Construction of a tool to measure perceptions about the use of the World Health Organization Safe Surgery Checklist Program
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
Texto Completo: | https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/57651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2014.11.011 |
Resumo: | Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended greater attention to patient safety, particularly regarding preventable adverse events. The Safe Surgery Saves Lives (CSSV) program was released recommending the application of a surgical checklist for items on the safety of procedures. The checklist implementation reduced the hospital mortality rate in the first 30 days. In Brazil, we found no studies of anesthesiologists' adherence to the practice of the checklist. Objective: The main objective was to develop a tool to measure the attitude of anesthesiologists and residents regarding the use of checklist in the perioperative period. Method: This was a cross-sectional study performed during the 59th CBA in BH/MG, whose participants were enrolled physicians who responded to the questionnaire with quantitative epidemiological approach. Results: From the sample of 459 participants who answered the questionnaire, 55% were male, 44.2% under 10 years of practice, and 15.5% with over 30 years of medical school completion. Seven items with 78% reliability coefficient were selected. There was a statistically significant difference between the groups of anesthesiologists who reported using the instrument in lessor more than 70% of patients, indicating that the attitude questionnaire discriminates between these two groups of professionals. Conclusions: The seven items questionnaire showed adequate internal consistency and a well-defined factor structure, and can be used as a tool to measure the anesthesiologists' perceptions about the checklist usefulness and applicability. (C) 2015 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. |
id |
UFSP_9896bca0e847fe931a9bfe51710f09a6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/57651 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository_id_str |
3465 |
spelling |
dos Santos Diego, Luis AntonioSalman, Fabiane CardiaSilva, Joao HenriqueBrandao, Julio Cezar [UNIFESP]de Oliveira Filho, Getulio [UNIFESP]Carneiro, Antonio FernandoBagatini, Airtonde Moraes, Jose Mariano2020-08-14T13:44:25Z2020-08-14T13:44:25Z2016Revista Brasileira De Anestesiologia. New York, v. 66, n. 4, p. 351-355, 2016.0034-7094https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/57651http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2014.11.011WOS000380843400004-en.pdfWOS000380843400004-pt.pdfS0034-7094201600040035110.1016/j.bjane.2014.11.011WOS:000380843400004Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended greater attention to patient safety, particularly regarding preventable adverse events. The Safe Surgery Saves Lives (CSSV) program was released recommending the application of a surgical checklist for items on the safety of procedures. The checklist implementation reduced the hospital mortality rate in the first 30 days. In Brazil, we found no studies of anesthesiologists' adherence to the practice of the checklist. Objective: The main objective was to develop a tool to measure the attitude of anesthesiologists and residents regarding the use of checklist in the perioperative period. Method: This was a cross-sectional study performed during the 59th CBA in BH/MG, whose participants were enrolled physicians who responded to the questionnaire with quantitative epidemiological approach. Results: From the sample of 459 participants who answered the questionnaire, 55% were male, 44.2% under 10 years of practice, and 15.5% with over 30 years of medical school completion. Seven items with 78% reliability coefficient were selected. There was a statistically significant difference between the groups of anesthesiologists who reported using the instrument in lessor more than 70% of patients, indicating that the attitude questionnaire discriminates between these two groups of professionals. Conclusions: The seven items questionnaire showed adequate internal consistency and a well-defined factor structure, and can be used as a tool to measure the anesthesiologists' perceptions about the checklist usefulness and applicability. (C) 2015 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda.Introdução: A Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS) tem recomendado uma maior atenção com a segurança do paciente, mais especificamente em relação aos eventos adversos evitáveis. Foi lançado o programa “Cirurgia Segura Salva Vidas (CSSV)”, que recomenda a aplicação da lista de verificação cirúrgica (checklist) para a conferência de itens relacionados à segurança do procedimento. A implantação do checklist reduziu a mortalidade hospitalar nos primeiros 30 dias. No Brasil, não foram identificados estudos sobre adesão dos anestesiologistas à prática do checklist. Objetivo: Desenvolvimento de uma ferramenta para mensuração da atitude dos anestesiologistas e residentes em relação ao uso do checklist no período perioperatório. Método: Estudo transversal feito durante o 59° Congresso Brasileiro de Anestesiologia (CBA), em Belo Horizonte (MG), cujos participantes foram médicos inscritos e que responderam ao questionário