Biometrias óptica e ultra-sônica: comparação dos métodos usados para o cálculo da lente intra-ocular acomodativa

• Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Filipe de [UNIFESP]
• Data de Publicação: 2004
• Outros Autores: Muccioli, Cristina [UNIFESP], Lopes, Yara Cristina [UNIFESP], Soriano, Eduardo Sone [UNIFESP], Belfort, Rubens Junior [UNIFESP]
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
• Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0004-27492004000600008; http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/2329
• topic: Biometry; Interferometry; Lens; Cataract; Reproducibility of results; Biometria; Interferometria; Cristalino; Catarata; Reprodutibilidade de resultados

PURPOSE: To compare reproducibility, level of agreement and correlation of two ultrasonic biometers and one optical biometer for the calculation of accommodative intraocular lens. METHODS: Cataract patients were submitted to the examination with 3 different biometers (IOLMaster, Axis II and Humphrey Mod. 820) before the implant of the C&C Vision AT-45 accommodative silicone intraocular lens. The Axis II biometer was used for both contact and immersion biometry. Axial length, anterior chamber depth and keratometry were the analyzed biometric parameters. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients from 53 to 90 years old (mean 70.6 y) were submitted to the examination with the three different biometers. The lowest mean axial length (23.12 mm) was obtained with the Axis II/contact and the highest (23.21 mm) with the Humphrey biometer. The lowest mean anterior chamber depth (2.97mm) was obtained with the Humphrey and the highest (3.10mm) with the IOLMaster. Reproducibility for axial length was high for all the biometers tested (coefficient of variation: 3.02% for Humphrey and Axis II / immersion; 3.07 % for Axis II/contact and 3.19% for IOLMaster). All biometers presented nearly equal results of the analyzed parameters (99.01% for axial length and 94.77% for anterior chamber depth). Pearson's coefficient showed a high correlation between the biometers, regarding the axial length and anterior chamber depth measurements. CONCLUSION: The devices used in this study showed excellent reproducibility and high level of agreement and of the axial length, anterior chamber depth and keratometry measurements, making it possible to reduce errors of intraocular lens calculation and visual insatisfaction after cataract surgery.