Is psychiatric reform a strategy for reducing the mental health budget? The case of Brazil

• Autor(a) principal: Andreoli, Sergio Baxter [UNIFESP]
• Data de Publicação: 2007
• Outros Autores: Almeida-Filho, Naomar, Martin, Denise [UNIFESP], Mateus, Mário Dinis [UNIFESP], Mari, Jair de Jesus [UNIFESP]
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
• Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-44462006005000032; http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/3559
• topic: Mental health; Health policy; Health care reform; Deinstitutionalization; Health care costs; Saúde mental; Política de saúde; Reforma dos serviços de saúde; Desinstitucionalização; Custos de cuidados de saúde

OBJECTIVE: To investigate trends in the provision of mental health services and financing in Brazil. METHOD: Data from DATASUS (the Brazilian Unified Health Computerized System) with free access in the web were collected regarding the number of beds, the development of new community centers, the number of mental health professionals, and costs involved from 1995 to 2005. RESULTS: In ten years, the number of psychiatric beds decreased 41% (5.4 to 3.2 per 10,000 inhabitants) while community services have increased nine-fold (0.004 to 0.037 per 10,000 inhabitants). Psychologists and social workers have accounted for three and two-fold, respectively, as much hirings as psychiatrists. Psychiatric admissions accounted for 95.5% of the budget in 1995 and 49% in 2005, and the expenses with community services and medication have increased 15% each. As a whole, the expenses in mental health decreased by 26.7% (2.66 to 1.95 US$ per capita). CONCLUSION: There has been a clear switch from hospital to community psychiatric care in Brazil, where the system can now provide a diversity of treatments and free access to psychotropics. However, the coverage of community services is precarious, and the reform was not accompanied by an increased public investment in mental health. The psychiatric reform is not a strategy for reducing costs; it necessarily implies increasing investments if countries decide to have a better care of those more disadvantaged.