Tipos de componentes glenoidais na artroplastia total anatômica do ombro: revisão sistemática

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Zan, Renato Aroca [UNIFESP]
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Tese
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.unifesp.br/11600/67135
Resumo: Introduction: Anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty is an effective treatment adopted for patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Loosening of the glenoid component represents one of the main failure mechanisms; however, doubts remain regarding the selection of the best implant for avoiding complication. Objective: evaluate the effectiveness between exclusive polyethylene (PE) glenoid implants and metal back (MB) implants. Methods: systematic review of randomized clinical trials (RCTs), comparing PE (keeled and pegged) versus MB implants. Results: eight RCTs were included, with 323 patients and 338 shoulders, 151 men, 157 women, aged between 60 and 74 years with follow-up from six weeks to ten years. Shoulder function through the Constant-Murley score, range of motion and pain through the Visual Analogue Scale, were important outcomes to access the PE components that showed no difference; meanwhile, there was a reduction in radiolucency lines (RL) up to grade two around 50% and 12.4% for complications and surgery revisions in favor of the peg over the keel. Compared to MB, there was 25% more RL around PE, however function and complication rates were equivalent. Conclusion: the PE component in anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty, shows more RL compared to MB, especially around the keel design.
id UFSP_1fde125bea2ad784c5d5c5b7c117b9dc
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/67135
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling Zan, Renato Aroca [UNIFESP]http://lattes.cnpq.br/1547726907932109http://lattes.cnpq.br/5982439031327655http://lattes.cnpq.br/0981211406387862http://lattes.cnpq.br/6528908852030714Tamaoki, Marcel Jun Sugawara [UNIFESP]Belloti, João Carlos [UNIFESP]Matsunaga, Fábio Teruo [UNIFESP]São Paulo2023-02-24T13:49:19Z2023-02-24T13:49:19Z2022-12-14https://repositorio.unifesp.br/11600/67135Introduction: Anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty is an effective treatment adopted for patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Loosening of the glenoid component represents one of the main failure mechanisms; however, doubts remain regarding the selection of the best implant for avoiding complication. Objective: evaluate the effectiveness between exclusive polyethylene (PE) glenoid implants and metal back (MB) implants. Methods: systematic review of randomized clinical trials (RCTs), comparing PE (keeled and pegged) versus MB implants. Results: eight RCTs were included, with 323 patients and 338 shoulders, 151 men, 157 women, aged between 60 and 74 years with follow-up from six weeks to ten years. Shoulder function through the Constant-Murley score, range of motion and pain through the Visual Analogue Scale, were important outcomes to access the PE components that showed no difference; meanwhile, there was a reduction in radiolucency lines (RL) up to grade two around 50% and 12.4% for complications and surgery revisions in favor of the peg over the keel. Compared to MB, there was 25% more RL around PE, however function and complication rates were equivalent. Conclusion: the PE component in anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty, shows more RL compared to MB, especially around the keel design.Introdução: a Artroplastia Total Anatômica do Ombro (ATO) é realizada nos pacientes portadores de osteoartrite da articulação do ombro em estágios mais graves ou na falha do tratamento conservador. Soltura do componente glenoidal representa um dos principais mecanismos de falha; contudo permanecem dúvidas quanto à seleção do melhor implante. Objetivo: avaliar a efetividade entre os implantes glenoidais exclusivos em polietileno (PE) e os implantes com metal back (MB). Métodos: revisão sistemática de ensaios clínicos randomizados (ECR), comparando os implantes de PE (keel e peg) com os de MB. Resultados: incluídos oito ECR, com 323 pacientes e 338 ombros, 151 homens, 157 mulheres, idade entre 60 e 74 anos e seguimento entre seis semanas a dez anos. Na comparação dos componentes em PE, o desfecho clínico por meio do escore de Constant – Murley, amplitude de movimento e dor por meio da Escala Visual Analógica, não mostraram diferença, porém, houve redução na formação de linhas de radioluscência (LRL) em torno de 50% para os graus até um ou dois e 12,4% nas complicações e revisões de cirurgia a favor do peg sobre o keel. Comparando com MB, houve 25% mais incidência de LRL ao redor dos PE, contudo a função e as taxas de complicações foram equivalentes. Conclusão: o componente em PE nas ATO, apresenta mais LRL comparado ao implante glenoidal em MB, em especial ao redor do modelo keel.183 f.porUniversidade Federal de São PauloArtroplastiaOmbroRevisão sistemáticaMetanáliseAdultosTipos de componentes glenoidais na artroplastia total anatômica do ombro: revisão sistemáticaGlenoid component types in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: systematic reviewinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESPEscola Paulista de Medicina (EPM)Cirurgia TranslacionalQualidade como método de avaliaçãoMedicina baseada em evidênciasTEXTtese final 2022.1.pdf:a.pdf.txttese final 2022.1.pdf:a.