Quality of the ophthalmological service to outpatients of the public and private healthcare systems
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
Texto Completo: | https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0004-27492017000600350&script=sci_arttext https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/58209 |
Resumo: | Purpose: To compare perceptions of the quality of ophthalmological services offered to outpatients from the public healthcare system to those from the private healthcare system, and to determine which measures are seen as necessary and a priority for improving the quality of care. Methods: This was a prospective observational study on 200 patients, 101 and 99 of whom were from the public and private healthcare systems, respectively. All patients underwent an ophthalmological examination at an ophthalmology hospital in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Personal interviews were conducted using two structured questionnaires adapted from the modified SERVQUAL scale. Results: Overall, patients from the private healthcare system were significantly more dissatisfied than those from the public healthcare system. In both systems, reliability was considered to be the most important determinant of quality, and it presented the highest level of dissatisfaction. Satisfaction with the public healthcare system was significantly greater than that with the private healthcare system in terms of the tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, and assurance determinants of the SERVQUAL scale. Conclusions: Institutions must plan, execute, evaluate, and monitor measures that seek to improve the overall patient satisfaction with the quality of services provided, particularly in the private healthcare system, and special attention must be paid to reliability in both healthcare systems. The identification and monitoring of the quality of healthcare services through the periodic use of the SERVQUAL scale may provide healthcare managers with information so that they can identify, plan, and monitor necessary and priority measures. This could be a key strategy for improving the quality of outpatient health services in the public and private systems. |
id |
UFSP_4243668baf1dda3f669b2a82f6197524 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/58209 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository_id_str |
3465 |
spelling |
Quality of the ophthalmological service to outpatients of the public and private healthcare systemsOphthalmologyHealth servicesQuality indicatorshealthcareAmbulatory careQuality assurancehealthcarePurpose: To compare perceptions of the quality of ophthalmological services offered to outpatients from the public healthcare system to those from the private healthcare system, and to determine which measures are seen as necessary and a priority for improving the quality of care. Methods: This was a prospective observational study on 200 patients, 101 and 99 of whom were from the public and private healthcare systems, respectively. All patients underwent an ophthalmological examination at an ophthalmology hospital in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Personal interviews were conducted using two structured questionnaires adapted from the modified SERVQUAL scale. Results: Overall, patients from the private healthcare system were significantly more dissatisfied than those from the public healthcare system. In both systems, reliability was considered to be the most important determinant of quality, and it presented the highest level of dissatisfaction. Satisfaction with the public healthcare system was significantly greater than that with the private healthcare system in terms of the tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, and assurance determinants of the SERVQUAL scale. Conclusions: Institutions must plan, execute, evaluate, and monitor measures that seek to improve the overall patient satisfaction with the quality of services provided, particularly in the private healthcare system, and special attention must be paid to reliability in both healthcare systems. The identification and monitoring of the quality of healthcare services through the periodic use of the SERVQUAL scale may provide healthcare managers with information so that they can identify, plan, and monitor necessary and priority measures. This could be a key strategy for improving the quality of outpatient health services in the public and private systems.Univ Fed Sao Paulo UNIFESP, EPM, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilUniv Fed Triangulo Mineiro, Sch Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Uberaba, MG, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Paulo UNIFESP, EPM, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilWeb of ScienceConsel Brasil Oftalmologia2020-09-01T13:21:20Z2020-09-01T13:21:20Z2017info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion350-354application/pdfhttps://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0004-27492017000600350&script=sci_arttextArquivos Brasileiros De Oftalmologia. Sao Paulo, v. 80, n. 6, p. 350-354, 2017.10.5935/0004-2749.20170086S0004-27492017000600350.pdf0004-2749S0004-27492017000600350https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/58209WOS:000418526100003engArquivos Brasileiros De OftalmologiaSao Pauloinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos Hercos, Benigno Vicente [UNIFESP]Berezovsky, Adriana [UNIFESP]reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-08-09T14:14:56Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/58209Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-08-09T14:14:56Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Quality of the ophthalmological service to outpatients of the public and private healthcare systems |
