The Status of Telestroke in the United States A Survey of Currently Active Stroke Telemedicine Programs

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Gisele Sampaio [UNIFESP]
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Farrell, Shawn, Shandra, Emma, Viswanathan, Anand, Schwamm, Lee H.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/35109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.645861
Resumo: Background and Purpose-Little is known about adoption or success of telestroke networks outside of published or federally funded programs. Under contract to the Health Resource Services Administration, we conducted an environmental scan of telestroke programs in the United States.Methods-An analyst contacted all potential programs identified in comprehensive online searches, interviewed respondents, and collected response data about structural and functional components of currently operating telestroke programs.Results-Among 97 potential programs contacted, 56 programs had confirmed telestroke activity, and 38 programs (68%) from 27 states participated. Hospital and community characteristics of nonparticipating programs were similar to those of participating ones. the top 3 clinical needs met by the telestroke were emergency department consultation (100%), patient triage (83.8%), and inpatient teleconsultation (46.0%). Telestroke programs were in operation a median of 2.44 years (interquartile range, 1.36-3.44 years); 94.6% used 2-way, real-time interactive video plus imaging, but only 44% used dedicated telemedicine consultation software. the mean number of spokes per hub increased significantly from 2007 to 2008 to 2009 (3.78 versus 7.60; P < 0.05), and >80% of spoke sites were rural or small hospitals. Reimbursement was absent for >40% of sites. Sites rated inability to obtain physician licensure (27.77%), lack of program funds (27.77%), and lack of reimbursement (19.44%) as the most important barriers to program growth.Conclusions-Telestroke is a widespread and growing practice model. Important barriers to expansion amenable to change relate to organizational, technical, and educational domains and external economic and regulatory forces. (Stroke. 2012;43:2078-2085.)
id UFSP_49741e0c62435cef255d462609724ffe
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/35109
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling Silva, Gisele Sampaio [UNIFESP]Farrell, ShawnShandra, EmmaViswanathan, AnandSchwamm, Lee H.Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Albert Einstein HospChildrens HospMassachusetts Gen Hosp2016-01-24T14:27:29Z2016-01-24T14:27:29Z2012-08-01Stroke. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, v. 43, n. 8, p. 2078-U138, 2012.0039-2499http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/35109http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.64586110.1161/STROKEAHA.111.645861WOS:000306689300021Background and Purpose-Little is known about adoption or success of telestroke networks outside of published or federally funded programs. Under contract to the Health Resource Services Administration, we conducted an environmental scan of telestroke programs in the United States.Methods-An analyst contacted all potential programs identified in comprehensive online searches, interviewed respondents, and collected response data about structural and functional components of currently operating telestroke programs.Results-Among 97 potential programs contacted, 56 programs had confirmed telestroke activity, and 38 programs (68%) from 27 states participated. Hospital and community characteristics of nonparticipating programs were similar to those of participating ones. the top 3 clinical needs met by the telestroke were emergency department consultation (100%), patient triage (83.8%), and inpatient teleconsultation (46.0%). Telestroke programs were in operation a median of 2.44 years (interquartile range, 1.36-3.44 years); 94.6% used 2-way, real-time interactive video plus imaging, but only 44% used dedicated telemedicine consultation software. the mean number of spokes per hub increased significantly from 2007 to 2008 to 2009 (3.78 versus 7.60; P < 0.05), and >80% of spoke sites were rural or small hospitals. Reimbursement was absent for >40% of sites. Sites rated inability to obtain physician licensure (27.77%), lack of program funds (27.77%), and lack of reimbursement (19.44%) as the most important barriers to program growth.Conclusions-Telestroke is a widespread and growing practice model. Important barriers to expansion amenable to change relate to organizational, technical, and educational domains and external economic and regulatory forces. (Stroke. 2012;43:2078-2085.)Health Resource Services Administration RequisitionUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Neurol & Neurosurg, São Paulo, BrazilAlbert Einstein Hosp, Neurol Program, São Paulo, BrazilChildrens Hosp, Ctr Innovat, Boston, MA 02115 USAMassachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Boston, MA 02114 USAMassachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Neurol, Boston, MA 02114 USAUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Neurol & Neurosurg, São Paulo, BrazilHealth Resource Services Administration Requisition: 09-HRS9923-ABWeb of Science2078-U138engLippincott Williams & WilkinsStroketelemedicinetelestrokeinventorybarriersThe Status of Telestroke in the United States A Survey of Currently Active Stroke Telemedicine Programsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP11600/351092022-07-08 10:33:25.933metadata only accessoai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/35109Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:34652023-05-25T12:18:43.778116Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.en.fl_str_mv The Status of Telestroke in the United States A Survey of Currently Active Stroke Telemedicine Programs
