Zika Virus Outbreak - Should assisted reproduction patients avoid pregnancy?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
dARK ID: | ark:/48912/0013000004pn5 |
DOI: | 10.5935/1518-0557.20170040 |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20170040 https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/53514 |
Resumo: | Objective: To discuss the requirement from the National Health Surveillance Agency(ANVISA), for assisted reproduction treatment patients to undergo laboratory tests for ZIKV detection, and if the public health authorities and government leaders' recommendations to women simply avoid pregnancy is prudent. Methods: This study was performed in a universityaffiliated in vitro fertilization center in Brazil. We present a critical discussion on the risk of microcephaly due to ZIKV infection and the prevalence of other harmful pathogens to vulnerable pregnant women and infants. We assessed, 954 patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles(ICSI), between April and November of 2016, concerning the results of ZIKV test, according to different regions in Brazil. Results: Patients undergoing ICSI cycles were split into groups, according to their region of origin: 28(3.0%) were from the North, 27(2.8%) were from the Northeast, 40(4.2%) were from the Midwest, 830(87.2%) were from the Southeast, and 29(3.0%) were from the South. Concerning the diagnosis, 112 samples had a positive or inconclusive result for ZIKV, by chromatography immunoassay. These samples were re-analyzed by ELISA and no result was positive. All positive results were from the Southeast region and none from the Northeast or Midwest regions, which are considered endemic regions. Conclusion: ZIKV test before the onset of assisted reproduction treatments does not rule out the risk of the infection during pregnancy. In addition, although ZIKV infection risk is extremely high, the microcephaly risk due to ZIKV is not higher than the risk of miscarriage and birth defects due to other recognized pathogens. |
id |
UFSP_3530037df4de119f20e029d3888e38bd |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/53514 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository_id_str |
3465 |
spelling |
Zika Virus Outbreak - Should assisted reproduction patients avoid pregnancy?Zika viruspregnancymiscarriagemicrocephalybirth defectsObjective: To discuss the requirement from the National Health Surveillance Agency(ANVISA), for assisted reproduction treatment patients to undergo laboratory tests for ZIKV detection, and if the public health authorities and government leaders' recommendations to women simply avoid pregnancy is prudent. Methods: This study was performed in a universityaffiliated in vitro fertilization center in Brazil. We present a critical discussion on the risk of microcephaly due to ZIKV infection and the prevalence of other harmful pathogens to vulnerable pregnant women and infants. We assessed, 954 patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles(ICSI), between April and November of 2016, concerning the results of ZIKV test, according to different regions in Brazil. Results: Patients undergoing ICSI cycles were split into groups, according to their region of origin: 28(3.0%) were from the North, 27(2.8%) were from the Northeast, 40(4.2%) were from the Midwest, 830(87.2%) were from the Southeast, and 29(3.0%) were from the South. Concerning the diagnosis, 112 samples had a positive or inconclusive result for ZIKV, by chromatography immunoassay. These samples were re-analyzed by ELISA and no result was positive. All positive results were from the Southeast region and none from the Northeast or Midwest regions, which are considered endemic regions. Conclusion: ZIKV test before the onset of assisted reproduction treatments does not rule out the risk of the infection during pregnancy. In addition, although ZIKV infection risk is extremely high, the microcephaly risk due to ZIKV is not higher than the risk of miscarriage and birth defects due to other recognized pathogens.Fertil Med Grp, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilCtr Estudos & Pesquisa Reprod Humana Assistida, Inst Sapientiae, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Paulo UNIFESP, Dept Cirurgia, Area Reprod Humana, Disciplina Urol, Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Paulo UNIFESP, Dept Cirurgia, Area Reprod Humana, Disciplina Urol, Sao Paulo, BrazilWeb of ScienceSoc Brasileira Reproducao Assistida-Sbra2020-06-26T16:30:23Z2020-06-26T16:30:23Z2017info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion208-211application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20170040Jornal Brasileiro De Reproducao Assistida. Ribeirao, v. 21, n. 3, p. 208-211, 2017.10.5935/1518-0557.20170040WOS000411259400007.pdf1517-5693https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/53514WOS:000411259400007ark:/48912/0013000004pn5engJornal Brasileiro De Reproducao AssistidaRibeiraoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBorges, Edson, Jr.de Almeida Ferreira Braga, Daniela Paes [UNIFESP]Zanetti, Bianca FerrariniSetti, Amanda SouzaProvenza, Rodrigo RosaIaconelli, Assumpto, Jr.reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-08-11T01:09:20Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/53514Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-12-11T19:57:11.148141Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Zika Virus Outbreak - Should assisted reproduction patients avoid pregnancy? |