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain317626${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/67135/6/tese%20final%202022.1.pdf%3aa.pdf.txt5fb8b073f225d6a0d663371a0f7e2490MD56open accessTHUMBNAILtese final 2022.1.pdf:a.pdf.jpgtese final 2022.1.pdf:a.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg3689${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/67135/8/tese%20final%202022.1.pdf%3aa.pdf.jpg16583ed7861aaad52f6388142d7e7f38MD58open accessLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-85836${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/67135/2/license.txt182a435782f3dc25d31113bee8953ec7MD52open accessORIGINALtese final 2022.1.pdf:a.pdftese final 2022.1.pdf:a.pdftese finalapplication/pdf3479767${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/67135/1/tese%20final%202022.1.pdf%3aa.pdf418d55322d6252c925676efd31ff1f1dMD51open access11600/671352023-11-09 01:02:50.173open accessoai:repositorio.unifesp.br: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Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:34652023-11-09T04:02:50Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Tipos de componentes glenoidais na artroplastia total anatômica do ombro: revisão sistemática
dc.title.alternative.en.fl_str_mv Glenoid component types in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: systematic review
title Tipos de componentes glenoidais na artroplastia total anatômica do ombro: revisão sistemática
spellingShingle Tipos de componentes glenoidais na artroplastia total anatômica do ombro: revisão sistemática
Zan, Renato Aroca [UNIFESP]
Artroplastia
Ombro
Revisão sistemática
Metanálise
Adultos
title_short Tipos de componentes glenoidais na artroplastia total anatômica do ombro: revisão sistemática
title_full Tipos de componentes glenoidais na artroplastia total anatômica do ombro: revisão sistemática
title_fullStr Tipos de componentes glenoidais na artroplastia total anatômica do ombro: revisão sistemática
title_full_unstemmed Tipos de componentes glenoidais na artroplastia total anatômica do ombro: revisão sistemática
title_sort Tipos de componentes glenoidais na artroplastia total anatômica do ombro: revisão sistemática
author Zan, Renato Aroca [UNIFESP]
author_facet Zan, Renato Aroca [UNIFESP]
author_role author
dc.contributor.authorLattes.pt_BR.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/1547726907932109
dc.contributor.advisorLattes.pt_BR.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/5982439031327655
dc.contributor.advisor-coLattes.pt_BR.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/0981211406387862
http://lattes.cnpq.br/6528908852030714
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Zan, Renato Aroca [UNIFESP]
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Tamaoki, Marcel Jun Sugawara [UNIFESP]
dc.contributor.advisor-co1.fl_str_mv Belloti, João Carlos [UNIFESP]
Matsunaga, Fábio Teruo [UNIFESP]
contributor_str_mv Tamaoki, Marcel Jun Sugawara [UNIFESP]
Belloti, João Carlos [UNIFESP]
Matsunaga, Fábio Teruo [UNIFESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Artroplastia
Ombro
Revisão sistemática
Metanálise
Adultos
topic Artroplastia
Ombro
Revisão sistemática
Metanálise
Adultos
description Introduction: Anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty is an effective treatment adopted for patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Loosening of the glenoid component represents one of the main failure mechanisms; however, doubts remain regarding the selection of the best implant for avoiding complication. Objective: evaluate the effectiveness between exclusive polyethylene (PE) glenoid implants and metal back (MB) implants. Methods: systematic review of randomized clinical trials (RCTs), comparing PE (keeled and pegged) versus MB implants. Results: eight RCTs were included, with 323 patients and 338 shoulders, 151 men, 157 women, aged between 60 and 74 years with follow-up from six weeks to ten years. Shoulder function through the Constant-Murley score, range of motion and pain through the Visual Analogue Scale, were important outcomes to access the PE components that showed no difference; meanwhile, there was a reduction in radiolucency lines (RL) up to grade two around 50% and 12.4% for complications and surgery revisions in favor of the peg over the keel. Compared to MB, there was 25% more RL around PE, however function and complication rates were equivalent. Conclusion: the PE component in anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty, shows more RL compared to MB, especially around the keel design.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2022-12-14
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2023-02-24T13:49:19Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2023-02-24T13:49:19Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.unifesp.br/11600/67135
url https://repositorio.unifesp.br/11600/67135
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 183 f.
dc.coverage.spatial.pt_BR.fl_str_mv São Paulo
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv ${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/67135/6/tese%20final%202022.1.pdf%3aa.pdf.txt
${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/67135/8/tese%20final%202022.1.pdf%3aa.pdf.jpg
${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/67135/2/license.txt
${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/67135/1/tese%20final%202022.1.pdf%3aa.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 5fb8b073f225d6a0d663371a0f7e2490
16583ed7861aaad52f6388142d7e7f38
182a435782f3dc25d31113bee8953ec7
418d55322d6252c925676efd31ff1f1d
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1802764188769058816