Portrayal of caesarean section in Brazilian women's magazines: 20 year review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Torloni, Maria Regina [UNIFESP]
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Daher, Silvia [UNIFESP], Betran, Ana Pilar, Widmer, Mariana, Montilla, Pilar, Souza, Joao Paulo, Merialdi, Mario
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d276
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/33360
Resumo: Objective To assess the quality and comprehensiveness of the information on caesarean section provided in Brazilian women's magazines.Design Review of articles published during 1988-2008 in top selling women's magazines.Setting Brazil, one of the countries with the highest caesarean section rates in the world.Data sources Women's magazines with the largest distribution during the study period, identified through the official national media indexing organisations.Selection criteria Articles with objective scientific information or advice, comments, opinions, or the experience of ordinary women or celebrities on delivery by caesarean section.Main outcome measures Sources of information mentioned by the author of the article, the accuracy and completeness of data presented on caesarean section, and alleged reasons why women would prefer to deliver though caesarean section.Results 118 articles were included. the main cited sources of information were health professionals (78% (n=92) of the articles). 71% (n=84) of the articles reported at least one benefit of caesarean section, and 82% (n=97) reported at least one short term maternal risk of caesarean section. the benefits most often attributed to delivery by caesarean section were reduction of pain and convenience for family or health professionals. the most frequently reported short term maternal risks of caesarean section were increased time to recover and that it is a less natural way of giving birth. Only one third of the articles mentioned any long term maternal risks or perinatal complications associated with caesarean section. Fear of pain was the main reported reason why women would prefer to deliver by caesarean section.Conclusions Most of the articles published in Brazilian women's magazines do not use optimal sources of information. the portrayal of caesarean section is mostly balanced, not explicitly in favour of one or another route of delivery, but incomplete and may be leading women to underestimate the maternal/perinatal risks associated with this route of delivery.
id UFSP_692e6f29342c066f815f1422cfef9c46
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/33360
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling Portrayal of caesarean section in Brazilian women's magazines: 20 year reviewObjective To assess the quality and comprehensiveness of the information on caesarean section provided in Brazilian women's magazines.Design Review of articles published during 1988-2008 in top selling women's magazines.Setting Brazil, one of the countries with the highest caesarean section rates in the world.Data sources Women's magazines with the largest distribution during the study period, identified through the official national media indexing organisations.Selection criteria Articles with objective scientific information or advice, comments, opinions, or the experience of ordinary women or celebrities on delivery by caesarean section.Main outcome measures Sources of information mentioned by the author of the article, the accuracy and completeness of data presented on caesarean section, and alleged reasons why women would prefer to deliver though caesarean section.Results 118 articles were included. the main cited sources of information were health professionals (78% (n=92) of the articles). 71% (n=84) of the articles reported at least one benefit of caesarean section, and 82% (n=97) reported at least one short term maternal risk of caesarean section. the benefits most often attributed to delivery by caesarean section were reduction of pain and convenience for family or health professionals. the most frequently reported short term maternal risks of caesarean section were increased time to recover and that it is a less natural way of giving birth. Only one third of the articles mentioned any long term maternal risks or perinatal complications associated with caesarean section. Fear of pain was the main reported reason why women would prefer to deliver by caesarean section.Conclusions Most of the articles published in Brazilian women's magazines do not use optimal sources of information. the portrayal of caesarean section is mostly balanced, not explicitly in favour of one or another route of delivery, but incomplete and may be leading women to underestimate the maternal/perinatal risks associated with this route of delivery.Brazilian Cochrane Ctr, BR-04039001 São Paulo, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Obstet, BR-04002400 São Paulo, BrazilWHO, Dept Reprod Hlth & Res, CH-1211 Geneva, SwitzerlandOsservatorio Nazl Salute Donna ON Da, Milan, ItalyUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Obstet, BR-04002400 São Paulo, BrazilWeb of ScienceWorld Health OrganizationB M J Publishing GroupBrazilian Cochrane CtrUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)WHOOsservatorio