Manual Resistance versus Conventional Resistance Training: Impact on Strength and Muscular Endurance in Recreationally Trained Men

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Chulvi-Medrano, Iván
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Rial, Tamara, Cortell-Tormo, Juan M., Alakhdar, Yasser, Teixeira, Cauê Vazquez La Scala [UNIFESP], Masiá-Tortosa, Laura, Dorgo, Sandor
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/51354
https://www.jssm.org/researchjssm-16-343.xml.xml
Resumo: Manual resistance training (MRT) has been widely used in the field of physical therapy. It has also been used as a strength training method due to the accommodating resistance nature of this modality. The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of an 8-week MRT program on maximum strength and muscular endurance in comparison to conventional resistance training in recreationally trained men. Twenty healthy recreationally trained male subjects were recruited and divided into a MRT training group and a conventional training (CT) group. CT group performed bench press and lat pull-down exercises, and the MRT group performed similar movements with resistance provided by a personal trainer. Both groups completed similar training protocol and training load: 2 training sessions weekly for 3 sets of 8 repetitions at an intensity of 8 to 10 on the perceived exertion scale of 0-10. Initial maximum strength differences were not significant between the groups. Neither group showed significant changes in muscular strength or endurance. Despite the statistically non-significant pre-to post differences, a trend for improvement was observed and effect size (ES) calculations indicated greater magnitude of effects for strength and endurance changes in the MRT group in lat pulldown (g=0.84) compared to CT group. Effectiveness of MRT is similar to CT for improving muscular strength and endurance. MRT can be used as a supplemental or alternative strength training modality for recreationally trained subjects, or be considered by personal trainers especially in low equipped facility conditions.
id UFSP_71a13336fa7be243dfcce0af0224727c
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/51354
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling Chulvi-Medrano, IvánRial, TamaraCortell-Tormo, Juan M.Alakhdar, YasserTeixeira, Cauê Vazquez La Scala [UNIFESP]Masiá-Tortosa, LauraDorgo, Sandor2019-08-19T11:49:36Z2019-08-19T11:49:36Z2017Journal Of Sports Science And Medicine. Bursa, v. 16, n. 3, p. 343-349, 2017.1303-2968https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/51354https://www.jssm.org/researchjssm-16-343.xml.xmlWOS000407360500006.pdfWOS:000407360500006Manual resistance training (MRT) has been widely used in the field of physical therapy. It has also been used as a strength training method due to the accommodating resistance nature of this modality. The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of an 8-week MRT program on maximum strength and muscular endurance in comparison to conventional resistance training in recreationally trained men. Twenty healthy recreationally trained male subjects were recruited and divided into a MRT training group and a conventional training (CT) group. CT group performed bench press and lat pull-down exercises, and the MRT group performed similar movements with resistance provided by a personal trainer. Both groups completed similar training protocol and training load: 2 training sessions weekly for 3 sets of 8 repetitions at an intensity of 8 to 10 on the perceived exertion scale of 0-10. Initial maximum strength differences were not significant between the groups. Neither group showed significant changes in muscular strength or endurance. Despite the statistically non-significant pre-to post differences, a trend for improvement was observed and effect size (ES) calculations indicated greater magnitude of effects for strength and endurance changes in the MRT group in lat pulldown (g=0.84) compared to CT group. Effectiveness of MRT is similar to CT for improving muscular strength and endurance. MRT can be used as a supplemental or alternative strength training modality for recreationally trained subjects, or be considered by personal trainers especially in low equipped facility conditions.Univ Alicante, Dept Gen & Specif Didact, Alicante, SpainBenestar Wellness Ctr, Valencia, SpainInt Hypopress & Phys Therapy Inst, Vigo, SpainUniv Valencia, Dept Phys Therapy, Valencia, SpainUniv Fed São Paulo, Dept Biosci, Santos, BrazilPraia Grande Coll, Fac Phys Educ, Praia Grande, BrazilUniv Texas El Paso, Dept Kinesiol, 1851 Wiggins St, El Paso, TX 79968 USAUniv Fed São Paulo, Dept Biosci, Santos, BrazilWeb of Science343-349engJournal Sports Science & MedicineStrength trainingBench pressLat pull-downMaximum strengthManual Resistance versus Conventional Resistance Training: Impact on Strength and Muscular Endurance in Recreationally Trained Meninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESPORIGINALWOS000407360500006.pdfapplication/pdf501604${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/51354/1/WOS000407360500006.pdf1d3f306c93c46f171a7709b55f17bde0MD51open accessTEXTWOS000407360500006.pdf.txtWOS000407360500006.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain36083${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/51354/5/WOS000407360500006.pdf.txt58b09716bb5142d4fbd4a1f563e9570fMD55open accessTHUMBNAILWOS000407360500006.pdf.jpgWOS000407360500006.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg6873${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/51354/7/WOS000407360500006.pdf.jpg74cf18343c3973481969c7ece9437ceaMD57open access11600/513542023-06-05 19:06:10.476open accessoai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/51354Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:34652023-06-05T22:06:10Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.en.fl_str_mv Manual Resistance versus Conventional Resistance Training: Impact on Strength and Muscular Endurance in Recreationally Trained Men
