What is the best indication for single-incision Ophira Mini Sling? Insights from a 2-year follow-up international multicentric study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Palma, Paulo Cesar Rodrigues
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Riccetto, Cássio Luis Zanettini, Bronzatto, Elaine, Castro, Rodrigo [UNIFESP], Altuna, Sebastian
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-013-2242-4
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/37680
Resumo: Introduction and hypothesis the Ophira Mini Sling System involves anchoring a midurethral, low-tension tape to the obturator internus muscles bilaterally at the level of the tendinous arc. Success rates in different subsets of patients are still to be defined. This work aims to identify which factors influence the 2-year outcomes of this treatment.Methods Analysis was based on data froma multicenter study. Endpoints for analysis included objective measurements: 1-h pad-weight (PWT), and cough stress test (CST), and questionnaires: International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) and Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI)-6. A logistic regression analysis evaluated possible risk factors for failure.Results in all, 124 female patients with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) underwent treatment with the Ophira procedure. All patients completed 1 year of follow-up, and 95 complied with the 2-year evaluation. Longitudinal analysis showed no significant differences between results at 1 and 2 years. the 2-year overall objective results were 81 (85.3 %) patients dry, six (6.3 %) improved, and eight (8.4 %) incontinent. A multivariate analysis revealed that previous anti-incontinence surgery was the only factor that significantly influenced surgical outcomes. Two years after treatment, women with previous failed surgeries had an odds ratio (OR) for treatment failure (based on PWT) of 4.0 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.02-15.57).Conclusions the Ophira procedure is an effective option for SUI treatment, with durable good results. Previous surgeries were identified as the only significant risk factor, though previously operated patients showed an acceptable success rate.
id UFSP_8bdee2e9cfcaaae6e2bf43fc273ff80d
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/37680
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling What is the best indication for single-incision Ophira Mini Sling? Insights from a 2-year follow-up international multicentric studyMinislingOphira procedureSingle-incision slingStress urinary incontinenceIntroduction and hypothesis the Ophira Mini Sling System involves anchoring a midurethral, low-tension tape to the obturator internus muscles bilaterally at the level of the tendinous arc. Success rates in different subsets of patients are still to be defined. This work aims to identify which factors influence the 2-year outcomes of this treatment.Methods Analysis was based on data froma multicenter study. Endpoints for analysis included objective measurements: 1-h pad-weight (PWT), and cough stress test (CST), and questionnaires: International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) and Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI)-6. A logistic regression analysis evaluated possible risk factors for failure.Results in all, 124 female patients with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) underwent treatment with the Ophira procedure. All patients completed 1 year of follow-up, and 95 complied with the 2-year evaluation. Longitudinal analysis showed no significant differences between results at 1 and 2 years. the 2-year overall objective results were 81 (85.3 %) patients dry, six (6.3 %) improved, and eight (8.4 %) incontinent. A multivariate analysis revealed that previous anti-incontinence surgery was the only factor that significantly influenced surgical outcomes. Two years after treatment, women with previous failed surgeries had an odds ratio (OR) for treatment failure (based on PWT) of 4.0 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.02-15.57).Conclusions the Ophira procedure is an effective option for SUI treatment, with durable good results. Previous surgeries were identified as the only significant risk factor, though previously operated patients showed an acceptable success rate.Univ Estadual Campinas, Div Female Urol, Campinas, SP, BrazilFed Univ São Paulo UNIFESP, Dept Gynecol, São Paulo, BrazilAustral Univ Hosp, Dept Gynecol, Buenos Aires, DF, ArgentinaFed Univ São Paulo UNIFESP, Dept Gynecol, São Paulo, BrazilWeb of ScienceSpringerUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Austral Univ HospPalma, Paulo Cesar RodriguesRiccetto, Cássio Luis ZanettiniBronzatto, ElaineCastro, Rodrigo [UNIFESP]Altuna, Sebastian2016-01-24T14:37:08Z2016-01-24T14:37:08Z2014-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion637-643application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-013-2242-4International Urogynecology Journal. London: Springer London Ltd, v. 25, n. 5, p. 637-643, 2014.10.1007/s00192-013-2242-4WOS000335135900013.pdf0937-3462http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/37680WOS:000335135900013engInternational Urogynecology Journalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://www.springer.com/open+access/authors+rights?SGWID=0-176704-12-683201-0reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-08-08T08:35:36Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/37680Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-08-08T08:35:36Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv What is the best indication for single-incision Ophira Mini Sling? Insights from a 2-year follow-up international multicentric study
