Comparative study of the healing process of the aponeurosis of the anterior abdominal wall of rats after wound closure using 3-0 nylon suture and N-butil-2-cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Batista, Carlos Augusto Marques [UNIFESP]
Data de Publicação: 2008
Outros Autores: Colleoni Neto, Ramiro [UNIFESP], Lopes Filho, Gaspar de Jesus [UNIFESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
dARK ID: ark:/48912/001300001166r
DOI: 10.1590/S0102-86502008000400010
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-86502008000400010
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/4480
Resumo: PURPOSE: To investigate the healing process of the aponeurosis of the anterior abdominal wall of rats, comparing two different materials for wound closure: 3-0 nylon suture and tissue adhesive N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate. METHODS: Forty-four Wistar rats were randomly divided into four groups according to the type of material used (suture or adhesive) and the number of days until reoperation (seven or 14 days). After a 4 cm incision in the aponeurosis, 22 rats underwent wound closure using 3-0 nylon suture and the other 22, the tissue adhesive. After seven days, 11 rats from each group were weighed again, submitted to reoperation and then euthanized. The same procedure was carried out after 14 days with the remaining rats. The surgical wound was macroscopically examined, the tensile strength was measured and the tissue edges were histologically examined. The statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance and Cox's proportional hazards model. Significance level was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: The animals lost on average 20 g over the period between the two operations. Wound closure was faster using the tissue adhesive. Only one animal, from the tissue adhesive group, had a small abscess with wound dehiscence. With regard to tensile strength, the best results were obtained with the tissue adhesive 14 days after the first surgery. The results of the histological examination showed no significant difference between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Upon morphological evaluation, the two types of material analyzed in this study (3-0 nylon suture and N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate, a tissue adhesive) were not significantly different with regard to the healing process of the aponeurosis of the anterior abdominal wall of rats. Wound closure using the tissue adhesive was faster. Higher tensile strength was observed in the tissue adhesive group 14 days after the first surgery.
id UFSP_c97588ebfe1f12f54a5e3073c04b3dac
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/4480
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling Comparative study of the healing process of the aponeurosis of the anterior abdominal wall of rats after wound closure using 3-0 nylon suture and N-butil-2-cyanoacrylate tissue adhesiveEstudo comparativo da cicatrização da aponeurose da parede abdominal anterior com a utilização do fio de poliamida monofilamentar 3-0 e o adesivo N-Butil-2-Cianoacrilato em ratosSuture TechniquesWound HealingCyanoacrylateAbdominal wallAponeurosisRatsTécnicas de SuturaCicatrização de FeridasCianoacrilatoParede abdominalAponeuroseRatosPURPOSE: To investigate the healing process of the aponeurosis of the anterior abdominal wall of rats, comparing two different materials for wound closure: 3-0 nylon suture and tissue adhesive N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate. METHODS: Forty-four Wistar rats were randomly divided into four groups according to the type of material used (suture or adhesive) and the number of days until reoperation (seven or 14 days). After a 4 cm incision in the aponeurosis, 22 rats underwent wound closure using 3-0 nylon suture and the other 22, the tissue adhesive. After seven days, 11 rats from each group were weighed again, submitted to reoperation and then euthanized. The same procedure was carried out after 14 days with the remaining rats. The surgical wound was macroscopically examined, the tensile strength was measured and the tissue edges were histologically examined. The statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance and Cox's proportional hazards model. Significance level was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: The animals lost on average 20 g over the period between the two operations. Wound closure was faster using the tissue adhesive. Only one animal, from the tissue adhesive group, had a small abscess with wound dehiscence. With regard to tensile strength, the best results were obtained with the tissue adhesive 14 days after the first surgery. The results of the histological examination showed no significant difference between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Upon morphological evaluation, the two types of material analyzed in this study (3-0 nylon suture and N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate, a tissue adhesive) were not significantly different with regard to the healing process of the aponeurosis of the anterior abdominal wall of rats. Wound closure using the tissue adhesive was faster. Higher tensile strength was observed in the tissue