive performance was counted daily from 21 to 40 weeks. This period was divided in five periods of 28 days each; period I (21st – 24th wks of age), II (25th – 28th wks of age), III (29th – 32nd wks of age), IV (33rd – 36th wks of age) and V (37th – 40th wks of age). The birds kept on the ground had better egg laying rates in periods I, II, III and IV and had heavier eggs in all periods than eggs produced by cage birds (P<0.0001). In all periods, it was observed that egg yolks had higher weights than the others (P<0.05). In periods I, II, III and IV, hens housed on the ground presented higher albumen weight (P<0.0001). The birds kept in the cage had worse warping conditions of the neck and tail regions (P<0.0001). The host system influenced the presence of intestinal parasites of the genus Raillietina, where it was observed that birds housed in the ground had a high incidence of them (P<0.0001). Birds kept in different productive systems and beak trimming did not have foot lesions (P>0.05). The debiting did not influence egg quality (P>0.05). Birds free of cages produced more eggs. Birds submitted to different systems and beak trimming produced eggs of the same quality. The housing system had no effect on contamination by Salmonella spp., Enterobacteria and total coliforms. The cage - free birds presented parasitic contamination with helminths of the genus Raillietina.
id UFSM_e86319259380fa88ac130bb2fb28629f
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/17898
network_acronym_str UFSM
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM
repository_id_str
spelling 2019-08-12T15:53:41Z2019-08-12T15:53:41Z2019-03-15http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/17898The production of eggs in conventional cages has been strongly questioned as to the welfare provided to the animals; this system could cause physical discomfort and inhibit the manifestation of natural behaviors. In this way alternative systems have emerged, which aim to improve the welfare of animals in the production system. Faced with this, one of the major challenges is to establish which of the production systems provides an adequate level of animal welfare, since no system meets all welfare requirements unless the animal is in freedom. The experiment was conducted in two experimental aviaries located in the Poultry Laboratory of the Federal University of Santa Maria. The objective of this study was to compare the performance and egg quality of laying hens, housed in conventional cages and in a floor (wood shaving was used as litter). The experiment used a total of 528 laying hens, Isa Brown line, 21 weeks old, distributed in a completely randomized design, with 4 treatments in a 2 x 2 factorial scheme (2 housing systems x 2 types of beak trimming), with 6 replicates of 22 birds each. The birds were divided into two groups, maintained in different housing systems (conventional cage versus floor with wood shaving litter), productive performance was counted daily from 21 to 40 weeks. This period was divided in five periods of 28 days each; period I (21st – 24th wks of age), II (25th – 28th wks of age), III (29th – 32nd wks of age), IV (33rd – 36th wks of age) and V (37th – 40th wks of age). The birds kept on the ground had better egg laying rates in periods I, II, III and IV and had heavier eggs in all periods than eggs produced by cage birds (P<0.0001). In all periods, it was observed that egg yolks had higher weights than the others (P<0.05). In periods I, II, III and IV, hens housed on the ground presented higher albumen weight (P<0.0001). The birds kept in the cage had worse warping conditions of the neck and tail regions (P<0.0001). The host system influenced the presence of intestinal parasites of the genus Raillietina, where it was observed that birds housed in the ground had a high incidence of them (P<0.0001). Birds kept in different productive systems and beak trimming did not have foot lesions (P>0.05). The debiting did not influence egg quality (P>0.05). Birds free of cages produced more eggs. Birds submitted to different systems and beak trimming produced eggs of the same quality. The housing system had no effect on contamination by Salmonella spp., Enterobacteria and total coliforms. The cage - free birds presented parasitic contamination with helminths of the genus Raillietina.A produção de ovos, em gaiolas convencionais, tem sido fortemente questionada em relação ao bem-estar animal, sob a alegação de que este sistema causa desconforto físico e inibe a manifestação dos comportamentos naturais. Desse modo surgiram os sistemas alternativos, que visam melhorar o bem-estar de animais no sistema produtivo. Diante disso, torna-se um dos maiores desafios estabelecer qual dos sistemas de produção oferece um nível adequado de bem-estar para os animais, visto que nenhum sistema contempla todos os requisitos de bem-estar, a não ser que o animal esteja em liberdade. O experimento foi conduzido em dois aviários experimentais localizados no Laboratório de Avicultura da Universidade Federal de Santa Maria. O objetivo, neste trabalho, foi comparar o desempenho e qualidade de ovos de poedeiras Isa Brown, alojadas em gaiolas convencionais e em piso com cama de maravalha. O experimento utilizou 528 poedeiras da linhagem Isa Brown, iniciou 21 semanas de idade, foram distribuídas em um delineamento inteiramente casualizado, com 4 tratamentos em esquema fatorial 2 x 2 (2 sistemas de alojamento x 2 números de debicagem), com 6 repetições de 22 aves cada. As aves foram divididas em dois grupos, mantidas em diferentes sistemas de