title |
Zika Virus Outbreak - Should assisted reproduction patients avoid pregnancy? |
spellingShingle |
Zika Virus Outbreak - Should assisted reproduction patients avoid pregnancy? Zika Virus Outbreak - Should assisted reproduction patients avoid pregnancy? Borges, Edson, Jr. Zika virus pregnancy miscarriage microcephaly birth defects Borges, Edson, Jr. Zika virus pregnancy miscarriage microcephaly birth defects |
title_short |
Zika Virus Outbreak - Should assisted reproduction patients avoid pregnancy? |
title_full |
Zika Virus Outbreak - Should assisted reproduction patients avoid pregnancy? |
title_fullStr |
Zika Virus Outbreak - Should assisted reproduction patients avoid pregnancy? Zika Virus Outbreak - Should assisted reproduction patients avoid pregnancy? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Zika Virus Outbreak - Should assisted reproduction patients avoid pregnancy? Zika Virus Outbreak - Should assisted reproduction patients avoid pregnancy? |
title_sort |
Zika Virus Outbreak - Should assisted reproduction patients avoid pregnancy? |
author |
Borges, Edson, Jr. |
author_facet |
Borges, Edson, Jr. Borges, Edson, Jr. de Almeida Ferreira Braga, Daniela Paes [UNIFESP] Zanetti, Bianca Ferrarini Setti, Amanda Souza Provenza, Rodrigo Rosa Iaconelli, Assumpto, Jr. de Almeida Ferreira Braga, Daniela Paes [UNIFESP] Zanetti, Bianca Ferrarini Setti, Amanda Souza Provenza, Rodrigo Rosa Iaconelli, Assumpto, Jr. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
de Almeida Ferreira Braga, Daniela Paes [UNIFESP] Zanetti, Bianca Ferrarini Setti, Amanda Souza Provenza, Rodrigo Rosa Iaconelli, Assumpto, Jr. |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Borges, Edson, Jr. de Almeida Ferreira Braga, Daniela Paes [UNIFESP] Zanetti, Bianca Ferrarini Setti, Amanda Souza Provenza, Rodrigo Rosa Iaconelli, Assumpto, Jr. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Zika virus pregnancy miscarriage microcephaly birth defects |
topic |
Zika virus pregnancy miscarriage microcephaly birth defects |
description |
Objective: To discuss the requirement from the National Health Surveillance Agency(ANVISA), for assisted reproduction treatment patients to undergo laboratory tests for ZIKV detection, and if the public health authorities and government leaders' recommendations to women simply avoid pregnancy is prudent. Methods: This study was performed in a universityaffiliated in vitro fertilization center in Brazil. We present a critical discussion on the risk of microcephaly due to ZIKV infection and the prevalence of other harmful pathogens to vulnerable pregnant women and infants. We assessed, 954 patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles(ICSI), between April and November of 2016, concerning the results of ZIKV test, according to different regions in Brazil. Results: Patients undergoing ICSI cycles were split into groups, according to their region of origin: 28(3.0%) were from the North, 27(2.8%) were from the Northeast, 40(4.2%) were from the Midwest, 830(87.2%) were from the Southeast, and 29(3.0%) were from the South. Concerning the diagnosis, 112 samples had a positive or inconclusive result for ZIKV, by chromatography immunoassay. These samples were re-analyzed by ELISA and no result was positive. All positive results were from the Southeast region and none from the Northeast or Midwest regions, which are considered endemic regions. Conclusion: ZIKV test before the onset of assisted reproduction treatments does not rule out the risk of the infection during pregnancy. In addition, although ZIKV infection risk is extremely high, the microcephaly risk due to ZIKV is not higher than the risk of miscarriage and birth defects due to other recognized pathogens. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017 2020-06-26T16:30:23Z 2020-06-26T16:30:23Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20170040 Jornal Brasileiro De Reproducao Assistida. Ribeirao, v. 21, n. 3, p. 208-211, 2017. 10.5935/1518-0557.20170040 WOS000411259400007.pdf 1517-5693 https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/53514 WOS:000411259400007 |
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv |
ark:/48912/0013000004pn5 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20170040 https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/53514 |
identifier_str_mv |
Jornal Brasileiro De Reproducao Assistida. Ribeirao, v. 21, n. 3, p. 208-211, 2017. 10.5935/1518-0557.20170040 WOS000411259400007.pdf 1517-5693 WOS:000411259400007 ark:/48912/0013000004pn5 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Jornal Brasileiro De Reproducao Assistida |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
208-211 application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Ribeirao |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Soc Brasileira Reproducao Assistida-Sbra |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Soc Brasileira Reproducao Assistida-Sbra |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) instacron:UNIFESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
instacron_str |
UNIFESP |
institution |
UNIFESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br |
_version_ |
1822183954322554880 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.5935/1518-0557.20170040 |