Boletim brasileiro de avaliação de tecnologias em saúde: deferasirox para o tratamento da sobrecarga de ferro

• Autor(a) principal: Silva, Marcus Tolentino [UNIFESP]
• Data de Publicação: 2011
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
• Texto Completo: http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/9151
• topic: Sobrecarga de ferro; Deferasirox; Relatório técnico; Avaliação da tecnologia biomédica; Iron overload Brazil; Technical report; Biomedical technology assessment

Objectives: to evaluate the evidence on efficacy and safety regarding deferasirox for treatment of iron overload relating to beta-thalassemia, sickle cell disease and myelodysplastic syndrome, in comparison with other iron chelators available in Brazil (deferoxamine and deferiprone). Methods: to produce a synthesis of the evidence, a search was conducted using reports from HTA agencies and systematic reviews in Medline (March 2009). Additionally, a search for clinical trials was conducted to update the information available. Among the references identified, the study by McLeod (2009) was selected because this was a systematic review and economic evaluation produced by a highly trustworthy HTA agency. Considering the local economic context and the availability of medications and laboratory supplies, the evidence was adapted and critically evaluated. Results: the evidence found was based on three clinical trials of low methodological quality that evaluated the use of deferasirox in relation to deferoxamine. No comparative studies between deferasirox and deferiprone were found. In the clinical trials identified, hepatic iron concentration (a test unavailable in Brazil) was taken to be the primary outcome, although in clinical practice, the iron levels were monitored by means of the serum ferritin concentration. The changes in serum ferritin concentration were more favorable among patients with beta thalassemia and sickle cell disease (highest prevalence in Brazil) who received deferoxamine than among those who received deferasirox. Previous economic evaluation suggests that deferasirox may be a cost-effective strategy. Conclusions: since deferasirox was only recently introduced onto the Brazilian market and is considered to be an alternative for treatment within the public healthcare system, drug surveillance information is required, particularly regarding the risks of kidney failure, cytopenia (agranulocytosis and thrombocytopenia) and gastrointestinal, hepatic, renal and blood disorders.