Functional outcomes of traumatic and non-traumatic rotator cuff tears after arthroscopic repair
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
Texto Completo: | http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/51383 http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v8.i8.631 |
Resumo: | AIM To compare the functional outcomes of traumatic and non-traumatic rotator cuff tears after arthroscopic repair. METHODS Eighty-seven patients with rotator cuff tears following arthroscopic treatment were divided into traumatic and non-traumatic tear groups. Postoperative muscle strength and outcomes using the modified University of California, Los Angeles score were evaluated. Sex, age, affected limb and dominant limb were correlated between groups. Muscle strength of the repaired and unaffected shoulders was compared. Rotator cuff injury size was measured. RESULTS Of the 87 patients who underwent rotator cuff repairs, 35 had traumatic tears and 52 had non-traumatic tears. In patients with non-traumatic tears, the average age was 59 years, 74.5% were female, 96.1% were righthand dominant and 92.3% had their dominant shoulder affected. Patients with traumatic tears were 59.5 years hand dominant and 88.5% had their dominant shoulder affected. No difference existed in the mean modified University of California, Los Angeles score between patients with traumatic tears (33.7) compared with those with non-traumatic tears (32.8). No strength differences were observed between groups: The strength difference between the non-affected and affected sides was 1.21 kg in the non-traumatic group and 1.39 kg in the traumatic group (P = 0.576), while the strength ratio between the non-affected/affected sides was 0.805 in the nontraumatic group and 0.729 in the traumatic group (P = 0.224). CONCLUSION The functional results of traumatic rotator cuff repairs are similar to non-traumatic tears. Both outcomes are satisfactory. |
id |
UFSP_e41e2331a6fd77288744dd0223d1c0ef |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/51383 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository_id_str |
3465 |
spelling |
Kitagaki Abechain, Jose Jorge [UNIFESP]Godinho, Glaydson GomesMatsunaga, Fabio Teruo [UNIFESP]Netto, Nicola Archetti [UNIFESP]Daou, Julia Pozzetti [UNIFESP]Sugawara Tamaoki, Marcel Jun [UNIFESP]2019-08-19T11:49:42Z2019-08-19T11:49:42Z2017World Journal Of Orthopedics. Pleasanton, v. 8, n. 8, p. 631-637, 2017.2218-5836http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/51383http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v8.i8.631WOS000408039600005.pdf10.5312/wjo.v8.i8.631WOS:000408039600005AIM To compare the functional outcomes of traumatic and non-traumatic rotator cuff tears after arthroscopic repair. METHODS Eighty-seven patients with rotator cuff tears following arthroscopic treatment were divided into traumatic and non-traumatic tear groups. Postoperative muscle strength and outcomes using the modified University of California, Los Angeles score were evaluated. Sex, age, affected limb and dominant limb were correlated between groups. Muscle strength of the repaired and unaffected shoulders was compared. Rotator cuff injury size was measured. RESULTS Of the 87 patients who underwent rotator cuff repairs, 35 had traumatic tears and 52 had non-traumatic tears. In patients with non-traumatic tears, the average age was 59 years, 74.5% were female, 96.1% were righthand dominant and 92.3% had their dominant shoulder affected. Patients with traumatic tears were 59.5 years hand dominant and 88.5% had their dominant shoulder affected. No difference existed in the mean modified University of California, Los Angeles score between patients with traumatic tears (33.7) compared with those with non-traumatic tears (32.8). No strength differences were observed between groups: The strength difference between the non-affected and affected sides was 1.21 kg in the non-traumatic group and 1.39 kg in the traumatic group (P = 0.576), while the strength ratio between the non-affected/affected sides was 0.805 in the nontraumatic group and 0.729 in the traumatic group (P = 0.224). CONCLUSION The functional results of traumatic rotator cuff repairs are similar to non-traumatic tears. Both outcomes are satisfactory.Univ Fed São Paulo, Orthoped & Traumatol Dept, Shoulder & Elbow Surg Sector Hand & Upper Limb Su, BR-04038030 São Paulo, SP, BrazilShoulder Surg Sector Hosp Ortoped Belo Horizon, BR-30210300 Belo Horizonte, MG, BrazilUniv Fed São Paulo, Orthoped & Traumatol Dept, Shoulder & Elbow Surg Sector Hand & Upper Limb Su, BR-04038030 São Paulo, SP, BrazilWeb of Science631-637engBaishideng Publishing Group IncRotator cuffShoulder painArthroscopyTendon injuriesOrthopedicsFunctional outcomes of traumatic and non-traumatic rotator cuff tears after arthroscopic repairinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESPORIGINALWOS000408039600005.pdfapplication/pdf1265309${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/51383/1/WOS000408039600005.pdf834a46a7c05a5dea2fdbbdac14695893MD51open accessTEXTWOS000408039600005.pdf.txtWOS000408039600005.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain47288${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/51383/2/WOS000408039600005.pdf.txte33ecad58b74a36beee173277b11405cMD52open accessTHUMBNAILWOS000408039600005.pdf.jpgWOS000408039600005.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg9218${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/51383/4/WOS000408039600005.pdf.jpge5944f6fef41d200947269d88ab3e522MD54open access11600/513832022-08-01 18:24:27.778open accessoai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/51383Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:34652022-08-01T21:24:27Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false |
