Experiência clínica com o uso de sedativos em terapia intensiva: estudo retrospectivo
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2002 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-70942002000600012 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/1549 |
Resumo: | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Among the most frequent indications for Intensive Care Unit patients sedation, one may mention artificial ventilation installation and maintenance, anxiety and uncomfortable or painful procedures. This retrospective study aimed at evaluating most common sedation indications and techniques for severe patients admitted to the Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM/UNIFESP) during an 11-month period. METHODS: After excluding patients remaining in the ICU for less than 24 hours and those without the necessary evaluation to determine their severity index (APACHE II), the sample was reduced to 307 patients. Most common techniques, sedation indications and neuromuscular blockers association were evaluated. RESULTS: Sedation was administered to 37.4% of patients. Psychiatric disorders, such as delirium, agitation, fear and anxiety, were some indications for sedation and corresponded to 25.77% of all indications. Most ventilated patients also needed sedative agents and mechanical ventilation installation and maintenance represented most indications, or approximately 57.73% of all sedated patients. Procedures, such as tracheal intubation and bronchoscopy, represented 11.34% of all indications and metabolic control (barbiturate coma and tetanus) represented 5.15% of the cases. Most common sedative techniques included opioids alone or associated to benzodiazepines. In this study, fentanyl alone was used in 58% of the cases, and fentanyl plus midazolam in 21.64% of patients. Haloperidol, diazepam, propofol and thiopental added up 19.5%. Neuromuscular blockers were used in 22.7% of mechanically in ventilated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Sedation is a common therapeutic resource for intensive care and is widely used to help mechanical ventilation and to treat psychiatric disorders. Fentanyl, alone or in association with midazolam, was the most widely used agent. |
id |
UFSP_e4bcdcc91dfc57fc1f3cefca089e186f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/1549 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository_id_str |
3465 |
spelling |
Experiência clínica com o uso de sedativos em terapia intensiva: estudo retrospectivoClinical experience with sedatives in the intensive care unit: a retrospective studyExperiencia clínica con el uso de sedativos en la terapia intensiva: estudio retrospectivoINTENSIVE CARESEDATIONSEDAÇÃOTERAPIA INTENSIVABACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Among the most frequent indications for Intensive Care Unit patients sedation, one may mention artificial ventilation installation and maintenance, anxiety and uncomfortable or painful procedures. This retrospective study aimed at evaluating most common sedation indications and techniques for severe patients admitted to the Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM/UNIFESP) during an 11-month period. METHODS: After excluding patients remaining in the ICU for less than 24 hours and those without the necessary evaluation to determine their severity index (APACHE II), the sample was reduced to 307 patients. Most common techniques, sedation indications and neuromuscular blockers association were evaluated. RESULTS: Sedation was administered to 37.4% of patients. Psychiatric disorders, such as delirium, agitation, fear and anxiety, were some indications for sedation and corresponded to 25.77% of all indications. Most ventilated patients also needed sedative agents and mechanical ventilation installation and maintenance represented most indications, or approximately 57.73% of all sedated patients. Procedures, such as tracheal intubation and bronchoscopy, represented 11.34% of all indications and metabolic control (barbiturate coma and tetanus) represented 5.15% of the cases. Most common sedative techniques included opioids alone or associated to benzodiazepines. In this study, fentanyl alone was used in 58% of the cases, and fentanyl plus midazolam in 21.64% of patients. Haloperidol, diazepam, propofol and thiopental added up 19.5%. Neuromuscular blockers were used in 22.7% of mechanically in ventilated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Sedation is a common therapeutic resource for intensive care and is widely used to help mechanical ventilation and to treat psychiatric disorders. Fentanyl, alone or in association with midazolam, was the most widely used agent.JUSTIFICATIVA Y OBJETIVOS: Entre las indicaciones más frecuentes de sedación en pacientes internados en Unidades de Terapia Intensiva (UTI) están la institución