Study of rabbit septal cartilage grafts placed on the nasal dorsum

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Souza, Marcia Maria Ale de [UNIFESP]
Data de Publicação: 2008
Outros Autores: Gregório, Luiz Carlos [UNIFESP], Sesso, Ricardo de Castro Cintra [UNIFESP], Souza, Soraia Ale [UNIFESP], Settanni, Flavio Aurélio Parente [UNIFESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.unifesp.br/11600/42646
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archfaci.10.4.250
Resumo: Objective: To compare the reabsorption characteristics of fresh septal cartilage autografts, preserved homografts, and preserved autografts in the nasal dorsum of rabbits.Methods: Rabbit nasal dorsum cartilage grafts were placed in 3 groups. The first group used fresh autologous cartilage; the second group, alcohol-preserved homologous cartilage; and the third group, alcohol-preserved autologous cartilage. Each rabbit received 2 grafts, one crushed and another noncrushed. After 16 weeks, the grafts were removed for analysis.Results: No graft calcification occurred in any group. Chondrogenesis was observed in all groups. The fresh autograft group had the best results in the evaluation of the area of graft recovered and chondrocyte viability. The preserved autologous and homologous grafts did not differ in relation to any of the variables analyzed. Crushed grafts had inferior results in the area of graft recovered and chondrocyte viability compared with the noncrushed forms. No significant difference among the 3 groups was noted in the thickness of the fibrous capsule that developed around the graft.Conclusions: The fresh cartilage autograft was superior to the crushed and uncrushed preserved homografts and autografts; both types of preserved grafts had equivalent histological results. The uncrushed forms were superior to the crushed forms.
id UFSP_8d8e7bf547325bc21bcb1940efb831e7
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/42646
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling Souza, Marcia Maria Ale de [UNIFESP]Gregório, Luiz Carlos [UNIFESP]Sesso, Ricardo de Castro Cintra [UNIFESP]Souza, Soraia Ale [UNIFESP]Settanni, Flavio Aurélio Parente [UNIFESP]Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)2018-06-15T13:56:00Z2018-06-15T13:56:00Z2008-07-01Archives Of Facial Plastic Surgery. Chicago: Amer Medical Assoc, v. 10, n. 4, p. 250-254, 2008.1521-2491http://repositorio.unifesp.br/11600/42646http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archfaci.10.4.25010.1001/archfaci.10.4.250WOS:000257754600006Objective: To compare the reabsorption characteristics of fresh septal cartilage autografts, preserved homografts, and preserved autografts in the nasal dorsum of rabbits.Methods: Rabbit nasal dorsum cartilage grafts were placed in 3 groups. The first group used fresh autologous cartilage; the second group, alcohol-preserved homologous cartilage; and the third group, alcohol-preserved autologous cartilage. Each rabbit received 2 grafts, one crushed and another noncrushed. After 16 weeks, the grafts were removed for analysis.Results: No graft calcification occurred in any group. Chondrogenesis was observed in all groups. The fresh autograft group had the best results in the evaluation of the area of graft recovered and chondrocyte viability. The preserved autologous and homologous grafts did not differ in relation to any of the variables analyzed. Crushed grafts had inferior results in the area of graft recovered and chondrocyte viability compared with the noncrushed forms. No significant difference among the 3 groups was noted in the thickness of the fibrous capsule that developed around the graft.Conclusions: The fresh cartilage autograft was superior to the crushed and uncrushed preserved homografts and autografts; both types of preserved grafts had equivalent histological results. The uncrushed forms were superior to the crushed forms.Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Med, Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Paulo, Div Rhinol, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Med, Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Paulo, Div Rhinol, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Sao Paulo, BrazilWeb of Science250-254engAmer Medical AssocArchives Of Facial Plastic SurgeryStudy of rabbit septal cartilage grafts placed on the nasal dorsuminfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP11600/426462021-10-05 22:00:45.767metadata only accessoai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/42646Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:34652023-05-25T12:08:26.309382Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.en.fl_str_mv Study of rabbit septal cartilage grafts placed on the nasal dorsum
title Study of rabbit septal cartilage grafts placed on the nasal dorsum
spellingShingle Study of rabbit septal cartilage grafts placed on the nasal dorsum
Souza, Marcia Maria Ale de [UNIFESP]
title_short Study of rabbit septal cartilage grafts placed on the nasal dorsum
title_full Study of rabbit septal cartilage grafts placed on the nasal dorsum
title_fullStr Study of rabbit septal cartilage grafts placed on the nasal dorsum
title_full_unstemmed Study of rabbit septal cartilage grafts placed on the nasal dorsum
title_sort Study of rabbit septal cartilage grafts placed on the nasal dorsum
author Souza, Marcia Maria Ale de [UNIFESP]
author_facet Souza, Marcia Maria Ale de [UNIFESP]
Gregório, Luiz Carlos [UNIFESP]
Sesso, Ricardo de Castro Cintra [UNIFESP]
Souza, Soraia Ale [UNIFESP]
Settanni, Flavio Aurélio Parente [UNIFESP]
author_role author
author2 Gregório, Luiz Carlos [UNIFESP]
Sesso, Ricardo de Castro Cintra [UNIFESP]
Souza, Soraia Ale [UNIFESP]
Settanni, Flavio Aurélio Parente [UNIFESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.institution.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Souza, Marcia Maria Ale de [UNIFESP]
Gregório, Luiz Carlos [UNIFESP]
Sesso, Ricardo de Castro Cintra [UNIFESP]
Souza, Soraia Ale [UNIFESP]
Settanni, Flavio Aurélio Parente [UNIFESP]
description Objective: To compare the reabsorption characteristics of fresh septal cartilage autografts, preserved homografts, and preserved autografts in the nasal dorsum of rabbits.Methods: Rabbit nasal dorsum cartilage grafts were placed in 3 groups. The first group used fresh autologous cartilage; the second group, alcohol-preserved homologous cartilage; and the third group, alcohol-preserved autologous cartilage. Each rabbit received 2 grafts, one crushed and another noncrushed. After 16 weeks, the grafts were removed for analysis.Results: No graft calcification occurred in any group. Chondrogenesis was observed in all groups. The fresh autograft group had the best results in the evaluation of the area of graft recovered and chondrocyte viability. The preserved autologous and homologous grafts did not differ in relation to any of the variables analyzed. Crushed grafts had inferior results in the area of graft recovered and chondrocyte viability compared with the noncrushed forms. No significant difference among the 3 groups was noted in the thickness of the fibrous capsule that developed around the graft.Conclusions: The fresh cartilage autograft was superior to the crushed and uncrushed preserved homografts and autografts; both types of preserved grafts had equivalent histological results. The uncrushed forms were superior to the crushed forms.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2008-07-01
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2018-06-15T13:56:00Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2018-06-15T13:56:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv Archives Of Facial Plastic Surgery. Chicago: Amer Medical Assoc, v. 10, n. 4, p. 250-254, 2008.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.unifesp.br/11600/42646
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archfaci.10.4.250
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 1521-2491
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.1001/archfaci.10.4.250
dc.identifier.wos.none.fl_str_mv WOS:000257754600006
identifier_str_mv Archives Of Facial Plastic Surgery. Chicago: Amer Medical Assoc, v. 10, n. 4, p. 250-254, 2008.
1521-2491
10.1001/archfaci.10.4.250
WOS:000257754600006
url http://repositorio.unifesp.br/11600/42646
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archfaci.10.4.250
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.none.fl_str_mv Archives Of Facial Plastic Surgery
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 250-254
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Amer Medical Assoc
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Amer Medical Assoc
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1783460254857560064