Safety of ultrasonography in pregnancy: WHO systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.6328 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/31462 |
Resumo: | Objective in the context of the planned International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology-World Health Organization multicenter study for the development of fetal growth standards for international application, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the safety of human exposure to ultrasonography in pregnancy.Methods A systematic search of electronic databases, reference lists and unpublished literature was conducted for trials and observational studies that assessed short- and long-term effects of exposure to ultrasonography, involving women and their fetuses exposed to ultrasonograpby, using B-mode or Doppler sonography during any period of pregnancy, for any number of times. the outcome measures were: (1) adverse maternal outcome; (2) adverse perinatal outcome; (3) abnormal childhood growth and neurological development, (4) non-right handedness; (5) childhood malignancy; and (6) intellectual performance and mental disease.Results the electronic search identified 6716 citations, and 19 were identified from secondary sources. A total of 6.1 publications reporting data from 41. different studies were included: 16 controlled trials,13 cohort and 12 case-control studies. Ultrasonography in pregnancy was not associated with adverse maternal or perinatal outcome, impaired physical or neurological development, increased risk for malignancy in childhood, subnormal intellectual performance or mental diseases. According to the available clinical trials, there was a weak association between exposure to ultrasonograpby and non-right handedness in boys (odds ratio 1.26; 95% CI, 1.03-1.54).Conclusion According to the available evidence, exposure to diagnostic ultrasonography during pregnancy appears to be safe. Copyright (C) World Health Organization (2009). |
id |
UFSP_90f57272b16516762908fa704b9c8a1c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/31462 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository_id_str |
3465 |
spelling |
Safety of ultrasonography in pregnancy: WHO systematic review of the literature and meta-analysisadverse effectsdiagnostic imagingdiagnostic techniquesfetusobstetric and gynecologicalpregnancyprenatalprenatal injuriessafetyultrasonographyObjective in the context of the planned International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology-World Health Organization multicenter study for the development of fetal growth standards for international application, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the safety of human exposure to ultrasonography in pregnancy.Methods A systematic search of electronic databases, reference lists and unpublished literature was conducted for trials and observational studies that assessed short- and long-term effects of exposure to ultrasonography, involving women and their fetuses exposed to ultrasonograpby, using B-mode or Doppler sonography during any period of pregnancy, for any number of times. the outcome measures were: (1) adverse maternal outcome; (2) adverse perinatal outcome; (3) abnormal childhood growth and neurological development, (4) non-right handedness; (5) childhood malignancy; and (6) intellectual performance and mental disease.Results the electronic search identified 6716 citations, and 19 were identified from secondary sources. A total of 6.1 publications reporting data from 41. different studies were included: 16 controlled trials,13 cohort and 12 case-control studies. Ultrasonography in pregnancy was not associated with adverse maternal or perinatal outcome, impaired physical or neurological development, increased risk for malignancy in childhood, subnormal intellectual performance or mental diseases. According to the available clinical trials, there was a weak association between exposure to ultrasonograpby and non-right handedness in boys (odds ratio 1.26; 95% CI, 1.03-1.54).Conclusion According to the available evidence, exposure to diagnostic ultrasonography during pregnancy appears to be safe. Copyright (C) World Health Organization (2009).Brazilian Cochrane Ctr, São Paulo, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Obstet, São Paulo, BrazilRiga Stradins Univ, Riga Matern Hosp, Riga, LatviaWHO, Dept Reprod Hlth & Res, CH-1211 Geneva, SwitzerlandWHO, Dept Knowledge Management & Sharing, CH-1211 Geneva, SwitzerlandChilean Minist Hlth, Off Womens Hlth Issues, Santiago, ChileUniv Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USAUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Obstet, São Paulo, BrazilWeb of ScienceWiley-BlackwellBrazilian Cochrane CtrUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Riga Stradins UnivWHOChilean Minist HlthUniv Calif Los AngelesTorloni, Maria Regina [UNIFESP]Vedmedovska, N.Merialdi, M.Betran, A. P.Allen, T.Gonzalez, R.Platt, L. D.ISUOG WHO Fetal Growth Study Grp2016-01-24T13:52:27Z2016-01-24T13:52:27Z2009-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion599-608http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.6328Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, v. 33, n. 5, p. 599-608, 2009.10.1002/uog.63280960-7692http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/31462WOS:000266365100017engUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://olabout.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-406071.htmlreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2023-05-18T14:25:08Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/31462Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652023-05-18T14:25:08Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Safety of ultrasonography in pregnancy: WHO systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis |
