Double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial of clofazimine compared with chloroquine in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bezerra, ELM
Data de Publicação: 2005
Outros Autores: Vilar, MJP, Neto, PBD, Sato, Emilia Inoue [UNIFESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/28472
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.21358
Resumo: Objective. To evaluate the efficacy of clofazimine (CFZ) compared with chloroquine diphosphate (CDP) for the treatment of cutaneous involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).Methods. A prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial was carried out in SLE patients with active cutaneous lesions, of whom 16 were randomized to receive CFZ at 100 mg/day and 17 received CDP at 250 mg/day for 6 months. All drugs had a similar appearance to avoid identification. Both groups received broad-spectrum sunscreens twice a day and the prednisone dose was kept stable during the study. Cutaneous lesions were evaluated by 2 blinded observers at baseline and at months 1, 2, 4, and 6.Results. Thirty-three patients were randomized to a treatment group, of whom 27 completed 6 months of treatment. the groups were homogeneous and comparable in terms of demographic and clinical characteristics. Five CFZ-treated patients and 1 CDP-treated patient (P = 0.15) dropped out due to development of severe lupus flare. At the end of the study, 12 CFZ-treated patients (75%) and 14 CDP-treated patients (82.4%) had complete or near-complete remission of skin lesions; intention-to-treat analysis showed no significant difference in the response rates between groups. Side effects, mainly skin and gastrointestinal events, were frequent in both groups, but no patients had to discontinue their treatment.Conclusion. These findings suggest that CFZ is equally as effective as CDP in controlling cutaneous lesions in SLE patients. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that the CFZ itself could be the cause of systemic lupus flare.
id UFSP_3bc2bd80c308cd4284bdf3214c8526d2
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/28472
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling Bezerra, ELMVilar, MJPNeto, PBDSato, Emilia Inoue [UNIFESP]Univ Fed Rio Grande NorteUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)2016-01-24T12:38:04Z2016-01-24T12:38:04Z2005-10-01Arthritis and Rheumatism. Hoboken: Wiley-liss, v. 52, n. 10, p. 3073-3078, 2005.0004-3591http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/28472http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.2135810.1002/art.21358WOS:000232548800016Objective. To evaluate the efficacy of clofazimine (CFZ) compared with chloroquine diphosphate (CDP) for the treatment of cutaneous involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).Methods. A prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial was carried out in SLE patients with active cutaneous lesions, of whom 16 were randomized to receive CFZ at 100 mg/day and 17 received CDP at 250 mg/day for 6 months. All drugs had a similar appearance to avoid identification. Both groups received broad-spectrum sunscreens twice a day and the prednisone dose was kept stable during the study. Cutaneous lesions were evaluated by 2 blinded observers at baseline and at months 1, 2, 4, and 6.Results. Thirty-three patients were randomized to a treatment group, of whom 27 completed 6 months of treatment. the groups were homogeneous and comparable in terms of demographic and clinical characteristics. Five CFZ-treated patients and 1 CDP-treated patient (P = 0.15) dropped out due to development of severe lupus flare. At the end of the study, 12 CFZ-treated patients (75%) and 14 CDP-treated patients (82.4%) had complete or near-complete remission of skin lesions; intention-to-treat analysis showed no significant difference in the response rates between groups. Side effects, mainly skin and gastrointestinal events, were frequent in both groups, but no patients had to discontinue their treatment.Conclusion. These findings suggest that CFZ is equally as effective as CDP in controlling cutaneous lesions in SLE patients. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that the CFZ itself could be the cause of systemic lupus flare.Univ Fed Rio Grande Norte, BR-59014020 Natal, RN, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, EPM, São Paulo, BrazilWeb of Science3073-3078engWiley-BlackwellArthritis and Rheumatismhttp://olabout.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-406071.htmlinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDouble-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial of clofazimine compared with chloroquine in patients with systemic lupus erythematosusinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP11600/284722022-09-27 14:37:30.934metadata only accessoai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/28472Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:34652022-09-27T17:37:30Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.en.fl_str_mv Double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial of clofazimine compared with chloroquine in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus
title Double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial of clofazimine compared with chloroquine in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus
spellingShingle Double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial of clofazimine compared with chloroquine in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus
Bezerra, ELM
title_short Double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial of clofazimine compared with chloroquine in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus
title_full Double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial of clofazimine compared with chloroquine in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus
title_fullStr Double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial of clofazimine compared with chloroquine in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus
title_full_unstemmed Double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial of clofazimine compared with chloroquine in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus
title_sort Double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial of clofazimine compared with chloroquine in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus
author Bezerra, ELM
author_facet Bezerra, ELM
Vilar, MJP
Neto, PBD
Sato, Emilia Inoue [UNIFESP]
author_role author
author2 Vilar, MJP
Neto, PBD
Sato, Emilia Inoue [UNIFESP]
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.institution.none.fl_str_mv Univ Fed Rio Grande Norte
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bezerra, ELM
Vilar, MJP
Neto, PBD
Sato, Emilia Inoue [UNIFESP]
description Objective. To evaluate the efficacy of clofazimine (CFZ) compared with chloroquine diphosphate (CDP) for the treatment of cutaneous involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).Methods. A prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial was carried out in SLE patients with active cutaneous lesions, of whom 16 were randomized to receive CFZ at 100 mg/day and 17 received CDP at 250 mg/day for 6 months. All drugs had a similar appearance to avoid identification. Both groups received broad-spectrum sunscreens twice a day and the prednisone dose was kept stable during the study. Cutaneous lesions were evaluated by 2 blinded observers at baseline and at months 1, 2, 4, and 6.Results. Thirty-three patients were randomized to a treatment group, of whom 27 completed 6 months of treatment. the groups were homogeneous and comparable in terms of demographic and clinical characteristics. Five CFZ-treated patients and 1 CDP-treated patient (P = 0.15) dropped out due to development of severe lupus flare. At the end of the study, 12 CFZ-treated patients (75%) and 14 CDP-treated patients (82.4%) had complete or near-complete remission of skin lesions; intention-to-treat analysis showed no significant difference in the response rates between groups. Side effects, mainly skin and gastrointestinal events, were frequent in both groups, but no patients had to discontinue their treatment.Conclusion. These findings suggest that CFZ is equally as effective as CDP in controlling cutaneous lesions in SLE patients. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that the CFZ itself could be the cause of systemic lupus flare.
publishDate 2005
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2005-10-01
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2016-01-24T12:38:04Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2016-01-24T12:38:04Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv Arthritis and Rheumatism. Hoboken: Wiley-liss, v. 52, n. 10, p. 3073-3078, 2005.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/28472
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.21358
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 0004-3591
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.1002/art.21358
dc.identifier.wos.none.fl_str_mv WOS:000232548800016
identifier_str_mv Arthritis and Rheumatism. Hoboken: Wiley-liss, v. 52, n. 10, p. 3073-3078, 2005.
0004-3591
10.1002/art.21358
WOS:000232548800016
url http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/28472
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.21358
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.none.fl_str_mv Arthritis and Rheumatism
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv http://olabout.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-406071.html
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://olabout.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-406071.html
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 3073-3078
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley-Blackwell
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley-Blackwell
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1802764177353211904