Prospective randomized comparison of human oocyte cryopreservation with slow-rate freezing or vitrification
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
dARK ID: | ark:/48912/001300000pfw7 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.065 |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.065 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/33003 |
Resumo: | Objective: To compare cryopreservation of mature human oocytes with slow-rate freezing and vitrification and determine which is most efficient at establishing a pregnancy.Design: Prospective randomized.Setting: Academically affiliated, private fertility center.Patient(s): Consenting patients with concerns about embryo cryopreservation and more than nine mature oocytes at retrieval were randomized to slow-rate freezing or vitrification of supernumerary (more than nine) oocytes.Intervention(s): Oocytes were frozen or vitrified, and upon request oocytes were thawed or warmed, respectively.Main Outcome Measure(s): Oocyte survival, fertilization, embryo development, and clinical pregnancy.Result(s): Patient use has resulted in 30 thaws and 48 warmings. Women's age at time of cryopreservation was similar. Oocyte survival was significantly higher following vitrification/warming (81%) compared with freezing/thawing (67%). Fertilization was more successful in oocytes vitrified/warmed compared with frozen/thawed. Fertilized oocytes from vitrification/warming had significantly better cleavage rates (84%) compared with freezing/thawing (71%) and resulted in embryos with significantly better morphology. Although similar numbers of embryos were transferred, embryos resulting from vitrified oocytes had significantly enhanced clinical (38%) pregnancy rates compared with embryos resulting from frozen oocyte (13%). Miscarriage and/or spontaneous abortion rates were similar.Conclusion(s): Our results suggest that vitrification/warming is currently the most efficient means of oocyte cryopreservation in relation to subsequent success in establishing pregnancy. (Fertil Steril (R) 2010; 94: 2088-95. (C) 2010 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.) |
id |
UFSP_2b107af4f96e5d229d61c93952ca7cba |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/33003 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository_id_str |
3465 |
spelling |
Prospective randomized comparison of human oocyte cryopreservation with slow-rate freezing or vitrificationProspective randomized studyhuman oocyte cryopreservationslow-rate freezingvitrificationpregnanciesObjective: To compare cryopreservation of mature human oocytes with slow-rate freezing and vitrification and determine which is most efficient at establishing a pregnancy.Design: Prospective randomized.Setting: Academically affiliated, private fertility center.Patient(s): Consenting patients with concerns about embryo cryopreservation and more than nine mature oocytes at retrieval were randomized to slow-rate freezing or vitrification of supernumerary (more than nine) oocytes.Intervention(s): Oocytes were frozen or vitrified, and upon request oocytes were thawed or warmed, respectively.Main Outcome Measure(s): Oocyte survival, fertilization, embryo development, and clinical pregnancy.Result(s): Patient use has resulted in 30 thaws and 48 warmings. Women's age at time of cryopreservation was similar. Oocyte survival was significantly higher following vitrification/warming (81%) compared with freezing/thawing (67%). Fertilization was more successful in oocytes vitrified/warmed compared with frozen/thawed. Fertilized oocytes from vitrification/warming had significantly better cleavage rates (84%) compared with freezing/thawing (71%) and resulted in embryos with significantly better morphology. Although similar numbers of embryos were transferred, embryos resulting from vitrified oocytes had significantly enhanced clinical (38%) pregnancy rates compared with embryos resulting from frozen oocyte (13%). Miscarriage and/or spontaneous abortion rates were similar.Conclusion(s): Our results suggest that vitrification/warming is currently the most efficient means of oocyte cryopreservation in relation to subsequent success in establishing pregnancy. (Fertil Steril (R) 2010; 94: 2088-95. (C) 2010 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)Univ Michigan, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USAUniv Michigan, Dept Urol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USAUniv Michigan, Dept Physiol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USAUniv Michigan, Dept Reprod Sci Program, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USAHuntington Med Reprod, BR-04501000 São Paulo, BrazilUniv São Paulo, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, São Paulo, BrazilHuntington Med Reprod, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilGenesis Genet Brazil, São Paulo, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Gynecol, BR-04501000 São Paulo, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Gynecol, BR-04501000 São Paulo, BrazilWeb of ScienceElsevier B.V.Univ MichiganHuntington Med ReprodUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)Genesis Genet BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Smith, Gary D.Serafini, Paulo C.Fioravanti, JoyceYadid, IsaacCoslovsky, MarcioHassun, PericlesAlegretti, Jose RobertoMotta, Eduardo L. [UNIFESP]2016-01-24T14:05:35Z2016-01-24T14:05:35Z2010-11-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion2088-2095http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.065Fertility and Sterility. New York: Elsevier B.V., v. 94, n. 6, p. 2088-2095, 2010.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.0650015-0282http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/33003WOS:000283441400029ark:/48912/001300000pfw7engFertility and Sterilityinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://www.elsevier.com/about/open-access/open-access-policies/article-posting-policyreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2016-01-24T12:05:35Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/33003Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-12-11T20:29:22.072998Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Prospective randomized comparison of human oocyte cryopreservation with slow-rate freezing or vitrification |
