Tipos de componentes glenoidais na artroplastia total anatômica do ombro: revisão sistemática
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Tese |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
Texto Completo: | https://repositorio.unifesp.br/11600/67135 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty is an effective treatment adopted for patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Loosening of the glenoid component represents one of the main failure mechanisms; however, doubts remain regarding the selection of the best implant for avoiding complication. Objective: evaluate the effectiveness between exclusive polyethylene (PE) glenoid implants and metal back (MB) implants. Methods: systematic review of randomized clinical trials (RCTs), comparing PE (keeled and pegged) versus MB implants. Results: eight RCTs were included, with 323 patients and 338 shoulders, 151 men, 157 women, aged between 60 and 74 years with follow-up from six weeks to ten years. Shoulder function through the Constant-Murley score, range of motion and pain through the Visual Analogue Scale, were important outcomes to access the PE components that showed no difference; meanwhile, there was a reduction in radiolucency lines (RL) up to grade two around 50% and 12.4% for complications and surgery revisions in favor of the peg over the keel. Compared to MB, there was 25% more RL around PE, however function and complication rates were equivalent. Conclusion: the PE component in anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty, shows more RL compared to MB, especially around the keel design. |
id |
UFSP_1fde125bea2ad784c5d5c5b7c117b9dc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/67135 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository_id_str |
3465 |
spelling |
Zan, Renato Aroca [UNIFESP]http://lattes.cnpq.br/1547726907932109http://lattes.cnpq.br/5982439031327655http://lattes.cnpq.br/0981211406387862http://lattes.cnpq.br/6528908852030714Tamaoki, Marcel Jun Sugawara [UNIFESP]Belloti, João Carlos [UNIFESP]Matsunaga, Fábio Teruo [UNIFESP]São Paulo2023-02-24T13:49:19Z2023-02-24T13:49:19Z2022-12-14https://repositorio.unifesp.br/11600/67135Introduction: Anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty is an effective treatment adopted for patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Loosening of the glenoid component represents one of the main failure mechanisms; however, doubts remain regarding the selection of the best implant for avoiding complication. Objective: evaluate the effectiveness between exclusive polyethylene (PE) glenoid implants and metal back (MB) implants. Methods: systematic review of randomized clinical trials (RCTs), comparing PE (keeled and pegged) versus MB implants. Results: eight RCTs were included, with 323 patients and 338 shoulders, 151 men, 157 women, aged between 60 and 74 years with follow-up from six weeks to ten years. Shoulder function through the Constant-Murley score, range of motion and pain through the Visual Analogue Scale, were important outcomes to access the PE components that showed no difference; meanwhile, there was a reduction in radiolucency lines (RL) up to grade two around 50% and 12.4% for complications and surgery revisions in favor of the peg over the keel. Compared to MB, there was 25% more RL around PE, however function and complication rates were equivalent. Conclusion: the PE component in anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty, shows more RL compared to MB, especially around the keel design.Introdução: a Artroplastia Total Anatômica do Ombro (ATO) é realizada nos pacientes portadores de osteoartrite da articulação do ombro em estágios mais graves ou na falha do tratamento conservador. Soltura do componente glenoidal representa um dos principais mecanismos de falha; contudo permanecem dúvidas quanto à seleção do melhor implante. Objetivo: avaliar a efetividade entre os implantes glenoidais exclusivos em polietileno (PE) e os implantes com metal back (MB). Métodos: revisão sistemática de ensaios clínicos randomizados (ECR), comparando os implantes de PE (keel e peg) com os de MB. Resultados: incluídos oito ECR, com 323 pacientes e 338 ombros, 151 homens, 157 mulheres, idade entre 60 e 74 anos e seguimento entre seis semanas a dez anos. Na comparação dos componentes em PE, o desfecho clínico por meio do escore de Constant – Murley, amplitude de movimento e dor por meio da Escala Visual Analógica, não mostraram diferença, porém, houve redução na formação de linhas de radioluscência (LRL) em torno de 50% para os graus até um ou dois e 12,4% nas complicações e revisões de cirurgia a favor do peg sobre o keel. Comparando com MB, houve 25% mais incidência de LRL ao redor dos PE, contudo a função e as taxas de complicações foram equivalentes. Conclusão: o componente em PE nas ATO, apresenta mais LRL comparado ao implante glenoidal em MB, em especial ao redor do modelo keel.183 f.porUniversidade Federal de São PauloArtroplastiaOmbroRevisão sistemáticaMetanáliseAdultosTipos de componentes glenoidais na artroplastia total anatômica do ombro: revisão sistemáticaGlenoid component types in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: systematic reviewinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESPEscola Paulista de Medicina (EPM)Cirurgia TranslacionalQualidade como método de avaliaçãoMedicina baseada em evidênciasTEXTtese final 2022.1.pdf:a.pdf.txttese final 2022.1.pdf:a.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain317626${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/67135/6/tese%20final%202022.1.pdf%3aa.pdf.txt5fb8b073f225d6a0d663371a0f7e2490MD56open accessTHUMBNAILtese final 2022.1.pdf:a.pdf.jpgtese final 2022.1.pdf:a.