Results of Surgical Treatment Compared with Ultrasound-Guided Foam Sclerotherapy in Patients with Varicose Veins: A Prospective Randomised Study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Figueiredo, Marcondes [UNIFESP]
Data de Publicação: 2009
Outros Autores: Araujo, Salustiano Pereira, Barros Junior, Newton de [UNIFESP], Miranda Junior, Fausto [UNIFESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/31957
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.07.015
Resumo: Objective: This study aims to compare venous clinical severity scores in patients with heated venous ulcers due to varicose veins of the tower limbs (the clinical, etiologic, anatomic, and pathophysiologic data (CEAP) classification: C(5) EpAsPr) treated by saphenous stripping and phlebectomy or by ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy.Method: Sixty patients were included: 29 underwent saphenous stripping and phlebectomy for varices in saphenous tributaries and 27 were treated by ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy; four cases were lost to follow-up. the main outcome measure was venous clinical severity scores (pain, oedema, inflammation, hyperpigmentation and lipodermatosclerosis). An ultrasound examination was carried out prior to treatment and 30, 60 and 180 days after the procedure to assess the relative efficacy of the methods in obliterating the saphenous trunk.Results: the mean venous clinical severity scores measured before and after 180 days were as follows: Surgery group - pain: before 1.97 standard deviation (SD) 0.19, 180 days 0.72 SD 0,53; oedema: before 1.66 SD 0.48, 180 days 0.55 SD 0.63; inflammation: before 1.55 SD 0.63, 180 days 0.72 SD 0.45. Foam sclerotherapy group - pain: before 1.81 SD 0.40, 180 days 0.56 SD 0.51; oedema: before 1.70 SD 0.47, 180 days 0.48 SD 0.64; inflammation: before 1.67 SD 0.68, after 0.89 SD 0.32. All scores showed statistically significant reductions in both patient groups. the saphenous vein had been obliterated, 180 days after treatment, in 78% of the surgery group, compared with 90% in the foam sclerotherapy group.Conclusions: Ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy is a safe and effective option for patients with chronic venous disorders. Crown Copyright (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of European Society for Vascular Surgery. All rights reserved.
id UFSP_48dc647522998b4a87cc8dc732de7811
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/31957
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling Figueiredo, Marcondes [UNIFESP]Araujo, Salustiano PereiraBarros Junior, Newton de [UNIFESP]Miranda Junior, Fausto [UNIFESP]Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)2016-01-24T13:58:56Z2016-01-24T13:58:56Z2009-12-01European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. London: W B Saunders Co Ltd, v. 38, n. 6, p. 758-763, 2009.1078-5884http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/31957http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.07.015WOS000273143400016.pdf10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.07.015WOS:000273143400016Objective: This study aims to compare venous clinical severity scores in patients with heated venous ulcers due to varicose veins of the tower limbs (the clinical, etiologic, anatomic, and pathophysiologic data (CEAP) classification: C(5) EpAsPr) treated by saphenous stripping and phlebectomy or by ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy.Method: Sixty patients were included: 29 underwent saphenous stripping and phlebectomy for varices in saphenous tributaries and 27 were treated by ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy; four cases were lost to follow-up. the main outcome measure was venous clinical severity scores (pain, oedema, inflammation, hyperpigmentation and lipodermatosclerosis). An ultrasound examination was carried out prior to treatment and 30, 60 and 180 days after the procedure to assess the relative efficacy of the methods in obliterating the saphenous trunk.Results: the mean venous clinical severity scores measured before and after 180 days were as follows: Surgery group - pain: before 1.97 standard deviation (SD) 0.19, 180 days 0.72 SD 0,53; oedema: before 1.66 SD 0.48, 180 days 0.55 SD 0.63; inflammation: before 1.55 SD 0.63, 180 days 0.72 SD 0.45. Foam sclerotherapy group - pain: before 1.81 SD 0.40, 180 days 0.56 SD 0.51; oedema: before 1.70 SD 0.47, 180 days 0.48 SD 0.64; inflammation: before 1.67 SD 0.68, after 0.89 SD 0.32. All scores showed statistically significant reductions in both patient groups. the saphenous vein had been obliterated, 180 days after treatment, in 78% of the surgery group, compared with 90% in the foam sclerotherapy group.Conclusions: Ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy is a safe and effective option for patients with chronic venous disorders. Crown Copyright (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of European Society for Vascular Surgery. All rights reserved.Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Surg, Vasc Sect, São Paulo, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Surg, Vasc Sect, São Paulo, BrazilWeb of Science758-763engW B Saunders Co LtdEuropean Journal of Vascular and Endovascular SurgeryVaricose vein ultrasonographyVaricose vein surgeryUltrasound-guided foam sclerotherapyPolidocanolResults of Surgical Treatment Compared with Ultrasound-Guided Foam Sclerotherapy in Patients with Varicose Veins: A Prospective Randomised Studyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESPORIGINALWOS000273143400016.pdfapplication/pdf187917${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/31957/1/WOS000273143400016.pdf3d716b34107fbac99c258163b45ff77eMD51open accessTEXTWOS000273143400016.pdf.txtWOS000273143400016.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain28014${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/31957/2/WOS000273143400016.pdf.txt32befc37fc50b0f5359a4de07c6d0031MD52open access11600/319572022-11-04 15:45:38.928open accessoai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/31957Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:34652023-05-25T12:29:56.810142Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.en.fl_str_mv Results of Surgical Treatment Compared with Ultrasound-Guided Foam Sclerotherapy in Patients with Varicose Veins: A Prospective Randomised Study