adhesive group 14 days after the first surgery.OBJETIVO: Investigar o processo de cicatrização da aponeurose da parede abdominal anterior em ratos, comparando dois diferentes materiais de sutura: fio de poliamida monofilamentar 3-0 e adesivo N-butil-2-cianoacrilato. MÉTODOS: Quarenta e quatro ratos Wistar, foram divididos aleatoriamente em quatro grupos, de acordo com o material de síntese (fio e adesivo cirúrgico) e o tempo de reoperação (7 e 14 dias). Após uma incisão de 4 cm na aponeurose, 22 animais foram submetidos à síntese com o fio de poliamida e os outros 22 animais com o adesivo proposto. Após o procedimento, aguardou-se um período de 7 e 14 dias, quando os animais, 11 de cada grupo, foram novamente pesados e submetidos à eutanásia, sendo realizada a avaliação macroscópica da ferida operatória, mensuração da força de ruptura da parede abdominal e estudo histológico das bordas da incisão. A análise estatística foi realizada através de um modelo de análise de variância e de riscos proporcionais de Cox, considerando significantes valores de p < 0,05. RESULTADOS: Os animais apresentaram uma perda média de 20 g, do dia da operação para o dia da reoperação. A síntese da aponeurose com o adesivo tecidual foi o método mais rápido. Apenas um animal, do grupo adesivo tecidual, apresentou pequeno abscesso local com deiscência de sutura. Com relação à força de ruptura da aponeurose, o melhor desempenho foi do grupo adesivo tecidual, com 14 dias de pós-operatório. Quanto ao estudo histológico, os resultados não mostraram diferença estatisticamente significante entre os dois grupos. CONCLUSÕES: O estudo do processo de cicatrização da aponeurose da parede abdominal anterior mostrou que tanto a síntese com o adesivo N-butil-2-cianoacrilato como com o fio de poliamida monofilamentar 3-0 não apresentou diferença estatisticamente significante na avaliação morfológica, enquanto que a síntese com o adesivo foi mais rápida e mais resistente ao teste de força de ruptura no 14° dia do que a síntese com o fio.School of Medicine of ValençaFederal University of São Paulo School of MedicineUNIFESP School of Medicine Department of SurgeryUNIFESP, School of MedicineUNIFESP, School of Medicine Department of SurgerySciELOSociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em CirurgiaSchool of Medicine of ValençaUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Batista, Carlos Augusto Marques [UNIFESP]Colleoni Neto, Ramiro [UNIFESP]Lopes Filho, Gaspar de Jesus [UNIFESP]2015-06-14T13:38:39Z2015-06-14T13:38:39Z2008-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion352-363application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-86502008000400010Acta Cirurgica Brasileira. Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia, v. 23, n. 4, p. 352-363, 2008.10.1590/S0102-86502008000400010S0102-86502008000400010.pdf0102-8650S0102-86502008000400010http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/4480WOS:000260318300010ark:/48912/001300001166rengActa Cirurgica Brasileirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-07-28T17:33:12Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/4480Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-12-11T20:49:05.052238Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparative study of the healing process of the aponeurosis of the anterior abdominal wall of rats after wound closure using 3-0 nylon suture and N-butil-2-cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive
Estudo comparativo da cicatrização da aponeurose da parede abdominal anterior com a utilização do fio de poliamida monofilamentar 3-0 e o adesivo N-Butil-2-Cianoacrilato em ratos
title Comparative study of the healing process of the aponeurosis of the anterior abdominal wall of rats after wound closure using 3-0 nylon suture and N-butil-2-cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive
spellingShingle Comparative study of the healing process of the aponeurosis of the anterior abdominal wall of rats after wound closure using 3-0 nylon suture and N-butil-2-cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive
Comparative study of the healing process of the aponeurosis of the anterior abdominal wall of rats after wound closure using 3-0 nylon suture and N-butil-2-cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive
Batista, Carlos Augusto Marques [UNIFESP]
Suture Techniques
Wound Healing
Cyanoacrylate
Abdominal wall
Aponeurosis
Rats
Técnicas de Sutura
Cicatrização de Feridas
Cianoacrilato
Parede abdominal
Aponeurose
Ratos
Batista, Carlos Augusto Marques [UNIFESP]
Suture Techniques
Wound Healing
Cyanoacrylate
Abdominal wall
Aponeurosis
Rats
Técnicas de Sutura
Cicatrização de Feridas
Cianoacrilato
Parede abdominal
Aponeurose
Ratos
title_short Comparative study of the healing process of the aponeurosis of the anterior abdominal wall of rats after wound closure using 3-0 nylon suture and N-butil-2-cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive
title_full Comparative study of the healing process of the aponeurosis of the anterior abdominal wall of rats after wound closure using 3-0 nylon suture and N-butil-2-cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive
title_fullStr Comparative study of the healing process of the aponeurosis of the anterior abdominal wall of rats after wound closure using 3-0 nylon suture and N-butil-2-cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive
Comparative study of the healing process of the aponeurosis of the anterior abdominal wall of rats after wound closure using 3-0 nylon suture and N-butil-2-cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study of the healing process of the aponeurosis of the anterior abdominal wall of rats after wound closure using 3-0 nylon suture and N-butil-2-cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive
Comparative study of the healing process of the aponeurosis of the anterior abdominal wall of rats after wound closure using 3-0 nylon suture and N-butil-2-cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive
title_sort Comparative study of the healing process of the aponeurosis of the anterior abdominal wall of rats after wound closure using 3-0 nylon suture and N-butil-2-cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive
author Batista, Carlos Augusto Marques [UNIFESP]
author_facet Batista, Carlos Augusto Marques [UNIFESP]
Batista, Carlos Augusto Marques [UNIFESP]
Colleoni Neto, Ramiro [UNIFESP]
Lopes Filho, Gaspar de Jesus [UNIFESP]
Colleoni Neto, Ramiro [UNIFESP]
Lopes Filho, Gaspar de Jesus [UNIFESP]
author_role author
author2 Colleoni Neto, Ramiro [UNIFESP]
Lopes Filho, Gaspar de Jesus [UNIFESP]
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv School of Medicine of Valença
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Batista, Carlos Augusto Marques [UNIFESP]
Colleoni Neto, Ramiro [UNIFESP]
Lopes Filho, Gaspar de Jesus [UNIFESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Suture Techniques
Wound Healing
Cyanoacrylate
Abdominal wall
Aponeurosis
Rats
Técnicas de Sutura
Cicatrização de Feridas
Cianoacrilato
Parede abdominal
Aponeurose
Ratos
topic Suture Techniques
Wound Healing
Cyanoacrylate
Abdominal wall
Aponeurosis
Rats
Técnicas de Sutura
Cicatrização de Feridas
Cianoacrilato
Parede abdominal
Aponeurose
Ratos
description PURPOSE: To investigate the healing process of the aponeurosis of the anterior abdominal wall of rats, comparing two different materials for wound closure: 3-0 nylon suture and tissue adhesive N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate. METHODS: Forty-four Wistar rats were randomly divided into four groups according to the type of material used (suture or adhesive) and the number of days until reoperation (seven or 14 days). After a 4 cm incision in the aponeurosis, 22 rats underwent wound closure using 3-0 nylon suture and the other 22, the tissue adhesive. After seven days, 11 rats from each group were weighed again, submitted to reoperation and then euthanized. The same procedure was carried out after 14 days with the remaining rats. The surgical wound was macroscopically examined, the tensile strength was measured and the tissue edges were histologically examined. The statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance and Cox's proportional hazards model. Significance level was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: The animals lost on average 20 g over the period between the two operations. Wound closure was faster using the tissue adhesive. Only one animal, from the tissue adhesive group, had a small abscess with wound dehiscence. With regard to tensile strength, the best results were obtained with the tissue adhesive 14 days after the first surgery. The results of the histological examination showed no significant difference between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Upon morphological evaluation, the two types of material analyzed in this study (3-0 nylon suture and N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate, a tissue adhesive) were not significantly different with regard to the healing process of the aponeurosis of the anterior abdominal wall of rats. Wound closure using the tissue adhesive was faster. Higher tensile strength was observed in the tissue adhesive group 14 days after the first surgery.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-08-01
2015-06-14T13:38:39Z
2015-06-14T13:38:39Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-86502008000400010
Acta Cirurgica Brasileira. Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia, v. 23, n. 4, p. 352-363, 2008.
10.1590/S0102-86502008000400010
S0102-86502008000400010.pdf
0102-8650
S0102-86502008000400010
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/4480
WOS:000260318300010
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv ark:/48912/001300001166r
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-86502008000400010
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/4480
identifier_str_mv Acta Cirurgica Brasileira. Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia, v. 23, n. 4, p. 352-363, 2008.
10.1590/S0102-86502008000400010
S0102-86502008000400010.pdf
0102-8650
S0102-86502008000400010
WOS:000260318300010
ark:/48912/001300001166r
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Acta Cirurgica Brasileira
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 352-363
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br
_version_ 1822219240475721728
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0102-86502008000400010