com abordagem epidemiológica quantitativa. Resultados: A amostra constou de 459 participantes que responderam ao questionário, 55% do sexo masculino, 44,2% com menos de 10 anos e 15,5% acima de 30 anos de conclusão do curso médico. Foram selecionados sete itens com coeficiente de confiabilidade de 78%. Houve diferença estatisticamente significativa entre os grupos de anestesiologistas que referiram usar o instrumento em menos ou mais de 70% dos pacientes assistidos. Isso indica que o questionário de atitudes discrimina entre esses dois grupos de profissionais. Conclusões: O questionário de sete itens mostrou adequada consistência interna e uma estrutura fatorial bem delimitada. Pode ser usado como ferramenta para medida das percepções de anestesiologistas quanto à utilidade e a aplicabilidade do checklist.SBA, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, BrazilUniv Fed Fluminense, Fac Med, Niteroi, RJ, BrazilFundacao Oswaldo Cruz, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, BrazilHosp Moinhos Vento, Porto Alegre, RS, BrazilUniv Fed Sergipe, Sao Cristovao, SE, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Paulo Unifesp, Translat Med, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilHarvard, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Cambridge, MA 02138 USAUniv Fed Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, SC, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Paulo Unifesp, Translat Med, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilWeb of Science351-355engporElsevier Science IncRevista Brasileira De AnestesiologiaFerramentaChecklistCirurgia seguraEventos adversosOrganização Mundial da SaúdeToolChecklistSafe surgeryAdverse eventsWorld Health OrganizationConstruction of a tool to measure perceptions about the use of the World Health Organization Safe Surgery Checklist ProgramConstrução de uma ferramenta para medida de percepções sobre o uso do checklist do Programa de Cirurgia Segura da Organização Mundial da Saúdeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleNew York664info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESPORIGINALWOS000380843400004-en.pdfapplication/pdf363435${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/57651/1/WOS000380843400004-en.pdf4b6a04ed756e923ff22180c8f1a466cfMD51open accessWOS000380843400004-pt.pdfapplication/pdf441394${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/57651/2/WOS000380843400004-pt.pdf0e3948c5692e62e4e00abf6e35bcd03aMD52open accessTEXTWOS000380843400004-en.pdf.txtWOS000380843400004-en.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain25140${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/57651/3/WOS000380843400004-en.pdf.txt5fc6a799bb7a66af7c40ca605ef3c27dMD53open accessWOS000380843400004-pt.pdf.txtWOS000380843400004-pt.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain27621${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/57651/6/WOS000380843400004-pt.pdf.txt33e1e552c059f902fdc0e92a66d71e6eMD56open accessTHUMBNAILWOS000380843400004-en.pdf.jpgWOS000380843400004-en.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg6884${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/57651/5/WOS000380843400004-en.pdf.jpgf641ec7ecc6b2a13489a19a0ee714852MD55open accessWOS000380843400004-pt.pdf.jpgWOS000380843400004-pt.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg7206${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/57651/8/WOS000380843400004-pt.pdf.jpg44d97e887038393ad2a0501490a94703MD58open access11600/576512022-07-31 20:27:06.806open accessoai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/57651Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:34652022-07-31T23:27:06Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false |
dc.title.en.fl_str_mv |
Construction of a tool to measure perceptions about the use of the World Health Organization Safe Surgery Checklist Program |
dc.title.alternative.pt.fl_str_mv |
Construção de uma ferramenta para medida de percepções sobre o uso do checklist do Programa de Cirurgia Segura da Organização Mundial da Saúde |
title |
Construction of a tool to measure perceptions about the use of the World Health Organization Safe Surgery Checklist Program |
spellingShingle |
Construction of a tool to measure perceptions about the use of the World Health Organization Safe Surgery Checklist Program dos Santos Diego, Luis Antonio Ferramenta Checklist Cirurgia segura Eventos adversos Organização Mundial da Saúde Tool Checklist Safe surgery Adverse events World Health Organization |
title_short |
Construction of a tool to measure perceptions about the use of the World Health Organization Safe Surgery Checklist Program |
title_full |
Construction of a tool to measure perceptions about the use of the World Health Organization Safe Surgery Checklist Program |
title_fullStr |
Construction of a tool to measure perceptions about the use of the World Health Organization Safe Surgery Checklist Program |
title_full_unstemmed |
Construction of a tool to measure perceptions about the use of the World Health Organization Safe Surgery Checklist Program |
title_sort |
Construction of a tool to measure perceptions about the use of the World Health Organization Safe Surgery Checklist Program |
author |
dos Santos Diego, Luis Antonio |
author_facet |
