Quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines on the use of physiotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/ker195 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/34072 |
Resumo: | Objective. To assess the quality of guidelines published in peer-reviewed literature concerning the role of physiotherapy in the management of patients with RA.Methods. A systematic literature search for clinical practice guidelines that included physiotherapy interventions was performed in four electronic databases. We assessed the quality of the selected guidelines using the appraisal of guidelines for research and evaluation (AGREE) instrument. in addition, the recommendations of guidelines with the highest quality scores were summarized.Results. Eight clinical practice guidelines fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Scope/purpose was the most often adequately addressed AGREE domain (in seven of the eight guidelines) and applicability the least (in two of the eight guidelines). Based on the AGREE domain scores, six guidelines could be recommended or strongly recommended for clinical use. Five out of these six (strongly) recommended guidelines included a recommendation on exercise therapy and/or patient education, with these interventions being recommended in every case. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and thermotherapy were recommended in four of these six guidelines. US, thermotherapy, low-level laser therapy, massage, passive mobilization and balneotherapy were addressed in one or two of these six guidelines.Conclusion. Six of eight clinical practice guidelines addressing physiotherapy interventions were recommended or strongly recommended according to the AGREE instrument. in general, guideline recommendations on physiotherapy intervention, from both the recommended guidelines as well as from the not recommended guidelines, lacked detail concerning mode of delivery, intensity, frequency and duration. |
id |
UFSP_c8191b98ababf72b95c62709e1b32ea6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/34072 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository_id_str |
3465 |
spelling |
Quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines on the use of physiotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic reviewGuidelinesPhysiotherapyRAQuality appraisalObjective. To assess the quality of guidelines published in peer-reviewed literature concerning the role of physiotherapy in the management of patients with RA.Methods. A systematic literature search for clinical practice guidelines that included physiotherapy interventions was performed in four electronic databases. We assessed the quality of the selected guidelines using the appraisal of guidelines for research and evaluation (AGREE) instrument. in addition, the recommendations of guidelines with the highest quality scores were summarized.Results. Eight clinical practice guidelines fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Scope/purpose was the most often adequately addressed AGREE domain (in seven of the eight guidelines) and applicability the least (in two of the eight guidelines). Based on the AGREE domain scores, six guidelines could be recommended or strongly recommended for clinical use. Five out of these six (strongly) recommended guidelines included a recommendation on exercise therapy and/or patient education, with these interventions being recommended in every case. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and thermotherapy were recommended in four of these six guidelines. US, thermotherapy, low-level laser therapy, massage, passive mobilization and balneotherapy were addressed in one or two of these six guidelines.Conclusion. Six of eight clinical practice guidelines addressing physiotherapy interventions were recommended or strongly recommended according to the AGREE instrument. in general, guideline recommendations on physiotherapy intervention, from both the recommended guidelines as well as from the not recommended guidelines, lacked detail concerning mode of delivery, intensity, frequency and duration.Leiden Univ, Dept Rheumatol, Med Ctr, NL-2300 RC Leiden, NetherlandsUniv British Columbia, Dept Phys Therapy, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, CanadaArthrit Res Ctr Canada, Vancouver, BC, CanadaLeiden Univ, Dept Orthopaed, Med Ctr, NL-2300 RC Leiden, NetherlandsUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Phys Therapy, São Paulo, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Phys Therapy, São Paulo, BrazilWeb of ScienceOxford Univ PressLeiden UnivUniv British ColumbiaArthrit Res Ctr CanadaUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Hurkmans, Emalie J.Jones, Anamaria [UNIFESP]Li, Linda C.Vlieland, Theodora P. M. Vliet2016-01-24T14:17:14Z2016-01-24T14:17:14Z2011-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion1879-1888http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/ker195Rheumatology. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press, v. 50, n. 10, p. 1879-1888, 2011.10.1093/rheumatology/ker1951462-0324http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/34072WOS:000295172600021engRheumatologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://www.oxfordjournals.org/access_purchase/self-archiving_policyb.htmlreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2023-03-24T15:34:37Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/34072Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652023-03-24T15:34:37Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines on the use of physiotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review |
title |
Quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines on the use of physiotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review |
spellingShingle |
Quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines on the use of physiotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review Hurkmans, Emalie J. Guidelines Physiotherapy RA Quality appraisal |
title_short |
Quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines on the use of physiotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review |
title_full |
Quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines on the use of physiotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review |
title_fullStr |
Quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines on the use of physiotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines on the use of physiotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review |
title_sort |
Quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines on the use of physiotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review |
author |
Hurkmans, Emalie J. |
author_facet |
Hurkmans, Emalie J. Jones, Anamaria [UNIFESP] Li, Linda C. Vlieland, Theodora P. M. Vliet |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Jones, Anamaria [UNIFESP] Li, Linda C. Vlieland, Theodora P. M. Vliet |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Leiden Univ Univ British Columbia Arthrit Res Ctr Canada Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Hurkmans, Emalie J. Jones, Anamaria [UNIFESP] Li, Linda C. Vlieland, Theodora P. M. Vliet |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Guidelines Physiotherapy RA Quality appraisal |
topic |
Guidelines Physiotherapy RA Quality appraisal |
description |
Objective. To assess the quality of guidelines published in peer-reviewed literature concerning the role of physiotherapy in the management of patients with RA.Methods. A systematic literature search for clinical practice guidelines that included physiotherapy interventions was performed in four electronic databases. We assessed the quality of the selected guidelines using the appraisal of guidelines for research and evaluation (AGREE) instrument. in addition, the recommendations of guidelines with the highest quality scores were summarized.Results. Eight clinical practice guidelines fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Scope/purpose was the most often adequately addressed AGREE domain (in seven of the eight guidelines) and applicability the least (in two of the eight guidelines). Based on the AGREE domain scores, six guidelines could be recommended or strongly recommended for clinical use. Five out of these six (strongly) recommended guidelines included a recommendation on exercise therapy and/or patient education, with these interventions being recommended in every case. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and thermotherapy were recommended in four of these six guidelines. US, thermotherapy, low-level laser therapy, massage, passive mobilization and balneotherapy were addressed in one or two of these six guidelines.Conclusion. Six of eight clinical practice guidelines addressing physiotherapy interventions were recommended or strongly recommended according to the AGREE instrument. in general, guideline recommendations on physiotherapy intervention, from both the recommended guidelines as well as from the not recommended guidelines, lacked detail concerning mode of delivery, intensity, frequency and duration. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-10-01 2016-01-24T14:17:14Z 2016-01-24T14:17:14Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/ker195 Rheumatology. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press, v. 50, n. 10, p. 1879-1888, 2011. 10.1093/rheumatology/ker195 1462-0324 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/34072 WOS:000295172600021 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/ker195 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/34072 |
identifier_str_mv |
Rheumatology. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press, v. 50, n. 10, p. 1879-1888, 2011. 10.1093/rheumatology/ker195 1462-0324 WOS:000295172600021 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Rheumatology |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://www.oxfordjournals.org/access_purchase/self-archiving_policyb.html |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://www.oxfordjournals.org/access_purchase/self-archiving_policyb.html |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
1879-1888 |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Oxford Univ Press |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Oxford Univ Press |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) instacron:UNIFESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
instacron_str |
UNIFESP |
institution |
UNIFESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br |
_version_ |
1814268307896795136 |