Considerations about the recommendations of the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf on the Amazon fan
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329201400107 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/8173 |
Resumo: | In 2004, Brazil submitted to the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (CLCS) a Submission for the outer limit of the Brazilian continental shelf for its extension beyond the limits of 200 nautical miles. In 2007, the CLCS presented its recommendations, however it did not recommend four areas proposed by Brazil, the Amazon Fan among them. The objective of this study is to present the main legal and technical aspects of the controversy about the Amazon Fan, in order to evaluate some alternatives for a future submission, new or revised. |
id |
UFSP_34fba6fd2d2ba7e72bf5c24cb2664f18 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/8173 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository_id_str |
3465 |
spelling |
Considerations about the recommendations of the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf on the Amazon fanConsiderações sobre as recomendações da Comissão de Limites da Plataforma Continental sobre o cone do AmazonasAmazon FanCLCScontinental shelffoot of slopeouter limitCone do AmazonasCLPCplataforma continentalpé do taludelimite exteriorIn 2004, Brazil submitted to the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (CLCS) a Submission for the outer limit of the Brazilian continental shelf for its extension beyond the limits of 200 nautical miles. In 2007, the CLCS presented its recommendations, however it did not recommend four areas proposed by Brazil, the Amazon Fan among them. The objective of this study is to present the main legal and technical aspects of the controversy about the Amazon Fan, in order to evaluate some alternatives for a future submission, new or revised.Em 2004, o Brasil submeteu à Comissão de Limites da Plataforma Continental (CLPC) uma proposta para o limite exterior da plataforma continental brasileira para extensão além das 200 milhas náuticas. Em 2007, a CLPC apresentou suas recomendações; no entanto, não recomendou quatro áreas propostas pelo Brasil, entre elas o Cone do Amazonas. O objetivo deste estudo é apresentar os principais aspectos legais e técnicos da controvérsia sobre o Cone do Amazonas a fim de avaliar algumas alternativas para uma futura submissão, nova ou revisada.Federal University of São PauloUNIFESPSciELOInstituto Brasileiro de Relações InternacionaisUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)More, Rodrigo Fernandes [UNIFESP]2015-06-14T13:46:52Z2015-06-14T13:46:52Z2014-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion117-142application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329201400107Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional. Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais, v. 57, n. 1, p. 117-142, 2014.10.1590/0034-7329201400107S0034-73292014000100117.pdf0034-7329S0034-73292014000100117http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/8173engRevista Brasileira de Política Internacionalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-07-29T13:44:49Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/8173Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-07-29T13:44:49Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Considerations about the recommendations of the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf on the Amazon fan Considerações sobre as recomendações da Comissão de Limites da Plataforma Continental sobre o cone do Amazonas |
title |
Considerations about the recommendations of the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf on the Amazon fan |
spellingShingle |
Considerations about the recommendations of the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf on the Amazon fan More, Rodrigo Fernandes [UNIFESP] Amazon Fan CLCS continental shelf foot of slope outer limit Cone do Amazonas CLPC plataforma continental pé do talude limite exterior |
title_short |
Considerations about the recommendations of the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf on the Amazon fan |
title_full |
Considerations about the recommendations of the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf on the Amazon fan |
title_fullStr |
Considerations about the recommendations of the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf on the Amazon fan |
title_full_unstemmed |
Considerations about the recommendations of the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf on the Amazon fan |
title_sort |
Considerations about the recommendations of the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf on the Amazon fan |
author |
More, Rodrigo Fernandes [UNIFESP] |
author_facet |
More, Rodrigo Fernandes [UNIFESP] |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
More, Rodrigo Fernandes [UNIFESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Amazon Fan CLCS continental shelf foot of slope outer limit Cone do Amazonas CLPC plataforma continental pé do talude limite exterior |
topic |
Amazon Fan CLCS continental shelf foot of slope outer limit Cone do Amazonas CLPC plataforma continental pé do talude limite exterior |
description |
In 2004, Brazil submitted to the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (CLCS) a Submission for the outer limit of the Brazilian continental shelf for its extension beyond the limits of 200 nautical miles. In 2007, the CLCS presented its recommendations, however it did not recommend four areas proposed by Brazil, the Amazon Fan among them. The objective of this study is to present the main legal and technical aspects of the controversy about the Amazon Fan, in order to evaluate some alternatives for a future submission, new or revised. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-01-01 2015-06-14T13:46:52Z 2015-06-14T13:46:52Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329201400107 Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional. Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais, v. 57, n. 1, p. 117-142, 2014. 10.1590/0034-7329201400107 S0034-73292014000100117.pdf 0034-7329 S0034-73292014000100117 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/8173 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329201400107 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/8173 |
identifier_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional. Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais, v. 57, n. 1, p. 117-142, 2014. 10.1590/0034-7329201400107 S0034-73292014000100117.pdf 0034-7329 S0034-73292014000100117 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
117-142 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) instacron:UNIFESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
instacron_str |
UNIFESP |
institution |
UNIFESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br |
_version_ |
1814268388075110400 |