Manual Resistance versus Conventional Resistance Training: Impact on Strength and Muscular Endurance in Recreationally Trained Men

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Chulvi-Medrano, Iván
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Rial, Tamara, Cortell-Tormo, Juan M., Alakhdar, Yasser, Teixeira, Cauê Vazquez La Scala [UNIFESP], Masiá-Tortosa, Laura, Dorgo, Sandor
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Texto Completo: https://www.jssm.org/researchjssm-16-343.xml.xml
https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/51354
Resumo: Manual resistance training (MRT) has been widely used in the field of physical therapy. It has also been used as a strength training method due to the accommodating resistance nature of this modality. The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of an 8-week MRT program on maximum strength and muscular endurance in comparison to conventional resistance training in recreationally trained men. Twenty healthy recreationally trained male subjects were recruited and divided into a MRT training group and a conventional training (CT) group. CT group performed bench press and lat pull-down exercises, and the MRT group performed similar movements with resistance provided by a personal trainer. Both groups completed similar training protocol and training load: 2 training sessions weekly for 3 sets of 8 repetitions at an intensity of 8 to 10 on the perceived exertion scale of 0-10. Initial maximum strength differences were not significant between the groups. Neither group showed significant changes in muscular strength or endurance. Despite the statistically non-significant pre-to post differences, a trend for improvement was observed and effect size (ES) calculations indicated greater magnitude of effects for strength and endurance changes in the MRT group in lat pulldown (g=0.84) compared to CT group. Effectiveness of MRT is similar to CT for improving muscular strength and endurance. MRT can be used as a supplemental or alternative strength training modality for recreationally trained subjects, or be considered by personal trainers especially in low equipped facility conditions.
id UFSP_5fbcccfc31ce5c9e1f29d1f8aeabe18a
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/51354
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling Manual Resistance versus Conventional Resistance Training: Impact on Strength and Muscular Endurance in Recreationally Trained MenStrength trainingBench pressLat pull-downMaximum strengthManual resistance training (MRT) has been widely used in the field of physical therapy. It has also been used as a strength training method due to the accommodating resistance nature of this modality. The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of an 8-week MRT program on maximum strength and muscular endurance in comparison to conventional resistance training in recreationally trained men. Twenty healthy recreationally trained male subjects were recruited and divided into a MRT training group and a conventional training (CT) group. CT group performed bench press and lat pull-down exercises, and the MRT group performed similar movements with resistance provided by a personal trainer. Both groups completed similar training protocol and training load: 2 training sessions weekly for 3 sets of 8 repetitions at an intensity of 8 to 10 on the perceived exertion scale of 0-10. Initial maximum strength differences were not significant between the groups. Neither group showed significant changes in muscular strength or endurance. Despite the statistically non-significant pre-to post differences, a trend for improvement was observed and effect size (ES) calculations indicated greater magnitude of effects for strength and endurance changes in the MRT group in lat pulldown (g=0.84) compared to CT group. Effectiveness of MRT is similar to CT for improving muscular strength and endurance. MRT can be used as a supplemental or alternative strength training modality for recreationally trained subjects, or be considered by personal trainers especially in low equipped facility conditions.Univ Alicante, Dept Gen & Specif Didact, Alicante, SpainBenestar Wellness Ctr, Valencia, SpainInt Hypopress & Phys Therapy Inst, Vigo, SpainUniv Valencia, Dept Phys Therapy, Valencia, SpainUniv Fed São Paulo, Dept Biosci, Santos, BrazilPraia Grande Coll, Fac Phys Educ, Praia Grande, BrazilUniv Texas El Paso, Dept Kinesiol, 1851 Wiggins St, El Paso, TX 79968 USAUniv Fed São Paulo, Dept Biosci, Santos, BrazilWeb of ScienceJournal Sports Science & Medicine2019-08-19T11:49:36Z2019-08-19T11:49:36Z2017info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion343-349application/pdfhttps://www.jssm.org/researchjssm-16-343.xml.xmlJournal Of Sports Science And Medicine. Bursa, v. 16, n. 3, p. 343-349, 2017.WOS000407360500006.pdf1303-2968https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/51354WOS:000407360500006enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessChulvi-Medrano, IvánRial, TamaraCortell-Tormo, Juan M.Alakhdar, YasserTeixeira, Cauê Vazquez La Scala [UNIFESP]Masiá-Tortosa, LauraDorgo, Sandorreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-08-03T01:26:51Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/51354Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-08-03T01:26:51Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Manual Resistance versus Conventional Resistance Training: Impact on Strength and Muscular Endurance in Recreationally Trained Men
