Zika Virus Outbreak - Should assisted reproduction patients avoid pregnancy?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Borges, Edson, Jr.
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: de Almeida Ferreira Braga, Daniela Paes [UNIFESP], Zanetti, Bianca Ferrarini, Setti, Amanda Souza, Provenza, Rodrigo Rosa, Iaconelli, Assumpto, Jr.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
dARK ID: ark:/48912/0013000004pn5
DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20170040
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20170040
https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/53514
Resumo: Objective: To discuss the requirement from the National Health Surveillance Agency(ANVISA), for assisted reproduction treatment patients to undergo laboratory tests for ZIKV detection, and if the public health authorities and government leaders' recommendations to women simply avoid pregnancy is prudent. Methods: This study was performed in a universityaffiliated in vitro fertilization center in Brazil. We present a critical discussion on the risk of microcephaly due to ZIKV infection and the prevalence of other harmful pathogens to vulnerable pregnant women and infants. We assessed, 954 patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles(ICSI), between April and November of 2016, concerning the results of ZIKV test, according to different regions in Brazil. Results: Patients undergoing ICSI cycles were split into groups, according to their region of origin: 28(3.0%) were from the North, 27(2.8%) were from the Northeast, 40(4.2%) were from the Midwest, 830(87.2%) were from the Southeast, and 29(3.0%) were from the South. Concerning the diagnosis, 112 samples had a positive or inconclusive result for ZIKV, by chromatography immunoassay. These samples were re-analyzed by ELISA and no result was positive. All positive results were from the Southeast region and none from the Northeast or Midwest regions, which are considered endemic regions. Conclusion: ZIKV test before the onset of assisted reproduction treatments does not rule out the risk of the infection during pregnancy. In addition, although ZIKV infection risk is extremely high, the microcephaly risk due to ZIKV is not higher than the risk of miscarriage and birth defects due to other recognized pathogens.
id UFSP_3530037df4de119f20e029d3888e38bd
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/53514
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling Zika Virus Outbreak - Should assisted reproduction patients avoid pregnancy?Zika viruspregnancymiscarriagemicrocephalybirth defectsObjective: To discuss the requirement from the National Health Surveillance Agency(ANVISA), for assisted reproduction treatment patients to undergo laboratory tests for ZIKV detection, and if the public health authorities and government leaders' recommendations to women simply avoid pregnancy is prudent. Methods: This study was performed in a universityaffiliated in vitro fertilization center in Brazil. We present a critical discussion on the risk of microcephaly due to ZIKV infection and the prevalence of other harmful pathogens to vulnerable pregnant women and infants. We assessed, 954 patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles(ICSI), between April and November of 2016, concerning the results of ZIKV test, according to different regions in Brazil. Results: Patients undergoing ICSI cycles were split into groups, according to their region of origin: 28(3.0%) were from the North, 27(2.8%) were from the Northeast, 40(4.2%) were from the Midwest, 830(87.2%) were from the Southeast, and 29(3.0%) were from the South. Concerning the diagnosis, 112 samples had a positive or inconclusive result for ZIKV, by chromatography immunoassay. These samples were re-analyzed by ELISA and no result was positive. All positive results were from the Southeast region and none from the Northeast or Midwest regions, which are considered endemic regions. Conclusion: ZIKV test before the onset of assisted reproduction treatments does not rule out the risk of the infection during pregnancy. In addition, although ZIKV infection risk is extremely high, the microcephaly risk due to ZIKV is not higher than the risk of miscarriage and birth defects due to other recognized pathogens.Fertil Med Grp, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilCtr Estudos & Pesquisa Reprod Humana Assistida, Inst Sapientiae, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Paulo UNIFESP, Dept Cirurgia, Area Reprod Humana, Disciplina Urol, Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Paulo UNIFESP, Dept Cirurgia, Area Reprod Humana, Disciplina Urol, Sao Paulo, BrazilWeb of ScienceSoc Brasileira Reproducao Assistida-Sbra2020-06-26T16:30:23Z2020-06-26T16:30:23Z2017info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion208-211application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20170040Jornal Brasileiro De Reproducao Assistida. Ribeirao, v. 21, n. 3, p. 208-211, 2017.10.5935/1518-0557.20170040WOS000411259400007.pdf1517-5693https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/53514WOS:000411259400007ark:/48912/0013000004pn5engJornal Brasileiro De Reproducao AssistidaRibeiraoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBorges, Edson, Jr.de Almeida Ferreira Braga, Daniela Paes [UNIFESP]Zanetti, Bianca FerrariniSetti, Amanda SouzaProvenza, Rodrigo RosaIaconelli, Assumpto, Jr.reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-08-11T01:09:20Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/53514Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-12-11T19:57:11.148141Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Zika Virus Outbreak - Should assisted reproduction patients avoid pregnancy?
title Zika Virus Outbreak - Should assisted reproduction patients avoid pregnancy?
spellingShingle Zika Virus Outbreak - Should assisted reproduction patients avoid pregnancy?