alojamento (gaiola convencional versus piso com cama de maravalha), o desempenho produtivo foi contabilizado diariamente das 21 às 40 semanas. Este período foi dividido em cinco períodos de 28 dias cada; período I (21ª – 24ª semanas), II (25ª – 28ª semanas), III (29ª – 32ª semanas), IV (33ª – 36ª semanas) e V (37ª – 40ª semanas). As aves mantidas no chão apresentaram melhores taxas de postura nos períodos I, II, III e IV e tiveram ovos mais pesados em todos os períodos, do que os ovos produzidos pelas aves de gaiola (P<0,0001). Em todos os períodos observa-se que as gemas destes ovos tiveram maiores pesos que os demais (P<0,05). Nos períodos I, II, III e IV aves alojadas no chão apresentaram maior peso de albúmen (P<0,0001). As aves mantidas na gaiola tiveram pior condição de empenamento das regiões do pescoço e cauda (P<0,0001). O sistema de alojamento influenciou a presença de parasitas intestinais do gênero Raillietina, onde observou-se que aves alojadas no chão tiveram grande incidência dos mesmos (P<0,0001). Aves mantidas em diferentes sistemas produtivos e debicagens não tiveram lesões de pé (P>0,05). A debicagem não influenciou na qualidade de ovos (P>0,05). As aves livres de gaiolas produziram mais ovos. Aves submetidas aos diferentes sistemas e debicagens produziram ovos com a mesma qualidade. O sistema de alojamento não teve efeito na contaminação por Salmonella spp., enterobactérias e coliformes totais. As aves livres de gaiola apresentaram contaminação parasitária com helmintos do gênero Raillietina.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico - CNPqporUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaCentro de Ciências RuraisPrograma de Pós-Graduação em ZootecniaUFSMBrasilZootecniaAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGaiolas convencionaisLivres de gaiolaDesempenhoQualidade de ovosPoedeirasCageCage-freePerformanceEgg qualityLaying hensCNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ZOOTECNIAImpactos dos sistemas de produção e debicagem na produção e qualidade de ovos de poedeirasImpacts of production and beak-trimming systems on egg production and quality of laying hensinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisRosa, Alexandre Pireshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/5343585494040314Stefanello, Catarinahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/1004217874825544Giacomini, Camila Borba Santoshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6778244967497480http://lattes.cnpq.br/3997528272914712Kuhn, Micheli Faccin50040000000260017f71f10-d0a7-45fc-b0cd-f3e798dfeaa4a2ffea1a-4888-4d50-8fb1-cb9469388df5207c625c-94f2-45ac-9226-4d3744dc8d25340224b9-8383-4dc0-95a3-f8ad3a14a84freponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMCC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8805http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/17898/2/license_rdf4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81956http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/17898/3/license.txt2f0571ecee68693bd5cd3f17c1e075dfMD53ORIGINALDIS_PPGZOOTECNIA_2019_KUHN_MICHELI.pdfDIS_PPGZOOTECNIA_2019_KUHN_MICHELI.pdfDissertação de Mestradoapplication/pdf1050336http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/17898/1/DIS_PPGZOOTECNIA_2019_KUHN_MICHELI.pdf702cd61ba53d4bc61a1082a93cc601fcMD51TEXTDIS_PPGZOOTECNIA_2019_KUHN_MICHELI.pdf.txtDIS_PPGZOOTECNIA_2019_KUHN_MICHELI.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain126410http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/17898/4/DIS_PPGZOOTECNIA_2019_KUHN_MICHELI.pdf.txtc94262173ebf83633f4acfd92916bd71MD54THUMBNAILDIS_PPGZOOTECNIA_2019_KUHN_MICHELI.pdf.jpgDIS_PPGZOOTECNIA_2019_KUHN_MICHELI.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg4228http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/17898/5/DIS_PPGZOOTECNIA_2019_KUHN_MICHELI.pdf.jpgf9c7df54fb479f6b444d63b29ed4683dMD551/178982019-08-13 03:02:40.619oai:repositorio.ufsm.br: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 Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/ONGhttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestatendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.comopendoar:2019-08-13T06:02:40Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Impactos dos sistemas de produção e debicagem na produção e qualidade de ovos de poedeiras
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv Impacts of production and beak-trimming systems on egg production and quality of laying hens
title Impactos dos sistemas de produção e debicagem na produção e qualidade de ovos de poedeiras
spellingShingle Impactos dos sistemas de produção e debicagem na produção e qualidade de ovos de poedeiras
Kuhn, Micheli Faccin
Gaiolas convencionais
Livres de gaiola
Desempenho
Qualidade de ovos
Poedeiras
Cage
Cage-free
Performance
Egg quality
Laying hens
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ZOOTECNIA
title_short Impactos dos sistemas de produção e debicagem na produção e qualidade de ovos de poedeiras
title_full Impactos dos sistemas de produção e debicagem na produção e qualidade de ovos de poedeiras
title_fullStr Impactos dos sistemas de produção e debicagem na produção e qualidade de ovos de poedeiras
title_full_unstemmed Impactos dos sistemas de produção e debicagem na produção e qualidade de ovos de poedeiras
title_sort Impactos dos sistemas de produção e debicagem na produção e qualidade de ovos de poedeiras
author Kuhn, Micheli Faccin
author_facet Kuhn, Micheli Faccin
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Rosa, Alexandre Pires
