Pharmacodynamic evaluation of commonly prescribed oral antibiotics against respiratory bacterial pathogens

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Kiffer, Carlos Roberto Veiga [UNIFESP]
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Pignatari, Antonio Carlos Campos [UNIFESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-11-286
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/34154
Resumo: Background: Upper and lower respiratory tract infections (RTIs) account for a substantial portion of outpatient antibiotic utilization. However, the pharmacodynamic activity of commonly used oral antibiotic regimens has not been studied against clinically relevant pathogens. the objective of this study was to assess the probability of achieving the requisite pharmacodynamic exposure for oral antibacterial regimens commonly prescribed for RTIs in adults against bacterial isolates frequently involved in these processes (S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, and M. catharralis).Methods: Using a 5000-subject Monte Carlo simulation, the cumulative fractions of response (CFR), (i.e., probabilities of achieving requisite pharmacodynamic targets) for the most commonly prescribed oral antibiotic regimens, as determined by a structured survey of medical prescription patterns, were assessed against local respiratory bacterial isolates from adults in São Paulo collected during the same time period. Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 230 isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae (103), Haemophilus influenzae (98), and Moraxella catharralis (29) from a previous local surveillance were used.Results: the most commonly prescribed antibiotic regimens were azithromycin 500 mg QD, amoxicillin 500 mg TID, and levofloxacin 500 mg QD, accounting for 58% of the prescriptions. Varied doses of these agents, plus gatifloxacin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, moxifloxacin, and cefaclor made up the remaining regimens. Utilizing aggressive pharmacodynamic exposure targets, the only regimens to achieve greater than 90% CFR against all three pathogens were amoxicillin/amoxicillin-clavulanate 500 mg TID (> 91%), gatifloxacin 400 mg QD (100%), and moxifloxacin 400 mg QD (100%). Considering S. pneumoniae isolates alone, azithromycin 1000 mg QD also achieved greater than 90% CFR (91.3%).Conclusions: the only regimens to achieve high CFR against all three pathogen populations in both scenarios were gatifloxacin 400 mg QD, moxifloxacin 400 mg QD, and amoxicillin-clavulanate 500 mg TID. These data suggest the need for reconsideration of empiric antibiotic regimen selection among adult patients with RTIs in the São Paulo area. Additionally, this type of study could be used to optimize prescribing patterns in specific regions in light of emerging resistance.
id UFSP_8e5587a527ae5b2947aa687b4212abb0
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/34154
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling Pharmacodynamic evaluation of commonly prescribed oral antibiotics against respiratory bacterial pathogensBackground: Upper and lower respiratory tract infections (RTIs) account for a substantial portion of outpatient antibiotic utilization. However, the pharmacodynamic activity of commonly used oral antibiotic regimens has not been studied against clinically relevant pathogens. the objective of this study was to assess the probability of achieving the requisite pharmacodynamic exposure for oral antibacterial regimens commonly prescribed for RTIs in adults against bacterial isolates frequently involved in these processes (S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, and M. catharralis).Methods: Using a 5000-subject Monte Carlo simulation, the cumulative fractions of response (CFR), (i.e., probabilities of achieving requisite pharmacodynamic targets) for the most commonly prescribed oral antibiotic regimens, as determined by a structured survey of medical prescription patterns, were assessed against local respiratory bacterial isolates from adults in São Paulo collected during the same time period. Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 230 isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae (103), Haemophilus influenzae (98), and Moraxella catharralis (29) from a previous local surveillance were used.Results: the most commonly prescribed antibiotic regimens were azithromycin 500 mg QD, amoxicillin 500 mg TID, and levofloxacin 500 mg QD, accounting for 58% of the prescriptions. Varied doses of these agents, plus gatifloxacin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, moxifloxacin, and cefaclor made up the remaining regimens. Utilizing aggressive pharmacodynamic exposure targets, the only regimens to achieve greater than 90% CFR against all three pathogens were amoxicillin/amoxicillin-clavulanate 500 mg TID (> 91%), gatifloxacin 400 mg QD (100%), and moxifloxacin 400 mg QD (100%). Considering S. pneumoniae isolates alone, azithromycin 1000 mg QD also achieved greater than 90% CFR (91.3%).Conclusions: the only regimens to achieve high CFR against all three pathogen populations in both scenarios were gatifloxacin 400 mg QD, moxifloxacin 400 mg QD, and amoxicillin-clavulanate 500 mg TID. These data suggest the need for reconsideration of empiric antibiotic regimen selection among adult patients with RTIs in the São Paulo area. Additionally, this type of study could be used to optimize prescribing patterns in specific regions in light of emerging resistance.Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Lab Especial Microbiol Clin, Dept Infect Dis, São Paulo, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Lab Especial Microbiol Clin, Dept Infect Dis, São Paulo, BrazilWeb of ScienceFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)FAPESP: 2009/13825-2Biomed Central LtdUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Kiffer, Carlos Roberto Veiga [UNIFESP]Pignatari, Antonio Carlos Campos [UNIFESP]2016-01-24T14:17:20Z2016-01-24T14:17:20Z2011-10-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion9application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-11-286Bmc Infectious Diseases. London: Biomed Central Ltd, v. 11, 9 p., 2011.10.1186/1471-2334-11-286WOS000296875900001.pdf1471-2334http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/34154WOS:000296875900001engBmc Infectious Diseasesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-08-08T09:11:09Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/34154Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-08-08T09:11:09Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Pharmacodynamic evaluation of commonly prescribed oral antibiotics against respiratory bacterial pathogens
title Pharmacodynamic evaluation of commonly prescribed oral antibiotics against respiratory bacterial pathogens
spellingShingle Pharmacodynamic evaluation of commonly prescribed oral antibiotics against respiratory bacterial pathogens
Kiffer, Carlos Roberto Veiga [UNIFESP]
title_short Pharmacodynamic evaluation of commonly prescribed oral antibiotics against respiratory bacterial pathogens
title_full Pharmacodynamic evaluation of commonly prescribed oral antibiotics against respiratory bacterial pathogens
title_fullStr Pharmacodynamic evaluation of commonly prescribed oral antibiotics against respiratory bacterial pathogens
title_full_unstemmed Pharmacodynamic evaluation of commonly prescribed oral antibiotics against respiratory bacterial pathogens
title_sort Pharmacodynamic evaluation of commonly prescribed oral antibiotics against respiratory bacterial pathogens
author Kiffer, Carlos Roberto Veiga [UNIFESP]
author_facet Kiffer, Carlos Roberto Veiga [UNIFESP]
Pignatari, Antonio Carlos Campos [UNIFESP]
author_role author
author2 Pignatari, Antonio Carlos Campos [UNIFESP]
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Kiffer, Carlos Roberto Veiga [UNIFESP]
Pignatari, Antonio Carlos Campos [UNIFESP]
description Background: Upper and lower respiratory tract infections (RTIs) account for a substantial portion of outpatient antibiotic utilization. However, the pharmacodynamic activity of commonly used oral antibiotic regimens has not been studied against clinically relevant pathogens. the objective of this study was to assess the probability of achieving the requisite pharmacodynamic exposure for oral antibacterial regimens commonly prescribed for RTIs in adults against bacterial isolates frequently involved in these processes (S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, and M. catharralis).Methods: Using a 5000-subject Monte Carlo simulation, the cumulative fractions of response (CFR), (i.e., probabilities of achieving requisite pharmacodynamic targets) for the most commonly prescribed oral antibiotic regimens, as determined by a structured survey of medical prescription patterns, were assessed against local respiratory bacterial isolates from adults in São Paulo collected during the same time period. Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 230 isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae (103), Haemophilus influenzae (98), and Moraxella catharralis (29) from a previous local surveillance were used.Results: the most commonly prescribed antibiotic regimens were azithromycin 500 mg QD, amoxicillin 500 mg TID, and levofloxacin 500 mg QD, accounting for 58% of the prescriptions. Varied doses of these agents, plus gatifloxacin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, moxifloxacin, and cefaclor made up the remaining regimens. Utilizing aggressive pharmacodynamic exposure targets, the only regimens to achieve greater than 90% CFR against all three pathogens were amoxicillin/amoxicillin-clavulanate 500 mg TID (> 91%), gatifloxacin 400 mg QD (100%), and moxifloxacin 400 mg QD (100%). Considering S. pneumoniae isolates alone, azithromycin 1000 mg QD also achieved greater than 90% CFR (91.3%).Conclusions: the only regimens to achieve high CFR against all three pathogen populations in both scenarios were gatifloxacin 400 mg QD, moxifloxacin 400 mg QD, and amoxicillin-clavulanate 500 mg TID. These data suggest the need for reconsideration of empiric antibiotic regimen selection among adult patients with RTIs in the São Paulo area. Additionally, this type of study could be used to optimize prescribing patterns in specific regions in light of emerging resistance.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-10-25
2016-01-24T14:17:20Z
2016-01-24T14:17:20Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-11-286
Bmc Infectious Diseases. London: Biomed Central Ltd, v. 11, 9 p., 2011.
10.1186/1471-2334-11-286
WOS000296875900001.pdf
1471-2334
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/34154
WOS:000296875900001
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-11-286
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/34154
identifier_str_mv Bmc Infectious Diseases. London: Biomed Central Ltd, v. 11, 9 p., 2011.
10.1186/1471-2334-11-286
WOS000296875900001.pdf
1471-2334
WOS:000296875900001
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Bmc Infectious Diseases
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 9
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Biomed Central Ltd
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Biomed Central Ltd
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br
_version_ 1814268394538532864