Treatment of the humeral shaft fractures - minimally invasive osteosynthesis with bridge plate versus conservative treatment with functional brace: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Matsunaga, Fabio T. [UNIFESP]
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Tamaoki, Marcel J. S. [UNIFESP], Matsumoto, Marcelo H. [UNIFESP], Santos, Joao B. G. dos [UNIFESP], Faloppa, Flavio [UNIFESP], Belloti, Joao C. [UNIFESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/36644
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-246
Resumo: Background: Humeral shaft fractures account for 1 to 3% of all fractures in adults and for 20% of all humeral fractures. Non-operative treatment is still the standard treatment of isolated humeral shaft fractures, although this method can present unsatisfactory results. Surgical treatment is reserved for specific conditions. Modern concepts of internal fixation of long bone shaft fractures advocate relative stabilisation techniques with no harm to fracture zone. Recently described, minimally invasive bridge plate osteosynthesis has been shown to be a secure technique with good results for treating humeral shaft fractures. There is no good quality evidence advocating which method is more effective. This randomised controlled trial will be performed to investigate the effectiveness of surgical treatment of humeral shaft fractures with bridge plating in comparison with conservative treatment with functional brace.Methods/Design: This randomised clinical trial aims to include 110 patients with humeral shaft fractures who will be allocated after randomisation to one of the two groups: bridge plate or functional brace. Surgical treatment will be performed according to technique described by Livani and Belangero using a narrow DCP plate. Non-operative management will consist of a functional brace for 6 weeks or until fracture consolidation. All patients will be included in the same rehabilitation program and will be followed up for 1 year after intervention. the primary outcome will be the DASH score after 6 months of intervention. As secondary outcomes, we will assess SF-36 questionnaire, treatment complications, Constant score, pain (Visual Analogue Scale) and radiographs.Discussion: According to current evidence shown in a recent systematic review, this study is one of the first randomised controlled trials designed to compare two methods to treat humeral shaft fractures (functional brace and bridge plate surgery).
id UFSP_e3e25e0b5d1ba2e2c8ad11bba2b7320e
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/36644
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling Matsunaga, Fabio T. [UNIFESP]Tamaoki, Marcel J. S. [UNIFESP]Matsumoto, Marcelo H. [UNIFESP]Santos, Joao B. G. dos [UNIFESP]Faloppa, Flavio [UNIFESP]Belloti, Joao C. [UNIFESP]Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)2016-01-24T14:32:07Z2016-01-24T14:32:07Z2013-08-07Trials. London: Biomed Central Ltd, v. 14, 8 p., 2013.1745-6215http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/36644http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-246WOS000323002300002.pdf10.1186/1745-6215-14-246WOS:000323002300002Background: Humeral shaft fractures account for 1 to 3% of all fractures in adults and for 20% of all humeral fractures. Non-operative treatment is still the standard treatment of isolated humeral shaft fractures, although this method can present unsatisfactory results. Surgical treatment is reserved for specific conditions. Modern concepts of internal fixation of long bone shaft fractures advocate relative stabilisation techniques with no harm to fracture zone. Recently described, minimally invasive bridge plate osteosynthesis has been shown to be a secure technique with good results for treating humeral shaft fractures. There is no good quality evidence advocating which method is more effective. This randomised controlled trial will be performed to investigate the effectiveness of surgical treatment of humeral shaft fractures with bridge plating in comparison with conservative treatment with functional brace.Methods/Design: This randomised clinical trial aims to include 110 patients with humeral shaft fractures who will be allocated after randomisation to one of the two groups: bridge plate or functional brace. Surgical treatment will be performed according to technique described by Livani and Belangero using a narrow DCP plate. Non-operative management will consist of a functional brace for 6 weeks or until fracture consolidation. All patients will be included in the same rehabilitation program and will be followed up for 1 year after intervention. the primary outcome will be the DASH score after 6 months of intervention. As secondary outcomes, we will assess SF-36 questionnaire, treatment complications, Constant score, pain (Visual Analogue Scale) and radiographs.Discussion: According to current evidence shown in a recent systematic review, this study is one of the first randomised controlled trials designed to compare two methods to treat humeral shaft fractures (functional brace and bridge plate surgery).Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista Med Unifesp EPM, Dept Orthoped & Traumatol, São Paulo, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista Med Unifesp EPM, Dept Orthoped & Traumatol, São Paulo, BrazilFAPESP: 2011/21611-2Web of Science8engBiomed Central LtdTrialsHumeral fracturesImmobilisationFracture fixationInternalOrthopaedic fixation devicesTreatment of the humeral shaft fractures - minimally invasive osteosynthesis with bridge plate versus conservative treatment with functional brace: study protocol for a randomised controlled trialinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESPORIGINALWOS000323002300002.pdfapplication/pdf2419421${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/36644/1/WOS000323002300002.pdf05be9a3a1f415abcd1d2c0222dc04270MD51open accessTEXTWOS000323002300002.pdf.txtWOS000323002300002.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain27310${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/36644/21/WOS000323002300002.pdf.txt9be2e62d26c33403b75caf0d443a4d64MD521open accessTHUMBNAILWOS000323002300002.pdf.jpgWOS000323002300002.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg6725${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/36644/23/WOS000323002300002.pdf.jpg2c05b04f78b96eccc7662111c26171fdMD523open access11600/366442023-06-05 19:47:15.406open accessoai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/36644Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:34652023-06-05T22:47:15Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.en.fl_str_mv Treatment of the humeral shaft fractures - minimally invasive osteosynthesis with bridge plate versus conservative treatment with functional brace: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title Treatment of the humeral shaft fractures - minimally invasive osteosynthesis with bridge plate versus conservative treatment with functional brace: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
