Ocular allergy latin american consensus

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santos, Myrna Serapião dos [UNIFESP]
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Alves, Milton Ruiz, Freitas, Denise de [UNIFESP], Sousa, Luciene Barbosa de, Wainsztein, Ricardo, Kandelman, Sérgio, Lozano, Mauricio, Beltrán, Francisco, Lozada, Oscar Baça, Santacruz, Concepción, Guzzo, Giovanni, Zaccarelli Filho, Carlos Alberto [UNIFESP], Gomes, José Álvaro Pereira [UNIFESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0004-27492011000600016
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/6776
Resumo: PURPOSE: To establish current definition, classification and staging, and to develop diagnosis and treatment recommendations for ocular allergy, by using Delphi approach. METHODS: Ten Latin American experts on ocular allergy participated in a 4-round Delphi panel approach. Four surveys were constructed and answered by panelists. A two-thirds majority was defined as consensus. Definition, classification, staging and diagnosis and treatment recommendations were the main outcomes. RESULTS: Ocular allergy was proposed as the general term to describe ocular allergic diseases. Consensus regarding classification was not reached. Signs and symptoms were considered extremely important for the diagnosis. It was consensus that a staging system should be proposed based on the disease severity. Environmental control, avoidance of allergens and the use of artificial tears were recommended as first line treatment. The secondary treatment should include topical anti-histamines, mast cell stabilizers and multi actions drugs. Topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory and vasoconstrictors were not recommended. Topical corticosteroids were recommended as third line of treatment for the most severe keratoconjunctivitis. Consensus was not reached regarding the use of systemic corticosteroids or immunosuppressant. Surgical approach and unconventional treatments were not recommended as routine. CONCLUSION: The task of creating guidelines for ocular allergies showed to be very complex. Many controversial topics remain unsolved. A larger consensus including experts from different groups around the world may be needed to further improve the current recommendations for several aspects of ocular allergy.
id UFSP_9973ce2d38cac14c53dd5a14393828c0
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/6776
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling Ocular allergy latin american consensusConsenso latino americano de alergia ocularQuestionnairesConsensusKeratoconjunctivitisAdrenal cortex hormonesImmunosuppressive agentsQuestionáriosConsensoConjuntivite alérgicaCeratoconjuntiviteCorticosteroidesImunossupressoresPURPOSE: To establish current definition, classification and staging, and to develop diagnosis and treatment recommendations for ocular allergy, by using Delphi approach. METHODS: Ten Latin American experts on ocular allergy participated in a 4-round Delphi panel approach. Four surveys were constructed and answered by panelists. A two-thirds majority was defined as consensus. Definition, classification, staging and diagnosis and treatment recommendations were the main outcomes. RESULTS: Ocular allergy was proposed as the general term to describe ocular allergic diseases. Consensus regarding classification was not reached. Signs and symptoms were considered extremely important for the diagnosis. It was consensus that a staging system should be proposed based on the disease severity. Environmental control, avoidance of allergens and the use of artificial tears were recommended as first line treatment. The secondary treatment should include topical anti-histamines, mast cell stabilizers and multi actions drugs. Topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory and vasoconstrictors were not recommended. Topical corticosteroids were recommended as third line of treatment for the most severe keratoconjunctivitis. Consensus was not reached regarding the use of systemic corticosteroids or immunosuppressant. Surgical approach and unconventional treatments were not recommended as routine. CONCLUSION: The task of creating guidelines for ocular allergies showed to be very complex. Many controversial topics remain unsolved. A larger consensus including experts from different groups around the world may be needed to further improve the current recommendations for several aspects of ocular allergy.OBJETIVO: Estabelecer a definição, classificação e estadiamento e desenvolver recomendações para o diagnóstico e tratamento da alergia ocular, usando o método Delphi de consenso. MÉTODOS: Dez especialistas em alergia ocular da América Latina participaram do painel. Quatro rodadas de questionários foram respondidas pelos painelistas. Consenso foi definido quando houve 2/3 ou mais de concordância. Os