Psychosocial interventions for prevention of psychological disorders in law enforcement officers
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2008 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005601.pub2 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/30221 |
Resumo: | BackgroundPsychosocial interventions are widely used for the prevention of psychological disorders in law enforcement officers.ObjectivesTo assess the effectiveness and comparative effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for the prevention of psychological disorders in law enforcement officers.Search strategyCCDANCTR-References was searched on 12/5/2008, electronic databases were searched, reference lists of review articles and included studies were checked, a specialist journal was handsearched, specialist books were checked and we contacted experts and trialists.Selection criteriaRandomised and quasi randomised controlled trials were eligible. the types of participants were people employed directly in law enforcement, including police officers and military police, regardless of gender, age and country of origin, and whether or not they had experienced some psychological trauma. All types of psychosocial intervention were eligible. the relevant outcome measures were psychological symptoms, adverse events and acceptability of interventions.Data collection and analysisData was entered into Review Manager 4.2 for analysis, but this review was converted to RevMan 5.0 for publication. Quality assessments were performed. Two authors independently selected studies, extracted data and assessed the quality of studies. Summary effects were to be calculated using RevMan but no meta-analyses were possible. for individual studies, dichotomous outcome data are presented using relative risk, and continuous outcome data are presented using the weighted mean difference. These results are given with their 95% confidence intervals (CI).Main resultsTen studies were included in the review but only five reported data that could be used. Three of the ten studies were related to exercise-based psychological interventions. Seven were related to psychological interventions. No meta-analyses were possible due to diversity of participants, interventions and outcomes. Two studies compared a psychosocial intervention versus another intervention. Three studies compared a psychosocial intervention to a control group. Only one primary prevention trial reported data for the primary outcomes and, although this study found a significant difference in depression in favour of the intervention at endpoint, this difference was no longer evident at 18 months. No studies of primary prevention comparing different interventions and reporting primary outcomes of interest were identified.The methodological quality of the included studies was summarised. No study met our full quality criteria and one was regarded as low-quality. the remainder could not be rated because of incomplete data in the published reports and inadequate responses from the trialists.Authors' conclusionsThere is evidence only from individual small and low quality trials with minimal data suggesting that police officers benefit from psychosocial interventions, in terms of physical symptoms and psychological symptoms such as anxiety, depression, sleep problems, cynicism, anger, PTSD, marital problems and distress. No data on adverse effects were available. Meta-analyses of the available data were not possible. Further well-designed trials of psychosocial interventions are required. Research is needed on organization-based interventions to enhance psychological health among police officers. |
id |
UFSP_78e289f715c35e66f8c02c7f5719e6a4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/30221 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository_id_str |
3465 |
spelling |
Psychosocial interventions for prevention of psychological disorders in law enforcement officersBackgroundPsychosocial interventions are widely used for the prevention of psychological disorders in law enforcement officers.ObjectivesTo assess the effectiveness and comparative effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for the prevention of psychological disorders in law enforcement officers.Search strategyCCDANCTR-References was searched on 12/5/2008, electronic databases were searched, reference lists of review articles and included studies were checked, a specialist journal was handsearched, specialist books were checked and we contacted experts and trialists.Selection criteriaRandomised and quasi randomised controlled trials were eligible. the types of participants were people employed directly in law enforcement, including police officers and military police, regardless of gender, age and country of origin, and whether or not they had experienced some psychological trauma. All types of psychosocial intervention were eligible. the relevant outcome measures were psychological symptoms, adverse events and acceptability of interventions.Data collection and analysisData was entered into Review Manager 4.2 for analysis, but this review was converted to RevMan 5.0 for publication. Quality assessments were performed. Two authors independently selected studies, extracted data and assessed the quality of studies. Summary effects were to be calculated using RevMan but no meta-analyses were possible. for individual studies, dichotomous outcome data are presented using relative risk, and continuous outcome data are presented using the weighted mean difference. These results are given with their 95% confidence intervals (CI).Main resultsTen studies were included in the review but only five reported data that could be used. Three of the ten studies were related to exercise-based psychological interventions. Seven were related to psychological interventions. No meta-analyses were possible due to diversity of participants, interventions and outcomes. Two studies compared a psychosocial intervention versus another intervention. Three studies compared a psychosocial intervention to a control group. Only one primary prevention trial reported data for the primary outcomes and, although this study found a significant difference in depression in favour of the intervention at endpoint, this difference was no longer evident at 18 months. No studies of primary prevention comparing different interventions and reporting primary outcomes of interest were identified.The methodological quality of the included studies was summarised. No study met our full quality criteria and one was regarded as low-quality. the remainder could not be rated because of incomplete data in the published reports and inadequate responses from the trialists.Authors' conclusionsThere is evidence only from individual small and low quality trials with minimal data suggesting that police officers benefit from psychosocial interventions, in terms of physical symptoms and psychological symptoms such as anxiety, depression, sleep problems, cynicism, anger, PTSD, marital problems and distress. No data on adverse effects were available. Meta-analyses of the available data were not possible. Further well-designed trials of psychosocial interventions are required. Research is needed on organization-based interventions to enhance psychological health among police officers.Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, BrazilKings Coll Inst Psychiat, London, EnglandEscola Paulista Med, BR-04023 São Paulo, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, BrazilEscola Paulista Med, BR-04023 São Paulo, BrazilWeb of ScienceWiley-BlackwellUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Kings Coll Inst PsychiatPeñalba, Valentina [UNIFESP]McGuire, HughLeite, Jose Roberto [UNIFESP]2016-01-24T13:49:17Z2016-01-24T13:49:17Z2008-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion72http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005601.pub2Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, n. 3, 72 p., 2008.10.1002/14651858.CD005601.pub21469-493Xhttp://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/30221WOS:000257810900042engCochrane Database of Systematic Reviewsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://olabout.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-406071.htmlreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2023-03-27T16:28:16Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/30221Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652023-03-27T16:28:16Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Psychosocial interventions for prevention of psychological disorders in law enforcement officers |
title |
Psychosocial interventions for prevention of psychological disorders in law enforcement officers |
spellingShingle |
Psychosocial interventions for prevention of psychological disorders in law enforcement officers Peñalba, Valentina [UNIFESP] |
title_short |
Psychosocial interventions for prevention of psychological disorders in law enforcement officers |
title_full |
Psychosocial interventions for prevention of psychological disorders in law enforcement officers |
title_fullStr |
Psychosocial interventions for prevention of psychological disorders in law enforcement officers |
title_full_unstemmed |
Psychosocial interventions for prevention of psychological disorders in law enforcement officers |
title_sort |
Psychosocial interventions for prevention of psychological disorders in law enforcement officers |
author |
Peñalba, Valentina [UNIFESP] |
author_facet |
Peñalba, Valentina [UNIFESP] McGuire, Hugh Leite, Jose Roberto [UNIFESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
McGuire, Hugh Leite, Jose Roberto [UNIFESP] |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) Kings Coll Inst Psychiat |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Peñalba, Valentina [UNIFESP] McGuire, Hugh Leite, Jose Roberto [UNIFESP] |
description |
BackgroundPsychosocial interventions are widely used for the prevention of psychological disorders in law enforcement officers.ObjectivesTo assess the effectiveness and comparative effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for the prevention of psychological disorders in law enforcement officers.Search strategyCCDANCTR-References was searched on 12/5/2008, electronic databases were searched, reference lists of review articles and included studies were checked, a specialist journal was handsearched, specialist books were checked and we contacted experts and trialists.Selection criteriaRandomised and quasi randomised controlled trials were eligible. the types of participants were people employed directly in law enforcement, including police officers and military police, regardless of gender, age and country of origin, and whether or not they had experienced some psychological trauma. All types of psychosocial intervention were eligible. the relevant outcome measures were psychological symptoms, adverse events and acceptability of interventions.Data collection and analysisData was entered into Review Manager 4.2 for analysis, but this review was converted to RevMan 5.0 for publication. Quality assessments were performed. Two authors independently selected studies, extracted data and assessed the quality of studies. Summary effects were to be calculated using RevMan but no meta-analyses were possible. for individual studies, dichotomous outcome data are presented using relative risk, and continuous outcome data are presented using the weighted mean difference. These results are given with their 95% confidence intervals (CI).Main resultsTen studies were included in the review but only five reported data that could be used. Three of the ten studies were related to exercise-based psychological interventions. Seven were related to psychological interventions. No meta-analyses were possible due to diversity of participants, interventions and outcomes. Two studies compared a psychosocial intervention versus another intervention. Three studies compared a psychosocial intervention to a control group. Only one primary prevention trial reported data for the primary outcomes and, although this study found a significant difference in depression in favour of the intervention at endpoint, this difference was no longer evident at 18 months. No studies of primary prevention comparing different interventions and reporting primary outcomes of interest were identified.The methodological quality of the included studies was summarised. No study met our full quality criteria and one was regarded as low-quality. the remainder could not be rated because of incomplete data in the published reports and inadequate responses from the trialists.Authors' conclusionsThere is evidence only from individual small and low quality trials with minimal data suggesting that police officers benefit from psychosocial interventions, in terms of physical symptoms and psychological symptoms such as anxiety, depression, sleep problems, cynicism, anger, PTSD, marital problems and distress. No data on adverse effects were available. Meta-analyses of the available data were not possible. Further well-designed trials of psychosocial interventions are required. Research is needed on organization-based interventions to enhance psychological health among police officers. |
publishDate |
2008 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2008-01-01 2016-01-24T13:49:17Z 2016-01-24T13:49:17Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005601.pub2 Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, n. 3, 72 p., 2008. 10.1002/14651858.CD005601.pub2 1469-493X http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/30221 WOS:000257810900042 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005601.pub2 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/30221 |
identifier_str_mv |
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, n. 3, 72 p., 2008. 10.1002/14651858.CD005601.pub2 1469-493X WOS:000257810900042 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://olabout.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-406071.html |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://olabout.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-406071.html |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
72 |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley-Blackwell |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley-Blackwell |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) instacron:UNIFESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
instacron_str |
UNIFESP |
institution |
UNIFESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br |
_version_ |
1814268452539465728 |