y la manutención de ventilación artificial, la ansiedad y procedimientos desconfortables o dolorosos. El objetivo de este estudio retrospectivo fue verificar las indicaciones y las técnicas más comunes de sedación en pacientes graves internados en la Unidad de Terapia Intensiva Quirúrgica de la Escuela Paulista de Medicina (EPM/UNIFESP) durante un período de 11 meses. MÉTODO: Después de haber sido excluidos los pacientes que permanecieron en la UTI menos de 24 horas o estaban sin exámenes indispensables para el cálculo del índice de gravedad (APACHE II), la muestra quedó reducida a 307 pacientes. Fueron analizadas las técnicas más utilizadas, las indicaciones de sedación y la asociación de bloqueadores neuromusculares. RESULTADOS: La sedación fue administrada en 37,4% de los pacientes. Entre las indicaciones de sedación están los disturbios de naturaleza psiquiátrica, como delirio, agitación, miedo y ansiedad. Éstas correspondieron a 25,77% de todas las indicaciones. La mayoría de los pacientes ventilados artificialmente también necesita de sedativos. Instalación y manutención de ventilación mecánica correspondieron a la mayoría de las indicaciones, alrededor de 57,73% de los pacientes sedados. Procedimientos como intubación traqueal y broncoscopia tuvieron 11,34% de las indicaciones y control del metabolismo (coma barbitúrico y tétano), 5,15%. Las técnicas mas comúnmente utilizadas incluyeron opioides aislados o asociados a benzodiazepínicos. En este estudio, el fentanil fue utilizado en 58% de las técnicas, aisladamente, y en 21,64% asociado al midazolam. Haloperidol, diazepam, propofol y tiopental sumaron 19,5%. Bloqueadores neuromusculares fueron utilizados en 22,7% de los casos en pacientes ventilados artificialmente. CONCLUSIONES: La sedación es un recurso terapéutico frecuente en la Terapia Intensiva, comúnmente utilizada para facilitar la ventilación artificial y tratar los problemas de naturaleza psiquiátrica. Fentanil, aisladamente o en asociación con midazolam, fue el agente más utilizado.JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: Dentre as indicações mais freqüentes de sedação em pacientes internados em Unidades de Terapia Intensiva (UTI) estão a instituição e a manutenção de ventilação artificial, a ansiedade e procedimentos desconfortáveis ou dolorosos. O objetivo deste estudo retrospectivo foi verificar as indicações e as técnicas mais comuns de sedação em pacientes graves internados na Unidade de Terapia Intensiva Cirúrgica da Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM/UNIFESP) durante um período de 11 meses. MÉTODO: Após terem sido excluídos os pacientes que permaneceram na UTI menos de 24 horas ou estavam sem exames indispensáveis para o cálculo do índice de gravidade (APACHE II), a amostra ficou reduzida a 307 pacientes. Foram analisadas as técnicas mais utilizadas, as indicações de sedação e a associação de bloqueadores neuromusculares. RESULTADOS: A sedação foi administrada em 37,4% dos pacientes. Entre as indicações de sedação estão os distúrbios de natureza psiquiátrica, como delírio, agitação, medo e ansiedade. Estas corresponderam a 25,77% de todas as indicações. A maioria dos pacientes ventilados artificialmente também necessita de sedativos. Instalação e manutenção de ventilação mecânica corresponderam à maioria das indicações, em torno de 57,73% dentre os pacientes sedados. Procedimentos como intubação traqueal e broncoscopia tiveram 11,34% das indicações e controle do metabolismo (coma barbitúrico e tétano), 5,15%. As técnicas mais comumente utilizadas incluíram opióides isolados ou associados a benzodiazepínicos. Neste estudo, o fentanil foi utilizado em 58% das técnicas, isoladamente, e em 21,64% associado ao midazolam. Haloperidol, diazepam, propofol e tiopental somaram 19,5%. Bloqueadores neuromusculares foram utilizados em 22,7% dos casos em pacientes ventilados artificialmente. CONCLUSÕES: A sedação é recurso terapêutico freqüente em Terapia Intensiva, comumente utilizada para facilitar a ventilação artificial e tratar os problemas de natureza psiquiátrica. Fentanil, isoladamente ou em associação com midazolam, foi o agente mais utilizado.UNESP FMB Departamento de AnestesiologiaUNIFESP-EPMUNIFESP, EPMSciELOSociedade Brasileira de AnestesiologiaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Rodrigues Júnior, Geraldo RolimAmaral, José Luiz Gomes do [UNIFESP]2015-06-14T13:29:49Z2015-06-14T13:29:49Z2002-11-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion747-755application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-70942002000600012Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia, v. 52, n. 6, p. 747-755, 2002.10.1590/S0034-70942002000600012S0034-70942002000600012.pdf0034-7094S0034-70942002000600012http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/1549porRevista Brasileira de Anestesiologiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-07-29T12:59:12Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/1549Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-07-29T12:59:12Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Experiência clínica com o uso de sedativos em terapia intensiva: estudo retrospectivo Clinical experience with sedatives in the intensive care unit: a retrospective study Experiencia clínica con el uso de sedativos en la terapia intensiva: estudio retrospectivo |
