Quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines on the use of physiotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Hurkmans, Emalie J.
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Jones, Anamaria [UNIFESP], Li, Linda C., Vlieland, Theodora P. M. Vliet
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/ker195
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/34072
Resumo: Objective. To assess the quality of guidelines published in peer-reviewed literature concerning the role of physiotherapy in the management of patients with RA.Methods. A systematic literature search for clinical practice guidelines that included physiotherapy interventions was performed in four electronic databases. We assessed the quality of the selected guidelines using the appraisal of guidelines for research and evaluation (AGREE) instrument. in addition, the recommendations of guidelines with the highest quality scores were summarized.Results. Eight clinical practice guidelines fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Scope/purpose was the most often adequately addressed AGREE domain (in seven of the eight guidelines) and applicability the least (in two of the eight guidelines). Based on the AGREE domain scores, six guidelines could be recommended or strongly recommended for clinical use. Five out of these six (strongly) recommended guidelines included a recommendation on exercise therapy and/or patient education, with these interventions being recommended in every case. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and thermotherapy were recommended in four of these six guidelines. US, thermotherapy, low-level laser therapy, massage, passive mobilization and balneotherapy were addressed in one or two of these six guidelines.Conclusion. Six of eight clinical practice guidelines addressing physiotherapy interventions were recommended or strongly recommended according to the AGREE instrument. in general, guideline recommendations on physiotherapy intervention, from both the recommended guidelines as well as from the not recommended guidelines, lacked detail concerning mode of delivery, intensity, frequency and duration.
id UFSP_c8191b98ababf72b95c62709e1b32ea6
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/34072
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling Quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines on the use of physiotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic reviewGuidelinesPhysiotherapyRAQuality appraisalObjective. To assess the quality of guidelines published in peer-reviewed literature concerning the role of physiotherapy in the management of patients with RA.Methods. A systematic literature search for clinical practice guidelines that included physiotherapy interventions was performed in four electronic databases. We assessed the quality of the selected guidelines using the appraisal of guidelines for research and evaluation (AGREE) instrument. in addition, the recommendations of guidelines with the highest quality scores were summarized.Results. Eight clinical practice guidelines fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Scope/purpose was the most often adequately addressed AGREE domain (in seven of the eight guidelines) and applicability the least (in two of the eight guidelines). Based on the AGREE domain scores, six guidelines could be recommended or strongly recommended for clinical use. Five out of these six (strongly) recommended guidelines included a recommendation on exercise therapy and/or patient education, with these interventions being recommended in every case. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and thermotherapy were recommended in four of these six guidelines. US, thermotherapy, low-level laser therapy, massage, passive mobilization and balneotherapy were addressed in one or two of these six guidelines.Conclusion. Six of eight clinical practice guidelines addressing physiotherapy interventions were recommended or strongly recommended according to the AGREE instrument. in general, guideline recommendations on physiotherapy intervention, from both the recommended guidelines as well as from the not recommended guidelines, lacked detail concerning mode of delivery, intensity, frequency and duration.Leiden Univ, Dept Rheumatol, Med Ctr, NL-2300 RC Leiden, NetherlandsUniv British Columbia, Dept Phys Therapy, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, CanadaArthrit Res Ctr Canada, Vancouver, BC, CanadaLeiden Univ, Dept Orthopaed, Med Ctr, NL-2300 RC Leiden, NetherlandsUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Phys Therapy, São Paulo, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Phys Therapy, São Paulo, BrazilWeb of ScienceOxford Univ PressLeiden UnivUniv British ColumbiaArthrit Res Ctr CanadaUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Hurkmans, Emalie J.Jones, Anamaria [UNIFESP]Li, Linda C.Vlieland, Theodora P. M. Vliet2016-01-24T14:17:14Z2016-01-24T14:17:14Z2011-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion1879-1888http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/ker195Rheumatology. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press, v. 50, n. 10, p. 1879-1888, 2011.10.1093/rheumatology/ker1951462-0324http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/34072WOS:000295172600021engRheumatologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://www.oxfordjournals.org/access_purchase/self-archiving_policyb.htmlreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2023-03-24T15:34:37Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/34072Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652023-03-24T15:34:37Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines on the use of physiotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review
title Quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines on the use of physiotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review
spellingShingle Quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines on the use of physiotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review
Hurkmans, Emalie J.
Guidelines
Physiotherapy
RA
Quality appraisal
title_short Quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines on the use of physiotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review
title_full Quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines on the use of physiotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review
title_fullStr Quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines on the use of physiotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines on the use of physiotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review
title_sort Quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines on the use of physiotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review
author Hurkmans, Emalie J.
author_facet Hurkmans, Emalie J.
Jones, Anamaria [UNIFESP]
Li, Linda C.
Vlieland, Theodora P. M. Vliet
author_role author
author2 Jones, Anamaria [UNIFESP]
Li, Linda C.
Vlieland, Theodora P. M. Vliet
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Leiden Univ
Univ British Columbia
Arthrit Res Ctr Canada
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Hurkmans, Emalie J.
Jones, Anamaria [UNIFESP]
Li, Linda C.
Vlieland, Theodora P. M. Vliet
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Guidelines
Physiotherapy
RA
Quality appraisal
topic Guidelines
Physiotherapy
RA
Quality appraisal
description Objective. To assess the quality of guidelines published in peer-reviewed literature concerning the role of physiotherapy in the management of patients with RA.Methods. A systematic literature search for clinical practice guidelines that included physiotherapy interventions was performed in four electronic databases. We assessed the quality of the selected guidelines using the appraisal of guidelines for research and evaluation (AGREE) instrument. in addition, the recommendations of guidelines with the highest quality scores were summarized.Results. Eight clinical practice guidelines fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Scope/purpose was the most often adequately addressed AGREE domain (in seven of the eight guidelines) and applicability the least (in two of the eight guidelines). Based on the AGREE domain scores, six guidelines could be recommended or strongly recommended for clinical use. Five out of these six (strongly) recommended guidelines included a recommendation on exercise therapy and/or patient education, with these interventions being recommended in every case. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and thermotherapy were recommended in four of these six guidelines. US, thermotherapy, low-level laser therapy, massage, passive mobilization and balneotherapy were addressed in one or two of these six guidelines.Conclusion. Six of eight clinical practice guidelines addressing physiotherapy interventions were recommended or strongly recommended according to the AGREE instrument. in general, guideline recommendations on physiotherapy intervention, from both the recommended guidelines as well as from the not recommended guidelines, lacked detail concerning mode of delivery, intensity, frequency and duration.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-10-01
2016-01-24T14:17:14Z
2016-01-24T14:17:14Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/ker195
Rheumatology. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press, v. 50, n. 10, p. 1879-1888, 2011.
10.1093/rheumatology/ker195
1462-0324
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/34072
WOS:000295172600021
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/ker195
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/34072
identifier_str_mv Rheumatology. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press, v. 50, n. 10, p. 1879-1888, 2011.
10.1093/rheumatology/ker195
1462-0324
WOS:000295172600021
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Rheumatology
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://www.oxfordjournals.org/access_purchase/self-archiving_policyb.html
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://www.oxfordjournals.org/access_purchase/self-archiving_policyb.html
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 1879-1888
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Oxford Univ Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Oxford Univ Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br
_version_ 1814268307896795136