Functional outcomes of traumatic and non-traumatic rotator cuff tears after arthroscopic repair

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Kitagaki Abechain, Jose Jorge [UNIFESP]
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Godinho, Glaydson Gomes, Matsunaga, Fabio Teruo [UNIFESP], Netto, Nicola Archetti [UNIFESP], Daou, Julia Pozzetti [UNIFESP], Sugawara Tamaoki, Marcel Jun [UNIFESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/51383
http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v8.i8.631
Resumo: AIM To compare the functional outcomes of traumatic and non-traumatic rotator cuff tears after arthroscopic repair. METHODS Eighty-seven patients with rotator cuff tears following arthroscopic treatment were divided into traumatic and non-traumatic tear groups. Postoperative muscle strength and outcomes using the modified University of California, Los Angeles score were evaluated. Sex, age, affected limb and dominant limb were correlated between groups. Muscle strength of the repaired and unaffected shoulders was compared. Rotator cuff injury size was measured. RESULTS Of the 87 patients who underwent rotator cuff repairs, 35 had traumatic tears and 52 had non-traumatic tears. In patients with non-traumatic tears, the average age was 59 years, 74.5% were female, 96.1% were righthand dominant and 92.3% had their dominant shoulder affected. Patients with traumatic tears were 59.5 years hand dominant and 88.5% had their dominant shoulder affected. No difference existed in the mean modified University of California, Los Angeles score between patients with traumatic tears (33.7) compared with those with non-traumatic tears (32.8). No strength differences were observed between groups: The strength difference between the non-affected and affected sides was 1.21 kg in the non-traumatic group and 1.39 kg in the traumatic group (P = 0.576), while the strength ratio between the non-affected/affected sides was 0.805 in the nontraumatic group and 0.729 in the traumatic group (P = 0.224). CONCLUSION The functional results of traumatic rotator cuff repairs are similar to non-traumatic tears. Both outcomes are satisfactory.
id UFSP_e41e2331a6fd77288744dd0223d1c0ef
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/51383
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling Kitagaki Abechain, Jose Jorge [UNIFESP]Godinho, Glaydson GomesMatsunaga, Fabio Teruo [UNIFESP]Netto, Nicola Archetti [UNIFESP]Daou, Julia Pozzetti [UNIFESP]Sugawara Tamaoki, Marcel Jun [UNIFESP]2019-08-19T11:49:42Z2019-08-19T11:49:42Z2017World Journal Of Orthopedics. Pleasanton, v. 8, n. 8, p. 631-637, 2017.2218-5836http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/51383http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v8.i8.631WOS000408039600005.pdf10.5312/wjo.v8.i8.631WOS:000408039600005AIM To compare the functional outcomes of traumatic and non-traumatic rotator cuff tears after arthroscopic repair. METHODS Eighty-seven patients with rotator cuff tears following arthroscopic treatment were divided into traumatic and non-traumatic tear groups. Postoperative muscle strength and outcomes using the modified University of California, Los Angeles score were evaluated. Sex, age, affected limb and dominant limb were correlated between groups. Muscle strength of the repaired and unaffected shoulders was compared. Rotator cuff injury size was measured. RESULTS Of the 87 patients who underwent rotator cuff repairs, 35 had traumatic tears and 52 had non-traumatic tears. In patients with non-traumatic tears, the average age was 59 years, 74.5% were female, 96.1% were righthand dominant and 92.3% had their dominant shoulder affected. Patients with traumatic tears were 59.5 years hand dominant and 88.5% had their dominant shoulder affected. No difference existed in the mean modified University of California, Los Angeles score between patients with traumatic tears (33.7) compared with those with non-traumatic tears (32.8). No strength differences were observed between groups: The strength difference between the non-affected and affected sides was 1.21 kg in the non-traumatic group and 1.39 kg in the traumatic group (P = 0.576), while the strength ratio between the non-affected/affected sides was 0.805 in the nontraumatic group and 0.729 in the traumatic group (P = 0.224). CONCLUSION The functional results of traumatic rotator cuff repairs are similar to non-traumatic tears. Both outcomes are satisfactory.Univ Fed São Paulo, Orthoped & Traumatol Dept, Shoulder & Elbow Surg Sector Hand & Upper Limb Su, BR-04038030 São Paulo, SP, BrazilShoulder Surg Sector Hosp Ortoped Belo Horizon, BR-30210300 Belo Horizonte, MG, BrazilUniv Fed São Paulo, Orthoped & Traumatol Dept, Shoulder & Elbow Surg Sector Hand & Upper Limb Su, BR-04038030 São Paulo, SP, BrazilWeb of Science631-637engBaishideng Publishing Group IncRotator cuffShoulder painArthroscopyTendon injuriesOrthopedicsFunctional outcomes of traumatic and non-traumatic rotator cuff tears after arthroscopic repairinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESPORIGINALWOS000408039600005.pdfapplication/pdf1265309${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/51383/1/WOS000408039600005.pdf834a46a7c05a5dea2fdbbdac14695893MD51open accessTEXTWOS000408039600005.pdf.txtWOS000408039600005.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain47288${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/51383/2/WOS000408039600005.pdf.txte33ecad58b74a36beee173277b11405cMD52open accessTHUMBNAILWOS000408039600005.pdf.jpgWOS000408039600005.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg9218${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/51383/4/WOS000408039600005.pdf.jpge5944f6fef41d200947269d88ab3e522MD54open access11600/513832022-08-01 18:24:27.778open accessoai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/51383Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:34652022-08-01T21:24:27Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.en.fl_str_mv Functional outcomes of traumatic and non-traumatic rotator cuff tears after arthroscopic repair
