A randomized double-blind controlled trial of sulphasalazine combined with pulses of methylprednisolone or placebo in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ciconelli, Rozana Mesquita [UNIFESP]
Data de Publicação: 1996
Outros Autores: Ferraz,Marcos Bosi [UNIFESP], Visioni, R. A., Oliveira, L. M., Atra, Edgard [UNIFESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.unifesp.br/11600/43196
http://rheumatology.oxfordjournals.org/content/35/2/150.abstract
Resumo: Thirty-eight patients with rheumatoid arthritis meeting American College of Rheumatism (ACR) criteria were entered in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of 6 months to assess whether monthly treatment with i.v. methylprednisolone (MP) enhances or accelerates the efficacy of sulphasalazine (SSZ). All patients had failed at least one second-line agent and were randomized to receive SSZ (2 g/day) and pulses of MP (5 mg/kg), or SSZ (2 g/day) and pulses of saline (SA). A single infusion of 2 h was carried out in both groups for a total of three times (0, 1 and 2 months). The two groups were comparable at baseline regarding their demographic and clinical characteristics. Disease activity was evaluated every 2 months by means of: (1) joint count; (2) morning stiffness; (3) grip strength;(4) visual analogue pain score; (5) health assessment questionnaire; and (6) erythrocyte sedimentation rate. All outcome measures improved significantly in both groups (P < 0.001). Evaluation at each follow-up visit showed no significant differences between the groups in any of the adverse effects attributable to SSZ therapy (one SA vs two MP). Adverse effects attributable to SA/MP therapy were rare and mild. We concluded that repeated pulses of MP during the first 3 months of treatment did not improve the efficacy of SSZ. Therefore, there is no justification for using MP in this way during the induction phase of SSZ therapy.
id UFSP_cef70e3f2331fa510c4b3e29f008dc27
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/43196
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling Ciconelli, Rozana Mesquita [UNIFESP]Ferraz,Marcos Bosi [UNIFESP]Visioni, R. A.Oliveira, L. M.Atra, Edgard [UNIFESP]Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)2018-06-15T16:39:07Z2018-06-15T16:39:07Z1996-02-01British Journal Of Rheumatology. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press United Kingdom, v. 35, n. 2, p. 150-154, 1996.0263-7103http://repositorio.unifesp.br/11600/43196http://rheumatology.oxfordjournals.org/content/35/2/150.abstractWOS:A1996UD88700012Thirty-eight patients with rheumatoid arthritis meeting American College of Rheumatism (ACR) criteria were entered in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of 6 months to assess whether monthly treatment with i.v. methylprednisolone (MP) enhances or accelerates the efficacy of sulphasalazine (SSZ). All patients had failed at least one second-line agent and were randomized to receive SSZ (2 g/day) and pulses of MP (5 mg/kg), or SSZ (2 g/day) and pulses of saline (SA). A single infusion of 2 h was carried out in both groups for a total of three times (0, 1 and 2 months). The two groups were comparable at baseline regarding their demographic and clinical characteristics. Disease activity was evaluated every 2 months by means of: (1) joint count; (2) morning stiffness; (3) grip strength;(4) visual analogue pain score; (5) health assessment questionnaire; and (6) erythrocyte sedimentation rate. All outcome measures improved significantly in both groups (P < 0.001). Evaluation at each follow-up visit showed no significant differences between the groups in any of the adverse effects attributable to SSZ therapy (one SA vs two MP). Adverse effects attributable to SA/MP therapy were rare and mild. We concluded that repeated pulses of MP during the first 3 months of treatment did not improve the efficacy of SSZ. Therefore, there is no justification for using MP in this way during the induction phase of SSZ therapy.ESCOLA PAULISTA MED,DISCIPLINE REUMATOL,DEPT MED,DIV RHEUMATOL,RUA BOTUCATU 740,BR-04023062 SAO PAULO,BRAZILESCOLA PAULISTA MED,DISCIPLINE REUMATOL,DEPT MED,DIV RHEUMATOL,RUA BOTUCATU 740,BR-04023062 SAO PAULO,BRAZILWeb of Science150-154engOxford Univ Press United KingdomBritish Journal Of Rheumatologyhttp://www.oxfordjournals.org/access_purchase/self-archiving_policyb.htmlinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesssulphasalazinemethylprednisolonecombination therapyrheumatoid arthritisA randomized double-blind controlled trial of sulphasalazine combined with pulses of methylprednisolone or placebo in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP11600/431962021-10-04 21:23:54.797metadata only accessoai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/43196Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:34652023-05-25T12:24:28.422918Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.en.fl_str_mv A randomized double-blind controlled trial of sulphasalazine combined with pulses of methylprednisolone or placebo in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis
