Clinical Considerations for the Surgical Treatment of Pectoralis Major Muscle Ruptures Based on 60 Cases A Prospective Study and Literature Review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pochini, Alberto de Castro [UNIFESP]
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Andreoli, Carlos Vicente [UNIFESP], Belangero, Paulo Santoro [UNIFESP], Figueiredo, Eduardo Antonio [UNIFESP], Terra, Bernardo Barcellos [UNIFESP], Cohen, Carina [UNIFESP], Andrade, Marilia dos Santos [UNIFESP], Cohen, Moises [UNIFESP], Ejnisman, Benno [UNIFESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/37167
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0363546513506556
Resumo: Background: Early recognition of the clinical signs of ruptures of the pectoralis major muscle (PMM) in athletes by orthopaedic surgeons, physical therapists, and physical trainers may prove to be critical for patient access to surgical treatment while the injury is still in the acute phase.Hypothesis: Total ruptures of the PMM may yield a better outcome with surgical treatment than with nonoperative treatment in athletes.Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.Methods: A prospective study was performed on 60 patients with total ruptures of the PMM. the patients were followed from 1997 to 2012, with a physical examination every 6 months for the first 2 years and every 12 months thereafter. the patients' mean age was 31.21 years, and the mean length of follow-up was 48.25 months. the surgical treatment methods included reinsertion of the tendon in 51% of the patients and nonoperative treatment in 49% of the patients. All of the patients were evaluated using the Bak criteria.Results: the bench-press exercise was associated with 80% of the PMM ruptures (48 patients). Forty-one of the patients with chronic ruptures were seen after 3 months (80%). the outcomes were poor in 9 patients from the nonoperative group (31%) and in 3 patients from the surgical group (9.7%); the outcomes were fair in 12 patients from the nonoperative group and in no patients from the surgical group. Excellent results were not observed in any patient from the nonoperative group and were observed in 21 patients from the surgical group (67.7%). the isokinetic evaluation at 60 deg/s showed a decrease in strength of 41.7% in the nonsurgical group and 14.3% for the surgical group, which was significant at P < .05.Conclusion: Total ruptures of the PMM exhibit better outcomes with surgical treatment than with nonoperative treatment based on the Bak criteria in athletes.
id UFSP_ea06e1dd83ec75fd7c8c417c5591570f
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/37167
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling Pochini, Alberto de Castro [UNIFESP]Andreoli, Carlos Vicente [UNIFESP]Belangero, Paulo Santoro [UNIFESP]Figueiredo, Eduardo Antonio [UNIFESP]Terra, Bernardo Barcellos [UNIFESP]Cohen, Carina [UNIFESP]Andrade, Marilia dos Santos [UNIFESP]Cohen, Moises [UNIFESP]Ejnisman, Benno [UNIFESP]Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)2016-01-24T14:34:57Z2016-01-24T14:34:57Z2014-01-01American Journal of Sports Medicine. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc, v. 42, n. 1, p. 95-102, 2014.0363-5465http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/37167http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/036354651350655610.1177/0363546513506556WOS:000329325600017Background: Early recognition of the clinical signs of ruptures of the pectoralis major muscle (PMM) in athletes by orthopaedic surgeons, physical therapists, and physical trainers may prove to be critical for patient access to surgical treatment while the injury is still in the acute phase.Hypothesis: Total ruptures of the PMM may yield a better outcome with surgical treatment than with nonoperative treatment in athletes.Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.Methods: A prospective study was performed on 60 patients with total ruptures of the PMM. the patients were followed from 1997 to 2012, with a physical examination every 6 months for the first 2 years and every 12 months thereafter. the patients' mean age was 31.21 years, and the mean length of follow-up was 48.25 months. the surgical treatment methods included reinsertion of the tendon in 51% of the patients and nonoperative treatment in 49% of the patients. All of the patients were evaluated using the Bak criteria.Results: the bench-press exercise was associated with 80% of the PMM ruptures (48 patients). Forty-one of the patients with chronic ruptures were seen after 3 months (80%). the outcomes were poor in 9 patients from the nonoperative group (31%) and in 3 patients from the surgical group (9.7%); the outcomes were fair in 12 patients from the nonoperative group and in no patients from the surgical group. Excellent results were not observed in any patient from the nonoperative group and were observed in 21 patients from the surgical group (67.7%). the isokinetic evaluation at 60 deg/s showed a decrease in strength of 41.7% in the nonsurgical group and 14.3% for the surgical group, which was significant at P < .05.Conclusion: Total ruptures of the PMM exhibit better outcomes with surgical treatment than with nonoperative treatment based on the Bak criteria in athletes.Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Sports & Traumatol Ctr, São Paulo, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Sports & Traumatol Ctr, São Paulo, BrazilWeb of Science95-102engSage Publications IncAmerican Journal of Sports Medicinehttp://www.uk.sagepub.com/aboutus/openaccess.htminfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessshouldergeneralbench presspectoralis major muscle rupturemuscle injuriescortical buttonClinical Considerations for the Surgical Treatment of Pectoralis Major Muscle Ruptures Based on 60 Cases A Prospective Study and Literature Reviewinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP11600/371672016-01-24 12:34:57.844metadata only accessoai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/37167Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:34652023-05-25T12:12:03.915491Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.en.fl_str_mv Clinical Considerations for the Surgical Treatment of Pectoralis Major Muscle Ruptures Based on 60 Cases A Prospective Study and Literature Review