title |
Prospective randomized comparison of human oocyte cryopreservation with slow-rate freezing or vitrification |
spellingShingle |
Prospective randomized comparison of human oocyte cryopreservation with slow-rate freezing or vitrification Prospective randomized comparison of human oocyte cryopreservation with slow-rate freezing or vitrification Smith, Gary D. Prospective randomized study human oocyte cryopreservation slow-rate freezing vitrification pregnancies Smith, Gary D. Prospective randomized study human oocyte cryopreservation slow-rate freezing vitrification pregnancies |
title_short |
Prospective randomized comparison of human oocyte cryopreservation with slow-rate freezing or vitrification |
title_full |
Prospective randomized comparison of human oocyte cryopreservation with slow-rate freezing or vitrification |
title_fullStr |
Prospective randomized comparison of human oocyte cryopreservation with slow-rate freezing or vitrification Prospective randomized comparison of human oocyte cryopreservation with slow-rate freezing or vitrification |
title_full_unstemmed |
Prospective randomized comparison of human oocyte cryopreservation with slow-rate freezing or vitrification Prospective randomized comparison of human oocyte cryopreservation with slow-rate freezing or vitrification |
title_sort |
Prospective randomized comparison of human oocyte cryopreservation with slow-rate freezing or vitrification |
author |
Smith, Gary D. |
author_facet |
Smith, Gary D. Smith, Gary D. Serafini, Paulo C. Fioravanti, Joyce Yadid, Isaac Coslovsky, Marcio Hassun, Pericles Alegretti, Jose Roberto Motta, Eduardo L. [UNIFESP] Serafini, Paulo C. Fioravanti, Joyce Yadid, Isaac Coslovsky, Marcio Hassun, Pericles Alegretti, Jose Roberto Motta, Eduardo L. [UNIFESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Serafini, Paulo C. Fioravanti, Joyce Yadid, Isaac Coslovsky, Marcio Hassun, Pericles Alegretti, Jose Roberto Motta, Eduardo L. [UNIFESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Univ Michigan Huntington Med Reprod Universidade de São Paulo (USP) Genesis Genet Brazil Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Smith, Gary D. Serafini, Paulo C. Fioravanti, Joyce Yadid, Isaac Coslovsky, Marcio Hassun, Pericles Alegretti, Jose Roberto Motta, Eduardo L. [UNIFESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Prospective randomized study human oocyte cryopreservation slow-rate freezing vitrification pregnancies |
topic |
Prospective randomized study human oocyte cryopreservation slow-rate freezing vitrification pregnancies |
description |
Objective: To compare cryopreservation of mature human oocytes with slow-rate freezing and vitrification and determine which is most efficient at establishing a pregnancy.Design: Prospective randomized.Setting: Academically affiliated, private fertility center.Patient(s): Consenting patients with concerns about embryo cryopreservation and more than nine mature oocytes at retrieval were randomized to slow-rate freezing or vitrification of supernumerary (more than nine) oocytes.Intervention(s): Oocytes were frozen or vitrified, and upon request oocytes were thawed or warmed, respectively.Main Outcome Measure(s): Oocyte survival, fertilization, embryo development, and clinical pregnancy.Result(s): Patient use has resulted in 30 thaws and 48 warmings. Women's age at time of cryopreservation was similar. Oocyte survival was significantly higher following vitrification/warming (81%) compared with freezing/thawing (67%). Fertilization was more successful in oocytes vitrified/warmed compared with frozen/thawed. Fertilized oocytes from vitrification/warming had significantly better cleavage rates (84%) compared with freezing/thawing (71%) and resulted in embryos with significantly better morphology. Although similar numbers of embryos were transferred, embryos resulting from vitrified oocytes had significantly enhanced clinical (38%) pregnancy rates compared with embryos resulting from frozen oocyte (13%). Miscarriage and/or spontaneous abortion rates were similar.Conclusion(s): Our results suggest that vitrification/warming is currently the most efficient means of oocyte cryopreservation in relation to subsequent success in establishing pregnancy. (Fertil Steril (R) 2010; 94: 2088-95. (C) 2010 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.) |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-11-01 2016-01-24T14:05:35Z 2016-01-24T14:05:35Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.065 Fertility and Sterility. New York: Elsevier B.V., v. 94, n. 6, p. 2088-2095, 2010. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.065 0015-0282 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/33003 WOS:000283441400029 |
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv |
ark:/48912/001300000pfw7 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.065 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/33003 |
identifier_str_mv |
Fertility and Sterility. New York: Elsevier B.V., v. 94, n. 6, p. 2088-2095, 2010. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.065 0015-0282 WOS:000283441400029 ark:/48912/001300000pfw7 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Fertility and Sterility |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://www.elsevier.com/about/open-access/open-access-policies/article-posting-policy |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://www.elsevier.com/about/open-access/open-access-policies/article-posting-policy |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
2088-2095 |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier B.V. |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier B.V. |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) instacron:UNIFESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
instacron_str |
UNIFESP |
institution |
UNIFESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br |
_version_ |
1822183937372323840 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.065 |