Prospective randomized comparison of human oocyte cryopreservation with slow-rate freezing or vitrification

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Smith, Gary D.
Data de Publicação: 2010
Outros Autores: Serafini, Paulo C., Fioravanti, Joyce, Yadid, Isaac, Coslovsky, Marcio, Hassun, Pericles, Alegretti, Jose Roberto, Motta, Eduardo L. [UNIFESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
dARK ID: ark:/48912/001300000pfw7
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.065
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.065
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/33003
Resumo: Objective: To compare cryopreservation of mature human oocytes with slow-rate freezing and vitrification and determine which is most efficient at establishing a pregnancy.Design: Prospective randomized.Setting: Academically affiliated, private fertility center.Patient(s): Consenting patients with concerns about embryo cryopreservation and more than nine mature oocytes at retrieval were randomized to slow-rate freezing or vitrification of supernumerary (more than nine) oocytes.Intervention(s): Oocytes were frozen or vitrified, and upon request oocytes were thawed or warmed, respectively.Main Outcome Measure(s): Oocyte survival, fertilization, embryo development, and clinical pregnancy.Result(s): Patient use has resulted in 30 thaws and 48 warmings. Women's age at time of cryopreservation was similar. Oocyte survival was significantly higher following vitrification/warming (81%) compared with freezing/thawing (67%). Fertilization was more successful in oocytes vitrified/warmed compared with frozen/thawed. Fertilized oocytes from vitrification/warming had significantly better cleavage rates (84%) compared with freezing/thawing (71%) and resulted in embryos with significantly better morphology. Although similar numbers of embryos were transferred, embryos resulting from vitrified oocytes had significantly enhanced clinical (38%) pregnancy rates compared with embryos resulting from frozen oocyte (13%). Miscarriage and/or spontaneous abortion rates were similar.Conclusion(s): Our results suggest that vitrification/warming is currently the most efficient means of oocyte cryopreservation in relation to subsequent success in establishing pregnancy. (Fertil Steril (R) 2010; 94: 2088-95. (C) 2010 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)
id UFSP_2b107af4f96e5d229d61c93952ca7cba
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/33003
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling Prospective randomized comparison of human oocyte cryopreservation with slow-rate freezing or vitrificationProspective randomized studyhuman oocyte cryopreservationslow-rate freezingvitrificationpregnanciesObjective: To compare cryopreservation of mature human oocytes with slow-rate freezing and vitrification and determine which is most efficient at establishing a pregnancy.Design: Prospective randomized.Setting: Academically affiliated, private fertility center.Patient(s): Consenting patients with concerns about embryo cryopreservation and more than nine mature oocytes at retrieval were randomized to slow-rate freezing or vitrification of supernumerary (more than nine) oocytes.Intervention(s): Oocytes were frozen or vitrified, and upon request oocytes were thawed or warmed, respectively.Main Outcome Measure(s): Oocyte survival, fertilization, embryo development, and clinical pregnancy.Result(s): Patient use has resulted in 30 thaws and 48 warmings. Women's age at time of cryopreservation was similar. Oocyte survival was significantly higher following vitrification/warming (81%) compared with freezing/thawing (67%). Fertilization was more successful in oocytes vitrified/warmed compared with frozen/thawed. Fertilized oocytes from vitrification/warming had significantly better cleavage rates (84%) compared with freezing/thawing (71%) and resulted in embryos with significantly better morphology. Although similar numbers of embryos were transferred, embryos resulting from vitrified oocytes had significantly enhanced clinical (38%) pregnancy rates compared with embryos resulting from frozen oocyte (13%). Miscarriage and/or spontaneous abortion rates were similar.Conclusion(s): Our results suggest that vitrification/warming is currently the most efficient means of oocyte cryopreservation in relation to subsequent success in establishing pregnancy. (Fertil Steril (R) 2010; 94: 2088-95. (C) 2010 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)Univ Michigan, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USAUniv Michigan, Dept Urol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USAUniv Michigan, Dept Physiol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USAUniv Michigan, Dept Reprod Sci Program, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USAHuntington Med Reprod, BR-04501000 São Paulo, BrazilUniv São Paulo, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, São Paulo, BrazilHuntington Med Reprod, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilGenesis Genet Brazil, São Paulo, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Gynecol, BR-04501000 São Paulo, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Gynecol, BR-04501000 São Paulo, BrazilWeb of ScienceElsevier B.V.Univ MichiganHuntington Med ReprodUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)Genesis Genet BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Smith, Gary D.Serafini, Paulo C.Fioravanti, JoyceYadid, IsaacCoslovsky, MarcioHassun, PericlesAlegretti, Jose RobertoMotta, Eduardo L. [UNIFESP]2016-01-24T14:05:35Z2016-01-24T14:05:35Z2010-11-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion2088-2095http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.065Fertility and Sterility. New York: Elsevier B.V., v. 94, n. 6, p. 2088-2095, 2010.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.0650015-0282http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/33003WOS:000283441400029ark:/48912/001300000pfw7engFertility and Sterilityinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://www.elsevier.com/about/open-access/open-access-policies/article-posting-policyreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2016-01-24T12:05:35Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/33003Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-12-11T20:29:22.072998Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Prospective randomized comparison of human oocyte cryopreservation with slow-rate freezing or vitrification
title Prospective randomized comparison of human oocyte cryopreservation with slow-rate freezing or vitrification
spellingShingle Prospective randomized comparison of human oocyte cryopreservation with slow-rate freezing or vitrification
Prospective randomized comparison of human oocyte cryopreservation with slow-rate freezing or vitrification
Smith, Gary D.