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg3689${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/67135/8/tese%20final%202022.1.pdf%3aa.pdf.jpg16583ed7861aaad52f6388142d7e7f38MD58open accessLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-85836${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/67135/2/license.txt182a435782f3dc25d31113bee8953ec7MD52open accessORIGINALtese final 2022.1.pdf:a.pdftese final 2022.1.pdf:a.pdftese finalapplication/pdf3479767${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/67135/1/tese%20final%202022.1.pdf%3aa.pdf418d55322d6252c925676efd31ff1f1dMD51open access11600/671352023-11-09 01:02:50.173open accessoai:repositorio.unifesp.br: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Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:34652023-11-09T04:02:50Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Tipos de componentes glenoidais na artroplastia total anatômica do ombro: revisão sistemática |
dc.title.alternative.en.fl_str_mv |
Glenoid component types in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: systematic review |
title |
Tipos de componentes glenoidais na artroplastia total anatômica do ombro: revisão sistemática |
spellingShingle |
Tipos de componentes glenoidais na artroplastia total anatômica do ombro: revisão sistemática Zan, Renato Aroca [UNIFESP] Artroplastia Ombro Revisão sistemática Metanálise Adultos |
title_short |
Tipos de componentes glenoidais na artroplastia total anatômica do ombro: revisão sistemática |
title_full |
Tipos de componentes glenoidais na artroplastia total anatômica do ombro: revisão sistemática |
title_fullStr |
Tipos de componentes glenoidais na artroplastia total anatômica do ombro: revisão sistemática |
title_full_unstemmed |
Tipos de componentes glenoidais na artroplastia total anatômica do ombro: revisão sistemática |
title_sort |
Tipos de componentes glenoidais na artroplastia total anatômica do ombro: revisão sistemática |
author |
Zan, Renato Aroca [UNIFESP] |
author_facet |
Zan, Renato Aroca [UNIFESP] |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/1547726907932109 |
dc.contributor.advisorLattes.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/5982439031327655 |
dc.contributor.advisor-coLattes.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/0981211406387862 http://lattes.cnpq.br/6528908852030714 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Zan, Renato Aroca [UNIFESP] |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Tamaoki, Marcel Jun Sugawara [UNIFESP] |
dc.contributor.advisor-co1.fl_str_mv |
Belloti, João Carlos [UNIFESP] Matsunaga, Fábio Teruo [UNIFESP] |
contributor_str_mv |
Tamaoki, Marcel Jun Sugawara [UNIFESP] Belloti, João Carlos [UNIFESP] Matsunaga, Fábio Teruo [UNIFESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Artroplastia Ombro Revisão sistemática Metanálise Adultos |
topic |
Artroplastia Ombro Revisão sistemática Metanálise Adultos |
description |
Introduction: Anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty is an effective treatment adopted for patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Loosening of the glenoid component represents one of the main failure mechanisms; however, doubts remain regarding the selection of the best implant for avoiding complication. Objective: evaluate the effectiveness between exclusive polyethylene (PE) glenoid implants and metal back (MB) implants. Methods: systematic review of randomized clinical trials (RCTs), comparing PE (keeled and pegged) versus MB implants. Results: eight RCTs were included, with 323 patients and 338 shoulders, 151 men, 157 women, aged between 60 and 74 years with follow-up from six weeks to ten years. Shoulder function through the Constant-Murley score, range of motion and pain through the Visual Analogue Scale, were important outcomes to access the PE components that showed no difference; meanwhile, there was a reduction in radiolucency lines (RL) up to grade two around 50% and 12.4% for complications and surgery revisions in favor of the peg over the keel. Compared to MB, there was 25% more RL around PE, however function and complication rates were equivalent. Conclusion: the PE component in anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty, shows more RL compared to MB, especially around the keel design. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2022-12-14 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2023-02-24T13:49:19Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2023-02-24T13:49:19Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
format |
doctoralThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.unifesp.br/11600/67135 |
url |
https://repositorio.unifesp.br/11600/67135 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
183 f. |
dc.coverage.spatial.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
São Paulo |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) instacron:UNIFESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
instacron_str |
UNIFESP |
institution |
UNIFESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/67135/6/tese%20final%202022.1.pdf%3aa.pdf.txt ${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/67135/8/tese%20final%202022.1.pdf%3aa.pdf.jpg ${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/67135/2/license.txt ${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/67135/1/tese%20final%202022.1.pdf%3aa.pdf |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
5fb8b073f225d6a0d663371a0f7e2490 16583ed7861aaad52f6388142d7e7f38 182a435782f3dc25d31113bee8953ec7 418d55322d6252c925676efd31ff1f1d |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1802764188769058816 |