Zika Virus Outbreak - Should assisted reproduction patients avoid pregnancy?
Borges, Edson, Jr.
Zika virus
pregnancy
miscarriage
microcephaly
birth defects
Borges, Edson, Jr.
Zika virus
pregnancy
miscarriage
microcephaly
birth defects
title_short Zika Virus Outbreak - Should assisted reproduction patients avoid pregnancy?
title_full Zika Virus Outbreak - Should assisted reproduction patients avoid pregnancy?
title_fullStr Zika Virus Outbreak - Should assisted reproduction patients avoid pregnancy?
Zika Virus Outbreak - Should assisted reproduction patients avoid pregnancy?
title_full_unstemmed Zika Virus Outbreak - Should assisted reproduction patients avoid pregnancy?
Zika Virus Outbreak - Should assisted reproduction patients avoid pregnancy?
title_sort Zika Virus Outbreak - Should assisted reproduction patients avoid pregnancy?
author Borges, Edson, Jr.
author_facet Borges, Edson, Jr.
Borges, Edson, Jr.
de Almeida Ferreira Braga, Daniela Paes [UNIFESP]
Zanetti, Bianca Ferrarini
Setti, Amanda Souza
Provenza, Rodrigo Rosa
Iaconelli, Assumpto, Jr.
de Almeida Ferreira Braga, Daniela Paes [UNIFESP]
Zanetti, Bianca Ferrarini
Setti, Amanda Souza
Provenza, Rodrigo Rosa
Iaconelli, Assumpto, Jr.
author_role author
author2 de Almeida Ferreira Braga, Daniela Paes [UNIFESP]
Zanetti, Bianca Ferrarini
Setti, Amanda Souza
Provenza, Rodrigo Rosa
Iaconelli, Assumpto, Jr.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Borges, Edson, Jr.
de Almeida Ferreira Braga, Daniela Paes [UNIFESP]
Zanetti, Bianca Ferrarini
Setti, Amanda Souza
Provenza, Rodrigo Rosa
Iaconelli, Assumpto, Jr.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Zika virus
pregnancy
miscarriage
microcephaly
birth defects
topic Zika virus
pregnancy
miscarriage
microcephaly
birth defects
description Objective: To discuss the requirement from the National Health Surveillance Agency(ANVISA), for assisted reproduction treatment patients to undergo laboratory tests for ZIKV detection, and if the public health authorities and government leaders' recommendations to women simply avoid pregnancy is prudent. Methods: This study was performed in a universityaffiliated in vitro fertilization center in Brazil. We present a critical discussion on the risk of microcephaly due to ZIKV infection and the prevalence of other harmful pathogens to vulnerable pregnant women and infants. We assessed, 954 patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles(ICSI), between April and November of 2016, concerning the results of ZIKV test, according to different regions in Brazil. Results: Patients undergoing ICSI cycles were split into groups, according to their region of origin: 28(3.0%) were from the North, 27(2.8%) were from the Northeast, 40(4.2%) were from the Midwest, 830(87.2%) were from the Southeast, and 29(3.0%) were from the South. Concerning the diagnosis, 112 samples had a positive or inconclusive result for ZIKV, by chromatography immunoassay. These samples were re-analyzed by ELISA and no result was positive. All positive results were from the Southeast region and none from the Northeast or Midwest regions, which are considered endemic regions. Conclusion: ZIKV test before the onset of assisted reproduction treatments does not rule out the risk of the infection during pregnancy. In addition, although ZIKV infection risk is extremely high, the microcephaly risk due to ZIKV is not higher than the risk of miscarriage and birth defects due to other recognized pathogens.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017
2020-06-26T16:30:23Z
2020-06-26T16:30:23Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20170040
Jornal Brasileiro De Reproducao Assistida. Ribeirao, v. 21, n. 3, p. 208-211, 2017.
10.5935/1518-0557.20170040
WOS000411259400007.pdf
1517-5693
https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/53514
WOS:000411259400007
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv ark:/48912/0013000004pn5
url http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20170040
https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/53514
identifier_str_mv Jornal Brasileiro De Reproducao Assistida. Ribeirao, v. 21, n. 3, p. 208-211, 2017.
10.5935/1518-0557.20170040
WOS000411259400007.pdf
1517-5693
WOS:000411259400007
ark:/48912/0013000004pn5
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Jornal Brasileiro De Reproducao Assistida
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 208-211
application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Ribeirao
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Soc Brasileira Reproducao Assistida-Sbra
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Soc Brasileira Reproducao Assistida-Sbra
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br
_version_ 1822183954322554880
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.5935/1518-0557.20170040