Surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: total or partial fundoplication? Systematic review and meta-analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ramos, Rodrigo F
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Lustosa, Suzana Angélica S, Almeida, Carlos Augusto P. De, Silva, Carolina P. Da, Matos, Delcio [UNIFESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0004-28032011000400007
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/6768
Resumo: CONTEXT: Although the high incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in the population, there is much controversy in this topic, especially in the surgical treatment. The decision to use of a total or partial fundoplication in the treatment of GERD is still a challenge to many surgeons because the few evidence found in the literature. OBJECTIVE: To bring more clear evidence in the comparison between total and partial fundoplication. DATA SOURCES: A systematic review of the literature and metaanalysis with randomized controlled trials accessed from MEDLINE, LILACS, Cochrane Controlled Trials Database was done. The outcomes remarked were: dysphagia, inability to belch, bloating, recurrence of acid reflux, heartburn and esophagitis. For data analysis the odds ratio was used with corresponding 95% confidence interval. Statistical heterogeneity in the results of the metaanalysis was assessed by calculating a test of heterogeneity. The software Review Manager 5 (Cochrane Collaboration) was utilized for the data gathered and the statistical analysis. Sensitive analysis was applied using only trials that included follow-up over 2 years. RESULTS: Ten trials were included with 1003 patients: 502 to total fundoplication group and 501 to partial fundoplication group. The outcomes dysphagia and inability to belch had statistical significant difference (P = 0.00001) in favor of partial fundoplication. There was not statistical difference in outcomes related with treatment failure. There were no heterogeneity in the outcomes dysphagia and recurrence of the acid reflux. CONCLUSION: The partial fundoplication has lower incidence of obstructive side effects.
id UFSP_6609fcd6350fc56e3d0d49eb1b390fba
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/6768
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling Surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: total or partial fundoplication? Systematic review and meta-analysisTratamento cirúrgico da doença do refluxo gastroesofágico: fundoplicatura total ou parcial? Revisão sistemática da literatura e metanáliseGastroesophageal refluxsurgeryFundoplicationReviewMeta-analysisRefluxo gastroesofágicocirurgiaFundoplicaturaRevisãoMetanáliseCONTEXT: Although the high incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in the population, there is much controversy in this topic, especially in the surgical treatment. The decision to use of a total or partial fundoplication in the treatment of GERD is still a challenge to many surgeons because the few evidence found in the literature. OBJECTIVE: To bring more clear evidence in the comparison between total and partial fundoplication. DATA SOURCES: A systematic review of the literature and metaanalysis with randomized controlled trials accessed from MEDLINE, LILACS, Cochrane Controlled Trials Database was done. The outcomes remarked were: dysphagia, inability to belch, bloating, recurrence of acid reflux, heartburn and esophagitis. For data analysis the odds ratio was used with corresponding 95% confidence interval. Statistical heterogeneity in the results of the metaanalysis was assessed by calculating a test of heterogeneity. The software Review Manager 5 (Cochrane Collaboration) was utilized for the data gathered and the statistical analysis. Sensitive analysis was applied using only trials that included follow-up over 2 years. RESULTS: Ten trials were included with 1003 patients: 502 to total fundoplication group and 501 to partial fundoplication group. The outcomes dysphagia and inability to belch had statistical significant difference (P = 0.00001) in favor of partial fundoplication. There was not statistical difference in outcomes related with treatment failure. There were no heterogeneity in the outcomes dysphagia and recurrence of the acid reflux. CONCLUSION: The partial fundoplication has lower incidence of obstructive side effects.CONTEXTO: Apesar da alta incidência da doença do refluxo gastroesofágico (DRGE) na população em geral, ainda existe muita controvérsia sobre este assunto, especialmente quanto ao tratamento cirúrgico. A decisão de usar fundoplicatura total ou parcial no tratamento da DRGE ainda é um desafio para muitos cirurgiões devido à pouca evidência disponível