Prospective randomized study
human oocyte cryopreservation
slow-rate freezing
vitrification
pregnancies
Smith, Gary D.
Prospective randomized study
human oocyte cryopreservation
slow-rate freezing
vitrification
pregnancies
title_short Prospective randomized comparison of human oocyte cryopreservation with slow-rate freezing or vitrification
title_full Prospective randomized comparison of human oocyte cryopreservation with slow-rate freezing or vitrification
title_fullStr Prospective randomized comparison of human oocyte cryopreservation with slow-rate freezing or vitrification
Prospective randomized comparison of human oocyte cryopreservation with slow-rate freezing or vitrification
title_full_unstemmed Prospective randomized comparison of human oocyte cryopreservation with slow-rate freezing or vitrification
Prospective randomized comparison of human oocyte cryopreservation with slow-rate freezing or vitrification
title_sort Prospective randomized comparison of human oocyte cryopreservation with slow-rate freezing or vitrification
author Smith, Gary D.
author_facet Smith, Gary D.
Smith, Gary D.
Serafini, Paulo C.
Fioravanti, Joyce
Yadid, Isaac
Coslovsky, Marcio
Hassun, Pericles
Alegretti, Jose Roberto
Motta, Eduardo L. [UNIFESP]
Serafini, Paulo C.
Fioravanti, Joyce
Yadid, Isaac
Coslovsky, Marcio
Hassun, Pericles
Alegretti, Jose Roberto
Motta, Eduardo L. [UNIFESP]
author_role author
author2 Serafini, Paulo C.
Fioravanti, Joyce
Yadid, Isaac
Coslovsky, Marcio
Hassun, Pericles
Alegretti, Jose Roberto
Motta, Eduardo L. [UNIFESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Univ Michigan
Huntington Med Reprod
Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
Genesis Genet Brazil
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Smith, Gary D.
Serafini, Paulo C.
Fioravanti, Joyce
Yadid, Isaac
Coslovsky, Marcio
Hassun, Pericles
Alegretti, Jose Roberto
Motta, Eduardo L. [UNIFESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Prospective randomized study
human oocyte cryopreservation
slow-rate freezing
vitrification
pregnancies
topic Prospective randomized study
human oocyte cryopreservation
slow-rate freezing
vitrification
pregnancies
description Objective: To compare cryopreservation of mature human oocytes with slow-rate freezing and vitrification and determine which is most efficient at establishing a pregnancy.Design: Prospective randomized.Setting: Academically affiliated, private fertility center.Patient(s): Consenting patients with concerns about embryo cryopreservation and more than nine mature oocytes at retrieval were randomized to slow-rate freezing or vitrification of supernumerary (more than nine) oocytes.Intervention(s): Oocytes were frozen or vitrified, and upon request oocytes were thawed or warmed, respectively.Main Outcome Measure(s): Oocyte survival, fertilization, embryo development, and clinical pregnancy.Result(s): Patient use has resulted in 30 thaws and 48 warmings. Women's age at time of cryopreservation was similar. Oocyte survival was significantly higher following vitrification/warming (81%) compared with freezing/thawing (67%). Fertilization was more successful in oocytes vitrified/warmed compared with frozen/thawed. Fertilized oocytes from vitrification/warming had significantly better cleavage rates (84%) compared with freezing/thawing (71%) and resulted in embryos with significantly better morphology. Although similar numbers of embryos were transferred, embryos resulting from vitrified oocytes had significantly enhanced clinical (38%) pregnancy rates compared with embryos resulting from frozen oocyte (13%). Miscarriage and/or spontaneous abortion rates were similar.Conclusion(s): Our results suggest that vitrification/warming is currently the most efficient means of oocyte cryopreservation in relation to subsequent success in establishing pregnancy. (Fertil Steril (R) 2010; 94: 2088-95. (C) 2010 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-11-01
2016-01-24T14:05:35Z
2016-01-24T14:05:35Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.065
Fertility and Sterility. New York: Elsevier B.V., v. 94, n. 6, p. 2088-2095, 2010.
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.065
0015-0282
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/33003
WOS:000283441400029
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv ark:/48912/001300000pfw7
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.065
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/33003
identifier_str_mv Fertility and Sterility. New York: Elsevier B.V., v. 94, n. 6, p. 2088-2095, 2010.
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.065
0015-0282
WOS:000283441400029
ark:/48912/001300000pfw7
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Fertility and Sterility
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://www.elsevier.com/about/open-access/open-access-policies/article-posting-policy
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://www.elsevier.com/about/open-access/open-access-policies/article-posting-policy
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 2088-2095
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier B.V.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier B.V.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br
_version_ 1822183937372323840
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.065