Estudo comparativo dos procedimentos percutâneos orientados por métodos de imagem no tratamento das coleções hepáticas
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2001 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-39842001000200006 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/1146 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare the efficacy of percutaneous needle aspiration and percutaneous catheter drainage, both guided by imaging methods, for the treatment of liver abscesses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 52 patients referred to our service for percutaneous treatment of abdominal abscesses, 17 presented liver abscesses, 13 of which were considered noncomplex and four were considered complex (multiloculated, multiple or associated to fistulas). Percutaneous needle aspiration was performed in 7/17 patients and 10/17 patients were submitted to percutaneous catheter drainage. The method used was considered successful when there was complete abscess resolution with both clinical and laboratorial improvement. RESULTS: The procedures were successful in 82.4% of all cases. In the group submitted to percutaneous needle aspiration the rate of success was 57.1% and in the group submitted to percutaneous catheter drainage the rate of success was 100%. Successful treatment was achieved in 75% of the patients submitted to percutaneous needle aspiration for abscesses smaller than 100 ml, but in only 33.3% of the patients with abscesses between 100 and 250 ml. There was complete resolution of the abscesses with percutaneous needle aspiration in 75% of the simple abscesses and in 25% of the complex abscesses. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous catheter drainage is more effective than percutaneous needle aspiration for the treatment of liver abscesses. Needle aspiration may probably be used as a valid alternative for smaller and noncomplex abscesses. |
id |
UFSP_dfe367f1c604a53c6922dfc9ae801c22 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/1146 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository_id_str |
3465 |
spelling |
Estudo comparativo dos procedimentos percutâneos orientados por métodos de imagem no tratamento das coleções hepáticasA comparative study of image-guided percutaneous procedures for the treatment of liver abscessesLiver abscessesPercutaneous needle aspirationPercutaneous catheter drainageColeções hepáticasPunção aspirativaDrenagem percutâneaOBJECTIVE: To determine and compare the efficacy of percutaneous needle aspiration and percutaneous catheter drainage, both guided by imaging methods, for the treatment of liver abscesses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 52 patients referred to our service for percutaneous treatment of abdominal abscesses, 17 presented liver abscesses, 13 of which were considered noncomplex and four were considered complex (multiloculated, multiple or associated to fistulas). Percutaneous needle aspiration was performed in 7/17 patients and 10/17 patients were submitted to percutaneous catheter drainage. The method used was considered successful when there was complete abscess resolution with both clinical and laboratorial improvement. RESULTS: The procedures were successful in 82.4% of all cases. In the group submitted to percutaneous needle aspiration the rate of success was 57.1% and in the group submitted to percutaneous catheter drainage the rate of success was 100%. Successful treatment was achieved in 75% of the patients submitted to percutaneous needle aspiration for abscesses smaller than 100 ml, but in only 33.3% of the patients with abscesses between 100 and 250 ml. There was complete resolution of the abscesses with percutaneous needle aspiration in 75% of the simple abscesses and in 25% of the complex abscesses. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous catheter drainage is more effective than percutaneous needle aspiration for the treatment of liver abscesses. Needle aspiration may probably be used as a valid alternative for smaller and noncomplex abscesses.OBJETIVO: Verificar e comparar a eficácia da punção aspirativa e da drenagem percutânea, orientadas por métodos de imagem, no tratamento das coleções hepáticas. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Foram encaminhados, ao nosso setor, 52 pacientes para tratamento percutâneo de coleções abdominais. Destes, 17 apresentavam coleções hepáticas, sendo 13/17 não-complexas e 4/17, complexas (multiloculadas, múltiplas ou associadas a fístulas). Foram submetidas a punção aspirativa 7/17 coleções (41,2%) e a drenagem percutânea, 10/17 (58,8%). Considerou-se como sucesso do método a resolução completa da coleção, com melhora clínica e laboratorial do paciente. RESULTADOS: O sucesso do procedimento ocorreu em 82,4% dos casos. Nas coleções submetidas exclusivamente a punção aspirativa, obteve-se sucesso em 57,1%, enquanto nas submetidas a drenagem percutânea o sucesso foi de 100%. O índice de sucesso no grupo submetido a punção aspirativa foi de 75% nas coleções menores que 100 ml, e de 33,3% naquelas entre 100 e 250 ml. Houve sucesso com a punção aspirativa em 75% das coleções não-complexas e em 25% das complexas. CONCLUSÃO: A drenagem percutânea é mais eficaz que a punção aspirativa no tratamento das coleções hepáticas. A punção aspirativa talvez possa ser empregada como alternativa válida nas coleções de menor volume e não-complexas.UNIFESP-EPM Departamento de Diagnóstico por ImagemUNIFESP, EPM, Depto. de Diagnóstico por ImagemSciELOColégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por ImagemUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Mello, Giselle Guedes Netto de [UNIFESP]Meirelles, Gustavo de Souza Portes [UNIFESP]Oliveira, José Marcelo Amatuzzi de [UNIFESP]Ajzen, Sergio Aron [UNIFESP]D'Ippolito, Giuseppe [UNIFESP]Szejnfeld, Jacob [UNIFESP]2015-06-14T13:29:22Z2015-06-14T13:29:22Z2001-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion83-88application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-39842001000200006Radiologia Brasileira. Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem, v. 34, n. 2, p. 83-88, 2001.10.1590/S0100-39842001000200006S0100-39842001000200006.pdf0100-3984S0100-39842001000200006http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/1146porRadiologia Brasileirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-07-29T16:05:26Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/1146Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-07-29T16:05:26Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Estudo comparativo dos procedimentos percutâneos orientados por métodos de imagem no tratamento das coleções hepáticas A comparative study of image-guided percutaneous procedures for the treatment of liver abscesses |
