Evaluation of survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A comparative analysis of prognostic systems
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
Texto Completo: | https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/55645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194922 |
Resumo: | Background and aim There are several prognostic systems that address different aspects of the patient and the tumour and can guide the management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to evaluate and compare the eight staging systems for a group of patients in a public service in Brazil. Methods Patients with HCC were retrospectively analysed between 2000 and 2012. The prognostic systems Okuda, The Cancer of the Liver Italian Program (CLIP), the Chinese University Prognostic Index (CUPI), Groupe d'Etude et de Traitement du Carcinome Hepatocellulaire (GRETCH), the modified TNM-based Japan Integrated Score (JIS) combined with alpha-fetoprotein and Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP), the TNM system, and the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Classification (BCLC) were applied to these patients and compared through model fit measurements, likelihood scores, and the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). Results A total of 247 patients were studied. The average survival time was 60 months. The TNM, Okuda, CLIP, GRETCH, modified JIS, and BCLC systems were well correlated with one another and individually important to the prediction of survival among the patients studied. However, in the statistical analysis, the CUPI delivered the best predictive performance (AIC = 566 |
id |
UFSP_2f5feabf36e0cba9fdf261346c3cec38 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/55645 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository_id_str |
3465 |
spelling |
Tannus, Roberta Kazan [UNIFESP]Almeida-Carvalho, S. R. [UNIFESP]Matos, Carla Adriana Loureiro de [UNIFESP]Gonzalez, Adriano Miziara [UNIFESP]Salzedas-Netto, Alcides Augusto [UNIFESP]Szejnfeld, Denis [UNIFESP]D'Ippolito, Giuseppe [UNIFESP]Lanzoni, Valeria Pereira [UNIFESP]Souza-Silva, I. [UNIFESP]2020-07-20T16:31:01Z2020-07-20T16:31:01Z2018Plos One. San Francisco, v. 13, n. 4, p. -, 2018.1932-6203https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/55645http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194922WOS000429203800056.pdf10.1371/journal.pone.0194922WOS:000429203800056Background and aim There are several prognostic systems that address different aspects of the patient and the tumour and can guide the management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to evaluate and compare the eight staging systems for a group of patients in a public service in Brazil. Methods Patients with HCC were retrospectively analysed between 2000 and 2012. The prognostic systems Okuda, The Cancer of the Liver Italian Program (CLIP), the Chinese University Prognostic Index (CUPI), Groupe d'Etude et de Traitement du Carcinome Hepatocellulaire (GRETCH), the modified TNM-based Japan Integrated Score (JIS) combined with alpha-fetoprotein and Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP), the TNM system, and the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Classification (BCLC) were applied to these patients and compared through model fit measurements, likelihood scores, and the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). Results A total of 247 patients were studied. The average survival time was 60 months. The TNM, Okuda, CLIP, GRETCH, modified JIS, and BCLC systems were well correlated with one another and individually important to the prediction of survival among the patients studied. However, in the statistical analysis, the CUPI delivered the best predictive performance (AIC = 566log-likelihood =-281,240). Conclusion Although the CUPI system was demonstrated to be the most appropriate HCC staging system for the studied population, the choice of an ideal system is a controversial subject, andfuture studies with larger numbers of patients are necessary for the validation of the CUPI system as the method of choice for other populations.Fed Univ Sao Paulo Unifesp, Hepatol Unit, Dept Gastroenterol, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilFed Univ Sao Paulo Unifesp, Liver Transplant Unit, Dept Surg, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilFed Univ Sao Paulo Unifesp, Dept Pediat Surg, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilFed Univ Sao Paulo Unifesp, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilFed Univ Sao Paulo Unifesp, Dept Diagnost Pathol, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilFed Univ Sao Paulo Unifesp, Hepatol Unit, Dept Gastroenterol, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilFed Univ Sao Paulo Unifesp, Liver Transplant Unit, Dept Surg, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilFed Univ Sao Paulo Unifesp, Dept Pediat Surg, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilFed Univ Sao Paulo Unifesp, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilFed Univ Sao Paulo Unifesp, Dept Diagnost Pathol, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilWeb of Science-engPublic Library SciencePlos OneEvaluation of survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A comparative analysis of prognostic systemsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleSan Franciscov. 134info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESPORIGINALWOS000429203800056.pdfapplication/pdf2474329${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/55645/1/WOS000429203800056.pdf54a8c291c59ca9eeadb86c1b8d2bbf18MD51open accessTEXTWOS000429203800056.pdf.txtWOS000429203800056.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain38866${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/55645/2/WOS000429203800056.pdf.txt7bd1583de40d0ad58a2775c7ca19f383MD52open accessTHUMBNAILWOS000429203800056.pdf.jpgWOS000429203800056.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg7601${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/55645/4/WOS000429203800056.pdf.jpg27f500f58fdf74f514becb4ac3d5134bMD54open access11600/556452022-08-01 02:42:15.744open accessoai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/55645Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:34652022-08-01T05:42:15Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false |