title Functional outcomes of traumatic and non-traumatic rotator cuff tears after arthroscopic repair
spellingShingle Functional outcomes of traumatic and non-traumatic rotator cuff tears after arthroscopic repair
Kitagaki Abechain, Jose Jorge [UNIFESP]
Rotator cuff
Shoulder pain
Arthroscopy
Tendon injuries
Orthopedics
title_short Functional outcomes of traumatic and non-traumatic rotator cuff tears after arthroscopic repair
title_full Functional outcomes of traumatic and non-traumatic rotator cuff tears after arthroscopic repair
title_fullStr Functional outcomes of traumatic and non-traumatic rotator cuff tears after arthroscopic repair
title_full_unstemmed Functional outcomes of traumatic and non-traumatic rotator cuff tears after arthroscopic repair
title_sort Functional outcomes of traumatic and non-traumatic rotator cuff tears after arthroscopic repair
author Kitagaki Abechain, Jose Jorge [UNIFESP]
author_facet Kitagaki Abechain, Jose Jorge [UNIFESP]
Godinho, Glaydson Gomes
Matsunaga, Fabio Teruo [UNIFESP]
Netto, Nicola Archetti [UNIFESP]
Daou, Julia Pozzetti [UNIFESP]
Sugawara Tamaoki, Marcel Jun [UNIFESP]
author_role author
author2 Godinho, Glaydson Gomes
Matsunaga, Fabio Teruo [UNIFESP]
Netto, Nicola Archetti [UNIFESP]
Daou, Julia Pozzetti [UNIFESP]
Sugawara Tamaoki, Marcel Jun [UNIFESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Kitagaki Abechain, Jose Jorge [UNIFESP]
Godinho, Glaydson Gomes
Matsunaga, Fabio Teruo [UNIFESP]
Netto, Nicola Archetti [UNIFESP]
Daou, Julia Pozzetti [UNIFESP]
Sugawara Tamaoki, Marcel Jun [UNIFESP]
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Rotator cuff
Shoulder pain
Arthroscopy
Tendon injuries
Orthopedics
topic Rotator cuff
Shoulder pain
Arthroscopy
Tendon injuries
Orthopedics
description AIM To compare the functional outcomes of traumatic and non-traumatic rotator cuff tears after arthroscopic repair. METHODS Eighty-seven patients with rotator cuff tears following arthroscopic treatment were divided into traumatic and non-traumatic tear groups. Postoperative muscle strength and outcomes using the modified University of California, Los Angeles score were evaluated. Sex, age, affected limb and dominant limb were correlated between groups. Muscle strength of the repaired and unaffected shoulders was compared. Rotator cuff injury size was measured. RESULTS Of the 87 patients who underwent rotator cuff repairs, 35 had traumatic tears and 52 had non-traumatic tears. In patients with non-traumatic tears, the average age was 59 years, 74.5% were female, 96.1% were righthand dominant and 92.3% had their dominant shoulder affected. Patients with traumatic tears were 59.5 years hand dominant and 88.5% had their dominant shoulder affected. No difference existed in the mean modified University of California, Los Angeles score between patients with traumatic tears (33.7) compared with those with non-traumatic tears (32.8). No strength differences were observed between groups: The strength difference between the non-affected and affected sides was 1.21 kg in the non-traumatic group and 1.39 kg in the traumatic group (P = 0.576), while the strength ratio between the non-affected/affected sides was 0.805 in the nontraumatic group and 0.729 in the traumatic group (P = 0.224). CONCLUSION The functional results of traumatic rotator cuff repairs are similar to non-traumatic tears. Both outcomes are satisfactory.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2017
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2019-08-19T11:49:42Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2019-08-19T11:49:42Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv World Journal Of Orthopedics. Pleasanton, v. 8, n. 8, p. 631-637, 2017.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/51383
http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v8.i8.631
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 2218-5836
dc.identifier.file.none.fl_str_mv WOS000408039600005.pdf
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.5312/wjo.v8.i8.631
dc.identifier.wos.none.fl_str_mv WOS:000408039600005
identifier_str_mv World Journal Of Orthopedics. Pleasanton, v. 8, n. 8, p. 631-637, 2017.
2218-5836
WOS000408039600005.pdf
10.5312/wjo.v8.i8.631
WOS:000408039600005
url http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/51383
http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v8.i8.631
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 631-637
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv ${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/51383/1/WOS000408039600005.pdf
${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/51383/2/WOS000408039600005.pdf.txt
${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/51383/4/WOS000408039600005.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 834a46a7c05a5dea2fdbbdac14695893
e33ecad58b74a36beee173277b11405c
e5944f6fef41d200947269d88ab3e522
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1802764133523783680