title Manual Resistance versus Conventional Resistance Training: Impact on Strength and Muscular Endurance in Recreationally Trained Men
spellingShingle Manual Resistance versus Conventional Resistance Training: Impact on Strength and Muscular Endurance in Recreationally Trained Men
Chulvi-Medrano, Iván
Strength training
Bench press
Lat pull-down
Maximum strength
title_short Manual Resistance versus Conventional Resistance Training: Impact on Strength and Muscular Endurance in Recreationally Trained Men
title_full Manual Resistance versus Conventional Resistance Training: Impact on Strength and Muscular Endurance in Recreationally Trained Men
title_fullStr Manual Resistance versus Conventional Resistance Training: Impact on Strength and Muscular Endurance in Recreationally Trained Men
title_full_unstemmed Manual Resistance versus Conventional Resistance Training: Impact on Strength and Muscular Endurance in Recreationally Trained Men
title_sort Manual Resistance versus Conventional Resistance Training: Impact on Strength and Muscular Endurance in Recreationally Trained Men
author Chulvi-Medrano, Iván
author_facet Chulvi-Medrano, Iván
Rial, Tamara
Cortell-Tormo, Juan M.
Alakhdar, Yasser
Teixeira, Cauê Vazquez La Scala [UNIFESP]
Masiá-Tortosa, Laura
Dorgo, Sandor
author_role author
author2 Rial, Tamara
Cortell-Tormo, Juan M.
Alakhdar, Yasser
Teixeira, Cauê Vazquez La Scala [UNIFESP]
Masiá-Tortosa, Laura
Dorgo, Sandor
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Chulvi-Medrano, Iván
Rial, Tamara
Cortell-Tormo, Juan M.
Alakhdar, Yasser
Teixeira, Cauê Vazquez La Scala [UNIFESP]
Masiá-Tortosa, Laura
Dorgo, Sandor
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Strength training
Bench press
Lat pull-down
Maximum strength
topic Strength training
Bench press
Lat pull-down
Maximum strength
description Manual resistance training (MRT) has been widely used in the field of physical therapy. It has also been used as a strength training method due to the accommodating resistance nature of this modality. The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of an 8-week MRT program on maximum strength and muscular endurance in comparison to conventional resistance training in recreationally trained men. Twenty healthy recreationally trained male subjects were recruited and divided into a MRT training group and a conventional training (CT) group. CT group performed bench press and lat pull-down exercises, and the MRT group performed similar movements with resistance provided by a personal trainer. Both groups completed similar training protocol and training load: 2 training sessions weekly for 3 sets of 8 repetitions at an intensity of 8 to 10 on the perceived exertion scale of 0-10. Initial maximum strength differences were not significant between the groups. Neither group showed significant changes in muscular strength or endurance. Despite the statistically non-significant pre-to post differences, a trend for improvement was observed and effect size (ES) calculations indicated greater magnitude of effects for strength and endurance changes in the MRT group in lat pulldown (g=0.84) compared to CT group. Effectiveness of MRT is similar to CT for improving muscular strength and endurance. MRT can be used as a supplemental or alternative strength training modality for recreationally trained subjects, or be considered by personal trainers especially in low equipped facility conditions.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2017
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2019-08-19T11:49:36Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2019-08-19T11:49:36Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv Journal Of Sports Science And Medicine. Bursa, v. 16, n. 3, p. 343-349, 2017.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/51354
https://www.jssm.org/researchjssm-16-343.xml.xml
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 1303-2968
dc.identifier.file.none.fl_str_mv WOS000407360500006.pdf
dc.identifier.wos.none.fl_str_mv WOS:000407360500006
identifier_str_mv Journal Of Sports Science And Medicine. Bursa, v. 16, n. 3, p. 343-349, 2017.
1303-2968
WOS000407360500006.pdf
WOS:000407360500006
url https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/51354
https://www.jssm.org/researchjssm-16-343.xml.xml
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 343-349
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Journal Sports Science & Medicine
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Journal Sports Science & Medicine
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv ${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/51354/1/WOS000407360500006.pdf
${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/51354/5/WOS000407360500006.pdf.txt
${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/51354/7/WOS000407360500006.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 1d3f306c93c46f171a7709b55f17bde0
58b09716bb5142d4fbd4a1f563e9570f
74cf18343c3973481969c7ece9437cea
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1802764111153463296