title |
Safety of ultrasonography in pregnancy: WHO systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis |
spellingShingle |
Safety of ultrasonography in pregnancy: WHO systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis Torloni, Maria Regina [UNIFESP] adverse effects diagnostic imaging diagnostic techniques fetus obstetric and gynecological pregnancy prenatal prenatal injuries safety ultrasonography |
title_short |
Safety of ultrasonography in pregnancy: WHO systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis |
title_full |
Safety of ultrasonography in pregnancy: WHO systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr |
Safety of ultrasonography in pregnancy: WHO systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Safety of ultrasonography in pregnancy: WHO systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis |
title_sort |
Safety of ultrasonography in pregnancy: WHO systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis |
author |
Torloni, Maria Regina [UNIFESP] |
author_facet |
Torloni, Maria Regina [UNIFESP] Vedmedovska, N. Merialdi, M. Betran, A. P. Allen, T. Gonzalez, R. Platt, L. D. ISUOG WHO Fetal Growth Study Grp |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Vedmedovska, N. Merialdi, M. Betran, A. P. Allen, T. Gonzalez, R. Platt, L. D. ISUOG WHO Fetal Growth Study Grp |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Cochrane Ctr Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) Riga Stradins Univ WHO Chilean Minist Hlth Univ Calif Los Angeles |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Torloni, Maria Regina [UNIFESP] Vedmedovska, N. Merialdi, M. Betran, A. P. Allen, T. Gonzalez, R. Platt, L. D. ISUOG WHO Fetal Growth Study Grp |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
adverse effects diagnostic imaging diagnostic techniques fetus obstetric and gynecological pregnancy prenatal prenatal injuries safety ultrasonography |
topic |
adverse effects diagnostic imaging diagnostic techniques fetus obstetric and gynecological pregnancy prenatal prenatal injuries safety ultrasonography |
description |
Objective in the context of the planned International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology-World Health Organization multicenter study for the development of fetal growth standards for international application, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the safety of human exposure to ultrasonography in pregnancy.Methods A systematic search of electronic databases, reference lists and unpublished literature was conducted for trials and observational studies that assessed short- and long-term effects of exposure to ultrasonography, involving women and their fetuses exposed to ultrasonograpby, using B-mode or Doppler sonography during any period of pregnancy, for any number of times. the outcome measures were: (1) adverse maternal outcome; (2) adverse perinatal outcome; (3) abnormal childhood growth and neurological development, (4) non-right handedness; (5) childhood malignancy; and (6) intellectual performance and mental disease.Results the electronic search identified 6716 citations, and 19 were identified from secondary sources. A total of 6.1 publications reporting data from 41. different studies were included: 16 controlled trials,13 cohort and 12 case-control studies. Ultrasonography in pregnancy was not associated with adverse maternal or perinatal outcome, impaired physical or neurological development, increased risk for malignancy in childhood, subnormal intellectual performance or mental diseases. According to the available clinical trials, there was a weak association between exposure to ultrasonograpby and non-right handedness in boys (odds ratio 1.26; 95% CI, 1.03-1.54).Conclusion According to the available evidence, exposure to diagnostic ultrasonography during pregnancy appears to be safe. Copyright (C) World Health Organization (2009). |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009-05-01 2016-01-24T13:52:27Z 2016-01-24T13:52:27Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.6328 Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, v. 33, n. 5, p. 599-608, 2009. 10.1002/uog.6328 0960-7692 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/31462 WOS:000266365100017 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.6328 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/31462 |
identifier_str_mv |
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, v. 33, n. 5, p. 599-608, 2009. 10.1002/uog.6328 0960-7692 WOS:000266365100017 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://olabout.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-406071.html |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://olabout.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-406071.html |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
599-608 |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley-Blackwell |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley-Blackwell |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) instacron:UNIFESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
instacron_str |
UNIFESP |
institution |
UNIFESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br |
_version_ |
1814268346209665024 |