Uma Análise do Índice Geral de Cursos usando DEA

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Favali, Joao Danilo [UNIFESP]
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Texto Completo: https://sucupira.capes.gov.br/sucupira/public/consultas/coleta/trabalhoConclusao/viewTrabalhoConclusao.jsf?popup=true&id_trabalho=7928448
https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/59781
Resumo: The National Institute for Educational Studies and Research “An ́ısio Teixeira” (Inep), an autarchy linked to the Ministry of Education (MEC), is responsible for providing information and statistics for the definition of educational policies. Within the context of higher education, there is the National System of Evaluation of Higher Education (Sinaes), which aims to evaluate institutions, courses and student performance. One of the informative tools of Sinaes is the General Courses Index (IGC), an indicator that seeks to measure the quality of each Institute of Higher Education (IES). The IGC synthesizes in a single value the average grades of undergraduate, masters and doctoral of the referred IES and is used, at least by the media, to rank them. Nevertheless, the methodology for obtaining the IGC carries an apparent paradox: it is possible for an IES to have undergraduate, masters and doctoral grades respectively higher than those of another IES, but with a lower IGC than the last one. This fact is accentuated by the methodology does not present theoretical justifications for the construction of the IGC, especially regarding the weighting factors and conversion of the grades. The purpose of this present work, therefore, is to use Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) on the data of the grades - in a first moment, these grades shall be the provided by Inep, later they will be normalized - in order to propose alternative rankings. The traditional DEA-CCR model and the cross efficiency approach were used, with two variations of secondary objectives, that revealed different rankings than the IGC and did not present the mentioned paradox.
id UFSP_66d9e784a5ef6ae1ad329b1f0cbedc43
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/59781
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling Uma Análise do Índice Geral de Cursos usando DEADEAIGCRankingDEAIGCRanqueamentoThe National Institute for Educational Studies and Research “An ́ısio Teixeira” (Inep), an autarchy linked to the Ministry of Education (MEC), is responsible for providing information and statistics for the definition of educational policies. Within the context of higher education, there is the National System of Evaluation of Higher Education (Sinaes), which aims to evaluate institutions, courses and student performance. One of the informative tools of Sinaes is the General Courses Index (IGC), an indicator that seeks to measure the quality of each Institute of Higher Education (IES). The IGC synthesizes in a single value the average grades of undergraduate, masters and doctoral of the referred IES and is used, at least by the media, to rank them. Nevertheless, the methodology for obtaining the IGC carries an apparent paradox: it is possible for an IES to have undergraduate, masters and doctoral grades respectively higher than those of another IES, but with a lower IGC than the last one. This fact is accentuated by the methodology does not present theoretical justifications for the construction of the IGC, especially regarding the weighting factors and conversion of the grades. The purpose of this present work, therefore, is to use Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) on the data of the grades - in a first moment, these grades shall be the provided by Inep, later they will be normalized - in order to propose alternative rankings. The traditional DEA-CCR model and the cross efficiency approach were used, with two variations of secondary objectives, that revealed different rankings than the IGC and did not present the mentioned paradox.O Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais An ́ısio Teixeira (Inep), autarquia federal vinculada ao Ministério da Educação (MEC), é responsável por fornecer informações e estatísticas para a definição de políticas educacionais. Dentro do contexto da educação superior, há o Sistema Nacional de Avaliação da Educação Superior (Sinaes), que visa avaliar as instituições, os cursos e o desempenho dos estudantes. Um dos instrumentos informativos do Sinaes é o Índice Geral de Cursos (IGC), indicador que busca medir a qualidade de cada Instituição de Educação Superior (IES). O IGC sintetiza em um único valor as notas médias de graduação, mestrado e doutorado das referidas IES e é utilizado, ao menos pela mídia, para o ranqueamento destas. Não obstante, a metodologia para obtenção do IGC carrega um aparente paradoxo: é possível uma IES ter notas de graduação, mestrado e doutorado