Estudo comparativo dos procedimentos percutâneos orientados por métodos de imagem no tratamento das coleções hepáticas

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mello, Giselle Guedes Netto de [UNIFESP]
Data de Publicação: 2001
Outros Autores: Meirelles, Gustavo de Souza Portes [UNIFESP], Oliveira, José Marcelo Amatuzzi de [UNIFESP], Ajzen, Sergio Aron [UNIFESP], D'Ippolito, Giuseppe [UNIFESP], Szejnfeld, Jacob [UNIFESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-39842001000200006
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/1146
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare the efficacy of percutaneous needle aspiration and percutaneous catheter drainage, both guided by imaging methods, for the treatment of liver abscesses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 52 patients referred to our service for percutaneous treatment of abdominal abscesses, 17 presented liver abscesses, 13 of which were considered noncomplex and four were considered complex (multiloculated, multiple or associated to fistulas). Percutaneous needle aspiration was performed in 7/17 patients and 10/17 patients were submitted to percutaneous catheter drainage. The method used was considered successful when there was complete abscess resolution with both clinical and laboratorial improvement. RESULTS: The procedures were successful in 82.4% of all cases. In the group submitted to percutaneous needle aspiration the rate of success was 57.1% and in the group submitted to percutaneous catheter drainage the rate of success was 100%. Successful treatment was achieved in 75% of the patients submitted to percutaneous needle aspiration for abscesses smaller than 100 ml, but in only 33.3% of the patients with abscesses between 100 and 250 ml. There was complete resolution of the abscesses with percutaneous needle aspiration in 75% of the simple abscesses and in 25% of the complex abscesses. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous catheter drainage is more effective than percutaneous needle aspiration for the treatment of liver abscesses. Needle aspiration may probably be used as a valid alternative for smaller and noncomplex abscesses.
id UFSP_dfe367f1c604a53c6922dfc9ae801c22
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/1146
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling Estudo comparativo dos procedimentos percutâneos orientados por métodos de imagem no tratamento das coleções hepáticasA comparative study of image-guided percutaneous procedures for the treatment of liver abscessesLiver abscessesPercutaneous needle aspirationPercutaneous catheter drainageColeções hepáticasPunção aspirativaDrenagem percutâneaOBJECTIVE: To determine and compare the efficacy of percutaneous needle aspiration and percutaneous catheter drainage, both guided by imaging methods, for the treatment of liver abscesses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 52 patients referred to our service for percutaneous treatment of abdominal abscesses, 17 presented liver abscesses, 13 of which were considered noncomplex and four were considered complex (multiloculated, multiple or associated to fistulas). Percutaneous needle aspiration was performed in 7/17 patients and 10/17 patients were submitted to percutaneous catheter drainage. The method used was considered successful when there was complete abscess resolution with both clinical and laboratorial improvement. RESULTS: The procedures were successful in 82.4% of all cases. In the group submitted to percutaneous needle aspiration the rate of success was 57.1% and in the group submitted to percutaneous catheter drainage the rate of success was 100%. Successful treatment was achieved in 75% of the patients submitted to percutaneous needle aspiration for abscesses smaller than 100 ml, but in only 33.3% of the patients with abscesses between 100 and 250 ml. There was complete resolution of the abscesses with percutaneous needle aspiration in 75% of the simple abscesses and in 25% of the complex abscesses. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous catheter drainage is more effective than percutaneous needle aspiration for the treatment of liver abscesses. Needle aspiration may probably be used as a valid alternative for smaller and noncomplex abscesses.OBJETIVO: Verificar e comparar a eficácia da punção aspirativa e da drenagem percutânea, orientadas por métodos de imagem, no tratamento das coleções hepáticas. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Foram encaminhados, ao nosso setor, 52 pacientes para tratamento percutâneo de coleções abdominais. Destes, 17 apresentavam coleções hepáticas, sendo 13/17 não-complexas e 4/17, complexas (multiloculadas, múltiplas ou associadas a fístulas). Foram submetidas a punção aspirativa 7/17 coleções (41,2%) e a drenagem percutânea, 10/17 (58,8%). Considerou-se como sucesso do método a resolução completa da coleção, com melhora clínica e laboratorial do paciente. RESULTADOS: O sucesso do procedimento ocorreu em 82,4% dos casos. Nas coleções submetidas exclusivamente a punção aspirativa, obteve-se sucesso em 57,1%, enquanto nas submetidas a drenagem percutânea o sucesso foi de 100%. O índice de sucesso no grupo submetido a punção aspirativa foi de 75% nas coleções menores que 100 ml, e de 33,3% naquelas entre 100 e 250 ml. Houve sucesso com a punção aspirativa em 75% das coleções não-complexas e em 25% das complexas. CONCLUSÃO: A drenagem percutânea é mais eficaz que a punção aspirativa no tratamento das coleções hepáticas. A punção aspirativa talvez possa ser empregada como alternativa válida nas coleções de menor volume e não-complexas.UNIFESP-EPM Departamento de Diagnóstico por ImagemUNIFESP, EPM, Depto. de Diagnóstico por ImagemSciELOColégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por ImagemUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Mello, Giselle Guedes Netto de [UNIFESP]Meirelles, Gustavo de Souza Portes [UNIFESP]Oliveira, José Marcelo Amatuzzi de [UNIFESP]Ajzen, Sergio Aron [UNIFESP]D'Ippolito, Giuseppe [UNIFESP]Szejnfeld, Jacob [UNIFESP]2015-06-14T13:29:22Z2015-06-14T13:29:22Z2001-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion83-88application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-39842001000200006Radiologia Brasileira. Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem, v. 34, n. 2, p. 83-88, 2001.10.1590/S0100-39842001000200006S0100-39842001000200006.pdf0100-3984S0100-39842001000200006http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/1146porRadiologia Brasileirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-07-29T16:05:26Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/1146Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-07-29T16:05:26Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Estudo comparativo dos procedimentos percutâneos orientados por métodos de imagem no tratamento das coleções hepáticas
A comparative study of image-guided percutaneous procedures for the treatment of liver abscesses
title Estudo comparativo dos procedimentos percutâneos orientados por métodos de imagem no tratamento das coleções hepáticas
spellingShingle Estudo comparativo dos procedimentos percutâneos orientados por métodos de imagem no tratamento das coleções hepáticas
Mello, Giselle Guedes Netto de [UNIFESP]
Liver abscesses
Percutaneous needle aspiration
Percutaneous catheter drainage
Coleções hepáticas
Punção aspirativa
Drenagem percutânea
title_short Estudo comparativo dos procedimentos percutâneos orientados por métodos de imagem no tratamento das coleções hepáticas
title_full Estudo comparativo dos procedimentos percutâneos orientados por métodos de imagem no tratamento das coleções hepáticas
title_fullStr Estudo comparativo dos procedimentos percutâneos orientados por métodos de imagem no tratamento das coleções hepáticas
title_full_unstemmed Estudo comparativo dos procedimentos percutâneos orientados por métodos de imagem no tratamento das coleções hepáticas
title_sort Estudo comparativo dos procedimentos percutâneos orientados por métodos de imagem no tratamento das coleções hepáticas
author Mello, Giselle Guedes Netto de [UNIFESP]
author_facet Mello, Giselle Guedes Netto de [UNIFESP]
Meirelles, Gustavo de Souza Portes [UNIFESP]
Oliveira, José Marcelo Amatuzzi de [UNIFESP]
Ajzen, Sergio Aron [UNIFESP]
D'Ippolito, Giuseppe [UNIFESP]
Szejnfeld, Jacob [UNIFESP]
author_role author
author2 Meirelles, Gustavo de Souza Portes [UNIFESP]
Oliveira, José Marcelo Amatuzzi de [UNIFESP]
Ajzen, Sergio Aron [UNIFESP]
D'Ippolito, Giuseppe [UNIFESP]
Szejnfeld, Jacob [UNIFESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mello, Giselle Guedes Netto de [UNIFESP]
Meirelles, Gustavo de Souza Portes [UNIFESP]
Oliveira, José Marcelo Amatuzzi de [UNIFESP]
Ajzen, Sergio Aron [UNIFESP]
D'Ippolito, Giuseppe [UNIFESP]
Szejnfeld, Jacob [UNIFESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Liver abscesses
Percutaneous needle aspiration
Percutaneous catheter drainage
Coleções hepáticas
Punção aspirativa
Drenagem percutânea
topic Liver abscesses
Percutaneous needle aspiration
Percutaneous catheter drainage
Coleções hepáticas
Punção aspirativa
Drenagem percutânea
description OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare the efficacy of percutaneous needle aspiration and percutaneous catheter drainage, both guided by imaging methods, for the treatment of liver abscesses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 52 patients referred to our service for percutaneous treatment of abdominal abscesses, 17 presented liver abscesses, 13 of which were considered noncomplex and four were considered complex (multiloculated, multiple or associated to fistulas). Percutaneous needle aspiration was performed in 7/17 patients and 10/17 patients were submitted to percutaneous catheter drainage. The method used was considered successful when there was complete abscess resolution with both clinical and laboratorial improvement. RESULTS: The procedures were successful in 82.4% of all cases. In the group submitted to percutaneous needle aspiration the rate of success was 57.1% and in the group submitted to percutaneous catheter drainage the rate of success was 100%. Successful treatment was achieved in 75% of the patients submitted to percutaneous needle aspiration for abscesses smaller than 100 ml, but in only 33.3% of the patients with abscesses between 100 and 250 ml. There was complete resolution of the abscesses with percutaneous needle aspiration in 75% of the simple abscesses and in 25% of the complex abscesses. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous catheter drainage is more effective than percutaneous needle aspiration for the treatment of liver abscesses. Needle aspiration may probably be used as a valid alternative for smaller and noncomplex abscesses.
publishDate 2001
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2001-04-01
2015-06-14T13:29:22Z
2015-06-14T13:29:22Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-39842001000200006
Radiologia Brasileira. Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem, v. 34, n. 2, p. 83-88, 2001.
10.1590/S0100-39842001000200006
S0100-39842001000200006.pdf
0100-3984
S0100-39842001000200006
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/1146
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-39842001000200006
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/1146
identifier_str_mv Radiologia Brasileira. Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem, v. 34, n. 2, p. 83-88, 2001.
10.1590/S0100-39842001000200006
S0100-39842001000200006.pdf
0100-3984
S0100-39842001000200006
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Radiologia Brasileira
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 83-88
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br
_version_ 1814268336488316928