spellingShingle Treatment of the humeral shaft fractures - minimally invasive osteosynthesis with bridge plate versus conservative treatment with functional brace: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Matsunaga, Fabio T. [UNIFESP]
Humeral fractures
Immobilisation
Fracture fixation
Internal
Orthopaedic fixation devices
title_short Treatment of the humeral shaft fractures - minimally invasive osteosynthesis with bridge plate versus conservative treatment with functional brace: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full Treatment of the humeral shaft fractures - minimally invasive osteosynthesis with bridge plate versus conservative treatment with functional brace: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Treatment of the humeral shaft fractures - minimally invasive osteosynthesis with bridge plate versus conservative treatment with functional brace: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Treatment of the humeral shaft fractures - minimally invasive osteosynthesis with bridge plate versus conservative treatment with functional brace: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_sort Treatment of the humeral shaft fractures - minimally invasive osteosynthesis with bridge plate versus conservative treatment with functional brace: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
author Matsunaga, Fabio T. [UNIFESP]
author_facet Matsunaga, Fabio T. [UNIFESP]
Tamaoki, Marcel J. S. [UNIFESP]
Matsumoto, Marcelo H. [UNIFESP]
Santos, Joao B. G. dos [UNIFESP]
Faloppa, Flavio [UNIFESP]
Belloti, Joao C. [UNIFESP]
author_role author
author2 Tamaoki, Marcel J. S. [UNIFESP]
Matsumoto, Marcelo H. [UNIFESP]
Santos, Joao B. G. dos [UNIFESP]
Faloppa, Flavio [UNIFESP]
Belloti, Joao C. [UNIFESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.institution.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Matsunaga, Fabio T. [UNIFESP]
Tamaoki, Marcel J. S. [UNIFESP]
Matsumoto, Marcelo H. [UNIFESP]
Santos, Joao B. G. dos [UNIFESP]
Faloppa, Flavio [UNIFESP]
Belloti, Joao C. [UNIFESP]
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Humeral fractures
Immobilisation
Fracture fixation
Internal
Orthopaedic fixation devices
topic Humeral fractures
Immobilisation
Fracture fixation
Internal
Orthopaedic fixation devices
description Background: Humeral shaft fractures account for 1 to 3% of all fractures in adults and for 20% of all humeral fractures. Non-operative treatment is still the standard treatment of isolated humeral shaft fractures, although this method can present unsatisfactory results. Surgical treatment is reserved for specific conditions. Modern concepts of internal fixation of long bone shaft fractures advocate relative stabilisation techniques with no harm to fracture zone. Recently described, minimally invasive bridge plate osteosynthesis has been shown to be a secure technique with good results for treating humeral shaft fractures. There is no good quality evidence advocating which method is more effective. This randomised controlled trial will be performed to investigate the effectiveness of surgical treatment of humeral shaft fractures with bridge plating in comparison with conservative treatment with functional brace.Methods/Design: This randomised clinical trial aims to include 110 patients with humeral shaft fractures who will be allocated after randomisation to one of the two groups: bridge plate or functional brace. Surgical treatment will be performed according to technique described by Livani and Belangero using a narrow DCP plate. Non-operative management will consist of a functional brace for 6 weeks or until fracture consolidation. All patients will be included in the same rehabilitation program and will be followed up for 1 year after intervention. the primary outcome will be the DASH score after 6 months of intervention. As secondary outcomes, we will assess SF-36 questionnaire, treatment complications, Constant score, pain (Visual Analogue Scale) and radiographs.Discussion: According to current evidence shown in a recent systematic review, this study is one of the first randomised controlled trials designed to compare two methods to treat humeral shaft fractures (functional brace and bridge plate surgery).
publishDate 2013
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2013-08-07
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2016-01-24T14:32:07Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2016-01-24T14:32:07Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv Trials. London: Biomed Central Ltd, v. 14, 8 p., 2013.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/36644
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-246
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 1745-6215
dc.identifier.file.none.fl_str_mv WOS000323002300002.pdf
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.1186/1745-6215-14-246
dc.identifier.wos.none.fl_str_mv WOS:000323002300002
identifier_str_mv Trials. London: Biomed Central Ltd, v. 14, 8 p., 2013.
1745-6215
WOS000323002300002.pdf
10.1186/1745-6215-14-246
WOS:000323002300002
url http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/36644
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-246
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.none.fl_str_mv Trials
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 8
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Biomed Central Ltd
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Biomed Central Ltd
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv ${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/36644/1/WOS000323002300002.pdf
${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/36644/21/WOS000323002300002.pdf.txt
${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/36644/23/WOS000323002300002.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 05be9a3a1f415abcd1d2c0222dc04270
9be2e62d26c33403b75caf0d443a4d64
2c05b04f78b96eccc7662111c26171fd
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1802764216282644480