Comparison between the Comfort and Hartwig sedation scales in pediatric patients undergoing mechanical lung ventilation
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 1999 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-31801999000500003 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/825 |
Resumo: | CONTEXT: A high number of hospitalized children do not receive adequate sedation due to inadequate evaluation and use of such agents. With the increase in knowledge of sedation and analgesia in recent years, concern has also risen, such that it is now not acceptable that incorrect evaluations of the state of children's pain and anxiety are made. OBJECTIVE: A comparison between the Comfort and Hartwig sedation scales in pediatric patients undergoing mechanical lung ventilation.DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: A pediatric intensive care unit with three beds at an urban teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Thirty simultaneous and independent observations were conducted by specialists on 18 patients studied. DIAGNOSTIC TEST: Comfort and Hartwig scales were applied, after 3 minutes of observation. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Agreement rate (kappa). RESULTS: On the Comfort scale, the averages for adequately sedated, insufficiently sedated, and over-sedated were 20.28 (SD 2.78), 27.5 (SD 0.70), and 15.1 (SD 1.10), respectively, whereas on the Hartwig scale, the averages for adequately sedated, insufficiently sedated, and over-sedated were 16.35 (SD 0.77), 20.85 (SD 1.57), and 13.0 (SD 0.89), respectively. The observed agreement rate was 63% (p = 0.006) and the expected agreement rate was 44% with a Kappa coefficient of 0.345238 (z = 2.49). CONCLUSIONS: In our study there was no statistically significant difference whether the more complex Comfort scale was applied (8 physiological and behavioral parameters) or the less complex Hartwig scale (5 behavioral parameters) was applied to assess the sedation of mechanically ventilated pediatric patients. |
id |
UFSP_4f06f0456ef2fb77b4e55fd40a54d2ec |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/825 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository_id_str |
3465 |
spelling |
Comparison between the Comfort and Hartwig sedation scales in pediatric patients undergoing mechanical lung ventilationSedation scaleComfort. HartwigMechanical Lung VentilationPediatric Intensive CareEscala de sedaçãoConfortHartwigVentilação pulmonar mecânicaCuidados intensivos pediátricosCONTEXT: A high number of hospitalized children do not receive adequate sedation due to inadequate evaluation and use of such agents. With the increase in knowledge of sedation and analgesia in recent years, concern has also risen, such that it is now not acceptable that incorrect evaluations of the state of children's pain and anxiety are made. OBJECTIVE: A comparison between the Comfort and Hartwig sedation scales in pediatric patients undergoing mechanical lung ventilation.DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: A pediatric intensive care unit with three beds at an urban teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Thirty simultaneous and independent observations were conducted by specialists on 18 patients studied. DIAGNOSTIC TEST: Comfort and Hartwig scales were applied, after 3 minutes of observation. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Agreement rate (kappa). RESULTS: On the Comfort scale, the averages for adequately sedated, insufficiently sedated, and over-sedated were 20.28 (SD 2.78), 27.5 (SD 0.70), and 15.1 (SD 1.10), respectively, whereas on the Hartwig scale, the averages for adequately sedated, insufficiently sedated, and over-sedated were 16.35 (SD 0.77), 20.85 (SD 1.57), and 13.0 (SD 0.89), respectively. The observed agreement rate was 63% (p = 0.006) and the expected agreement rate was 44% with a Kappa coefficient of 0.345238 (z = 2.49). CONCLUSIONS: In our study there was no statistically significant difference whether the more complex Comfort scale was applied (8 physiological and behavioral parameters) or the less complex Hartwig scale (5 behavioral parameters) was applied to assess the sedation of mechanically ventilated pediatric patients.CONTEXTO: É elevado o número de crianças hospitalizadas que não recebem uma sedação adequada, devido a avaliação e ao uso inadequado desses agentes. Nos últimos anos aumentou a preocupação e os conhecimentos a respeito da sedação e analgesia, de tal modo que é inaceitável hoje em dia termos uma criança sem correta avaliação de seu estado de dor e ansiedade. OBJETIVO: Comparar o uso de duas escalas de sedação (COMFORT e HARTWIG) em pacientes pediátricos em ventilação pulmonar mecânica. TIPO DE ESTUDO: Estudo prospectivo. LOCAL: Unidade de cuidados intensivos pediátricos de hospital terciário. PARTICIPANTES: Realizadas 30 observações, simultâneas e independentes, em 18 pacientes, por médicos especializados. TESTE DIAGNÓSTICO: Após observação de três minutos, aplicou-se critérios objetivos (escalas de COMFORT e HARTWIG) para avaliar a sedação. VARIÁVEL ESTUDADA: Taxa de concordância (Coeficiente Kappa) onde p < 0,01 foi considerado significante. RESULTADOS: Escala COMFORT (média e desvio padrão) para adequadamente sedado, inadequadamente sedado e muito sedado foi 20,28 ± 2,78, 27,5 ± 0,70 e 15,1 ± 1,10 respectivamente. Para a escala de HARTWIG: 16,35 ± 0,77, 20,85 ± 1,57 e 13,0 ± 0,89. Taxa de concordância observada 63% (p = 0,006), esperada de 44% com o coeficiente kappa = 0,345238 (z = 2,49). CONCLUSÕES: Em nosso estudo, não houve diferença significativa na aplicabilidade entre as escalas de COMFORT e HARTWIG em assegurar o nível de sedação em crianças submetidas a ventilação pulmonar mecânica.Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Escola Paulista de MedicinaHospital do Servidor Público Municipal de São PauloUNIFESP, EPMSciELOAssociação Paulista de Medicina - APMUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Hospital do Servidor Público Municipal de São PauloCarvalho, Werther Brunow de [UNIFESP]Silva, Paulo Sérgio Lucas daChiu, Seing Tsok PauloFonseca, Marcelo Cunio Machado [UNIFESP]Belli, Luiz Antônio [UNIFESP]2015-06-14T13:24:55Z2015-06-14T13:24:55Z1999-09-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion192-196application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-31801999000500003São Paulo Medical Journal. Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM, v. 117, n. 5, p. 192-196, 1999.10.1590/S1516-31801999000500003S1516-31801999000500003.pdf1516-3180S1516-31801999000500003http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/825engSão Paulo Medical Journalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-08-06T06:06:59Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/825Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-08-06T06:06:59Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison between the Comfort and Hartwig sedation scales in pediatric patients undergoing mechanical lung ventilation |
