Comparison of MICE and Etest with CLSI Agar Dilution for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing against Oxacillin-Resistant Staphylococcus spp.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Campana, Eloiza Helena [UNIFESP]
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Carvalhaes, Cecília Godoy [UNIFESP], Nonato, Bruna [UNIFESP], Machado, Antônia Maria de Oliveira [UNIFESP], Gales, Ana Cristina [UNIFESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094627
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/37663
Resumo: Objective: the main objective of this study was to comparatively evaluate the performance of M. I. C. E. and Etest methodologies to that of agar dilution for determining the antimicrobial susceptibility profile of oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus spp.Methods: A total of 100 oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus spp. isolates were collected from hospitalized patients at a teaching hospital. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for vancomycin, teicoplanin and linezolid was performed using the reference CLSI agar dilution method (2009), Etest and M. I. C. E. methodologies. the MIC values were interpreted according to CLSI susceptibility breakpoints and compared by regression analysis.Results: in general, the essential agreement (+/- 1-log(2)) between M. I. C. E. and CLSI agar dilution was 93.0%, 84.0% and 77.0% for linezolid, teicoplanin and vancomycin, respectively. Essential agreement rates between M. I. C. E. and Etest were excellent (>90.0%) for all antibiotics tested. Both strips (M. I. C. E. and Etest) yielded two very major errors for linezolid. Unacceptable minor rates were observed for teicoplanin against CoNS and for vancomycin against S. aureus.Conclusions: According to our results, linezolid and teicoplanin MICs against all staphylococci and S. aureus, respectively, were more accurately predicted by M. I. C. E. strips. However, the Etest showed better performance than M. I. C. E. for predicting vancomycin MICs against all staphylococci. Thus, microbiologists must be aware of the different performance of commercially available gradient strips against staphylococci.
id UFSP_6142c0167a153b2138164babf96fbdc5
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/37663
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling Comparison of MICE and Etest with CLSI Agar Dilution for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing against Oxacillin-Resistant Staphylococcus spp.Objective: the main objective of this study was to comparatively evaluate the performance of M. I. C. E. and Etest methodologies to that of agar dilution for determining the antimicrobial susceptibility profile of oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus spp.Methods: A total of 100 oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus spp. isolates were collected from hospitalized patients at a teaching hospital. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for vancomycin, teicoplanin and linezolid was performed using the reference CLSI agar dilution method (2009), Etest and M. I. C. E. methodologies. the MIC values were interpreted according to CLSI susceptibility breakpoints and compared by regression analysis.Results: in general, the essential agreement (+/- 1-log(2)) between M. I. C. E. and CLSI agar dilution was 93.0%, 84.0% and 77.0% for linezolid, teicoplanin and vancomycin, respectively. Essential agreement rates between M. I. C. E. and Etest were excellent (>90.0%) for all antibiotics tested. Both strips (M. I. C. E. and Etest) yielded two very major errors for linezolid. Unacceptable minor rates were observed for teicoplanin against CoNS and for vancomycin against S. aureus.Conclusions: According to our results, linezolid and teicoplanin MICs against all staphylococci and S. aureus, respectively, were more accurately predicted by M. I. C. E. strips. However, the Etest showed better performance than M. I. C. E. for predicting vancomycin MICs against all staphylococci. Thus, microbiologists must be aware of the different performance of commercially available gradient strips against staphylococci.Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Lab Alerta, Disciplina Infectol, São Paulo, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Hosp São Paulo, Lab Cent, São Paulo, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Lab Alerta, Disciplina Infectol, São Paulo, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Hosp São Paulo, Lab Cent, São Paulo, BrazilWeb of ScienceThermo Fisher Scientific, São Paulo, BrazilConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)CNPq: 307816/2009-5Public Library ScienceUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Campana, Eloiza Helena [UNIFESP]Carvalhaes, Cecília Godoy [UNIFESP]Nonato, Bruna [UNIFESP]Machado, Antônia Maria de Oliveira [UNIFESP]Gales, Ana Cristina [UNIFESP]2016-01-24T14:37:07Z2016-01-24T14:37:07Z2014-04-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion5application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094627Plos One. San Francisco: Public Library Science, v. 9, n. 4, 5 p., 2014.10.1371/journal.pone.0094627WOS000336970400059.pdf1932-6203http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/37663WOS:000336970400059engPlos Oneinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-08-08T08:46:32Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/37663Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-08-08T08:46:32Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of MICE and Etest with CLSI Agar Dilution for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing against Oxacillin-Resistant Staphylococcus spp.
title Comparison of MICE and Etest with CLSI Agar Dilution for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing against Oxacillin-Resistant Staphylococcus spp.
spellingShingle Comparison of MICE and Etest with CLSI Agar Dilution for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing against Oxacillin-Resistant Staphylococcus spp.
