What is important for continent catheterizable stomas: angulations or extension?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Vilela, Marcelo L. [UNIFESP]
Data de Publicação: 2007
Outros Autores: Furtado, Geovanne S. [UNIFESP], Koh, Ivan Hong Jun [UNIFESP], Poli de Figueiredo, Luiz Francisco [UNIFESP], Ortiz, Valdemar [UNIFESP], Srougi, Miguel [UNIFESP], Macedo Junior, Antonio [UNIFESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-55382007000200018
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/3673
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: We developed an experimental ex-vivo model to define factors that may influence continence of catheterizable channels by urinary and colonic stomas based on the principle of imbrication of the outlet tube. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 20 pigs, colon specimens with 25 cm length were obtained and a transverse flap with 3.0 cm length x 1.5 cm width in the average point of the intestine was tubulated to create an efferent tube. With the tube configured, it was embedded by 3 seromuscular stitches far 0.5 cm each other. A pressure study of both intra-luminal surface and channel was then conducted during the filling of the submerse piece with environmental air in a water container, to define the efferent channel continence. The study was repeated after the progressive release of suture stitches until only one stitch remains. RESULTS: Channel continence analyzed in each segment in three different valve length situations, making a total of 20 segments, revealed that with 3 stitches (1.5 cm valve) the maximum average pressure prior to overflow was 54 cm H2O; 53.65 cm H2O with 2 stitches (1.0 cm of valve), and 55.45 cm H2O with only one stitch (0.5 cm of valve), which are the same values. The record at the segment explosion pressure was 67.87 cm H2O. CONCLUSION: The study showed that angulation of channel with colon, maintained by only one stitch (0.5 cm imbrication) was more important than a larger extension of the valve, represented by 3 suture stitches (1.5 cm imbrication) in order to allow continence to the efferent channel.
id UFSP_c2033e24c16b9b42161da2e3cfeeeef6
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/3673
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling What is important for continent catheterizable stomas: angulations or extension?urodynamicsurinary diversioncontinent urinary reservoirsfecal incontinenceanimal experimentationswineOBJECTIVE: We developed an experimental ex-vivo model to define factors that may influence continence of catheterizable channels by urinary and colonic stomas based on the principle of imbrication of the outlet tube. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 20 pigs, colon specimens with 25 cm length were obtained and a transverse flap with 3.0 cm length x 1.5 cm width in the average point of the intestine was tubulated to create an efferent tube. With the tube configured, it was embedded by 3 seromuscular stitches far 0.5 cm each other. A pressure study of both intra-luminal surface and channel was then conducted during the filling of the submerse piece with environmental air in a water container, to define the efferent channel continence. The study was repeated after the progressive release of suture stitches until only one stitch remains. RESULTS: Channel continence analyzed in each segment in three different valve length situations, making a total of 20 segments, revealed that with 3 stitches (1.5 cm valve) the maximum average pressure prior to overflow was 54 cm H2O; 53.65 cm H2O with 2 stitches (1.0 cm of valve), and 55.45 cm H2O with only one stitch (0.5 cm of valve), which are the same values. The record at the segment explosion pressure was 67.87 cm H2O. CONCLUSION: The study showed that angulation of channel with colon, maintained by only one stitch (0.5 cm imbrication) was more important than a larger extension of the valve, represented by 3 suture stitches (1.5 cm imbrication) in order to allow continence to the efferent channel.Federal University of São Paulo Divisions of Urology and Experimental Surgery Department of SurgeryUNIFESP, Divisions of Urology and Experimental Surgery Department of SurgerySciELOSociedade Brasileira de UrologiaUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Vilela, Marcelo L. [UNIFESP]Furtado, Geovanne S. [UNIFESP]Koh, Ivan Hong Jun [UNIFESP]Poli de Figueiredo, Luiz Francisco [UNIFESP]Ortiz, Valdemar [UNIFESP]Srougi, Miguel [UNIFESP]Macedo Junior, Antonio [UNIFESP]2015-06-14T13:36:52Z2015-06-14T13:36:52Z2007-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion254-263application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-55382007000200018International braz j urol. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia, v. 33, n. 2, p. 254-263, 2007.10.1590/S1677-55382007000200018S1677-55382007000200018.pdf1677-5538S1677-55382007000200018http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/3673engInternational braz j urolinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-07-28T20:57:41Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/3673Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-07-28T20:57:41Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv What is important for continent catheterizable stomas: angulations or extension?
title What is important for continent catheterizable stomas: angulations or extension?
spellingShingle What is important for continent catheterizable stomas: angulations or extension?