dc.title.en.fl_str_mv |
Functional outcomes of traumatic and non-traumatic rotator cuff tears after arthroscopic repair |
title |
Functional outcomes of traumatic and non-traumatic rotator cuff tears after arthroscopic repair |
spellingShingle |
Functional outcomes of traumatic and non-traumatic rotator cuff tears after arthroscopic repair Kitagaki Abechain, Jose Jorge [UNIFESP] Rotator cuff Shoulder pain Arthroscopy Tendon injuries Orthopedics |
title_short |
Functional outcomes of traumatic and non-traumatic rotator cuff tears after arthroscopic repair |
title_full |
Functional outcomes of traumatic and non-traumatic rotator cuff tears after arthroscopic repair |
title_fullStr |
Functional outcomes of traumatic and non-traumatic rotator cuff tears after arthroscopic repair |
title_full_unstemmed |
Functional outcomes of traumatic and non-traumatic rotator cuff tears after arthroscopic repair |
title_sort |
Functional outcomes of traumatic and non-traumatic rotator cuff tears after arthroscopic repair |
author |
Kitagaki Abechain, Jose Jorge [UNIFESP] |
author_facet |
Kitagaki Abechain, Jose Jorge [UNIFESP] Godinho, Glaydson Gomes Matsunaga, Fabio Teruo [UNIFESP] Netto, Nicola Archetti [UNIFESP] Daou, Julia Pozzetti [UNIFESP] Sugawara Tamaoki, Marcel Jun [UNIFESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Godinho, Glaydson Gomes Matsunaga, Fabio Teruo [UNIFESP] Netto, Nicola Archetti [UNIFESP] Daou, Julia Pozzetti [UNIFESP] Sugawara Tamaoki, Marcel Jun [UNIFESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Kitagaki Abechain, Jose Jorge [UNIFESP] Godinho, Glaydson Gomes Matsunaga, Fabio Teruo [UNIFESP] Netto, Nicola Archetti [UNIFESP] Daou, Julia Pozzetti [UNIFESP] Sugawara Tamaoki, Marcel Jun [UNIFESP] |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Rotator cuff Shoulder pain Arthroscopy Tendon injuries Orthopedics |
topic |
Rotator cuff Shoulder pain Arthroscopy Tendon injuries Orthopedics |
description |
AIM To compare the functional outcomes of traumatic and non-traumatic rotator cuff tears after arthroscopic repair. METHODS Eighty-seven patients with rotator cuff tears following arthroscopic treatment were divided into traumatic and non-traumatic tear groups. Postoperative muscle strength and outcomes using the modified University of California, Los Angeles score were evaluated. Sex, age, affected limb and dominant limb were correlated between groups. Muscle strength of the repaired and unaffected shoulders was compared. Rotator cuff injury size was measured. RESULTS Of the 87 patients who underwent rotator cuff repairs, 35 had traumatic tears and 52 had non-traumatic tears. In patients with non-traumatic tears, the average age was 59 years, 74.5% were female, 96.1% were righthand dominant and 92.3% had their dominant shoulder affected. Patients with traumatic tears were 59.5 years hand dominant and 88.5% had their dominant shoulder affected. No difference existed in the mean modified University of California, Los Angeles score between patients with traumatic tears (33.7) compared with those with non-traumatic tears (32.8). No strength differences were observed between groups: The strength difference between the non-affected and affected sides was 1.21 kg in the non-traumatic group and 1.39 kg in the traumatic group (P = 0.576), while the strength ratio between the non-affected/affected sides was 0.805 in the nontraumatic group and 0.729 in the traumatic group (P = 0.224). CONCLUSION The functional results of traumatic rotator cuff repairs are similar to non-traumatic tears. Both outcomes are satisfactory. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2017 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2019-08-19T11:49:42Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2019-08-19T11:49:42Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
World Journal Of Orthopedics. Pleasanton, v. 8, n. 8, p. 631-637, 2017. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/51383 http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v8.i8.631 |
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv |
2218-5836 |
dc.identifier.file.none.fl_str_mv |
WOS000408039600005.pdf |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.5312/wjo.v8.i8.631 |
dc.identifier.wos.none.fl_str_mv |
WOS:000408039600005 |
identifier_str_mv |
World Journal Of Orthopedics. Pleasanton, v. 8, n. 8, p. 631-637, 2017. 2218-5836 WOS000408039600005.pdf 10.5312/wjo.v8.i8.631 WOS:000408039600005 |
url |
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/51383 http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v8.i8.631 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
631-637 |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) instacron:UNIFESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
instacron_str |
UNIFESP |
institution |
UNIFESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/51383/1/WOS000408039600005.pdf ${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/51383/2/WOS000408039600005.pdf.txt ${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/51383/4/WOS000408039600005.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
834a46a7c05a5dea2fdbbdac14695893 e33ecad58b74a36beee173277b11405c e5944f6fef41d200947269d88ab3e522 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1802764133523783680 |