title |
Experiência clínica com o uso de sedativos em terapia intensiva: estudo retrospectivo |
spellingShingle |
Experiência clínica com o uso de sedativos em terapia intensiva: estudo retrospectivo Rodrigues Júnior, Geraldo Rolim INTENSIVE CARE SEDATION SEDAÇÃO TERAPIA INTENSIVA |
title_short |
Experiência clínica com o uso de sedativos em terapia intensiva: estudo retrospectivo |
title_full |
Experiência clínica com o uso de sedativos em terapia intensiva: estudo retrospectivo |
title_fullStr |
Experiência clínica com o uso de sedativos em terapia intensiva: estudo retrospectivo |
title_full_unstemmed |
Experiência clínica com o uso de sedativos em terapia intensiva: estudo retrospectivo |
title_sort |
Experiência clínica com o uso de sedativos em terapia intensiva: estudo retrospectivo |
author |
Rodrigues Júnior, Geraldo Rolim |
author_facet |
Rodrigues Júnior, Geraldo Rolim Amaral, José Luiz Gomes do [UNIFESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Amaral, José Luiz Gomes do [UNIFESP] |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rodrigues Júnior, Geraldo Rolim Amaral, José Luiz Gomes do [UNIFESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
INTENSIVE CARE SEDATION SEDAÇÃO TERAPIA INTENSIVA |
topic |
INTENSIVE CARE SEDATION SEDAÇÃO TERAPIA INTENSIVA |
description |
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Among the most frequent indications for Intensive Care Unit patients sedation, one may mention artificial ventilation installation and maintenance, anxiety and uncomfortable or painful procedures. This retrospective study aimed at evaluating most common sedation indications and techniques for severe patients admitted to the Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM/UNIFESP) during an 11-month period. METHODS: After excluding patients remaining in the ICU for less than 24 hours and those without the necessary evaluation to determine their severity index (APACHE II), the sample was reduced to 307 patients. Most common techniques, sedation indications and neuromuscular blockers association were evaluated. RESULTS: Sedation was administered to 37.4% of patients. Psychiatric disorders, such as delirium, agitation, fear and anxiety, were some indications for sedation and corresponded to 25.77% of all indications. Most ventilated patients also needed sedative agents and mechanical ventilation installation and maintenance represented most indications, or approximately 57.73% of all sedated patients. Procedures, such as tracheal intubation and bronchoscopy, represented 11.34% of all indications and metabolic control (barbiturate coma and tetanus) represented 5.15% of the cases. Most common sedative techniques included opioids alone or associated to benzodiazepines. In this study, fentanyl alone was used in 58% of the cases, and fentanyl plus midazolam in 21.64% of patients. Haloperidol, diazepam, propofol and thiopental added up 19.5%. Neuromuscular blockers were used in 22.7% of mechanically in ventilated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Sedation is a common therapeutic resource for intensive care and is widely used to help mechanical ventilation and to treat psychiatric disorders. Fentanyl, alone or in association with midazolam, was the most widely used agent. |
publishDate |
2002 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2002-11-01 2015-06-14T13:29:49Z 2015-06-14T13:29:49Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-70942002000600012 Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia, v. 52, n. 6, p. 747-755, 2002. 10.1590/S0034-70942002000600012 S0034-70942002000600012.pdf 0034-7094 S0034-70942002000600012 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/1549 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-70942002000600012 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/1549 |
identifier_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia, v. 52, n. 6, p. 747-755, 2002. 10.1590/S0034-70942002000600012 S0034-70942002000600012.pdf 0034-7094 S0034-70942002000600012 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
747-755 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) instacron:UNIFESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
instacron_str |
UNIFESP |
institution |
UNIFESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br |
_version_ |
1814268313391333376 |