Precision and Accuracy of Oxygen Flow Meters Used at Hospital Settings

• Autor(a) principal: Davidson, Josy [UNIFESP]
• Data de Publicação: 2012
• Outros Autores: Gazzeta, Claudia [UNIFESP], Torres, Luciano C. [UNIFESP], Jardim, José Roberto [UNIFESP], Nascimento, Oliver Augusto [UNIFESP]
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
• Texto Completo: http://rc.rcjournal.com/content/57/7/1071.short; http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/35026
• topic: oxygen inhalation therapy; laboratory test; instrumentation

BACKGROUND: Oxygen therapy is an important therapeutic resource for patients with hypoxemia. When changing oxygen flow meters, we have observed that sometimes, even with the same oxygen flow setting as before, a different S-pO2 is obtained. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the precision and accuracy of flow meters used in hospital settings. METHODS: An experimental study was performed to test oxygen flow meters from a tertiary hospital, by using a calibrated flow analyzer. Used and new flow meter accuracy was tested by reading in the gas analyzer a single measurement at flow rates of 1, 3, 5, and 10 L/min in 91 flow meters, and they were compared using the Student t test or Mann-Whitney U test. Flow meter precision was tested by reading in the flow analyzer 3 repetitive measurements set at flow rates of 1, 3, 5, and 10 L/min in 11 flow meters, and the reproducibility of these measurements was conducted by using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the Friedman test. RESULTS: the mean measured flow rates were slightly lower than the stipulated flow rate at 1 L/min, very close for 3 L/min, and higher for the 5 and 10 L/min flow rates. There was a large variability among the measurements from different flow meters, mainly at low flow rates (1 and 3 L/min). There was no difference between new and used flow meters at the flow rates measured, except at 10 L/min. Flow meters precision analysis showed a good reproducibility in 3 repetitive measurements for each flow rate (minimum 0.95, maximum 0.99 intraclass correlations). CONCLUSIONS: the flow meters tested showed good precision and poor accuracy.