Campana, Eloiza Helena [UNIFESP]
title_short Comparison of MICE and Etest with CLSI Agar Dilution for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing against Oxacillin-Resistant Staphylococcus spp.
title_full Comparison of MICE and Etest with CLSI Agar Dilution for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing against Oxacillin-Resistant Staphylococcus spp.
title_fullStr Comparison of MICE and Etest with CLSI Agar Dilution for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing against Oxacillin-Resistant Staphylococcus spp.
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of MICE and Etest with CLSI Agar Dilution for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing against Oxacillin-Resistant Staphylococcus spp.
title_sort Comparison of MICE and Etest with CLSI Agar Dilution for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing against Oxacillin-Resistant Staphylococcus spp.
author Campana, Eloiza Helena [UNIFESP]
author_facet Campana, Eloiza Helena [UNIFESP]
Carvalhaes, Cecília Godoy [UNIFESP]
Nonato, Bruna [UNIFESP]
Machado, Antônia Maria de Oliveira [UNIFESP]
Gales, Ana Cristina [UNIFESP]
author_role author
author2 Carvalhaes, Cecília Godoy [UNIFESP]
Nonato, Bruna [UNIFESP]
Machado, Antônia Maria de Oliveira [UNIFESP]
Gales, Ana Cristina [UNIFESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Campana, Eloiza Helena [UNIFESP]
Carvalhaes, Cecília Godoy [UNIFESP]
Nonato, Bruna [UNIFESP]
Machado, Antônia Maria de Oliveira [UNIFESP]
Gales, Ana Cristina [UNIFESP]
description Objective: the main objective of this study was to comparatively evaluate the performance of M. I. C. E. and Etest methodologies to that of agar dilution for determining the antimicrobial susceptibility profile of oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus spp.Methods: A total of 100 oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus spp. isolates were collected from hospitalized patients at a teaching hospital. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for vancomycin, teicoplanin and linezolid was performed using the reference CLSI agar dilution method (2009), Etest and M. I. C. E. methodologies. the MIC values were interpreted according to CLSI susceptibility breakpoints and compared by regression analysis.Results: in general, the essential agreement (+/- 1-log(2)) between M. I. C. E. and CLSI agar dilution was 93.0%, 84.0% and 77.0% for linezolid, teicoplanin and vancomycin, respectively. Essential agreement rates between M. I. C. E. and Etest were excellent (>90.0%) for all antibiotics tested. Both strips (M. I. C. E. and Etest) yielded two very major errors for linezolid. Unacceptable minor rates were observed for teicoplanin against CoNS and for vancomycin against S. aureus.Conclusions: According to our results, linezolid and teicoplanin MICs against all staphylococci and S. aureus, respectively, were more accurately predicted by M. I. C. E. strips. However, the Etest showed better performance than M. I. C. E. for predicting vancomycin MICs against all staphylococci. Thus, microbiologists must be aware of the different performance of commercially available gradient strips against staphylococci.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-04-14
2016-01-24T14:37:07Z
2016-01-24T14:37:07Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094627
Plos One. San Francisco: Public Library Science, v. 9, n. 4, 5 p., 2014.
10.1371/journal.pone.0094627
WOS000336970400059.pdf
1932-6203
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/37663
WOS:000336970400059
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094627
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/37663
identifier_str_mv Plos One. San Francisco: Public Library Science, v. 9, n. 4, 5 p., 2014.
10.1371/journal.pone.0094627
WOS000336970400059.pdf
1932-6203
WOS:000336970400059
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Plos One
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 5
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Public Library Science
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Public Library Science
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br
_version_ 1814268376197890048