title |
Estudo comparativo dos procedimentos percutâneos orientados por métodos de imagem no tratamento das coleções hepáticas |
spellingShingle |
Estudo comparativo dos procedimentos percutâneos orientados por métodos de imagem no tratamento das coleções hepáticas Mello, Giselle Guedes Netto de [UNIFESP] Liver abscesses Percutaneous needle aspiration Percutaneous catheter drainage Coleções hepáticas Punção aspirativa Drenagem percutânea |
title_short |
Estudo comparativo dos procedimentos percutâneos orientados por métodos de imagem no tratamento das coleções hepáticas |
title_full |
Estudo comparativo dos procedimentos percutâneos orientados por métodos de imagem no tratamento das coleções hepáticas |
title_fullStr |
Estudo comparativo dos procedimentos percutâneos orientados por métodos de imagem no tratamento das coleções hepáticas |
title_full_unstemmed |
Estudo comparativo dos procedimentos percutâneos orientados por métodos de imagem no tratamento das coleções hepáticas |
title_sort |
Estudo comparativo dos procedimentos percutâneos orientados por métodos de imagem no tratamento das coleções hepáticas |
author |
Mello, Giselle Guedes Netto de [UNIFESP] |
author_facet |
Mello, Giselle Guedes Netto de [UNIFESP] Meirelles, Gustavo de Souza Portes [UNIFESP] Oliveira, José Marcelo Amatuzzi de [UNIFESP] Ajzen, Sergio Aron [UNIFESP] D'Ippolito, Giuseppe [UNIFESP] Szejnfeld, Jacob [UNIFESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Meirelles, Gustavo de Souza Portes [UNIFESP] Oliveira, José Marcelo Amatuzzi de [UNIFESP] Ajzen, Sergio Aron [UNIFESP] D'Ippolito, Giuseppe [UNIFESP] Szejnfeld, Jacob [UNIFESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Mello, Giselle Guedes Netto de [UNIFESP] Meirelles, Gustavo de Souza Portes [UNIFESP] Oliveira, José Marcelo Amatuzzi de [UNIFESP] Ajzen, Sergio Aron [UNIFESP] D'Ippolito, Giuseppe [UNIFESP] Szejnfeld, Jacob [UNIFESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Liver abscesses Percutaneous needle aspiration Percutaneous catheter drainage Coleções hepáticas Punção aspirativa Drenagem percutânea |
topic |
Liver abscesses Percutaneous needle aspiration Percutaneous catheter drainage Coleções hepáticas Punção aspirativa Drenagem percutânea |
description |
OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare the efficacy of percutaneous needle aspiration and percutaneous catheter drainage, both guided by imaging methods, for the treatment of liver abscesses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 52 patients referred to our service for percutaneous treatment of abdominal abscesses, 17 presented liver abscesses, 13 of which were considered noncomplex and four were considered complex (multiloculated, multiple or associated to fistulas). Percutaneous needle aspiration was performed in 7/17 patients and 10/17 patients were submitted to percutaneous catheter drainage. The method used was considered successful when there was complete abscess resolution with both clinical and laboratorial improvement. RESULTS: The procedures were successful in 82.4% of all cases. In the group submitted to percutaneous needle aspiration the rate of success was 57.1% and in the group submitted to percutaneous catheter drainage the rate of success was 100%. Successful treatment was achieved in 75% of the patients submitted to percutaneous needle aspiration for abscesses smaller than 100 ml, but in only 33.3% of the patients with abscesses between 100 and 250 ml. There was complete resolution of the abscesses with percutaneous needle aspiration in 75% of the simple abscesses and in 25% of the complex abscesses. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous catheter drainage is more effective than percutaneous needle aspiration for the treatment of liver abscesses. Needle aspiration may probably be used as a valid alternative for smaller and noncomplex abscesses. |
publishDate |
2001 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2001-04-01 2015-06-14T13:29:22Z 2015-06-14T13:29:22Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-39842001000200006 Radiologia Brasileira. Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem, v. 34, n. 2, p. 83-88, 2001. 10.1590/S0100-39842001000200006 S0100-39842001000200006.pdf 0100-3984 S0100-39842001000200006 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/1146 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-39842001000200006 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/1146 |
identifier_str_mv |
Radiologia Brasileira. Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem, v. 34, n. 2, p. 83-88, 2001. 10.1590/S0100-39842001000200006 S0100-39842001000200006.pdf 0100-3984 S0100-39842001000200006 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Radiologia Brasileira |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
83-88 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) instacron:UNIFESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
instacron_str |
UNIFESP |
institution |
UNIFESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br |
_version_ |
1814268336488316928 |