Research Smad2 and Smad6 as predictors of overall survival in oral squamous cell carcinoma patients

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mangone, Flavia R. R.
Data de Publicação: 2010
Outros Autores: Walder, Fernando [UNIFESP], Maistro, Simone, Pasini, Fatima S., Lehn, Carlos N., Carvalho, Marcos B., Brentani, M. Mitzi, Snitcovsky, Igor, Federico, Miriam H. H. [UINIFESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-4598-9-106
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/32543
Resumo: Background: To test if the expression of Smad1-8 mRNAs were predictive of survival in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).Patients and Methods: We analyzed, prospectively, the expression of Smad1-8, by means of Ribonuclease Protection Assay in 48 primary, operable, oral SCC. in addition, 21 larynx, 10 oropharynx and 4 hypopharynx SCC and 65 matched adjacent mucosa, available for study, were also included. for survival analysis, patients were categorized as positive or negative for each Smad, according to median mRNA expression. We also performed real-time quantitative PCR (QRTPCR) to asses the pattern of TGF beta 1, TGF beta 2, TGF beta 3 in oral SCC.Results: Our results showed that Smad2 and Smad6 mRNA expression were both associated with survival in Oral SCC patients. Cox Multivariate analysis revealed that Smad6 positivity and Smad2 negativity were both predictive of good prognosis for oral SCC patients, independent of lymph nodal status (P = 0.003 and P = 0.029, respectively). in addition, simultaneously Smad2(-) and Smad6(+) oral SCC group of patients did not reach median overall survival (mOS) whereas the mOS of Smad2(+)/Smad6(-) subgroup was 11.6 months (P = 0.004, univariate analysis). Regarding to TGF beta isoforms, we found that Smad2 mRNA and TGF beta 1 mRNA were inversely correlated (p = 0.05, R = -0.33), and that seven of the eight TGF beta 1(+) patients were Smad2(-). in larynx SCC, Smad7(-) patients did not reach mOS whereas mOS of Smad7(+) patients were only 7.0 months (P = 0.04). No other correlations were found among Smad expression, clinico-pathological characteristics and survival in oral, larynx, hypopharynx, oropharynx or the entire head and neck SCC population.Conclusion: Smad6 together with Smad2 may be prognostic factors, independent of nodal status in oral SCC after curative resection. the underlying mechanism which involves aberrant TGF beta signaling should be better clarified in the future.
id UFSP_bf16003c84a6f4e64cb16948da97d6c2
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/32543
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling Research Smad2 and Smad6 as predictors of overall survival in oral squamous cell carcinoma patientsBackground: To test if the expression of Smad1-8 mRNAs were predictive of survival in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).Patients and Methods: We analyzed, prospectively, the expression of Smad1-8, by means of Ribonuclease Protection Assay in 48 primary, operable, oral SCC. in addition, 21 larynx, 10 oropharynx and 4 hypopharynx SCC and 65 matched adjacent mucosa, available for study, were also included. for survival analysis, patients were categorized as positive or negative for each Smad, according to median mRNA expression. We also performed real-time quantitative PCR (QRTPCR) to asses the pattern of TGF beta 1, TGF beta 2, TGF beta 3 in oral SCC.Results: Our results showed that Smad2 and Smad6 mRNA expression were both associated with survival in Oral SCC patients. Cox Multivariate analysis revealed that Smad6 positivity and Smad2 negativity were both predictive of good prognosis for oral SCC patients, independent of lymph nodal status (P = 0.003 and P = 0.029, respectively). in addition, simultaneously Smad2(-) and Smad6(+) oral SCC group of patients did not reach median overall survival (mOS) whereas the mOS of Smad2(+)/Smad6(-) subgroup was 11.6 months (P = 0.004, univariate analysis). Regarding to TGF beta isoforms, we found that Smad2 mRNA and TGF beta 1 mRNA were inversely correlated (p = 0.05, R = -0.33), and that seven of the eight TGF beta 1(+) patients were Smad2(-). in larynx SCC, Smad7(-) patients did not reach mOS whereas mOS of Smad7(+) patients were only 7.0 months (P = 0.04). No other correlations were found among Smad expression, clinico-pathological characteristics and survival in oral, larynx, hypopharynx, oropharynx or the entire head and neck SCC population.Conclusion: Smad6 together with Smad2 may be prognostic factors, independent of nodal status in oral SCC after curative resection. the underlying mechanism which involves aberrant TGF beta signaling should be better clarified in the future.Univ São Paulo, Disciplina Oncol, Dept Radiol, Fac Med,LIM 24,Hosp Clin, São Paulo, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Otorrinolaringol, São Paulo, BrazilHosp Heliopolis, Serv Cirurgia Cabeca & Pescoco, São Paulo, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Otorrinolaringol, São Paulo, BrazilWeb of ScienceFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)FAPESP: 02/01738-9Biomed Central LtdUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Hosp HeliopolisMangone, Flavia R. R.Walder, Fernando [UNIFESP]Maistro, SimonePasini, Fatima S.Lehn, Carlos N.Carvalho, Marcos B.Brentani, M. MitziSnitcovsky, IgorFederico, Miriam H. H. [UINIFESP]2016-01-24T13:59:41Z2016-01-24T13:59:41Z2010-05-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion10application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-4598-9-106Molecular Cancer. London: Biomed Central Ltd, v. 9, 10 p., 2010.10.1186/1476-4598-9-106WOS000279275100001.pdf1476-4598http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/32543WOS:000279275100001engMolecular Cancerinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-08-07T17:06:38Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/32543Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-08-07T17:06:38Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Research Smad2 and Smad6 as predictors of overall survival in oral squamous cell carcinoma patients
title Research Smad2 and Smad6 as predictors of overall survival in oral squamous cell carcinoma patients
spellingShingle Research Smad2 and Smad6 as predictors of overall survival in oral squamous cell carcinoma patients
Mangone, Flavia R. R.
