Long-term results with a one-stage complex primary hypospadias repair strategy (the three-in-one technique)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Macedo, Antonio [UNIFESP]
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Liguori, Riberto [UNIFESP], Ottoni, Sergio L. [UNIFESP], Garrone, Gilmar [UNIFESP], Damazio, Eulalio [UNIFESP], Mattos, Ricardo M. [UNIFESP], Ortiz, Valdemar [UNIFESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2011.02.024
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/33718
Resumo: Purpose: Complex primary hypospadias repair that warrants urethral plate division is treated mostly in two steps, not necessarily in two surgeries. Our aim was to review long-term results with a one-stage strategy based on reconstruction of the urethral plate with buccal mucosa graft and onlay transverse preputial flap anastomosis protected by a tunica vaginalis flap (the three-in-one concept).Material and methods: We were able to report on 35 patients operated for primary scrotal, penoscrotal and perineal hypospadias between March 2002 and June 2008. We reviewed all charts and had phone interviews with patients not seen for the last 24 months. We investigated parameters such as UTI occurrence, fistula, residual curvature, meatal stenosis, urethral diverticula, dehiscence, orchitis and parental perception.Results: Surgical complications occurred in 13 patients (37%): 4 meatal stenosis, 4 diverticula, 5 fistulae and 2 residual penile curvatures (total 42%). Meatal dilatation was successful in 2 cases, reflected in fistula resolution. the reoperation rate was 31.5% consisting mostly of simple procedures like fistula closure, meatotomy and penile curvature release, and complex diverticula repair in 4 cases. Parental perception was excellent for 57% (20 patients) and good or acceptable for the remaining. Mean follow-up was 4.6 years.Conclusions: the one-step strategy is associated with 68.5% success in a single operation, whereas 31.5% will need a second repair. We recognize that meatal problems are mostly associated with fistulae and diverticula; therefore, we recommend a final acceptable proximal glandar opening that will not compromise the neourethra. (C) 2011 Journal of Pediatric Urology Company. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
id UFSP_7718536c3ef6184950f53a1e4d0e1514
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/33718
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling Long-term results with a one-stage complex primary hypospadias repair strategy (the three-in-one technique)HypospadiaUrethroplastyBuccal mucosaPurpose: Complex primary hypospadias repair that warrants urethral plate division is treated mostly in two steps, not necessarily in two surgeries. Our aim was to review long-term results with a one-stage strategy based on reconstruction of the urethral plate with buccal mucosa graft and onlay transverse preputial flap anastomosis protected by a tunica vaginalis flap (the three-in-one concept).Material and methods: We were able to report on 35 patients operated for primary scrotal, penoscrotal and perineal hypospadias between March 2002 and June 2008. We reviewed all charts and had phone interviews with patients not seen for the last 24 months. We investigated parameters such as UTI occurrence, fistula, residual curvature, meatal stenosis, urethral diverticula, dehiscence, orchitis and parental perception.Results: Surgical complications occurred in 13 patients (37%): 4 meatal stenosis, 4 diverticula, 5 fistulae and 2 residual penile curvatures (total 42%). Meatal dilatation was successful in 2 cases, reflected in fistula resolution. the reoperation rate was 31.5% consisting mostly of simple procedures like fistula closure, meatotomy and penile curvature release, and complex diverticula repair in 4 cases. Parental perception was excellent for 57% (20 patients) and good or acceptable for the remaining. Mean follow-up was 4.6 years.Conclusions: the one-step strategy is associated with 68.5% success in a single operation, whereas 31.5% will need a second repair. We recognize that meatal problems are mostly associated with fistulae and diverticula; therefore, we recommend a final acceptable proximal glandar opening that will not compromise the neourethra. (C) 2011 Journal of Pediatric Urology Company. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Urol, BR-01323000 São Paulo, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Urol, BR-01323000 São Paulo, BrazilWeb of ScienceElsevier B.V.Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Macedo, Antonio [UNIFESP]Liguori, Riberto [UNIFESP]Ottoni, Sergio L. [UNIFESP]Garrone, Gilmar [UNIFESP]Damazio, Eulalio [UNIFESP]Mattos, Ricardo M. [UNIFESP]Ortiz, Valdemar [UNIFESP]2016-01-24T14:16:47Z2016-01-24T14:16:47Z2011-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion299-304http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2011.02.024Journal of Pediatric Urology. Oxford: Elsevier B.V., v. 7, n. 3, p. 299-304, 2011.10.1016/j.jpurol.2011.02.0241477-5131http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/33718WOS:000292666200015engJournal of Pediatric Urologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://www.elsevier.com/about/open-access/open-access-policies/article-posting-policyreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2022-11-03T10:40:49Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/33718Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652022-11-03T10:40:49Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Long-term results with a one-stage complex primary hypospadias repair strategy (the three-in-one technique)