title Clinical Considerations for the Surgical Treatment of Pectoralis Major Muscle Ruptures Based on 60 Cases A Prospective Study and Literature Review
spellingShingle Clinical Considerations for the Surgical Treatment of Pectoralis Major Muscle Ruptures Based on 60 Cases A Prospective Study and Literature Review
Pochini, Alberto de Castro [UNIFESP]
shoulder
general
bench press
pectoralis major muscle rupture
muscle injuries
cortical button
title_short Clinical Considerations for the Surgical Treatment of Pectoralis Major Muscle Ruptures Based on 60 Cases A Prospective Study and Literature Review
title_full Clinical Considerations for the Surgical Treatment of Pectoralis Major Muscle Ruptures Based on 60 Cases A Prospective Study and Literature Review
title_fullStr Clinical Considerations for the Surgical Treatment of Pectoralis Major Muscle Ruptures Based on 60 Cases A Prospective Study and Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Considerations for the Surgical Treatment of Pectoralis Major Muscle Ruptures Based on 60 Cases A Prospective Study and Literature Review
title_sort Clinical Considerations for the Surgical Treatment of Pectoralis Major Muscle Ruptures Based on 60 Cases A Prospective Study and Literature Review
author Pochini, Alberto de Castro [UNIFESP]
author_facet Pochini, Alberto de Castro [UNIFESP]
Andreoli, Carlos Vicente [UNIFESP]
Belangero, Paulo Santoro [UNIFESP]
Figueiredo, Eduardo Antonio [UNIFESP]
Terra, Bernardo Barcellos [UNIFESP]
Cohen, Carina [UNIFESP]
Andrade, Marilia dos Santos [UNIFESP]
Cohen, Moises [UNIFESP]
Ejnisman, Benno [UNIFESP]
author_role author
author2 Andreoli, Carlos Vicente [UNIFESP]
Belangero, Paulo Santoro [UNIFESP]
Figueiredo, Eduardo Antonio [UNIFESP]
Terra, Bernardo Barcellos [UNIFESP]
Cohen, Carina [UNIFESP]
Andrade, Marilia dos Santos [UNIFESP]
Cohen, Moises [UNIFESP]
Ejnisman, Benno [UNIFESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.institution.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pochini, Alberto de Castro [UNIFESP]
Andreoli, Carlos Vicente [UNIFESP]
Belangero, Paulo Santoro [UNIFESP]
Figueiredo, Eduardo Antonio [UNIFESP]
Terra, Bernardo Barcellos [UNIFESP]
Cohen, Carina [UNIFESP]
Andrade, Marilia dos Santos [UNIFESP]
Cohen, Moises [UNIFESP]
Ejnisman, Benno [UNIFESP]
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv shoulder
general
bench press
pectoralis major muscle rupture
muscle injuries
cortical button
topic shoulder
general
bench press
pectoralis major muscle rupture
muscle injuries
cortical button
description Background: Early recognition of the clinical signs of ruptures of the pectoralis major muscle (PMM) in athletes by orthopaedic surgeons, physical therapists, and physical trainers may prove to be critical for patient access to surgical treatment while the injury is still in the acute phase.Hypothesis: Total ruptures of the PMM may yield a better outcome with surgical treatment than with nonoperative treatment in athletes.Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.Methods: A prospective study was performed on 60 patients with total ruptures of the PMM. the patients were followed from 1997 to 2012, with a physical examination every 6 months for the first 2 years and every 12 months thereafter. the patients' mean age was 31.21 years, and the mean length of follow-up was 48.25 months. the surgical treatment methods included reinsertion of the tendon in 51% of the patients and nonoperative treatment in 49% of the patients. All of the patients were evaluated using the Bak criteria.Results: the bench-press exercise was associated with 80% of the PMM ruptures (48 patients). Forty-one of the patients with chronic ruptures were seen after 3 months (80%). the outcomes were poor in 9 patients from the nonoperative group (31%) and in 3 patients from the surgical group (9.7%); the outcomes were fair in 12 patients from the nonoperative group and in no patients from the surgical group. Excellent results were not observed in any patient from the nonoperative group and were observed in 21 patients from the surgical group (67.7%). the isokinetic evaluation at 60 deg/s showed a decrease in strength of 41.7% in the nonsurgical group and 14.3% for the surgical group, which was significant at P < .05.Conclusion: Total ruptures of the PMM exhibit better outcomes with surgical treatment than with nonoperative treatment based on the Bak criteria in athletes.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2014-01-01
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2016-01-24T14:34:57Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2016-01-24T14:34:57Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv American Journal of Sports Medicine. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc, v. 42, n. 1, p. 95-102, 2014.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/37167
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0363546513506556
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 0363-5465
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.1177/0363546513506556
dc.identifier.wos.none.fl_str_mv WOS:000329325600017
identifier_str_mv American Journal of Sports Medicine. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc, v. 42, n. 1, p. 95-102, 2014.
0363-5465
10.1177/0363546513506556
WOS:000329325600017
url http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/37167
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0363546513506556
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.none.fl_str_mv American Journal of Sports Medicine
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv http://www.uk.sagepub.com/aboutus/openaccess.htm
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://www.uk.sagepub.com/aboutus/openaccess.htm
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 95-102
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sage Publications Inc
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sage Publications Inc
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1783460261823250432