title |
Comparison between the Comfort and Hartwig sedation scales in pediatric patients undergoing mechanical lung ventilation |
spellingShingle |
Comparison between the Comfort and Hartwig sedation scales in pediatric patients undergoing mechanical lung ventilation Carvalho, Werther Brunow de [UNIFESP] Sedation scale Comfort. Hartwig Mechanical Lung Ventilation Pediatric Intensive Care Escala de sedação Confort Hartwig Ventilação pulmonar mecânica Cuidados intensivos pediátricos |
title_short |
Comparison between the Comfort and Hartwig sedation scales in pediatric patients undergoing mechanical lung ventilation |
title_full |
Comparison between the Comfort and Hartwig sedation scales in pediatric patients undergoing mechanical lung ventilation |
title_fullStr |
Comparison between the Comfort and Hartwig sedation scales in pediatric patients undergoing mechanical lung ventilation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison between the Comfort and Hartwig sedation scales in pediatric patients undergoing mechanical lung ventilation |
title_sort |
Comparison between the Comfort and Hartwig sedation scales in pediatric patients undergoing mechanical lung ventilation |
author |
Carvalho, Werther Brunow de [UNIFESP] |
author_facet |
Carvalho, Werther Brunow de [UNIFESP] Silva, Paulo Sérgio Lucas da Chiu, Seing Tsok Paulo Fonseca, Marcelo Cunio Machado [UNIFESP] Belli, Luiz Antônio [UNIFESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva, Paulo Sérgio Lucas da Chiu, Seing Tsok Paulo Fonseca, Marcelo Cunio Machado [UNIFESP] Belli, Luiz Antônio [UNIFESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) Hospital do Servidor Público Municipal de São Paulo |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Carvalho, Werther Brunow de [UNIFESP] Silva, Paulo Sérgio Lucas da Chiu, Seing Tsok Paulo Fonseca, Marcelo Cunio Machado [UNIFESP] Belli, Luiz Antônio [UNIFESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Sedation scale Comfort. Hartwig Mechanical Lung Ventilation Pediatric Intensive Care Escala de sedação Confort Hartwig Ventilação pulmonar mecânica Cuidados intensivos pediátricos |
topic |
Sedation scale Comfort. Hartwig Mechanical Lung Ventilation Pediatric Intensive Care Escala de sedação Confort Hartwig Ventilação pulmonar mecânica Cuidados intensivos pediátricos |
description |
CONTEXT: A high number of hospitalized children do not receive adequate sedation due to inadequate evaluation and use of such agents. With the increase in knowledge of sedation and analgesia in recent years, concern has also risen, such that it is now not acceptable that incorrect evaluations of the state of children's pain and anxiety are made. OBJECTIVE: A comparison between the Comfort and Hartwig sedation scales in pediatric patients undergoing mechanical lung ventilation.DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: A pediatric intensive care unit with three beds at an urban teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Thirty simultaneous and independent observations were conducted by specialists on 18 patients studied. DIAGNOSTIC TEST: Comfort and Hartwig scales were applied, after 3 minutes of observation. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Agreement rate (kappa). RESULTS: On the Comfort scale, the averages for adequately sedated, insufficiently sedated, and over-sedated were 20.28 (SD 2.78), 27.5 (SD 0.70), and 15.1 (SD 1.10), respectively, whereas on the Hartwig scale, the averages for adequately sedated, insufficiently sedated, and over-sedated were 16.35 (SD 0.77), 20.85 (SD 1.57), and 13.0 (SD 0.89), respectively. The observed agreement rate was 63% (p = 0.006) and the expected agreement rate was 44% with a Kappa coefficient of 0.345238 (z = 2.49). CONCLUSIONS: In our study there was no statistically significant difference whether the more complex Comfort scale was applied (8 physiological and behavioral parameters) or the less complex Hartwig scale (5 behavioral parameters) was applied to assess the sedation of mechanically ventilated pediatric patients. |
publishDate |
1999 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
1999-09-02 2015-06-14T13:24:55Z 2015-06-14T13:24:55Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-31801999000500003 São Paulo Medical Journal. Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM, v. 117, n. 5, p. 192-196, 1999. 10.1590/S1516-31801999000500003 S1516-31801999000500003.pdf 1516-3180 S1516-31801999000500003 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/825 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-31801999000500003 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/825 |
identifier_str_mv |
São Paulo Medical Journal. Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM, v. 117, n. 5, p. 192-196, 1999. 10.1590/S1516-31801999000500003 S1516-31801999000500003.pdf 1516-3180 S1516-31801999000500003 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
São Paulo Medical Journal |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
192-196 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) instacron:UNIFESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
instacron_str |
UNIFESP |
institution |
UNIFESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br |
_version_ |
1814268275069026304 |