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/5343585494040314
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv Stefanello, Catarina
dc.contributor.referee1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/1004217874825544
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv Giacomini, Camila Borba Santos
dc.contributor.referee2Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/6778244967497480
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/3997528272914712
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Kuhn, Micheli Faccin
contributor_str_mv Rosa, Alexandre Pires
Stefanello, Catarina
Giacomini, Camila Borba Santos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Gaiolas convencionais
Livres de gaiola
Desempenho
Qualidade de ovos
Poedeiras
topic Gaiolas convencionais
Livres de gaiola
Desempenho
Qualidade de ovos
Poedeiras
Cage
Cage-free
Performance
Egg quality
Laying hens
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ZOOTECNIA
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Cage
Cage-free
Performance
Egg quality
Laying hens
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ZOOTECNIA
description The production of eggs in conventional cages has been strongly questioned as to the welfare provided to the animals; this system could cause physical discomfort and inhibit the manifestation of natural behaviors. In this way alternative systems have emerged, which aim to improve the welfare of animals in the production system. Faced with this, one of the major challenges is to establish which of the production systems provides an adequate level of animal welfare, since no system meets all welfare requirements unless the animal is in freedom. The experiment was conducted in two experimental aviaries located in the Poultry Laboratory of the Federal University of Santa Maria. The objective of this study was to compare the performance and egg quality of laying hens, housed in conventional cages and in a floor (wood shaving was used as litter). The experiment used a total of 528 laying hens, Isa Brown line, 21 weeks old, distributed in a completely randomized design, with 4 treatments in a 2 x 2 factorial scheme (2 housing systems x 2 types of beak trimming), with 6 replicates of 22 birds each. The birds were divided into two groups, maintained in different housing systems (conventional cage versus floor with wood shaving litter), productive performance was counted daily from 21 to 40 weeks. This period was divided in five periods of 28 days each; period I (21st – 24th wks of age), II (25th – 28th wks of age), III (29th – 32nd wks of age), IV (33rd – 36th wks of age) and V (37th – 40th wks of age). The birds kept on the ground had better egg laying rates in periods I, II, III and IV and had heavier eggs in all periods than eggs produced by cage birds (P<0.0001). In all periods, it was observed that egg yolks had higher weights than the others (P<0.05). In periods I, II, III and IV, hens housed on the ground presented higher albumen weight (P<0.0001). The birds kept in the cage had worse warping conditions of the neck and tail regions (P<0.0001). The host system influenced the presence of intestinal parasites of the genus Raillietina, where it was observed that birds housed in the ground had a high incidence of them (P<0.0001). Birds kept in different productive systems and beak trimming did not have foot lesions (P>0.05). The debiting did not influence egg quality (P>0.05). Birds free of cages produced more eggs. Birds submitted to different systems and beak trimming produced eggs of the same quality. The housing system had no effect on contamination by Salmonella spp., Enterobacteria and total coliforms. The cage - free birds presented parasitic contamination with helminths of the genus Raillietina.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2019-08-12T15:53:41Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2019-08-12T15:53:41Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2019-03-15
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/17898
url http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/17898
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv 500400000002
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 600
dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv 17f71f10-d0a7-45fc-b0cd-f3e798dfeaa4
a2ffea1a-4888-4d50-8fb1-cb9469388df5
207c625c-94f2-45ac-9226-4d3744dc8d25
340224b9-8383-4dc0-95a3-f8ad3a14a84f
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Centro de Ciências Rurais
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zootecnia
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFSM
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Zootecnia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Centro de Ciências Rurais
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/17898/2/license_rdf
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/17898/3/license.txt
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/17898/1/DIS_PPGZOOTECNIA_2019_KUHN_MICHELI.pdf
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/17898/4/DIS_PPGZOOTECNIA_2019_KUHN_MICHELI.pdf.txt
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/17898/5/DIS_PPGZOOTECNIA_2019_KUHN_MICHELI.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347
2f0571ecee68693bd5cd3f17c1e075df
702cd61ba53d4bc61a1082a93cc601fc
c94262173ebf83633f4acfd92916bd71
f9c7df54fb479f6b444d63b29ed4683d
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv atendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.com
_version_ 1801485283045146624