title_short Research Smad2 and Smad6 as predictors of overall survival in oral squamous cell carcinoma patients
title_full Research Smad2 and Smad6 as predictors of overall survival in oral squamous cell carcinoma patients
title_fullStr Research Smad2 and Smad6 as predictors of overall survival in oral squamous cell carcinoma patients
title_full_unstemmed Research Smad2 and Smad6 as predictors of overall survival in oral squamous cell carcinoma patients
title_sort Research Smad2 and Smad6 as predictors of overall survival in oral squamous cell carcinoma patients
author Mangone, Flavia R. R.
author_facet Mangone, Flavia R. R.
Walder, Fernando [UNIFESP]
Maistro, Simone
Pasini, Fatima S.
Lehn, Carlos N.
Carvalho, Marcos B.
Brentani, M. Mitzi
Snitcovsky, Igor
Federico, Miriam H. H. [UINIFESP]
author_role author
author2 Walder, Fernando [UNIFESP]
Maistro, Simone
Pasini, Fatima S.
Lehn, Carlos N.
Carvalho, Marcos B.
Brentani, M. Mitzi
Snitcovsky, Igor
Federico, Miriam H. H. [UINIFESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
Hosp Heliopolis
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mangone, Flavia R. R.
Walder, Fernando [UNIFESP]
Maistro, Simone
Pasini, Fatima S.
Lehn, Carlos N.
Carvalho, Marcos B.
Brentani, M. Mitzi
Snitcovsky, Igor
Federico, Miriam H. H. [UINIFESP]
description Background: To test if the expression of Smad1-8 mRNAs were predictive of survival in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).Patients and Methods: We analyzed, prospectively, the expression of Smad1-8, by means of Ribonuclease Protection Assay in 48 primary, operable, oral SCC. in addition, 21 larynx, 10 oropharynx and 4 hypopharynx SCC and 65 matched adjacent mucosa, available for study, were also included. for survival analysis, patients were categorized as positive or negative for each Smad, according to median mRNA expression. We also performed real-time quantitative PCR (QRTPCR) to asses the pattern of TGF beta 1, TGF beta 2, TGF beta 3 in oral SCC.Results: Our results showed that Smad2 and Smad6 mRNA expression were both associated with survival in Oral SCC patients. Cox Multivariate analysis revealed that Smad6 positivity and Smad2 negativity were both predictive of good prognosis for oral SCC patients, independent of lymph nodal status (P = 0.003 and P = 0.029, respectively). in addition, simultaneously Smad2(-) and Smad6(+) oral SCC group of patients did not reach median overall survival (mOS) whereas the mOS of Smad2(+)/Smad6(-) subgroup was 11.6 months (P = 0.004, univariate analysis). Regarding to TGF beta isoforms, we found that Smad2 mRNA and TGF beta 1 mRNA were inversely correlated (p = 0.05, R = -0.33), and that seven of the eight TGF beta 1(+) patients were Smad2(-). in larynx SCC, Smad7(-) patients did not reach mOS whereas mOS of Smad7(+) patients were only 7.0 months (P = 0.04). No other correlations were found among Smad expression, clinico-pathological characteristics and survival in oral, larynx, hypopharynx, oropharynx or the entire head and neck SCC population.Conclusion: Smad6 together with Smad2 may be prognostic factors, independent of nodal status in oral SCC after curative resection. the underlying mechanism which involves aberrant TGF beta signaling should be better clarified in the future.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-05-12
2016-01-24T13:59:41Z
2016-01-24T13:59:41Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-4598-9-106
Molecular Cancer. London: Biomed Central Ltd, v. 9, 10 p., 2010.
10.1186/1476-4598-9-106
WOS000279275100001.pdf
1476-4598
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/32543
WOS:000279275100001
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-4598-9-106
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/32543
identifier_str_mv Molecular Cancer. London: Biomed Central Ltd, v. 9, 10 p., 2010.
10.1186/1476-4598-9-106
WOS000279275100001.pdf
1476-4598
WOS:000279275100001
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Molecular Cancer
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 10
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Biomed Central Ltd
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Biomed Central Ltd
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br
_version_ 1814268389898584064