dos Santos Diego, Luis Antonio Salman, Fabiane Cardia Silva, Joao Henrique Brandao, Julio Cezar [UNIFESP] de Oliveira Filho, Getulio [UNIFESP] Carneiro, Antonio Fernando Bagatini, Airton de Moraes, Jose Mariano |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Salman, Fabiane Cardia Silva, Joao Henrique Brandao, Julio Cezar [UNIFESP] de Oliveira Filho, Getulio [UNIFESP] Carneiro, Antonio Fernando Bagatini, Airton de Moraes, Jose Mariano |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
dos Santos Diego, Luis Antonio Salman, Fabiane Cardia Silva, Joao Henrique Brandao, Julio Cezar [UNIFESP] de Oliveira Filho, Getulio [UNIFESP] Carneiro, Antonio Fernando Bagatini, Airton de Moraes, Jose Mariano |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ferramenta Checklist Cirurgia segura Eventos adversos Organização Mundial da Saúde |
topic |
Ferramenta Checklist Cirurgia segura Eventos adversos Organização Mundial da Saúde Tool Checklist Safe surgery Adverse events World Health Organization |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Tool Checklist Safe surgery Adverse events World Health Organization |
description |
Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended greater attention to patient safety, particularly regarding preventable adverse events. The Safe Surgery Saves Lives (CSSV) program was released recommending the application of a surgical checklist for items on the safety of procedures. The checklist implementation reduced the hospital mortality rate in the first 30 days. In Brazil, we found no studies of anesthesiologists' adherence to the practice of the checklist. Objective: The main objective was to develop a tool to measure the attitude of anesthesiologists and residents regarding the use of checklist in the perioperative period. Method: This was a cross-sectional study performed during the 59th CBA in BH/MG, whose participants were enrolled physicians who responded to the questionnaire with quantitative epidemiological approach. Results: From the sample of 459 participants who answered the questionnaire, 55% were male, 44.2% under 10 years of practice, and 15.5% with over 30 years of medical school completion. Seven items with 78% reliability coefficient were selected. There was a statistically significant difference between the groups of anesthesiologists who reported using the instrument in lessor more than 70% of patients, indicating that the attitude questionnaire discriminates between these two groups of professionals. Conclusions: The seven items questionnaire showed adequate internal consistency and a well-defined factor structure, and can be used as a tool to measure the anesthesiologists' perceptions about the checklist usefulness and applicability. (C) 2015 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2016 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2020-08-14T13:44:25Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2020-08-14T13:44:25Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira De Anestesiologia. New York, v. 66, n. 4, p. 351-355, 2016. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/57651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2014.11.011 |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
0034-7094 |
dc.identifier.file.none.fl_str_mv |
WOS000380843400004-en.pdf WOS000380843400004-pt.pdf |
dc.identifier.scielo.none.fl_str_mv |
S0034-70942016000400351 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1016/j.bjane.2014.11.011 |
dc.identifier.wos.none.fl_str_mv |
WOS:000380843400004 |
identifier_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira De Anestesiologia. New York, v. 66, n. 4, p. 351-355, 2016. 0034-7094 WOS000380843400004-en.pdf WOS000380843400004-pt.pdf S0034-70942016000400351 10.1016/j.bjane.2014.11.011 WOS:000380843400004 |
url |
https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/57651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2014.11.011 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng por |
language |
eng por |
dc.relation.ispartof.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira De Anestesiologia |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
351-355 |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
New York |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier Science Inc |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier Science Inc |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) instacron:UNIFESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
instacron_str |
UNIFESP |
institution |
UNIFESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/57651/1/WOS000380843400004-en.pdf ${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/57651/2/WOS000380843400004-pt.pdf ${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/57651/3/WOS000380843400004-en.pdf.txt ${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/57651/6/WOS000380843400004-pt.pdf.txt ${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/57651/5/WOS000380843400004-en.pdf.jpg ${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/57651/8/WOS000380843400004-pt.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
4b6a04ed756e923ff22180c8f1a466cf 0e3948c5692e62e4e00abf6e35bcd03a 5fc6a799bb7a66af7c40ca605ef3c27d 33e1e552c059f902fdc0e92a66d71e6e f641ec7ecc6b2a13489a19a0ee714852 44d97e887038393ad2a0501490a94703 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1802764150169927680 |