Uma Análise do Índice Geral de Cursos usando DEA
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
Texto Completo: | https://sucupira.capes.gov.br/sucupira/public/consultas/coleta/trabalhoConclusao/viewTrabalhoConclusao.jsf?popup=true&id_trabalho=7928448 https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/59781 |
Resumo: | The National Institute for Educational Studies and Research “An ́ısio Teixeira” (Inep), an autarchy linked to the Ministry of Education (MEC), is responsible for providing information and statistics for the definition of educational policies. Within the context of higher education, there is the National System of Evaluation of Higher Education (Sinaes), which aims to evaluate institutions, courses and student performance. One of the informative tools of Sinaes is the General Courses Index (IGC), an indicator that seeks to measure the quality of each Institute of Higher Education (IES). The IGC synthesizes in a single value the average grades of undergraduate, masters and doctoral of the referred IES and is used, at least by the media, to rank them. Nevertheless, the methodology for obtaining the IGC carries an apparent paradox: it is possible for an IES to have undergraduate, masters and doctoral grades respectively higher than those of another IES, but with a lower IGC than the last one. This fact is accentuated by the methodology does not present theoretical justifications for the construction of the IGC, especially regarding the weighting factors and conversion of the grades. The purpose of this present work, therefore, is to use Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) on the data of the grades - in a first moment, these grades shall be the provided by Inep, later they will be normalized - in order to propose alternative rankings. The traditional DEA-CCR model and the cross efficiency approach were used, with two variations of secondary objectives, that revealed different rankings than the IGC and did not present the mentioned paradox. |
id |
UFSP_66d9e784a5ef6ae1ad329b1f0cbedc43 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/59781 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository_id_str |
3465 |
spelling |
Uma Análise do Índice Geral de Cursos usando DEADEAIGCRankingDEAIGCRanqueamentoThe National Institute for Educational Studies and Research “An ́ısio Teixeira” (Inep), an autarchy linked to the Ministry of Education (MEC), is responsible for providing information and statistics for the definition of educational policies. Within the context of higher education, there is the National System of Evaluation of Higher Education (Sinaes), which aims to evaluate institutions, courses and student performance. One of the informative tools of Sinaes is the General Courses Index (IGC), an indicator that seeks to measure the quality of each Institute of Higher Education (IES). The IGC synthesizes in a single value the average grades of undergraduate, masters and doctoral of the referred IES and is used, at least by the media, to rank them. Nevertheless, the methodology for obtaining the IGC carries an apparent paradox: it is possible for an IES to have undergraduate, masters and doctoral grades respectively higher than those of another IES, but with a lower IGC than the last one. This fact is accentuated by the methodology does not present theoretical justifications for the construction of the IGC, especially regarding the weighting factors and conversion of the grades. The purpose of this present work, therefore, is to use Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) on the data of the grades - in a first moment, these grades shall be the provided by Inep, later they will be normalized - in order to propose alternative rankings. The traditional DEA-CCR model and the cross efficiency approach were used, with two variations of secondary objectives, that revealed different rankings than the IGC and did not present the mentioned paradox.O Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais An ́ısio Teixeira (Inep), autarquia federal vinculada ao Ministério da Educação (MEC), é responsável por fornecer informações e estatísticas para a definição de políticas educacionais. Dentro do contexto da educação superior, há o Sistema Nacional de Avaliação da Educação Superior (Sinaes), que visa avaliar as instituições, os cursos e o desempenho dos estudantes. Um dos instrumentos informativos do Sinaes é o Índice Geral de Cursos (IGC), indicador que busca medir a qualidade de cada Instituição de Educação Superior (IES). O IGC sintetiza em um único valor as notas médias de graduação, mestrado e doutorado das referidas IES e é utilizado, ao menos pela mídia, para o ranqueamento destas. Não obstante, a metodologia para obtenção do IGC carrega um aparente paradoxo: é possível uma IES ter notas de graduação, mestrado e doutorado respectivamente superiores aos de uma outra IES, mas com IGC menor do que o da última. Esse fato é acentuado pela metodologia não