na literatura. OBJETIVO: Comparar a fundoplicatura total e as fundoplicaturas parciais no tratamento da DRGE, avaliando a eficácia das duas técnicas operatórias. MÉTODO: Foram utilizadas a revisão sistemática da literatura e metanálise de estudos prospectivos e randomizados. Fontes de informação utilizadas: LILACS, MEDLINE, Cochrane Controlled Clinical Trials Database. A metanálise foi realizada utilizando-se o programa de informática da Colaboração Cochrane (Review Manager 5.0.1) e o cálculo dos desfechos foi feito pela razão de chances, com respectivo intervalo de confiança de 95%. Os desfechos estudados foram: disfagia, dificuldade em eructar, plenitude gástrica, recurrência do refluxo ácido, pirose e esofagite. Análise de subgrupo: estudos com seguimento maior que 2 anos. RESULTADOS: Foram selecionados 10 ensaios clínicos, onde 1003 doentes foram estudados, sendo 502 alocados para o grupo fundoplicatura total e 501 locados para o grupo fundoplicatura parcial. Os desfechos contínuos não puderam ser calculados em razão da falta de dados. Somente os desfechos disfagia e dificuldade em eructar tiveram resultados estatisticamente significantes (P<0.0001) a favor da fundoplicatura parcial. CONCLUSÃO: A fundoplicatura parcial está relacionada com a menor incidência de eventos obstrutivos pós-operatórios.Universidade Federal Fluminense Departamento de CirurgiaHospital Munir Rafful Unidade de Ensino, Pesquisa e ExtensãoFaculdade de Medicina de Volta RedondaUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) Programa da Pós-graduação em GastrocirurgiaUNIFESP, Programa da Pós-graduação em GastrocirurgiaSciELOInstituto Brasileiro de Estudos e Pesquisas de Gastroenterologia - IBEPEGE Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva - CBCD Sociedade Brasileira de Motilidade Digestiva - SBMD Federação Brasileira de Gastroenterologia - FBGSociedade Brasileira de Hepatologia - SBHSociedade Brasileira de Endoscopia Digestiva - SOBEDUniversidade Federal Fluminense Departamento de CirurgiaHospital Munir Rafful Unidade de Ensino, Pesquisa e ExtensãoFaculdade de Medicina de Volta RedondaUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Ramos, Rodrigo FLustosa, Suzana Angélica SAlmeida, Carlos Augusto P. DeSilva, Carolina P. DaMatos, Delcio [UNIFESP]2015-06-14T13:43:25Z2015-06-14T13:43:25Z2011-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion252-260application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0004-28032011000400007Arquivos de Gastroenterologia. Instituto Brasileiro de Estudos e Pesquisas de Gastroenterologia - IBEPEGE Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva - CBCD Sociedade Brasileira de Motilidade Digestiva - SBMD Federação Brasileira de Gastroenterologia - FBGSociedade Brasileira de Hepatologia - SBHSociedade Brasileira de Endoscopia Digestiva - SOBED, v. 48, n. 4, p. 252-260, 2011.10.1590/S0004-28032011000400007S0004-28032011000400007.pdf0004-2803S0004-28032011000400007http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/6768engArquivos de Gastroenterologiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-08-05T03:43:32Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/6768Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-08-05T03:43:32Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: total or partial fundoplication? Systematic review and meta-analysis
Tratamento cirúrgico da doença do refluxo gastroesofágico: fundoplicatura total ou parcial? Revisão sistemática da literatura e metanálise
title Surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: total or partial fundoplication? Systematic review and meta-analysis
spellingShingle Surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: total or partial fundoplication? Systematic review and meta-analysis
Ramos, Rodrigo F
Gastroesophageal reflux
surgery
Fundoplication
Review
Meta-analysis
Refluxo gastroesofágico
cirurgia
Fundoplicatura
Revisão
Metanálise
title_short Surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: total or partial fundoplication? Systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: total or partial fundoplication? Systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: total or partial fundoplication? Systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: total or partial fundoplication? Systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort Surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: total or partial fundoplication? Systematic review and meta-analysis
author Ramos, Rodrigo F
author_facet Ramos, Rodrigo F
Lustosa, Suzana Angélica S
Almeida, Carlos Augusto P. De
Silva, Carolina P. Da
Matos, Delcio [UNIFESP]
author_role author
author2 Lustosa, Suzana Angélica S
Almeida, Carlos Augusto P. De