title Manual Resistance versus Conventional Resistance Training: Impact on Strength and Muscular Endurance in Recreationally Trained Men
spellingShingle Manual Resistance versus Conventional Resistance Training: Impact on Strength and Muscular Endurance in Recreationally Trained Men
Chulvi-Medrano, Iván
Strength training
Bench press
Lat pull-down
Maximum strength
title_short Manual Resistance versus Conventional Resistance Training: Impact on Strength and Muscular Endurance in Recreationally Trained Men
title_full Manual Resistance versus Conventional Resistance Training: Impact on Strength and Muscular Endurance in Recreationally Trained Men
title_fullStr Manual Resistance versus Conventional Resistance Training: Impact on Strength and Muscular Endurance in Recreationally Trained Men
title_full_unstemmed Manual Resistance versus Conventional Resistance Training: Impact on Strength and Muscular Endurance in Recreationally Trained Men
title_sort Manual Resistance versus Conventional Resistance Training: Impact on Strength and Muscular Endurance in Recreationally Trained Men
author Chulvi-Medrano, Iván
author_facet Chulvi-Medrano, Iván
Rial, Tamara
Cortell-Tormo, Juan M.
Alakhdar, Yasser
Teixeira, Cauê Vazquez La Scala [UNIFESP]
Masiá-Tortosa, Laura
Dorgo, Sandor
author_role author
author2 Rial, Tamara
Cortell-Tormo, Juan M.
Alakhdar, Yasser
Teixeira, Cauê Vazquez La Scala [UNIFESP]
Masiá-Tortosa, Laura
Dorgo, Sandor
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Chulvi-Medrano, Iván
Rial, Tamara
Cortell-Tormo, Juan M.
Alakhdar, Yasser
Teixeira, Cauê Vazquez La Scala [UNIFESP]
Masiá-Tortosa, Laura
Dorgo, Sandor
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Strength training
Bench press
Lat pull-down
Maximum strength
topic Strength training
Bench press
Lat pull-down
Maximum strength
description Manual resistance training (MRT) has been widely used in the field of physical therapy. It has also been used as a strength training method due to the accommodating resistance nature of this modality. The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of an 8-week MRT program on maximum strength and muscular endurance in comparison to conventional resistance training in recreationally trained men. Twenty healthy recreationally trained male subjects were recruited and divided into a MRT training group and a conventional training (CT) group. CT group performed bench press and lat pull-down exercises, and the MRT group performed similar movements with resistance provided by a personal trainer. Both groups completed similar training protocol and training load: 2 training sessions weekly for 3 sets of 8 repetitions at an intensity of 8 to 10 on the perceived exertion scale of 0-10. Initial maximum strength differences were not significant between the groups. Neither group showed significant changes in muscular strength or endurance. Despite the statistically non-significant pre-to post differences, a trend for improvement was observed and effect size (ES) calculations indicated greater magnitude of effects for strength and endurance changes in the MRT group in lat pulldown (g=0.84) compared to CT group. Effectiveness of MRT is similar to CT for improving muscular strength and endurance. MRT can be used as a supplemental or alternative strength training modality for recreationally trained subjects, or be considered by personal trainers especially in low equipped facility conditions.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017
2019-08-19T11:49:36Z
2019-08-19T11:49:36Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.jssm.org/researchjssm-16-343.xml.xml
Journal Of Sports Science And Medicine. Bursa, v. 16, n. 3, p. 343-349, 2017.
WOS000407360500006.pdf
1303-2968
https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/51354
WOS:000407360500006
url https://www.jssm.org/researchjssm-16-343.xml.xml
https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/51354
identifier_str_mv Journal Of Sports Science And Medicine. Bursa, v. 16, n. 3, p. 343-349, 2017.
WOS000407360500006.pdf
1303-2968
WOS:000407360500006
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 343-349
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Journal Sports Science & Medicine
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Journal Sports Science & Medicine
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br
_version_ 1814268270075707392