title The Status of Telestroke in the United States A Survey of Currently Active Stroke Telemedicine Programs
spellingShingle The Status of Telestroke in the United States A Survey of Currently Active Stroke Telemedicine Programs
Silva, Gisele Sampaio [UNIFESP]
telemedicine
telestroke
inventory
barriers
title_short The Status of Telestroke in the United States A Survey of Currently Active Stroke Telemedicine Programs
title_full The Status of Telestroke in the United States A Survey of Currently Active Stroke Telemedicine Programs
title_fullStr The Status of Telestroke in the United States A Survey of Currently Active Stroke Telemedicine Programs
title_full_unstemmed The Status of Telestroke in the United States A Survey of Currently Active Stroke Telemedicine Programs
title_sort The Status of Telestroke in the United States A Survey of Currently Active Stroke Telemedicine Programs
author Silva, Gisele Sampaio [UNIFESP]
author_facet Silva, Gisele Sampaio [UNIFESP]
Farrell, Shawn
Shandra, Emma
Viswanathan, Anand
Schwamm, Lee H.
author_role author
author2 Farrell, Shawn
Shandra, Emma
Viswanathan, Anand
Schwamm, Lee H.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.institution.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
Albert Einstein Hosp
Childrens Hosp
Massachusetts Gen Hosp
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Gisele Sampaio [UNIFESP]
Farrell, Shawn
Shandra, Emma
Viswanathan, Anand
Schwamm, Lee H.
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv telemedicine
telestroke
inventory
barriers
topic telemedicine
telestroke
inventory
barriers
description Background and Purpose-Little is known about adoption or success of telestroke networks outside of published or federally funded programs. Under contract to the Health Resource Services Administration, we conducted an environmental scan of telestroke programs in the United States.Methods-An analyst contacted all potential programs identified in comprehensive online searches, interviewed respondents, and collected response data about structural and functional components of currently operating telestroke programs.Results-Among 97 potential programs contacted, 56 programs had confirmed telestroke activity, and 38 programs (68%) from 27 states participated. Hospital and community characteristics of nonparticipating programs were similar to those of participating ones. the top 3 clinical needs met by the telestroke were emergency department consultation (100%), patient triage (83.8%), and inpatient teleconsultation (46.0%). Telestroke programs were in operation a median of 2.44 years (interquartile range, 1.36-3.44 years); 94.6% used 2-way, real-time interactive video plus imaging, but only 44% used dedicated telemedicine consultation software. the mean number of spokes per hub increased significantly from 2007 to 2008 to 2009 (3.78 versus 7.60; P < 0.05), and >80% of spoke sites were rural or small hospitals. Reimbursement was absent for >40% of sites. Sites rated inability to obtain physician licensure (27.77%), lack of program funds (27.77%), and lack of reimbursement (19.44%) as the most important barriers to program growth.Conclusions-Telestroke is a widespread and growing practice model. Important barriers to expansion amenable to change relate to organizational, technical, and educational domains and external economic and regulatory forces. (Stroke. 2012;43:2078-2085.)
publishDate 2012
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2012-08-01
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2016-01-24T14:27:29Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2016-01-24T14:27:29Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv Stroke. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, v. 43, n. 8, p. 2078-U138, 2012.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/35109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.645861
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 0039-2499
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.645861
dc.identifier.wos.none.fl_str_mv WOS:000306689300021
identifier_str_mv Stroke. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, v. 43, n. 8, p. 2078-U138, 2012.
0039-2499
10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.645861
WOS:000306689300021
url http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/35109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.645861
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.none.fl_str_mv Stroke
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 2078-U138
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1783460275182108672