title |
Quality of the ophthalmological service to outpatients of the public and private healthcare systems |
spellingShingle |
Quality of the ophthalmological service to outpatients of the public and private healthcare systems Santos Hercos, Benigno Vicente [UNIFESP] Ophthalmology Health services Quality indicators healthcare Ambulatory care Quality assurance healthcare |
title_short |
Quality of the ophthalmological service to outpatients of the public and private healthcare systems |
title_full |
Quality of the ophthalmological service to outpatients of the public and private healthcare systems |
title_fullStr |
Quality of the ophthalmological service to outpatients of the public and private healthcare systems |
title_full_unstemmed |
Quality of the ophthalmological service to outpatients of the public and private healthcare systems |
title_sort |
Quality of the ophthalmological service to outpatients of the public and private healthcare systems |
author |
Santos Hercos, Benigno Vicente [UNIFESP] |
author_facet |
Santos Hercos, Benigno Vicente [UNIFESP] Berezovsky, Adriana [UNIFESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Berezovsky, Adriana [UNIFESP] |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santos Hercos, Benigno Vicente [UNIFESP] Berezovsky, Adriana [UNIFESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ophthalmology Health services Quality indicators healthcare Ambulatory care Quality assurance healthcare |
topic |
Ophthalmology Health services Quality indicators healthcare Ambulatory care Quality assurance healthcare |
description |
Purpose: To compare perceptions of the quality of ophthalmological services offered to outpatients from the public healthcare system to those from the private healthcare system, and to determine which measures are seen as necessary and a priority for improving the quality of care. Methods: This was a prospective observational study on 200 patients, 101 and 99 of whom were from the public and private healthcare systems, respectively. All patients underwent an ophthalmological examination at an ophthalmology hospital in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Personal interviews were conducted using two structured questionnaires adapted from the modified SERVQUAL scale. Results: Overall, patients from the private healthcare system were significantly more dissatisfied than those from the public healthcare system. In both systems, reliability was considered to be the most important determinant of quality, and it presented the highest level of dissatisfaction. Satisfaction with the public healthcare system was significantly greater than that with the private healthcare system in terms of the tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, and assurance determinants of the SERVQUAL scale. Conclusions: Institutions must plan, execute, evaluate, and monitor measures that seek to improve the overall patient satisfaction with the quality of services provided, particularly in the private healthcare system, and special attention must be paid to reliability in both healthcare systems. The identification and monitoring of the quality of healthcare services through the periodic use of the SERVQUAL scale may provide healthcare managers with information so that they can identify, plan, and monitor necessary and priority measures. This could be a key strategy for improving the quality of outpatient health services in the public and private systems. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017 2020-09-01T13:21:20Z 2020-09-01T13:21:20Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0004-27492017000600350&script=sci_arttext Arquivos Brasileiros De Oftalmologia. Sao Paulo, v. 80, n. 6, p. 350-354, 2017. 10.5935/0004-2749.20170086 S0004-27492017000600350.pdf 0004-2749 S0004-27492017000600350 https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/58209 WOS:000418526100003 |
url |
https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0004-27492017000600350&script=sci_arttext https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/58209 |
identifier_str_mv |
Arquivos Brasileiros De Oftalmologia. Sao Paulo, v. 80, n. 6, p. 350-354, 2017. 10.5935/0004-2749.20170086 S0004-27492017000600350.pdf 0004-2749 S0004-27492017000600350 WOS:000418526100003 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Arquivos Brasileiros De Oftalmologia |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
350-354 application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Sao Paulo |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Consel Brasil Oftalmologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Consel Brasil Oftalmologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) instacron:UNIFESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
instacron_str |
UNIFESP |
institution |
UNIFESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br |
_version_ |
1814268331315691521 |