Nazl Salute Donna ON DaTorloni, Maria Regina [UNIFESP]Daher, Silvia [UNIFESP]Betran, Ana PilarWidmer, MarianaMontilla, PilarSouza, Joao PauloMerialdi, Mario2016-01-24T14:06:04Z2016-01-24T14:06:04Z2011-01-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion7application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d276British Medical Journal. London: B M J Publishing Group, v. 342, 7 p., 2011.10.1136/bmj.d276WOS000286887100008.pdf0959-535Xhttp://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/33360WOS:000286887100008engBritish Medical Journalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-08-08T00:44:02Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/33360Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-08-08T00:44:02Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Portrayal of caesarean section in Brazilian women's magazines: 20 year review
title Portrayal of caesarean section in Brazilian women's magazines: 20 year review
spellingShingle Portrayal of caesarean section in Brazilian women's magazines: 20 year review
Torloni, Maria Regina [UNIFESP]
title_short Portrayal of caesarean section in Brazilian women's magazines: 20 year review
title_full Portrayal of caesarean section in Brazilian women's magazines: 20 year review
title_fullStr Portrayal of caesarean section in Brazilian women's magazines: 20 year review
title_full_unstemmed Portrayal of caesarean section in Brazilian women's magazines: 20 year review
title_sort Portrayal of caesarean section in Brazilian women's magazines: 20 year review
author Torloni, Maria Regina [UNIFESP]
author_facet Torloni, Maria Regina [UNIFESP]
Daher, Silvia [UNIFESP]
Betran, Ana Pilar
Widmer, Mariana
Montilla, Pilar
Souza, Joao Paulo
Merialdi, Mario
author_role author
author2 Daher, Silvia [UNIFESP]
Betran, Ana Pilar
Widmer, Mariana
Montilla, Pilar
Souza, Joao Paulo
Merialdi, Mario
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Cochrane Ctr
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
WHO
Osservatorio Nazl Salute Donna ON Da
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Torloni, Maria Regina [UNIFESP]
Daher, Silvia [UNIFESP]
Betran, Ana Pilar
Widmer, Mariana
Montilla, Pilar
Souza, Joao Paulo
Merialdi, Mario
description Objective To assess the quality and comprehensiveness of the information on caesarean section provided in Brazilian women's magazines.Design Review of articles published during 1988-2008 in top selling women's magazines.Setting Brazil, one of the countries with the highest caesarean section rates in the world.Data sources Women's magazines with the largest distribution during the study period, identified through the official national media indexing organisations.Selection criteria Articles with objective scientific information or advice, comments, opinions, or the experience of ordinary women or celebrities on delivery by caesarean section.Main outcome measures Sources of information mentioned by the author of the article, the accuracy and completeness of data presented on caesarean section, and alleged reasons why women would prefer to deliver though caesarean section.Results 118 articles were included. the main cited sources of information were health professionals (78% (n=92) of the articles). 71% (n=84) of the articles reported at least one benefit of caesarean section, and 82% (n=97) reported at least one short term maternal risk of caesarean section. the benefits most often attributed to delivery by caesarean section were reduction of pain and convenience for family or health professionals. the most frequently reported short term maternal risks of caesarean section were increased time to recover and that it is a less natural way of giving birth. Only one third of the articles mentioned any long term maternal risks or perinatal complications associated with caesarean section. Fear of pain was the main reported reason why women would prefer to deliver by caesarean section.Conclusions Most of the articles published in Brazilian women's magazines do not use optimal sources of information. the portrayal of caesarean section is mostly balanced, not explicitly in favour of one or another route of delivery, but incomplete and may be leading women to underestimate the maternal/perinatal risks associated with this route of delivery.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-01-25
2016-01-24T14:06:04Z
2016-01-24T14:06:04Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d276
British Medical Journal. London: B M J Publishing Group, v. 342, 7 p., 2011.
10.1136/bmj.d276
WOS000286887100008.pdf
0959-535X
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/33360
WOS:000286887100008
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d276
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/33360
identifier_str_mv British Medical Journal. London: B M J Publishing Group, v. 342, 7 p., 2011.
10.1136/bmj.d276
WOS000286887100008.pdf
0959-535X
WOS:000286887100008
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv British Medical Journal
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 7
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv B M J Publishing Group
publisher.none.fl_str_mv B M J Publishing Group
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br
_version_ 1814268347429158912