title Long-term results with a one-stage complex primary hypospadias repair strategy (the three-in-one technique)
spellingShingle Long-term results with a one-stage complex primary hypospadias repair strategy (the three-in-one technique)
Macedo, Antonio [UNIFESP]
Hypospadia
Urethroplasty
Buccal mucosa
title_short Long-term results with a one-stage complex primary hypospadias repair strategy (the three-in-one technique)
title_full Long-term results with a one-stage complex primary hypospadias repair strategy (the three-in-one technique)
title_fullStr Long-term results with a one-stage complex primary hypospadias repair strategy (the three-in-one technique)
title_full_unstemmed Long-term results with a one-stage complex primary hypospadias repair strategy (the three-in-one technique)
title_sort Long-term results with a one-stage complex primary hypospadias repair strategy (the three-in-one technique)
author Macedo, Antonio [UNIFESP]
author_facet Macedo, Antonio [UNIFESP]
Liguori, Riberto [UNIFESP]
Ottoni, Sergio L. [UNIFESP]
Garrone, Gilmar [UNIFESP]
Damazio, Eulalio [UNIFESP]
Mattos, Ricardo M. [UNIFESP]
Ortiz, Valdemar [UNIFESP]
author_role author
author2 Liguori, Riberto [UNIFESP]
Ottoni, Sergio L. [UNIFESP]
Garrone, Gilmar [UNIFESP]
Damazio, Eulalio [UNIFESP]
Mattos, Ricardo M. [UNIFESP]
Ortiz, Valdemar [UNIFESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Macedo, Antonio [UNIFESP]
Liguori, Riberto [UNIFESP]
Ottoni, Sergio L. [UNIFESP]
Garrone, Gilmar [UNIFESP]
Damazio, Eulalio [UNIFESP]
Mattos, Ricardo M. [UNIFESP]
Ortiz, Valdemar [UNIFESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Hypospadia
Urethroplasty
Buccal mucosa
topic Hypospadia
Urethroplasty
Buccal mucosa
description Purpose: Complex primary hypospadias repair that warrants urethral plate division is treated mostly in two steps, not necessarily in two surgeries. Our aim was to review long-term results with a one-stage strategy based on reconstruction of the urethral plate with buccal mucosa graft and onlay transverse preputial flap anastomosis protected by a tunica vaginalis flap (the three-in-one concept).Material and methods: We were able to report on 35 patients operated for primary scrotal, penoscrotal and perineal hypospadias between March 2002 and June 2008. We reviewed all charts and had phone interviews with patients not seen for the last 24 months. We investigated parameters such as UTI occurrence, fistula, residual curvature, meatal stenosis, urethral diverticula, dehiscence, orchitis and parental perception.Results: Surgical complications occurred in 13 patients (37%): 4 meatal stenosis, 4 diverticula, 5 fistulae and 2 residual penile curvatures (total 42%). Meatal dilatation was successful in 2 cases, reflected in fistula resolution. the reoperation rate was 31.5% consisting mostly of simple procedures like fistula closure, meatotomy and penile curvature release, and complex diverticula repair in 4 cases. Parental perception was excellent for 57% (20 patients) and good or acceptable for the remaining. Mean follow-up was 4.6 years.Conclusions: the one-step strategy is associated with 68.5% success in a single operation, whereas 31.5% will need a second repair. We recognize that meatal problems are mostly associated with fistulae and diverticula; therefore, we recommend a final acceptable proximal glandar opening that will not compromise the neourethra. (C) 2011 Journal of Pediatric Urology Company. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-06-01
2016-01-24T14:16:47Z
2016-01-24T14:16:47Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2011.02.024
Journal of Pediatric Urology. Oxford: Elsevier B.V., v. 7, n. 3, p. 299-304, 2011.
10.1016/j.jpurol.2011.02.024
1477-5131
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/33718
WOS:000292666200015
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2011.02.024
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/33718
identifier_str_mv Journal of Pediatric Urology. Oxford: Elsevier B.V., v. 7, n. 3, p. 299-304, 2011.
10.1016/j.jpurol.2011.02.024
1477-5131
WOS:000292666200015
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Pediatric Urology
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://www.elsevier.com/about/open-access/open-access-policies/article-posting-policy
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://www.elsevier.com/about/open-access/open-access-policies/article-posting-policy
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 299-304
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier B.V.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier B.V.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br
_version_ 1814268315066957824