Vilela, Marcelo L. [UNIFESP]
urodynamics
urinary diversion
continent urinary reservoirs
fecal incontinence
animal experimentation
swine
title_short What is important for continent catheterizable stomas: angulations or extension?
title_full What is important for continent catheterizable stomas: angulations or extension?
title_fullStr What is important for continent catheterizable stomas: angulations or extension?
title_full_unstemmed What is important for continent catheterizable stomas: angulations or extension?
title_sort What is important for continent catheterizable stomas: angulations or extension?
author Vilela, Marcelo L. [UNIFESP]
author_facet Vilela, Marcelo L. [UNIFESP]
Furtado, Geovanne S. [UNIFESP]
Koh, Ivan Hong Jun [UNIFESP]
Poli de Figueiredo, Luiz Francisco [UNIFESP]
Ortiz, Valdemar [UNIFESP]
Srougi, Miguel [UNIFESP]
Macedo Junior, Antonio [UNIFESP]
author_role author
author2 Furtado, Geovanne S. [UNIFESP]
Koh, Ivan Hong Jun [UNIFESP]
Poli de Figueiredo, Luiz Francisco [UNIFESP]
Ortiz, Valdemar [UNIFESP]
Srougi, Miguel [UNIFESP]
Macedo Junior, Antonio [UNIFESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Vilela, Marcelo L. [UNIFESP]
Furtado, Geovanne S. [UNIFESP]
Koh, Ivan Hong Jun [UNIFESP]
Poli de Figueiredo, Luiz Francisco [UNIFESP]
Ortiz, Valdemar [UNIFESP]
Srougi, Miguel [UNIFESP]
Macedo Junior, Antonio [UNIFESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv urodynamics
urinary diversion
continent urinary reservoirs
fecal incontinence
animal experimentation
swine
topic urodynamics
urinary diversion
continent urinary reservoirs
fecal incontinence
animal experimentation
swine
description OBJECTIVE: We developed an experimental ex-vivo model to define factors that may influence continence of catheterizable channels by urinary and colonic stomas based on the principle of imbrication of the outlet tube. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 20 pigs, colon specimens with 25 cm length were obtained and a transverse flap with 3.0 cm length x 1.5 cm width in the average point of the intestine was tubulated to create an efferent tube. With the tube configured, it was embedded by 3 seromuscular stitches far 0.5 cm each other. A pressure study of both intra-luminal surface and channel was then conducted during the filling of the submerse piece with environmental air in a water container, to define the efferent channel continence. The study was repeated after the progressive release of suture stitches until only one stitch remains. RESULTS: Channel continence analyzed in each segment in three different valve length situations, making a total of 20 segments, revealed that with 3 stitches (1.5 cm valve) the maximum average pressure prior to overflow was 54 cm H2O; 53.65 cm H2O with 2 stitches (1.0 cm of valve), and 55.45 cm H2O with only one stitch (0.5 cm of valve), which are the same values. The record at the segment explosion pressure was 67.87 cm H2O. CONCLUSION: The study showed that angulation of channel with colon, maintained by only one stitch (0.5 cm imbrication) was more important than a larger extension of the valve, represented by 3 suture stitches (1.5 cm imbrication) in order to allow continence to the efferent channel.
publishDate 2007
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2007-04-01
2015-06-14T13:36:52Z
2015-06-14T13:36:52Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-55382007000200018
International braz j urol. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia, v. 33, n. 2, p. 254-263, 2007.
10.1590/S1677-55382007000200018
S1677-55382007000200018.pdf
1677-5538
S1677-55382007000200018
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/3673
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-55382007000200018
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/3673
identifier_str_mv International braz j urol. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia, v. 33, n. 2, p. 254-263, 2007.
10.1590/S1677-55382007000200018
S1677-55382007000200018.pdf
1677-5538
S1677-55382007000200018
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv International braz j urol
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 254-263
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br
_version_ 1814268353761509376