Comparison between the Comfort and Hartwig sedation scales in pediatric patients undergoing mechanical lung ventilation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Carvalho, Werther Brunow de [UNIFESP]
Data de Publicação: 1999
Outros Autores: Silva, Paulo Sérgio Lucas da, Chiu, Seing Tsok Paulo, Fonseca, Marcelo Cunio Machado [UNIFESP], Belli, Luiz Antônio [UNIFESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-31801999000500003
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/825
Resumo: CONTEXT: A high number of hospitalized children do not receive adequate sedation due to inadequate evaluation and use of such agents. With the increase in knowledge of sedation and analgesia in recent years, concern has also risen, such that it is now not acceptable that incorrect evaluations of the state of children's pain and anxiety are made. OBJECTIVE: A comparison between the Comfort and Hartwig sedation scales in pediatric patients undergoing mechanical lung ventilation.DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: A pediatric intensive care unit with three beds at an urban teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Thirty simultaneous and independent observations were conducted by specialists on 18 patients studied. DIAGNOSTIC TEST: Comfort and Hartwig scales were applied, after 3 minutes of observation. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Agreement rate (kappa). RESULTS: On the Comfort scale, the averages for adequately sedated, insufficiently sedated, and over-sedated were 20.28 (SD 2.78), 27.5 (SD 0.70), and 15.1 (SD 1.10), respectively, whereas on the Hartwig scale, the averages for adequately sedated, insufficiently sedated, and over-sedated were 16.35 (SD 0.77), 20.85 (SD 1.57), and 13.0 (SD 0.89), respectively. The observed agreement rate was 63% (p = 0.006) and the expected agreement rate was 44% with a Kappa coefficient of 0.345238 (z = 2.49). CONCLUSIONS: In our study there was no statistically significant difference whether the more complex Comfort scale was applied (8 physiological and behavioral parameters) or the less complex Hartwig scale (5 behavioral parameters) was applied to assess the sedation of mechanically ventilated pediatric patients.
id UFSP_4f06f0456ef2fb77b4e55fd40a54d2ec
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/825
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling Comparison between the Comfort and Hartwig sedation scales in pediatric patients undergoing mechanical lung ventilationSedation scaleComfort. HartwigMechanical Lung VentilationPediatric Intensive CareEscala de sedaçãoConfortHartwigVentilação pulmonar mecânicaCuidados intensivos pediátricosCONTEXT: A high number of hospitalized children do not receive adequate sedation due to inadequate evaluation and use of such agents. With the increase in knowledge of sedation and analgesia in recent years, concern has also risen, such that it is now not acceptable that incorrect evaluations of the state of children's pain and anxiety are made. OBJECTIVE: A comparison between the Comfort and Hartwig sedation scales in pediatric patients undergoing mechanical lung ventilation.DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: A pediatric intensive care unit with three beds at an urban teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Thirty simultaneous and independent observations were conducted by specialists on 18 patients studied. DIAGNOSTIC TEST: Comfort and Hartwig scales were applied, after 3 minutes of observation. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Agreement rate (kappa). RESULTS: On the Comfort scale, the averages for adequately sedated, insufficiently sedated, and over-sedated were 20.28 (SD 2.78), 27.5 (SD 0.70), and 15.1 (SD 1.10), respectively, whereas on the Hartwig scale, the averages for adequately sedated, insufficiently sedated, and over-sedated were 16.35 (SD 0.77), 20.85 (SD 1.57), and 13.0 (SD 0.89), respectively. The observed agreement rate was 63% (p = 0.006) and the expected agreement rate was 44% with a Kappa coefficient of 0.345238 (z = 2.49). CONCLUSIONS: In our study there was no statistically significant difference whether the more complex Comfort scale was applied (8 physiological and behavioral parameters) or the less complex Hartwig scale (5 behavioral parameters) was applied to assess the sedation of mechanically ventilated pediatric patients.CONTEXTO: É elevado o número de crianças hospitalizadas que não recebem uma sedação adequada, devido a avaliação e ao uso inadequado desses agentes. Nos últimos anos aumentou a preocupação e os conhecimentos a respeito da sedação e analgesia, de tal modo que é inaceitável hoje em dia termos uma criança sem correta avaliação de seu estado de dor e ansiedade. OBJETIVO: Comparar o uso de duas escalas de sedação (COMFORT e HARTWIG) em pacientes pediátricos em ventilação pulmonar mecânica. TIPO DE ESTUDO: Estudo prospectivo. LOCAL: Unidade de cuidados intensivos pediátricos de hospital terciário. PARTICIPANTES: Realizadas 30 observações, simultâneas e independentes, em 18 pacientes, por médicos especializados. TESTE DIAGNÓSTICO: Após observação de três minutos, aplicou-se critérios objetivos (escalas de COMFORT e HARTWIG) para avaliar a sedação. VARIÁVEL ESTUDADA: Taxa de concordância (Coeficiente Kappa) onde p < 0,01 foi considerado significante. RESULTADOS: Escala COMFORT (média e desvio padrão) para adequadamente sedado, inadequadamente sedado e muito sedado foi 20,28 ± 2,78, 27,5 ± 0,70 e 15,1 ± 1,10 respectivamente. Para a escala de HARTWIG: 16,35 ± 0,77, 20,85 ± 1,57 e 13,0 ± 0,89. Taxa de concordância observada 63% (p = 0,006), esperada de 44% com o coeficiente kappa = 0,345238 (z = 2,49). CONCLUSÕES: Em nosso estudo, não houve diferença significativa na aplicabilidade entre as escalas de COMFORT e HARTWIG em assegurar o nível de sedação em crianças submetidas a ventilação pulmonar mecânica.Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Escola Paulista de MedicinaHospital do Servidor Público Municipal de São PauloUNIFESP, EPMSciELOAssociação Paulista de Medicina - APMUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Hospital do Servidor Público Municipal de São PauloCarvalho, Werther Brunow de [UNIFESP]Silva, Paulo Sérgio Lucas daChiu, Seing Tsok PauloFonseca, Marcelo Cunio Machado [UNIFESP]Belli, Luiz Antônio [UNIFESP]2015-06-14T13:24:55Z2015-06-14T13:24:55Z1999-09-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion192-196application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-31801999000500003São Paulo Medical Journal. Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM, v. 117, n. 5, p. 192-196, 1999.10.1590/S1516-31801999000500003S1516-31801999000500003.pdf1516-3180S1516-31801999000500003http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/825engSão Paulo Medical Journalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-08-06T06:06:59Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/825Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-08-06T06:06:59Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison between the Comfort and Hartwig sedation scales in pediatric patients undergoing mechanical lung ventilation
title Comparison between the Comfort and Hartwig sedation scales in pediatric patients undergoing mechanical lung ventilation
spellingShingle Comparison between the Comfort and Hartwig sedation scales in pediatric patients undergoing mechanical lung ventilation
Carvalho, Werther Brunow de [UNIFESP]
Sedation scale
Comfort. Hartwig
Mechanical Lung Ventilation
Pediatric Intensive Care
Escala de sedação
Confort
Hartwig
Ventilação pulmonar mecânica
Cuidados intensivos pediátricos
title_short Comparison between the Comfort and Hartwig sedation scales in pediatric patients undergoing mechanical lung ventilation
title_full Comparison between the Comfort and Hartwig sedation scales in pediatric patients undergoing mechanical lung ventilation
title_fullStr Comparison between the Comfort and Hartwig sedation scales in pediatric patients undergoing mechanical lung ventilation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between the Comfort and Hartwig sedation scales in pediatric patients undergoing mechanical lung ventilation
title_sort Comparison between the Comfort and Hartwig sedation scales in pediatric patients undergoing mechanical lung ventilation
author Carvalho, Werther Brunow de [UNIFESP]
author_facet Carvalho, Werther Brunow de [UNIFESP]
Silva, Paulo Sérgio Lucas da
Chiu, Seing Tsok Paulo
Fonseca, Marcelo Cunio Machado [UNIFESP]
Belli, Luiz Antônio [UNIFESP]
author_role author
author2 Silva, Paulo Sérgio Lucas da
Chiu, Seing Tsok Paulo
Fonseca, Marcelo Cunio Machado [UNIFESP]
Belli, Luiz Antônio [UNIFESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
Hospital do Servidor Público Municipal de São Paulo
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Carvalho, Werther Brunow de [UNIFESP]
Silva, Paulo Sérgio Lucas da
Chiu, Seing Tsok Paulo
Fonseca, Marcelo Cunio Machado [UNIFESP]
Belli, Luiz Antônio [UNIFESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Sedation scale
Comfort. Hartwig
Mechanical Lung Ventilation
Pediatric Intensive Care
Escala de sedação
Confort
Hartwig
Ventilação pulmonar mecânica
Cuidados intensivos pediátricos
topic Sedation scale
Comfort. Hartwig
Mechanical Lung Ventilation
Pediatric Intensive Care
Escala de sedação
Confort
Hartwig
Ventilação pulmonar mecânica
Cuidados intensivos pediátricos
description CONTEXT: A high number of hospitalized children do not receive adequate sedation due to inadequate evaluation and use of such agents. With the increase in knowledge of sedation and analgesia in recent years, concern has also risen, such that it is now not acceptable that incorrect evaluations of the state of children's pain and anxiety are made. OBJECTIVE: A comparison between the Comfort and Hartwig sedation scales in pediatric patients undergoing mechanical lung ventilation.DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: A pediatric intensive care unit with three beds at an urban teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Thirty simultaneous and independent observations were conducted by specialists on 18 patients studied. DIAGNOSTIC TEST: Comfort and Hartwig scales were applied, after 3 minutes of observation. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Agreement rate (kappa). RESULTS: On the Comfort scale, the averages for adequately sedated, insufficiently sedated, and over-sedated were 20.28 (SD 2.78), 27.5 (SD 0.70), and 15.1 (SD 1.10), respectively, whereas on the Hartwig scale, the averages for adequately sedated, insufficiently sedated, and over-sedated were 16.35 (SD 0.77), 20.85 (SD 1.57), and 13.0 (SD 0.89), respectively. The observed agreement rate was 63% (p = 0.006) and the expected agreement rate was 44% with a Kappa coefficient of 0.345238 (z = 2.49). CONCLUSIONS: In our study there was no statistically significant difference whether the more complex Comfort scale was applied (8 physiological and behavioral parameters) or the less complex Hartwig scale (5 behavioral parameters) was applied to assess the sedation of mechanically ventilated pediatric patients.
publishDate 1999
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 1999-09-02
2015-06-14T13:24:55Z
2015-06-14T13:24:55Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-31801999000500003
São Paulo Medical Journal. Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM, v. 117, n. 5, p. 192-196, 1999.
10.1590/S1516-31801999000500003
S1516-31801999000500003.pdf
1516-3180
S1516-31801999000500003
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/825
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-31801999000500003
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/825
identifier_str_mv São Paulo Medical Journal. Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM, v. 117, n. 5, p. 192-196, 1999.
10.1590/S1516-31801999000500003
S1516-31801999000500003.pdf
1516-3180
S1516-31801999000500003
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv São Paulo Medical Journal
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 192-196
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br
_version_ 1814268275069026304