respectivamente superiores aos de uma outra IES, mas com IGC menor do que o da última. Esse fato é acentuado pela metodologia não apresentar justificativas teóricas para a confecção do IGC, especialmente para os fatores de ponderação e conversão das notas. O objetivo do presente trabalho, portanto, é o de utilizar Análise de Envoltória de Dados (DEA, Data Envelopment Analysis) sobre os dados das notas - em um primeiro momento as notas utilizadas são as fornecidas pelo Inep, posteriormente as notas serão normalizadas - a fim de propor ranqueamentos alternativos. Empregou-se o tradicional modelo DEA-CCR e a abordagem cross efficiency, com duas variações de objetivos secundários, que revelaram rankings distintos àquele do IGC e que não apresentam o mencionado paradoxo.Dados abertos - Sucupira - Teses e dissertações (2019)Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Milioni, Armando Zeferino [UNIFESP]Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Favali, Joao Danilo [UNIFESP]2021-01-19T16:35:59Z2021-01-19T16:35:59Z2019-07-05info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://sucupira.capes.gov.br/sucupira/public/consultas/coleta/trabalhoConclusao/viewTrabalhoConclusao.jsf?popup=true&id_trabalho=7928448JOAO DANILO FAVALI.pdfhttps://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/59781porinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-08-11T09:18:04Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/59781Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-08-11T09:18:04Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Uma Análise do Índice Geral de Cursos usando DEA
title Uma Análise do Índice Geral de Cursos usando DEA
spellingShingle Uma Análise do Índice Geral de Cursos usando DEA
Favali, Joao Danilo [UNIFESP]
DEA
IGC
Ranking
DEA
IGC
Ranqueamento
title_short Uma Análise do Índice Geral de Cursos usando DEA
title_full Uma Análise do Índice Geral de Cursos usando DEA
title_fullStr Uma Análise do Índice Geral de Cursos usando DEA
title_full_unstemmed Uma Análise do Índice Geral de Cursos usando DEA
title_sort Uma Análise do Índice Geral de Cursos usando DEA
author Favali, Joao Danilo [UNIFESP]
author_facet Favali, Joao Danilo [UNIFESP]
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Milioni, Armando Zeferino [UNIFESP]
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Favali, Joao Danilo [UNIFESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv DEA
IGC
Ranking
DEA
IGC
Ranqueamento
topic DEA
IGC
Ranking
DEA
IGC
Ranqueamento
description The National Institute for Educational Studies and Research “An ́ısio Teixeira” (Inep), an autarchy linked to the Ministry of Education (MEC), is responsible for providing information and statistics for the definition of educational policies. Within the context of higher education, there is the National System of Evaluation of Higher Education (Sinaes), which aims to evaluate institutions, courses and student performance. One of the informative tools of Sinaes is the General Courses Index (IGC), an indicator that seeks to measure the quality of each Institute of Higher Education (IES). The IGC synthesizes in a single value the average grades of undergraduate, masters and doctoral of the referred IES and is used, at least by the media, to rank them. Nevertheless, the methodology for obtaining the IGC carries an apparent paradox: it is possible for an IES to have undergraduate, masters and doctoral grades respectively higher than those of another IES, but with a lower IGC than the last one. This fact is accentuated by the methodology does not present theoretical justifications for the construction of the IGC, especially regarding the weighting factors and conversion of the grades. The purpose of this present work, therefore, is to use Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) on the data of the grades - in a first moment, these grades shall be the provided by Inep, later they will be normalized - in order to propose alternative rankings. The traditional DEA-CCR model and the cross efficiency approach were used, with two variations of secondary objectives, that revealed different rankings than the IGC and did not present the mentioned paradox.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-07-05
2021-01-19T16:35:59Z
2021-01-19T16:35:59Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://sucupira.capes.gov.br/sucupira/public/consultas/coleta/trabalhoConclusao/viewTrabalhoConclusao.jsf?popup=true&id_trabalho=7928448
JOAO DANILO FAVALI.pdf
https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/59781
url https://sucupira.capes.gov.br/sucupira/public/consultas/coleta/trabalhoConclusao/viewTrabalhoConclusao.jsf?popup=true&id_trabalho=7928448
https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/59781
identifier_str_mv JOAO DANILO FAVALI.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br
_version_ 1814268347495219200