Avaliação ultra-sonográfica e urodinâmica em pacientes com incontinência urinária

• Autor(a) principal: Sartori, Marair Gracio Ferreira [UNIFESP]
• Data de Publicação: 1999
• Outros Autores: Bergamo, Carlos Alberto Salles [UNIFESP], Martins, Sérgio Brasileiro [UNIFESP], Takano, Cláudia [UNIFESP], Girão, Manoel João Batista Castello [UNIFESP], Baracat, Edmund Chada [UNIFESP], Lima, Geraldo Rodrigues De [UNIFESP]
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
• Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-72031999000100006; http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/727
• topic: Urinary incontinence; Urodynamic study; Ultrasonography, transvaginal; Ultrasonography, urethra; Incontinência urinária; Estudo urodinâmico; Ultra-sonografia transvaginal; Uretra

Purpose: to evaluate the agreement between the urodynamic and ultrasonography diagnoses of urinary incontinence, as well as to correlate the variables of both examinations. Methodology: three hundred eighty-one patients with urine loss were selected, from the Sectior of Urogynecology and Vaginal Surgery of the Division of Gynecology, Escola Paulista de Medicina - Federal University of São Paulo. All of them were submitted to urodynamic study, according to the standardization of the International Society of Continence, and to ultrasonography of the bladder neck, with a 6 MHz trasvaginal transducer. We analyzed the maximum closing urethral pressure (MCUP) and the etiological diagnosis of the urine loss. In the ultrasonography, the position of the bladder neck was evaluated in relation to the inferior border of the pubic symphysis, and its mobility as well as the diameter of the urethra and bladder neck. The women were categoriaed according to the urodynamic study in to stress urinary incontinence, detrusor instability and mixed urinary incontinence. Results: 1) the bladder neck, at rest was most frequently above the inferior border of the pubic symphysis and, during effort, below or at the height of the bony reference, in the three groups; 2) the mobility of the bladder neck was similar in the groups; 3) there was no significant correlation between MCUP and the diameter of the urethra and of the bladder neck. Conclusion: we deem that ultrasonography of the bladder neck is always a complement to the clinical evaluation and the urodymanic study.