Fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) for BCR/ABL in chronic myeloid leukemia after bone marrow transplantation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Chauffaille, Maria de Lourdes Lopes Ferrari [UNIFESP]
Data de Publicação: 2001
Outros Autores: Oliveira, José Salvador Rodrigues de [UNIFESP], Romeo, Maura [UNIFESP], Kerbauy, José [UNIFESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-31802001000100005
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/1095
Resumo: CONTEXT: Identification of Philadelphia chromosome or BCR/ABL gene rearrangement in chronic myeloid leukemia is important at diagnosis as well as after treatment. OBJECTIVE: To compare the results of karyotyping using fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) upon diagnosis and 1 year after bone marrow transplantation in 12 patients. TYPE OF STUDY: Diagnostic test and residual disease detection. SETTING: Hematology and Hemotherapy Department, Federal University of São Paulo/Escola Paulista de Medicina, São Paulo, Brazil. SAMPLE: 12 patients with chronic myeloid leukemia at diagnosis and 1 year after bone marrow transplantation. DIAGNOSTIC TEST: Karyotyping was done in the usual way and the BCR/ABL gene-specific probe was used for FISH. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Disease at diagnosis and residual. RESULTS: At diagnosis, 10 patients presented t(9;22)(q34.1;q11) as well as positive FISH. Two cases did not have metaphases but FISH was positive. After bone marrow transplantation, 8 patients presented normal karyotype, 1 had persistence of identifiable Philadelphia chromosome and 3 had no metaphases. Two cases showed complete chimera and 2 had donor and host cells simultaneously. FISH was possible in all cases after bone marrow transplantation and confirmed the persistence of identifiable Philadelphia chromosome clone in one patient, and identified another that did not present metaphases for analysis. Cases that showed mixed chimera in karyotype were negative for BCR/ABL by FISH. CONCLUSION: The applicability of FISH is clear, particularly for residual disease detection. Classical and molecular cytogenetics are complementary methods.
id UFSP_254221f8c69f24b3a7c333fbbe6f4a7b
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/1095
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling Fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) for BCR/ABL in chronic myeloid leukemia after bone marrow transplantationBCR/ABL GenesChronic myeloid leukemiaFluorescent in-situ hybridizationGenes BCR/ABLLeucemia mielóde crônicaHibridação in situ por fluorescênciaLeucemia mielóide crônicaCONTEXT: Identification of Philadelphia chromosome or BCR/ABL gene rearrangement in chronic myeloid leukemia is important at diagnosis as well as after treatment. OBJECTIVE: To compare the results of karyotyping using fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) upon diagnosis and 1 year after bone marrow transplantation in 12 patients. TYPE OF STUDY: Diagnostic test and residual disease detection. SETTING: Hematology and Hemotherapy Department, Federal University of São Paulo/Escola Paulista de Medicina, São Paulo, Brazil. SAMPLE: 12 patients with chronic myeloid leukemia at diagnosis and 1 year after bone marrow transplantation. DIAGNOSTIC TEST: Karyotyping was done in the usual way and the BCR/ABL gene-specific probe was used for FISH. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Disease at diagnosis and residual. RESULTS: At diagnosis, 10 patients presented t(9;22)(q34.1;q11) as well as positive FISH. Two cases did not have metaphases but FISH was positive. After bone marrow transplantation, 8 patients presented normal karyotype, 1 had persistence of identifiable Philadelphia chromosome and 3 had no metaphases. Two cases showed complete chimera and 2 had donor and host cells simultaneously. FISH was possible in all cases after bone marrow transplantation and confirmed the persistence of identifiable Philadelphia chromosome clone in one patient, and identified another that did not present metaphases for analysis. Cases that showed mixed chimera in karyotype were negative for BCR/ABL by FISH. CONCLUSION: The applicability of FISH is clear, particularly for residual disease detection. Classical and molecular cytogenetics are complementary methods.CONTEXTO: Na leucemia mielóide crônica, a detecção do cromossomo Philadelphia ou o rearranjo gênico BCR/ABL é importante tanto ao diagnóstico como após o tratamento. OBJETIVO: Comparar os resultados do cariótipo com a hibridação in situ por fluorescência ao diagnóstico e, após um ano de transplante de medula óssea, em 12 pacientes com leucemia mielóide crônica. TIPO DE ESTUDO: Teste diagnóstico e detecção de doença residual. LOCAL: Disciplina de Hematologia e Hemoterapia da Universidade de São Paulo/Escola Paulista de Medicina. AMOSTRA: 12 pacientes com leucemia mielóide crônica ao diagnóstico e um ano após transplante de medula óssea. TESTE DIAGNÓSTICO: A análise do cariótipo (forma clássica) e a hibridação in situ por fluorescência com a sonda específica para os genes BCR/ABL. VARIÁVEIS ESTUDADAS: Doença ao diagnóstico e residual. RESULTADOS: Ao diagnóstico, 10 pacientes apresentaram t(9;22)(q34.1;q11) no cariótipo assim como pela hibridação in situ por fluorescência. Dois casos em que na citogenética não havia mitoses, apresentaram rearranjo pela hibridação in situ por fluorescência. Após o transplante de medula óssea, o cariótipo mostrou ausência do cromossomo Philadelphia em 8 casos, persistência em um e ausência de metáfases em três. Em dois casos havia quimera completa e em outros dois havia concomitância de células do doador e do receptor. A hibridação in situ por fluorescência foi possível em todos os casos após o transplante de medula óssea, confirmando a persistência do clone cromossomo Philadelphia num paciente em que o cariótipo também havia mostrado e identificando noutro em que não havia metáfases. Os casos de quimera mista foram negativos para BCR/ABL pela hibridação in situ por fluorescência. CONCLUSÃO: Ficou evidente a aplicabilidade da hibridação in situ por fluorescência, particularmente na detecção de doença residual. A citogenética clássica e a molecular são métodos complementares.Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) Escola Paulista de Medicina Discipline of Hematology and HemotherapyUNIFESP, EPM, Discipline of Hematology and HemotherapySciELOAssociação Paulista de Medicina - APMUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Chauffaille, Maria de Lourdes Lopes Ferrari [UNIFESP]Oliveira, José Salvador Rodrigues de [UNIFESP]Romeo, Maura [UNIFESP]Kerbauy, José [UNIFESP]2015-06-14T13:25:10Z2015-06-14T13:25:10Z2001-01-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion16-18application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-31802001000100005São Paulo Medical Journal. Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM, v. 119, n. 1, p. 16-18, 2001.10.1590/S1516-31802001000100005S1516-31802001000100005.pdf1516-3180S1516-31802001000100005http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/1095engSão Paulo Medical Journalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-08-06T06:13:42Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/1095Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-08-06T06:13:42Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) for BCR/ABL in chronic myeloid leukemia after bone marrow transplantation
title Fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) for BCR/ABL in chronic myeloid leukemia after bone marrow transplantation
spellingShingle Fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) for BCR/ABL in chronic myeloid leukemia after bone marrow transplantation
Chauffaille, Maria de Lourdes Lopes Ferrari [UNIFESP]
BCR/ABL Genes
Chronic myeloid leukemia
Fluorescent in-situ hybridization
Genes BCR/ABL
Leucemia mielóde crônica
Hibridação in situ por fluorescência
Leucemia mielóide crônica
title_short Fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) for BCR/ABL in chronic myeloid leukemia after bone marrow transplantation
title_full Fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) for BCR/ABL in chronic myeloid leukemia after bone marrow transplantation
title_fullStr Fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) for BCR/ABL in chronic myeloid leukemia after bone marrow transplantation
title_full_unstemmed Fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) for BCR/ABL in chronic myeloid leukemia after bone marrow transplantation
title_sort Fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) for BCR/ABL in chronic myeloid leukemia after bone marrow transplantation
author Chauffaille, Maria de Lourdes Lopes Ferrari [UNIFESP]
author_facet Chauffaille, Maria de Lourdes Lopes Ferrari [UNIFESP]
Oliveira, José Salvador Rodrigues de [UNIFESP]
Romeo, Maura [UNIFESP]
Kerbauy, José [UNIFESP]
author_role author
author2 Oliveira, José Salvador Rodrigues de [UNIFESP]
Romeo, Maura [UNIFESP]
Kerbauy, José [UNIFESP]
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Chauffaille, Maria de Lourdes Lopes Ferrari [UNIFESP]
Oliveira, José Salvador Rodrigues de [UNIFESP]
Romeo, Maura [UNIFESP]
Kerbauy, José [UNIFESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv BCR/ABL Genes
Chronic myeloid leukemia
Fluorescent in-situ hybridization
Genes BCR/ABL
Leucemia mielóde crônica
Hibridação in situ por fluorescência
Leucemia mielóide crônica
topic BCR/ABL Genes
Chronic myeloid leukemia
Fluorescent in-situ hybridization
Genes BCR/ABL
Leucemia mielóde crônica
Hibridação in situ por fluorescência
Leucemia mielóide crônica
description CONTEXT: Identification of Philadelphia chromosome or BCR/ABL gene rearrangement in chronic myeloid leukemia is important at diagnosis as well as after treatment. OBJECTIVE: To compare the results of karyotyping using fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) upon diagnosis and 1 year after bone marrow transplantation in 12 patients. TYPE OF STUDY: Diagnostic test and residual disease detection. SETTING: Hematology and Hemotherapy Department, Federal University of São Paulo/Escola Paulista de Medicina, São Paulo, Brazil. SAMPLE: 12 patients with chronic myeloid leukemia at diagnosis and 1 year after bone marrow transplantation. DIAGNOSTIC TEST: Karyotyping was done in the usual way and the BCR/ABL gene-specific probe was used for FISH. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Disease at diagnosis and residual. RESULTS: At diagnosis, 10 patients presented t(9;22)(q34.1;q11) as well as positive FISH. Two cases did not have metaphases but FISH was positive. After bone marrow transplantation, 8 patients presented normal karyotype, 1 had persistence of identifiable Philadelphia chromosome and 3 had no metaphases. Two cases showed complete chimera and 2 had donor and host cells simultaneously. FISH was possible in all cases after bone marrow transplantation and confirmed the persistence of identifiable Philadelphia chromosome clone in one patient, and identified another that did not present metaphases for analysis. Cases that showed mixed chimera in karyotype were negative for BCR/ABL by FISH. CONCLUSION: The applicability of FISH is clear, particularly for residual disease detection. Classical and molecular cytogenetics are complementary methods.
publishDate 2001
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2001-01-04
2015-06-14T13:25:10Z
2015-06-14T13:25:10Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-31802001000100005
São Paulo Medical Journal. Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM, v. 119, n. 1, p. 16-18, 2001.
10.1590/S1516-31802001000100005
S1516-31802001000100005.pdf
1516-3180
S1516-31802001000100005
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/1095
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-31802001000100005
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/1095
identifier_str_mv São Paulo Medical Journal. Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM, v. 119, n. 1, p. 16-18, 2001.
10.1590/S1516-31802001000100005
S1516-31802001000100005.pdf
1516-3180
S1516-31802001000100005
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv São Paulo Medical Journal
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 16-18
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br
_version_ 1814268394564747264