Silva, Carolina P. Da
Matos, Delcio [UNIFESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Fluminense Departamento de Cirurgia
Hospital Munir Rafful Unidade de Ensino, Pesquisa e Extensão
Faculdade de Medicina de Volta Redonda
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ramos, Rodrigo F
Lustosa, Suzana Angélica S
Almeida, Carlos Augusto P. De
Silva, Carolina P. Da
Matos, Delcio [UNIFESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Gastroesophageal reflux
surgery
Fundoplication
Review
Meta-analysis
Refluxo gastroesofágico
cirurgia
Fundoplicatura
Revisão
Metanálise
topic Gastroesophageal reflux
surgery
Fundoplication
Review
Meta-analysis
Refluxo gastroesofágico
cirurgia
Fundoplicatura
Revisão
Metanálise
description CONTEXT: Although the high incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in the population, there is much controversy in this topic, especially in the surgical treatment. The decision to use of a total or partial fundoplication in the treatment of GERD is still a challenge to many surgeons because the few evidence found in the literature. OBJECTIVE: To bring more clear evidence in the comparison between total and partial fundoplication. DATA SOURCES: A systematic review of the literature and metaanalysis with randomized controlled trials accessed from MEDLINE, LILACS, Cochrane Controlled Trials Database was done. The outcomes remarked were: dysphagia, inability to belch, bloating, recurrence of acid reflux, heartburn and esophagitis. For data analysis the odds ratio was used with corresponding 95% confidence interval. Statistical heterogeneity in the results of the metaanalysis was assessed by calculating a test of heterogeneity. The software Review Manager 5 (Cochrane Collaboration) was utilized for the data gathered and the statistical analysis. Sensitive analysis was applied using only trials that included follow-up over 2 years. RESULTS: Ten trials were included with 1003 patients: 502 to total fundoplication group and 501 to partial fundoplication group. The outcomes dysphagia and inability to belch had statistical significant difference (P = 0.00001) in favor of partial fundoplication. There was not statistical difference in outcomes related with treatment failure. There were no heterogeneity in the outcomes dysphagia and recurrence of the acid reflux. CONCLUSION: The partial fundoplication has lower incidence of obstructive side effects.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-12-01
2015-06-14T13:43:25Z
2015-06-14T13:43:25Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0004-28032011000400007
Arquivos de Gastroenterologia. Instituto Brasileiro de Estudos e Pesquisas de Gastroenterologia - IBEPEGE Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva - CBCD Sociedade Brasileira de Motilidade Digestiva - SBMD Federação Brasileira de Gastroenterologia - FBGSociedade Brasileira de Hepatologia - SBHSociedade Brasileira de Endoscopia Digestiva - SOBED, v. 48, n. 4, p. 252-260, 2011.
10.1590/S0004-28032011000400007
S0004-28032011000400007.pdf
0004-2803
S0004-28032011000400007
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/6768
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0004-28032011000400007
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/6768
identifier_str_mv Arquivos de Gastroenterologia. Instituto Brasileiro de Estudos e Pesquisas de Gastroenterologia - IBEPEGE Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva - CBCD Sociedade Brasileira de Motilidade Digestiva - SBMD Federação Brasileira de Gastroenterologia - FBGSociedade Brasileira de Hepatologia - SBHSociedade Brasileira de Endoscopia Digestiva - SOBED, v. 48, n. 4, p. 252-260, 2011.
10.1590/S0004-28032011000400007
S0004-28032011000400007.pdf
0004-2803
S0004-28032011000400007
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Arquivos de Gastroenterologia
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 252-260
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Estudos e Pesquisas de Gastroenterologia - IBEPEGE Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva - CBCD Sociedade Brasileira de Motilidade Digestiva - SBMD Federação Brasileira de Gastroenterologia - FBGSociedade Brasileira de Hepatologia - SBHSociedade Brasileira de Endoscopia Digestiva - SOBED
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Brasileiro de Estudos e Pesquisas de Gastroenterologia - IBEPEGE Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva - CBCD Sociedade Brasileira de Motilidade Digestiva - SBMD Federação Brasileira de Gastroenterologia - FBGSociedade Brasileira de Hepatologia - SBHSociedade Brasileira de Endoscopia Digestiva - SOBED
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br
_version_ 1814268406561505280