title A randomized double-blind controlled trial of sulphasalazine combined with pulses of methylprednisolone or placebo in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis
spellingShingle A randomized double-blind controlled trial of sulphasalazine combined with pulses of methylprednisolone or placebo in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis
Ciconelli, Rozana Mesquita [UNIFESP]
sulphasalazine
methylprednisolone
combination therapy
rheumatoid arthritis
title_short A randomized double-blind controlled trial of sulphasalazine combined with pulses of methylprednisolone or placebo in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis
title_full A randomized double-blind controlled trial of sulphasalazine combined with pulses of methylprednisolone or placebo in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis
title_fullStr A randomized double-blind controlled trial of sulphasalazine combined with pulses of methylprednisolone or placebo in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis
title_full_unstemmed A randomized double-blind controlled trial of sulphasalazine combined with pulses of methylprednisolone or placebo in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis
title_sort A randomized double-blind controlled trial of sulphasalazine combined with pulses of methylprednisolone or placebo in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis
author Ciconelli, Rozana Mesquita [UNIFESP]
author_facet Ciconelli, Rozana Mesquita [UNIFESP]
Ferraz,Marcos Bosi [UNIFESP]
Visioni, R. A.
Oliveira, L. M.
Atra, Edgard [UNIFESP]
author_role author
author2 Ferraz,Marcos Bosi [UNIFESP]
Visioni, R. A.
Oliveira, L. M.
Atra, Edgard [UNIFESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.institution.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ciconelli, Rozana Mesquita [UNIFESP]
Ferraz,Marcos Bosi [UNIFESP]
Visioni, R. A.
Oliveira, L. M.
Atra, Edgard [UNIFESP]
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv sulphasalazine
methylprednisolone
combination therapy
rheumatoid arthritis
topic sulphasalazine
methylprednisolone
combination therapy
rheumatoid arthritis
description Thirty-eight patients with rheumatoid arthritis meeting American College of Rheumatism (ACR) criteria were entered in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of 6 months to assess whether monthly treatment with i.v. methylprednisolone (MP) enhances or accelerates the efficacy of sulphasalazine (SSZ). All patients had failed at least one second-line agent and were randomized to receive SSZ (2 g/day) and pulses of MP (5 mg/kg), or SSZ (2 g/day) and pulses of saline (SA). A single infusion of 2 h was carried out in both groups for a total of three times (0, 1 and 2 months). The two groups were comparable at baseline regarding their demographic and clinical characteristics. Disease activity was evaluated every 2 months by means of: (1) joint count; (2) morning stiffness; (3) grip strength;(4) visual analogue pain score; (5) health assessment questionnaire; and (6) erythrocyte sedimentation rate. All outcome measures improved significantly in both groups (P < 0.001). Evaluation at each follow-up visit showed no significant differences between the groups in any of the adverse effects attributable to SSZ therapy (one SA vs two MP). Adverse effects attributable to SA/MP therapy were rare and mild. We concluded that repeated pulses of MP during the first 3 months of treatment did not improve the efficacy of SSZ. Therefore, there is no justification for using MP in this way during the induction phase of SSZ therapy.
publishDate 1996
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 1996-02-01
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2018-06-15T16:39:07Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2018-06-15T16:39:07Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv British Journal Of Rheumatology. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press United Kingdom, v. 35, n. 2, p. 150-154, 1996.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.unifesp.br/11600/43196
http://rheumatology.oxfordjournals.org/content/35/2/150.abstract
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 0263-7103
dc.identifier.wos.none.fl_str_mv WOS:A1996UD88700012
identifier_str_mv British Journal Of Rheumatology. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press United Kingdom, v. 35, n. 2, p. 150-154, 1996.
0263-7103
WOS:A1996UD88700012
url http://repositorio.unifesp.br/11600/43196
http://rheumatology.oxfordjournals.org/content/35/2/150.abstract
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.none.fl_str_mv British Journal Of Rheumatology
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv http://www.oxfordjournals.org/access_purchase/self-archiving_policyb.html
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://www.oxfordjournals.org/access_purchase/self-archiving_policyb.html
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 150-154
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Oxford Univ Press United Kingdom
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Oxford Univ Press United Kingdom
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1783460286969151488