dc.title.en.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A comparative analysis of prognostic systems |
title |
Evaluation of survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A comparative analysis of prognostic systems |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A comparative analysis of prognostic systems Tannus, Roberta Kazan [UNIFESP] |
title_short |
Evaluation of survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A comparative analysis of prognostic systems |
title_full |
Evaluation of survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A comparative analysis of prognostic systems |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A comparative analysis of prognostic systems |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A comparative analysis of prognostic systems |
title_sort |
Evaluation of survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A comparative analysis of prognostic systems |
author |
Tannus, Roberta Kazan [UNIFESP] |
author_facet |
Tannus, Roberta Kazan [UNIFESP] Almeida-Carvalho, S. R. [UNIFESP] Matos, Carla Adriana Loureiro de [UNIFESP] Gonzalez, Adriano Miziara [UNIFESP] Salzedas-Netto, Alcides Augusto [UNIFESP] Szejnfeld, Denis [UNIFESP] D'Ippolito, Giuseppe [UNIFESP] Lanzoni, Valeria Pereira [UNIFESP] Souza-Silva, I. [UNIFESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Almeida-Carvalho, S. R. [UNIFESP] Matos, Carla Adriana Loureiro de [UNIFESP] Gonzalez, Adriano Miziara [UNIFESP] Salzedas-Netto, Alcides Augusto [UNIFESP] Szejnfeld, Denis [UNIFESP] D'Ippolito, Giuseppe [UNIFESP] Lanzoni, Valeria Pereira [UNIFESP] Souza-Silva, I. [UNIFESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Tannus, Roberta Kazan [UNIFESP] Almeida-Carvalho, S. R. [UNIFESP] Matos, Carla Adriana Loureiro de [UNIFESP] Gonzalez, Adriano Miziara [UNIFESP] Salzedas-Netto, Alcides Augusto [UNIFESP] Szejnfeld, Denis [UNIFESP] D'Ippolito, Giuseppe [UNIFESP] Lanzoni, Valeria Pereira [UNIFESP] Souza-Silva, I. [UNIFESP] |
description |
Background and aim There are several prognostic systems that address different aspects of the patient and the tumour and can guide the management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to evaluate and compare the eight staging systems for a group of patients in a public service in Brazil. Methods Patients with HCC were retrospectively analysed between 2000 and 2012. The prognostic systems Okuda, The Cancer of the Liver Italian Program (CLIP), the Chinese University Prognostic Index (CUPI), Groupe d'Etude et de Traitement du Carcinome Hepatocellulaire (GRETCH), the modified TNM-based Japan Integrated Score (JIS) combined with alpha-fetoprotein and Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP), the TNM system, and the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Classification (BCLC) were applied to these patients and compared through model fit measurements, likelihood scores, and the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). Results A total of 247 patients were studied. The average survival time was 60 months. The TNM, Okuda, CLIP, GRETCH, modified JIS, and BCLC systems were well correlated with one another and individually important to the prediction of survival among the patients studied. However, in the statistical analysis, the CUPI delivered the best predictive performance (AIC = 566 |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2018 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2020-07-20T16:31:01Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2020-07-20T16:31:01Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
Plos One. San Francisco, v. 13, n. 4, p. -, 2018. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/55645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194922 |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
1932-6203 |
dc.identifier.file.none.fl_str_mv |
WOS000429203800056.pdf |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1371/journal.pone.0194922 |
dc.identifier.wos.none.fl_str_mv |
WOS:000429203800056 |
identifier_str_mv |
Plos One. San Francisco, v. 13, n. 4, p. -, 2018. 1932-6203 WOS000429203800056.pdf 10.1371/journal.pone.0194922 WOS:000429203800056 |
url |
https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/55645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194922 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.none.fl_str_mv |
Plos One |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
- |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
San Francisco |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Public Library Science |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Public Library Science |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) instacron:UNIFESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
instacron_str |
UNIFESP |
institution |
UNIFESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/55645/1/WOS000429203800056.pdf ${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/55645/2/WOS000429203800056.pdf.txt ${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/55645/4/WOS000429203800056.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
54a8c291c59ca9eeadb86c1b8d2bbf18 7bd1583de40d0ad58a2775c7ca19f383 27f500f58fdf74f514becb4ac3d5134b |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1802764151742791680 |