apresentar justificativas teóricas para a confecção do IGC, especialmente para os fatores de ponderação e conversão das notas. O objetivo do presente trabalho, portanto, é o de utilizar Análise de Envoltória de Dados (DEA, Data Envelopment Analysis) sobre os dados das notas - em um primeiro momento as notas utilizadas são as fornecidas pelo Inep, posteriormente as notas serão normalizadas - a fim de propor ranqueamentos alternativos. Empregou-se o tradicional modelo DEA-CCR e a abordagem cross efficiency, com duas variações de objetivos secundários, que revelaram rankings distintos àquele do IGC e que não apresentam o mencionado paradoxo.Dados abertos - Sucupira - Teses e dissertações (2019)Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Milioni, Armando Zeferino [UNIFESP]Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Favali, Joao Danilo [UNIFESP]2021-01-19T16:35:59Z2021-01-19T16:35:59Z2019-07-05info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://sucupira.capes.gov.br/sucupira/public/consultas/coleta/trabalhoConclusao/viewTrabalhoConclusao.jsf?popup=true&id_trabalho=7928448JOAO DANILO FAVALI.pdfhttps://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/59781porinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-08-11T09:18:04Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/59781Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-08-11T09:18:04Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Uma Análise do Índice Geral de Cursos usando DEA |
title |
Uma Análise do Índice Geral de Cursos usando DEA |
spellingShingle |
Uma Análise do Índice Geral de Cursos usando DEA Favali, Joao Danilo [UNIFESP] DEA IGC Ranking DEA IGC Ranqueamento |
title_short |
Uma Análise do Índice Geral de Cursos usando DEA |
title_full |
Uma Análise do Índice Geral de Cursos usando DEA |
title_fullStr |
Uma Análise do Índice Geral de Cursos usando DEA |
title_full_unstemmed |
Uma Análise do Índice Geral de Cursos usando DEA |
title_sort |
Uma Análise do Índice Geral de Cursos usando DEA |
author |
Favali, Joao Danilo [UNIFESP] |
author_facet |
Favali, Joao Danilo [UNIFESP] |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Milioni, Armando Zeferino [UNIFESP] Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Favali, Joao Danilo [UNIFESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
DEA IGC Ranking DEA IGC Ranqueamento |
topic |
DEA IGC Ranking DEA IGC Ranqueamento |
description |
The National Institute for Educational Studies and Research “An ́ısio Teixeira” (Inep), an autarchy linked to the Ministry of Education (MEC), is responsible for providing information and statistics for the definition of educational policies. Within the context of higher education, there is the National System of Evaluation of Higher Education (Sinaes), which aims to evaluate institutions, courses and student performance. One of the informative tools of Sinaes is the General Courses Index (IGC), an indicator that seeks to measure the quality of each Institute of Higher Education (IES). The IGC synthesizes in a single value the average grades of undergraduate, masters and doctoral of the referred IES and is used, at least by the media, to rank them. Nevertheless, the methodology for obtaining the IGC carries an apparent paradox: it is possible for an IES to have undergraduate, masters and doctoral grades respectively higher than those of another IES, but with a lower IGC than the last one. This fact is accentuated by the methodology does not present theoretical justifications for the construction of the IGC, especially regarding the weighting factors and conversion of the grades. The purpose of this present work, therefore, is to use Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) on the data of the grades - in a first moment, these grades shall be the provided by Inep, later they will be normalized - in order to propose alternative rankings. The traditional DEA-CCR model and the cross efficiency approach were used, with two variations of secondary objectives, that revealed different rankings than the IGC and did not present the mentioned paradox. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-07-05 2021-01-19T16:35:59Z 2021-01-19T16:35:59Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://sucupira.capes.gov.br/sucupira/public/consultas/coleta/trabalhoConclusao/viewTrabalhoConclusao.jsf?popup=true&id_trabalho=7928448 JOAO DANILO FAVALI.pdf https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/59781 |
url |
https://sucupira.capes.gov.br/sucupira/public/consultas/coleta/trabalhoConclusao/viewTrabalhoConclusao.jsf?popup=true&id_trabalho=7928448 https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/59781 |
identifier_str_mv |
JOAO DANILO FAVALI.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) instacron:UNIFESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
instacron_str |
UNIFESP |
institution |
UNIFESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br |
_version_ |
1814268347495219200 |