aspectos principais avaliados foram: definição, classificação, estadiamento e recomendações para diagnóstico e tratamento da alergia ocular. RESULTADOS: Alergia Ocular foi proposto como termo geral para descrever as doenças alérgicas oculares. Consenso sobre classificação não foi atingido. Sinais e sintomas foram considerados extremamente importantes para o diagnóstico. Consenso foi atingido sobre a necessidade de se estabelecer um sistema de estadiamento baseado na gravidade da doença. Controle ambiental e de exposição a alérgenos e o uso de lágrimas artificiais foram considerados tratamento de primeira linha e o uso tópico de anti-histamínicos, estabilizadores de membranas de mastócitos e drogas de ação múltipla, como tratamento de segunda linha. Anti-inflamatórios não hormonais tópicos e vasoconstrictores não foram recomendados. Corticosteroides tópicos foram estabelecidos como terceira linha de tratamento para casos graves de ceratoconjuntivite. Consenso não foi obtido em relação ao uso sistêmico de corticosteróides e imunossupressores. Abordagem cirúrgica e tratamentos não convencionais não foram recomendados de rotina. CONCLUSÃO: O desafio de criar recomendações para diversos aspectos da alergia ocular mostrou-se muito complexo, muitos deles permanencendo ainda controversos. Consensos mais amplos podem ser necessários para melhorar as recomendações atuais referentes a importantes aspectos da alergia ocular.Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) Setor de Córnea e Doenças ExternasUniversidade de São Paulo Faculdade de Medicina Hospital das ClínicasUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) Departamento de OftalmologiaHospital de Olhos de Sorocaba Departamento de OftalmologiaUniversidad de Buenos Aires Instituto de La VisiónClínica SkopusUniversidad del Rosario Fundación Oftalmologica Nacional Departamento de Oftalmologia Pediatrica y EstrabismoHospital Dr. Luis Sánchez Bulnes e Clínica Lomas Altas Servicio de Córnea y Cirugía RefractivaFundación Hospital Nuestra Señora Servicio de CórneaFundación Conde de Valenciana I.A.P. Instituto de Oftalmología Servicio de CórneaIntrials Clinical Research Clinical Operations ManagerIntrials Clinical Research BDM & Clinical Research AssociateUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) Instituto da Visão Setor de Córnea e Doenças ExternasUNIFESP, Setor de Córnea e Doenças ExternasUNIFESP, Depto. de OftalmologiaUNIFESP, Instituto da Visão Setor de Córnea e Doenças ExternasSciELOConselho Brasileiro de OftalmologiaUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Hospital de Olhos de Sorocaba Departamento de OftalmologiaUniversidad de Buenos Aires Instituto de La VisiónClínica SkopusUniversidad del Rosario Fundación Oftalmologica Nacional Departamento de Oftalmologia Pediatrica y EstrabismoHospital Dr. Luis Sánchez Bulnes e Clínica Lomas Altas Servicio de Córnea y Cirugía RefractivaFundación Hospital Nuestra Señora Servicio de CórneaFundación Conde de Valenciana I.A.P. Instituto de Oftalmología Servicio de CórneaIntrials Clinical Research Clinical Operations ManagerIntrials Clinical Research BDM & Clinical Research AssociateSantos, Myrna Serapião dos [UNIFESP]Alves, Milton RuizFreitas, Denise de [UNIFESP]Sousa, Luciene Barbosa deWainsztein, RicardoKandelman, SérgioLozano, MauricioBeltrán, FranciscoLozada, Oscar BaçaSantacruz, ConcepciónGuzzo, GiovanniZaccarelli Filho, Carlos Alberto [UNIFESP]Gomes, José Álvaro Pereira [UNIFESP]2015-06-14T13:43:26Z2015-06-14T13:43:26Z2011-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion452-456application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0004-27492011000600016Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia. Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia, v. 74, n. 6, p. 452-456, 2011.10.1590/S0004-27492011000600016S0004-27492011000600016.pdf0004-2749S0004-27492011000600016http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/6776engArquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-08-05T16:34:09Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/6776Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-08-05T16:34:09Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Ocular allergy latin american consensus
Consenso latino americano de alergia ocular
title Ocular allergy latin american consensus
spellingShingle Ocular allergy latin american consensus
Santos, Myrna Serapião dos [UNIFESP]
Questionnaires
Consensus
Keratoconjunctivitis
Adrenal cortex hormones
Immunosuppressive agents
Questionários
Consenso
Conjuntivite alérgica
Ceratoconjuntivite
Corticosteroides
Imunossupressores
title_short Ocular allergy latin american consensus
title_full Ocular allergy latin american consensus
title_fullStr Ocular allergy latin american consensus
title_full_unstemmed Ocular allergy latin american consensus
title_sort Ocular allergy latin american consensus