title What is the best indication for single-incision Ophira Mini Sling? Insights from a 2-year follow-up international multicentric study
spellingShingle What is the best indication for single-incision Ophira Mini Sling? Insights from a 2-year follow-up international multicentric study
Palma, Paulo Cesar Rodrigues
Minisling
Ophira procedure
Single-incision sling
Stress urinary incontinence
title_short What is the best indication for single-incision Ophira Mini Sling? Insights from a 2-year follow-up international multicentric study
title_full What is the best indication for single-incision Ophira Mini Sling? Insights from a 2-year follow-up international multicentric study
title_fullStr What is the best indication for single-incision Ophira Mini Sling? Insights from a 2-year follow-up international multicentric study
title_full_unstemmed What is the best indication for single-incision Ophira Mini Sling? Insights from a 2-year follow-up international multicentric study
title_sort What is the best indication for single-incision Ophira Mini Sling? Insights from a 2-year follow-up international multicentric study
author Palma, Paulo Cesar Rodrigues
author_facet Palma, Paulo Cesar Rodrigues
Riccetto, Cássio Luis Zanettini
Bronzatto, Elaine
Castro, Rodrigo [UNIFESP]
Altuna, Sebastian
author_role author
author2 Riccetto, Cássio Luis Zanettini
Bronzatto, Elaine
Castro, Rodrigo [UNIFESP]
Altuna, Sebastian
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
Austral Univ Hosp
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Palma, Paulo Cesar Rodrigues
Riccetto, Cássio Luis Zanettini
Bronzatto, Elaine
Castro, Rodrigo [UNIFESP]
Altuna, Sebastian
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Minisling
Ophira procedure
Single-incision sling
Stress urinary incontinence
topic Minisling
Ophira procedure
Single-incision sling
Stress urinary incontinence
description Introduction and hypothesis the Ophira Mini Sling System involves anchoring a midurethral, low-tension tape to the obturator internus muscles bilaterally at the level of the tendinous arc. Success rates in different subsets of patients are still to be defined. This work aims to identify which factors influence the 2-year outcomes of this treatment.Methods Analysis was based on data froma multicenter study. Endpoints for analysis included objective measurements: 1-h pad-weight (PWT), and cough stress test (CST), and questionnaires: International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) and Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI)-6. A logistic regression analysis evaluated possible risk factors for failure.Results in all, 124 female patients with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) underwent treatment with the Ophira procedure. All patients completed 1 year of follow-up, and 95 complied with the 2-year evaluation. Longitudinal analysis showed no significant differences between results at 1 and 2 years. the 2-year overall objective results were 81 (85.3 %) patients dry, six (6.3 %) improved, and eight (8.4 %) incontinent. A multivariate analysis revealed that previous anti-incontinence surgery was the only factor that significantly influenced surgical outcomes. Two years after treatment, women with previous failed surgeries had an odds ratio (OR) for treatment failure (based on PWT) of 4.0 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.02-15.57).Conclusions the Ophira procedure is an effective option for SUI treatment, with durable good results. Previous surgeries were identified as the only significant risk factor, though previously operated patients showed an acceptable success rate.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-05-01
2016-01-24T14:37:08Z
2016-01-24T14:37:08Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-013-2242-4
International Urogynecology Journal. London: Springer London Ltd, v. 25, n. 5, p. 637-643, 2014.
10.1007/s00192-013-2242-4
WOS000335135900013.pdf
0937-3462
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/37680
WOS:000335135900013
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-013-2242-4
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/37680
identifier_str_mv International Urogynecology Journal. London: Springer London Ltd, v. 25, n. 5, p. 637-643, 2014.
10.1007/s00192-013-2242-4
WOS000335135900013.pdf
0937-3462
WOS:000335135900013
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv International Urogynecology Journal
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://www.springer.com/open+access/authors+rights?SGWID=0-176704-12-683201-0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://www.springer.com/open+access/authors+rights?SGWID=0-176704-12-683201-0
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 637-643
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br
_version_ 1814268380780167168