title Results of Surgical Treatment Compared with Ultrasound-Guided Foam Sclerotherapy in Patients with Varicose Veins: A Prospective Randomised Study
spellingShingle Results of Surgical Treatment Compared with Ultrasound-Guided Foam Sclerotherapy in Patients with Varicose Veins: A Prospective Randomised Study
Figueiredo, Marcondes [UNIFESP]
Varicose vein ultrasonography
Varicose vein surgery
Ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy
Polidocanol
title_short Results of Surgical Treatment Compared with Ultrasound-Guided Foam Sclerotherapy in Patients with Varicose Veins: A Prospective Randomised Study
title_full Results of Surgical Treatment Compared with Ultrasound-Guided Foam Sclerotherapy in Patients with Varicose Veins: A Prospective Randomised Study
title_fullStr Results of Surgical Treatment Compared with Ultrasound-Guided Foam Sclerotherapy in Patients with Varicose Veins: A Prospective Randomised Study
title_full_unstemmed Results of Surgical Treatment Compared with Ultrasound-Guided Foam Sclerotherapy in Patients with Varicose Veins: A Prospective Randomised Study
title_sort Results of Surgical Treatment Compared with Ultrasound-Guided Foam Sclerotherapy in Patients with Varicose Veins: A Prospective Randomised Study
author Figueiredo, Marcondes [UNIFESP]
author_facet Figueiredo, Marcondes [UNIFESP]
Araujo, Salustiano Pereira
Barros Junior, Newton de [UNIFESP]
Miranda Junior, Fausto [UNIFESP]
author_role author
author2 Araujo, Salustiano Pereira
Barros Junior, Newton de [UNIFESP]
Miranda Junior, Fausto [UNIFESP]
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.institution.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Figueiredo, Marcondes [UNIFESP]
Araujo, Salustiano Pereira
Barros Junior, Newton de [UNIFESP]
Miranda Junior, Fausto [UNIFESP]
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Varicose vein ultrasonography
Varicose vein surgery
Ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy
Polidocanol
topic Varicose vein ultrasonography
Varicose vein surgery
Ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy
Polidocanol
description Objective: This study aims to compare venous clinical severity scores in patients with heated venous ulcers due to varicose veins of the tower limbs (the clinical, etiologic, anatomic, and pathophysiologic data (CEAP) classification: C(5) EpAsPr) treated by saphenous stripping and phlebectomy or by ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy.Method: Sixty patients were included: 29 underwent saphenous stripping and phlebectomy for varices in saphenous tributaries and 27 were treated by ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy; four cases were lost to follow-up. the main outcome measure was venous clinical severity scores (pain, oedema, inflammation, hyperpigmentation and lipodermatosclerosis). An ultrasound examination was carried out prior to treatment and 30, 60 and 180 days after the procedure to assess the relative efficacy of the methods in obliterating the saphenous trunk.Results: the mean venous clinical severity scores measured before and after 180 days were as follows: Surgery group - pain: before 1.97 standard deviation (SD) 0.19, 180 days 0.72 SD 0,53; oedema: before 1.66 SD 0.48, 180 days 0.55 SD 0.63; inflammation: before 1.55 SD 0.63, 180 days 0.72 SD 0.45. Foam sclerotherapy group - pain: before 1.81 SD 0.40, 180 days 0.56 SD 0.51; oedema: before 1.70 SD 0.47, 180 days 0.48 SD 0.64; inflammation: before 1.67 SD 0.68, after 0.89 SD 0.32. All scores showed statistically significant reductions in both patient groups. the saphenous vein had been obliterated, 180 days after treatment, in 78% of the surgery group, compared with 90% in the foam sclerotherapy group.Conclusions: Ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy is a safe and effective option for patients with chronic venous disorders. Crown Copyright (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of European Society for Vascular Surgery. All rights reserved.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2009-12-01
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2016-01-24T13:58:56Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2016-01-24T13:58:56Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. London: W B Saunders Co Ltd, v. 38, n. 6, p. 758-763, 2009.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/31957
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.07.015
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 1078-5884
dc.identifier.file.none.fl_str_mv WOS000273143400016.pdf
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.07.015
dc.identifier.wos.none.fl_str_mv WOS:000273143400016
identifier_str_mv European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. London: W B Saunders Co Ltd, v. 38, n. 6, p. 758-763, 2009.
1078-5884
WOS000273143400016.pdf
10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.07.015
WOS:000273143400016
url http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/31957
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.07.015
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.none.fl_str_mv European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 758-763
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv W B Saunders Co Ltd
publisher.none.fl_str_mv W B Saunders Co Ltd
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv ${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/31957/1/WOS000273143400016.pdf
${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/31957/2/WOS000273143400016.pdf.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 3d716b34107fbac99c258163b45ff77e
32befc37fc50b0f5359a4de07c6d0031
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1783460298965909504