author Santos, Myrna Serapião dos [UNIFESP]
author_facet Santos, Myrna Serapião dos [UNIFESP]
Alves, Milton Ruiz
Freitas, Denise de [UNIFESP]
Sousa, Luciene Barbosa de
Wainsztein, Ricardo
Kandelman, Sérgio
Lozano, Mauricio
Beltrán, Francisco
Lozada, Oscar Baça
Santacruz, Concepción
Guzzo, Giovanni
Zaccarelli Filho, Carlos Alberto [UNIFESP]
Gomes, José Álvaro Pereira [UNIFESP]
author_role author
author2 Alves, Milton Ruiz
Freitas, Denise de [UNIFESP]
Sousa, Luciene Barbosa de
Wainsztein, Ricardo
Kandelman, Sérgio
Lozano, Mauricio
Beltrán, Francisco
Lozada, Oscar Baça
Santacruz, Concepción
Guzzo, Giovanni
Zaccarelli Filho, Carlos Alberto [UNIFESP]
Gomes, José Álvaro Pereira [UNIFESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
Hospital de Olhos de Sorocaba Departamento de Oftalmologia
Universidad de Buenos Aires Instituto de La Visión
Clínica Skopus
Universidad del Rosario Fundación Oftalmologica Nacional Departamento de Oftalmologia Pediatrica y Estrabismo
Hospital Dr. Luis Sánchez Bulnes e Clínica Lomas Altas Servicio de Córnea y Cirugía Refractiva
Fundación Hospital Nuestra Señora Servicio de Córnea
Fundación Conde de Valenciana I.A.P. Instituto de Oftalmología Servicio de Córnea
Intrials Clinical Research Clinical Operations Manager
Intrials Clinical Research BDM & Clinical Research Associate
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos, Myrna Serapião dos [UNIFESP]
Alves, Milton Ruiz
Freitas, Denise de [UNIFESP]
Sousa, Luciene Barbosa de
Wainsztein, Ricardo
Kandelman, Sérgio
Lozano, Mauricio
Beltrán, Francisco
Lozada, Oscar Baça
Santacruz, Concepción
Guzzo, Giovanni
Zaccarelli Filho, Carlos Alberto [UNIFESP]
Gomes, José Álvaro Pereira [UNIFESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Questionnaires
Consensus
Keratoconjunctivitis
Adrenal cortex hormones
Immunosuppressive agents
Questionários
Consenso
Conjuntivite alérgica
Ceratoconjuntivite
Corticosteroides
Imunossupressores
topic Questionnaires
Consensus
Keratoconjunctivitis
Adrenal cortex hormones
Immunosuppressive agents
Questionários
Consenso
Conjuntivite alérgica
Ceratoconjuntivite
Corticosteroides
Imunossupressores
description PURPOSE: To establish current definition, classification and staging, and to develop diagnosis and treatment recommendations for ocular allergy, by using Delphi approach. METHODS: Ten Latin American experts on ocular allergy participated in a 4-round Delphi panel approach. Four surveys were constructed and answered by panelists. A two-thirds majority was defined as consensus. Definition, classification, staging and diagnosis and treatment recommendations were the main outcomes. RESULTS: Ocular allergy was proposed as the general term to describe ocular allergic diseases. Consensus regarding classification was not reached. Signs and symptoms were considered extremely important for the diagnosis. It was consensus that a staging system should be proposed based on the disease severity. Environmental control, avoidance of allergens and the use of artificial tears were recommended as first line treatment. The secondary treatment should include topical anti-histamines, mast cell stabilizers and multi actions drugs. Topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory and vasoconstrictors were not recommended. Topical corticosteroids were recommended as third line of treatment for the most severe keratoconjunctivitis. Consensus was not reached regarding the use of systemic corticosteroids or immunosuppressant. Surgical approach and unconventional treatments were not recommended as routine. CONCLUSION: The task of creating guidelines for ocular allergies showed to be very complex. Many controversial topics remain unsolved. A larger consensus including experts from different groups around the world may be needed to further improve the current recommendations for several aspects of ocular allergy.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-12-01
2015-06-14T13:43:26Z
2015-06-14T13:43:26Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0004-27492011000600016
Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia. Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia, v. 74, n. 6, p. 452-456, 2011.
10.1590/S0004-27492011000600016
S0004-27492011000600016.pdf
0004-2749
S0004-27492011000600016
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/6776
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0004-27492011000600016
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/6776
identifier_str_mv Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia. Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia, v. 74, n. 6, p. 452-456, 2011.
10.1590/S0004-27492011000600016
S0004-27492011000600016.pdf
0004-2749
S0004-27492011000600016
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 452-456
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br
_version_ 1814268378637926400